Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Retrospective and Future Automotive Infotainment Systems—100 Years of User Interface Evolution Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

17. User Experience with Increasing Levels of Vehicle Automation: Overview of the Challenges and Opportunities as Vehicles Progress from Partial to High Automation

verfasst von : Patrice Reilhac, Katharina Hottelart, Frederik Diederichs, Christopher Nowakowski

Erschienen in: Automotive User Interfaces

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The long awaited arrival of automated driving technology has the automotive industry perched on the precipice of radical change when it comes to the design of vehicle interiors and user experience. Recently, much thinking and many vehicle concepts have been devoted to demonstrating how vehicle interiors might change when vehicles reach full automation, where a human driver is neither required nor in some cases, even allowed to control the vehicle. However, looking more near term across all global market segments, we will likely see an increasing number of vehicles with widely varying automation capabilities emerging simultaneously. Any system short of full automation will still require driver control in some set of situations, and some fully automated vehicles will still allow driver control when desired. While it is unlikely that the basic seating arrangement, steering wheel, and pedals will be radically altered in this emerging segment of partial to highly automated vehicles, it is quite clear that the overall user experience during automated driving will need to evolve. Drivers will not be content to hold the steering wheel and stare at the road waiting for what may be a very infrequent request to take-over driving. The chapter presents the research conducted to develop the Valeo Mobius® Intuitive Driving solution for providing an embedded digital experience, even in lower levels of automation, and all while still promoting both shorter transition response times and better transition quality when emergency situations call for a transition from automated to manual control.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Methods to Validate Automotive User Interfaces Within Immersive Driving Environments
Nächstes Kapitel AutoPlay: Unfolding Motivational Affordances of Autonomous Driving
Literatur
Blanco, M., Atwood, J., Vasquez, H. M., Trimble, T. E., Fitchett, V. L., & Radlbeck, J. (2015). Human factors evaluation of level 2 and level 3 automated driving concepts (Report No. DOT HS 812 182). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Blincoe, L. J., Miller, T. R., Zaloshnja, E., & Lawrence, B. A. (2014). The economic and societal impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2010 (Report No. DOT HS 812 013). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Brooke, J. (1986). System Usability Scale. Reading, England: Digital Equipment Corporation.
Diederichs, F., Pöhler, G., & Spath, D. (2014). Driving maneuver prediction based on driver behavior observation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Kraków, Poland, July 19–23.
Diederichs, F., Bischoff, S., Widlroither, H., Reilhac, P., Hottelart, K., & Moizard, J. (2015). New HMI concept for an intuitive automated driving experience and enhanced transitions. In Proceedings from the 7th Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Interactions, Nottingham, UK, Sept. 1–3.
Diederichs, F., Schüttke, T., & Spath, D. (2015). Driver intention algorithm for pedestrian protection and automated emergency braking systems. In Proceedings of IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems—(ITSC 2015), Canary Islands, Spain, Sept. 15–18.
Diels, C., & Bos J. (2015). Self-driving carsickness. In Special Issue of Applied Ergonomics—Transport in the 21st Century: The Application of Human Factors to Future User Needs (In Press).
Diels, C., Bos J., Reilhac, P., & Hottelart, K. (2016). Motion sickness in automated vehicles: the elephant in the room. In G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Ed.), Road Vehicle Automation 2. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Feron, S., & Nicolas, L. (2012). Eyes close to the road: the perfect restitution? Ergonomic and technical perspectives on two solutions: HUD and top mounted instrument cluster. In IQPC 3rd International Conference on Automotive Cockpit HMI, Bonn, Germany, Sept. 24–26.
Flemisch F. O., Adams C. A., Conway S. R., Goodrich K. H., Palmer M. T., & Schutte P. C. (2003). The h-metaphor as a guideline for vehicle automation and interaction, NASA/TM-2003-212672.
Ganzhorn, M., Diederichs, F., & Höfer, M. (2013). Eine bewerterbasierte Ablenkungsskala (BABS) zur objektiven Beurteilung von Unaufmerksamkeit. In: Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag. pp 133–146.
Geddes, N. B. (1940). Magic Motorways. New York, NY: Random House.
Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., & Bengler, K. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, Sept. 30–Oct. 4.
Llaneras, R. E., Salinger, J., & Green, C. A. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Bolton Landing, NY, June 17–20, pp. 92–98.
Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., & Bauer, W. (2015). Take-over requests for automated driving. In 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Las Vegas, NV, July 27–30.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2015). Early estimate of motor vehicle traffic fatalities for the first quarter of 2015 (Crash Stats Brief Statistical Summary Report No. DOT HS 812 190). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
NHTSA. (2008). National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey: Report to Congress (Technical Report DOT-HS-811-059). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., & Bengler, K. (2014). How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, Oct. 27–31.
Reilhac, P., Millet, N., & Hottelart, K. (2015). Thinking intuitive driving automation. tractatus technologico-humanicus. In: G. Meyer & S. Beiker (Eds.), Road Vehicle Automation 2. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Reilhac, P., Moizard, J., Kaiser, F., & Hottelart, K. (2016). Cockpit concept for conditional automated driving. In: ATZ Magazine, No 3, 2016, p. 42–46 (In press).
SAE. (2014). SAE J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Automated Motor Vehicles. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014a). A Survey of Public Opinion About Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia (UMTRI-2014-21). Ann Arbor, MI.: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014b). Public Opinion About Self-Driving Vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia (UMTRI-2104-30). Ann Arbor, MI.: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2015). Motorists’ Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation (UMTRI-2015-22). Ann Arbor, MI.: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2016). Motorists’ Preferences for Different Levels of Vehicle Automation: 2016 (UMTRI-2016-8). Ann Arbor, MI.: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Sulzmann, F., Melcher, V., Diederichs, F., & Sayar, R. (2013). Modular dashboard for flexible in car HMI testing. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human aspects of road and rail transportation (Advances in human factors and ergonomics series) (pp. 97–106). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Treat, J. R., Tumbas, N. S., McDonald, S. T., Shinar, D., Hume, R. D., Mayer, R. E., Stanisfer, R. L. & Castellan, N. J. (1977). Tri-Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents (Technical Report DOT-HS-034-3-535-77). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Metadaten
Titel
User Experience with Increasing Levels of Vehicle Automation: Overview of the Challenges and Opportunities as Vehicles Progress from Partial to High Automation
verfasst von
Patrice Reilhac
Katharina Hottelart
Frederik Diederichs
Christopher Nowakowski
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Automotive User Interfaces

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49447-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-49448-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49448-7_17

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise