nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Urteilen und Entscheiden

verfasst von : Prof. Dr. Peter Fischer, Dr. Kathrin Jander, Prof. Dr. Joachim Krueger

Erschienen in: Sozialpsychologie für Bachelor

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Das menschliche Urteilen und Entscheiden im sozialen Kontext ist einerseits geprägt von bestimmten Bedürfnissen und Motiven – wie etwa der Suche nach selbstwertbestätigenden Daten – und anderseits bestimmten kognitiven Voreinstellungen und Beschränkungen. Entscheidungsheuristiken erleichtern das Urteilen und Entscheiden, führen aber auch zu regelhaften Fehlurteilen. Wahrnehmungseffekte, die nur von der Darstellung der Aufgabe, nicht aber ihrer Substanz abhängen, geben weiteren Aufschluss über zugrunde liegende mentale Prozesse.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Der Mensch als rationalisierendes Wesen: Kognitive Dissonanz und Selbstrechtfertigung

Nächstes Kapitel Prosoziales Verhalten, Hilfeverhalten und Zivilcourage

Alicke, M. D. & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning & J. I. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment: Studies in self and identity (pp. 85–106). New York: Psychology Press.

Alicke, M. D., Zell, E. & Guenther, C. L. (2013). Social self-analysis: Constructing, enhancing, and protecting the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 173–234.

Brewer, M. B. & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268–275.CrossRef

Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D. & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 206–215.CrossRef

Combs, B. & Slovic, P. (1979). Newspaper coverage of causes of death. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 837–843, 849.CrossRef

Dawes, R. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 497–548). New York: Oxford University Press.

Doherty, M. E., Mynatt, C. R., Tweney, R. D. & Schiavo, M. D. (1979). Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica, 43, 111–121.CrossRef

Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Epley, N. & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396.CrossRef

Fiedler, K. & Krueger, J. I. (2012). More than an artifact: Regression as a theoretical construct. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Social judgment and decision making (pp. 171–181). New York: Psychology Press.

Fischer, P. (2011). Selective exposure, decision uncertainty, and cognitive economy: A new theoretical perspective on confirmatory information search. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 751–762.CrossRef

Frederick, S. W. & Mochon, D. (2012). A scale distortion theory of anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 124–133.CrossRef

Fischer, P. & Greitemeyer, T. (2010). A new look at selective-exposure effects: An integrative model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 384–389.CrossRef

Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75, 509–510.CrossRef

Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 62, 451–482.CrossRef

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R. & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences.Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295–314.CrossRef

Gino, F., Sharek, Z. & Moore, D. A. (2011). Keeping the illusion of control under control: Ceilings, floors, and imperfect calibration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 104–114.CrossRef

Gold, E. & Hester, G. (2008). The gambler’s fallacy and the coin’s memory. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn Mason Dawes (pp. 21–46). New York: Psychology Press.

Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., Frey, D. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2009). Biased assimilation: The role of source position. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 22–39.CrossRef

Hastie, R. & Dawes, R. M. (2010). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Hastie, R. & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. Psychological Review, 112, 494–508.CrossRef

Hoffrage, U. & Hertwig, R. (2012). Simple heuristics in a complex social world. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Social judgment and decision making (pp. 135–150). New York, Psychology Press.

Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.CrossRef

Klein, S. B, Loftus, J. & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Self-knowledge of an amnesic patient: Toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 250–260.CrossRef

Krueger, J. I. (2000). Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli’s game revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 546–558.CrossRef

Krueger, J. I. (2001). Null hypothesis significance testing: On the survival of a flawed method. American Psychologist, 56, 16–26.CrossRef

Krueger, J. I. (2012). The (ir)rationality project in social psychology: A review and assessment. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Social judgment and decision making (pp. 59–75). New York: Psychology Press.

Krueger, J. I. & Massey, A. L. (2009). A rational reconstruction of misbehavior. Social Cognition, 27, 786–812.CrossRef

Krueger, J. I. & Wright, J. C. (2011). Measurement of self-enhancement (and self-protection). In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 472–494). New York: Guilford.

Kruglanski, A. W. & Ajzen, I. (1983). Bias and error in human judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 1–44.CrossRef

Laland, K. (2001). Imitation, social learning, and preparedness as mechanisms of bounded rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 233-248). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRef

Larrick, R. P., Mannes, A. E. & Soll, J. B. (2012). The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), Social judgment and decision making (pp. 227 –242). New York: Psychology Press.

Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D. & Faraone, S. V. (1984). Information integration in price-quality tradeoffs: The effect of missing information. Memory & Cognition, 12, 96–102.CrossRef

Levin, I. P., Kim, K. J. & Corry, F. A. (1976). Invariance of the weight parameter in information integration. Memory & Cognition, 4, 43–47.CrossRef

Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P. & Tversky, A. (1990). Foundations of measurement (Vol. II): Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. New York: Academic Press.CrossRef

Metcalf, G. E. & Malkiel, B. G. (1994). The Wall Street Journal contests: The experts, the darts, and the efficient market hypothesis. Applied Financial Economics, 4, 371–374.CrossRef

Musahl, H. P. (1997). Gefahrenkognition. Theoretische Annäherungen, empirische Befunde und Anwendungsbezüge zur subjektiven Gefahrenkenntnis. Heidelberg: Asanger.

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.CrossRef

Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K. & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 832–844.CrossRef

Nisbett, R. E., Zukier, H. & Lemley, R. E. (1981). The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 248–277.CrossRef

Russo, J. E. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990). Decision traps: Ten barriers to brilliant decision making and how to overcome them. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H. & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.CrossRef

Slovic, P. & MacPhillamy, D. J. (1974). Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 172–194.CrossRef

Stephan, E. & Kiell, G. (2000). Decision processes in professional investors: Does expertise moderate judgmental biases? In E. Hölzl (Ed.), Fairness and cooperation (pp. 416 –420). Proceedings of the IAREP/SABE 2000 Conference.

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.CrossRef

Strack, F. & Deutsch, R. (2002). Urteilsheuristiken. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Eds.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie, Band III: Motivations- und Informationsverarbeitungstheorien (2. vollst. überarb. u. erw. Aufl., S. 352–384). Bern: Huber.

Strack, F. & Mussweiler, T. (2003). Heuristic strategies for estimation under uncertainty: The enigmatic case of anchoring. In G. V. Bodenhausen & A. J. Lambert (Eds.), Foundations of social cognition: A festschrift in honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (pp. 79-95). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. London: Little, Brown.

Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M. & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1–26.CrossRef

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.CrossRef

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment und uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.CrossRef

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRef

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.CrossRef

Wiswede, G. (2000). Einführung in die Wirtschaftspsychologie. München: Reinhardt.

Titel: Urteilen und Entscheiden
verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Peter Fischer
Dr. Kathrin Jander
Prof. Dr. Joachim Krueger
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Sozialpsychologie für Bachelor
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56738-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56739-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56739-5_3