Skip to main content

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

32. Usage Bibliometrics as a Tool to Measure Research Activity

verfasst von : Edwin A. Henneken, Michael J. Kurtz

Erschienen in: Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Measures for research activity and impact have become integral ingredients in the assessment of a wide range of entities (individual researchers, organizations, institutions, regions, disciplines). Traditional bibliometric indicators, like publication- and citation-based indicators, provide an essential part of this picture, but cannot describe the complete picture. Since reading scholarly publications is an essential part of the research lifecycle, it is only natural to introduce measures for this activity in attempts to quantify the efficiency, productivity and impact of an entity. Citations and reads are significantly different signals, so taken together, they provide a more complete picture of research activity. Most scholarly publications are now accessed online, making the study of reads and read patterns possible. Clickstream logs allow us to follow information access by the entire research community in real time. Publication and citation datasets just reflect activity by authors. In addition, download statistics, derived from these clickstreams, will help us identify publications with significant impact, but which do not attract many citations. Clickstream signals are arguably more complex than, say, citation signals. For one, they are a superposition of different classes of readers. Systematic downloads by crawlers also contaminate the signal, as does random browsing behavior. We will discuss the complexities associated with clickstream data and how, with proper filtering, statistically significant relations and conclusions can be inferred from download statistics. We will describe how download statistics can be used to describe research activity at different levels of aggregation, ranging from organizations to countries. These statistics show a strong correlation with socioeconomic indicators, like the gross domestic product (). A comparison will be made with traditional bibliometric indicators. Since we will be using clickstream data from the Astrophysics Data System (), we will argue that astronomy is representative for more general trends.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat E. Garfield: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295, 90–93 (2006)CrossRef E. Garfield: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295, 90–93 (2006)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat C.T. Bergstrom, J.D. West, M.A. Wiseman: The Eigenfactor™ metrics, J. Neurosci. 28, 11433–11434 (2008)CrossRef C.T. Bergstrom, J.D. West, M.A. Wiseman: The Eigenfactor™ metrics, J. Neurosci. 28, 11433–11434 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat H. Moed: Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, J. Informetr. 4, 265–277 (2010)CrossRef H. Moed: Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, J. Informetr. 4, 265–277 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn: The historical literature of astronomy, via ADS, ASP Conf. Ser. 153, 293–296 (1998) M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn: The historical literature of astronomy, via ADS, ASP Conf. Ser. 153, 293–296 (1998)
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Kurtz, J. Bollen: Usage bibliometrics, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 44, 3–64 (2010)CrossRef M.J. Kurtz, J. Bollen: Usage bibliometrics, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 44, 3–64 (2010)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, T. Dobrowolski, I. Rowlands, M. Jamali, P. Polydoratou: Revisiting “obsolescence” and journal article “decay” through usage data: An analysis of digital journal use by year of publication, Inf. Process. Manag. 41, 1441–1461 (2005)CrossRef D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, T. Dobrowolski, I. Rowlands, M. Jamali, P. Polydoratou: Revisiting “obsolescence” and journal article “decay” through usage data: An analysis of digital journal use by year of publication, Inf. Process. Manag. 41, 1441–1461 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat D. Nicholas, D. Clark, H.R. Jamali, A. Watkinson: Log usage analysis: What it discloses about use, information seeking and trustworthiness, Int. J. Knowl. Content Dev. Technol. 4, 23–37 (2014)CrossRef D. Nicholas, D. Clark, H.R. Jamali, A. Watkinson: Log usage analysis: What it discloses about use, information seeking and trustworthiness, Int. J. Knowl. Content Dev. Technol. 4, 23–37 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M. Thelwall, K. Kousha: ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68, 468–479 (2017)CrossRef M. Thelwall, K. Kousha: ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68, 468–479 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat C. Tenopir, L. Christian, R. Anderson, L. Estelle, S. Allard, D. Nicholas: Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator, Qual. Quant. Methods Libr. 5, 365–377 (2016) C. Tenopir, L. Christian, R. Anderson, L. Estelle, S. Allard, D. Nicholas: Beyond the download: Issues in developing a secondary usage calculator, Qual. Quant. Methods Libr. 5, 365–377 (2016)
Zurück zum Zitat W. Glänzel, J. Gorraiz: Usage metrics versus altmetrics: Confusing terminology?, Scientometrics 102, 2161 (2005)CrossRef W. Glänzel, J. Gorraiz: Usage metrics versus altmetrics: Confusing terminology?, Scientometrics 102, 2161 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J. Gorraiz, C. Gumpenberger, C. Schlögl: Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas, Scientometrics 101, 1077 (2014)CrossRef J. Gorraiz, C. Gumpenberger, C. Schlögl: Usage versus citation behaviours in four subject areas, Scientometrics 101, 1077 (2014)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat H.F. Moed, G. Halevi: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 412–431 (2016)CrossRef H.F. Moed, G. Halevi: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67, 412–431 (2016)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Kurtz, E.A. Henneken: Measuring Metrics – A forty year longitudinal cross-validation of citations, downloads, and peer review in astrophysics, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68, 695–708 (2017)CrossRef M.J. Kurtz, E.A. Henneken: Measuring Metrics – A forty year longitudinal cross-validation of citations, downloads, and peer review in astrophysics, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68, 695–708 (2017)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat J. Bollen, H. van de Sompel: Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59, 136–149 (2008)CrossRef J. Bollen, H. van de Sompel: Usage impact factor: The effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59, 136–149 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat C.J. Lintott, K. Schawinski, A. Slosar, K. Land, S. Bamford, D. Thomas, M.J. Raddick, R.C. Nichol, A. Szalay, D. Andreescu, P. Murray, J. Vandenberg: Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Mon. Not. R Astron. Soc. 389, 1179–1189 (2008)CrossRef C.J. Lintott, K. Schawinski, A. Slosar, K. Land, S. Bamford, D. Thomas, M.J. Raddick, R.C. Nichol, A. Szalay, D. Andreescu, P. Murray, J. Vandenberg: Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Mon. Not. R Astron. Soc. 389, 1179–1189 (2008)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat G. Eichhorn, M.J. Kurtz, A. Accomazzi, C.S. Grant, S.S. Murray: The NASA Astrophysics Data System: The search engine and its user interface, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 143, 61–83 (2000)CrossRef G. Eichhorn, M.J. Kurtz, A. Accomazzi, C.S. Grant, S.S. Murray: The NASA Astrophysics Data System: The search engine and its user interface, Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 143, 61–83 (2000)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, S.S. Murray, N. Martimbeau, B. Elwell: The bibliometric properties of article readership information, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 111–128 (2005)CrossRef M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, S.S. Murray, N. Martimbeau, B. Elwell: The bibliometric properties of article readership information, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 111–128 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, S.S. Murray: Worldwide use and impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 36–45 (2005)CrossRef M.J. Kurtz, G. Eichhorn, A. Accomazzi, C. Grant, M. Demleitner, S.S. Murray: Worldwide use and impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 56, 36–45 (2005)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat E.A. Henneken, M.J. Kurtz, A. Accomazzi, C.S. Grant, D. Thompson, E. Bohlen, S.S. Murray: Use of astronomical literature – A report on usage patterns, J. Informetr. 1, 1–8 (2009)CrossRef E.A. Henneken, M.J. Kurtz, A. Accomazzi, C.S. Grant, D. Thompson, E. Bohlen, S.S. Murray: Use of astronomical literature – A report on usage patterns, J. Informetr. 1, 1–8 (2009)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat A. Pepe, M.J. Kurtz: A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline, PLoS ONE 7, E46428 (2012)CrossRef A. Pepe, M.J. Kurtz: A measure of total research impact independent of time and discipline, PLoS ONE 7, E46428 (2012)CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat M. Simkin, V. Roychowdhury: Do you sincerely want to be cited? Or: read before you cite, Significance 3, 179–181 (2006)CrossRef M. Simkin, V. Roychowdhury: Do you sincerely want to be cited? Or: read before you cite, Significance 3, 179–181 (2006)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Usage Bibliometrics as a Tool to Measure Research Activity
verfasst von
Edwin A. Henneken
Michael J. Kurtz
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_32

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.