Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Discovering the Unfindable: The Tension Between Findability and Discoverability in a Bookshop Designed for Serendipity Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

User Needs in Smart Homes: Changing Needs According to Life Cycles and the Impact on Designing Smart Home Solutions

verfasst von : Olivia De Ruyck, Peter Conradie, Lieven De Marez, Jelle Saldien

Erschienen in: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Smart home solutions are gaining popularity but hold a large untapped potential. This paper presents smart home needs from a user point of view. Based on co-creation workshops with residents of different life cycles in Belgium, it draws conclusions about key issues related to user needs. Starting from these insights we can describe characteristics of inhabitants according to their life cycle. We conclude that their needs for smart solutions and the way they want to equip their homes differ. The younger generation looks for modular systems with possibilities to expand or move them. They are moment oriented and buy Internet of Things (IoT) appliances according to their current needs and budget. The older generation, by contrast, searches for quality and all-in-one solutions. They want a complete solution that does not require any updates or extras and is proof for their future needs. The results of this study in the form of eight guidelines can be considered when designing smart home solutions.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Towards Participatory Design of Social Robots
Nächstes Kapitel A Formative Study of Interactive Bias Metrics in Visual Analytics Using Anchoring Bias
Literatur
1.
Balta-Ozkan, N., et al.: Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes. Energy Policy 63, 363–374 (2013)CrossRef
2.
Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., McCloskey, R.: The “Acceptance” of ambient assisted living: developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. In: Abdulrazak, B., Giroux, S., Bouchard, B., Pigot, H., Mokhtari, M. (eds.) ICOST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6719, pp. 161–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-21535-3_​21CrossRef
3.
Bouyon, S.: Recent trends in EU home ownership. ECRI Comment 15, vol. 15, pp. 1–8 (2015)
4.
Brown, S., et al.: Household technology use: integrating household life cycle and the model of adoption of technology in households. Inf. Soc. 22(4), 205–218 (2006)CrossRef
5.
Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V.: Model of adoption of technology in households: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q. 29(3), 399–426 (2005)CrossRef
6.
Cesta, A., et al.: Monitoring elderly people with the ROBOCARE domestic environment: interaction synthesis and user evaluation. Comput. Intell. 27(1), 60–82 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
7.
Chan, M., et al.: Smart homes - current features and future perspectives. Maturitas 64(2), 90–97 (2009)CrossRef
8.
Cook, D.J.: How smart is your home? Science 335(6076), 1579–1581 (2012)CrossRef
9.
De Decker, P., Dewilde, C.: Home-ownership and asset-based welfare: the case of Belgium. J. Hous. Built Environ. 25(2), 243–262 (2010)CrossRef
10.
Deloitte: Switch on to the connected home - The Deloitte Consumer Review (2017)
11.
Deng, Y., et al.: Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. In: Proceedings of 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive System, pp. 695–704 (2014)
12.
Eurostat: People in the EU: who are we and how do we live? 2015 (2015)
13.
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Krueger, D.: Consumption over the life cycle: facts from consumer expenditure survey data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 89(3), 552–565 (2007)CrossRef
14.
Friedewald, M., et al.: Perspectives of ambient intelligence in the home environment. Telematics Inform. 22, 221–238 (2005)CrossRef
15.
16.
Gartner: Leading the IoT: Gartner Insights on How to Lead in a Connected World (2017)
17.
GfK: The truth behind the hype - insights on consumer attitudes to the smart home (2016)
18.
Haines, V., et al.: Probing user values in the home environment within a technology driven smart home project. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 11(5), 349–359 (2007)CrossRef
19.
Hargreaves, T., et al.: Keeping energy visible? exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy 52(November), 126–134 (2013)CrossRef
20.
21.
Hargreaves, T., Wilson, C.: Who uses smart home technologies? Representations of users by the smart home industry. In: ECEEE Summer Study, pp. 1–14 (2013)
22.
Harrison, C., et al.: Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J. Res. Dev. 54(4), 1–16 (2010)CrossRef
23.
van Hoof, J., et al.: Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(5), 310–331 (2011)CrossRef
24.
Hornecker, E.: Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework: the card brainstorming game. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Tangible Embedded Embodied Interaction, vol. 10, pp. 101–108 (2010)
25.
Hwang, A., et al.: Using participatory design to determine the needs of informal caregivers for smart home user interfaces. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 41–48 (2012)
26.
IDEO: IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design., Palo Alto (2003)
27.
International Telecommunication Union: Measuring the Information Society, Geneva (2010)
28.
Jakobi, T., et al.: The Catch(es) with smart home – experiences of a living lab field study. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 1620–1633 (2017)
29.
Kim, M.J., et al.: A critical review of user studies on healthy smart homes. Indoor Built Environ. 22(1), 260–270 (2013)CrossRef
30.
Kim, S., Paulos, E.: InAir: sharing indoor air quality measurements and visualizations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, pp. 1861–1870 (2010)
31.
Lawson, R.: Patterns of tourist expenditure and types of vacation across the family life cycle. J. Travel Res. 29(4), 12–18 (1991)CrossRef
32.
Lorenzen-Huber, L., et al.: Privacy, technology, and aging: a proposed framework. Ageing Int. 36(2), 232–252 (2011)CrossRef
33.
Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J.: The PLEX cards and its techniques as sources of inspiration when designing for playfulness. Int. J. Arts Technol. 6(1), 22 (2013)CrossRef
34.
35.
Mennicken, S., et al.: From today’s augmented houses to tomorrow’s smart homes : new directions for home automation research, pp. 105–115 (2014)
36.
Mora, S., et al.: Tiles: a card-based ideation toolkit for the internet of things. In: Proceedings of 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive System - DIS 2017, pp. 587–598 (2017)
37.
Parasuraman, A., Colby, C.L.: Techno-Ready Marketing: How and Why your Customers Adopt Technology. The Free Press, New York (2007)
38.
PWC: Smart home, seamless life - Unlocking a culture of convenience. PWC Consum. Intell. Ser., January 2017
39.
Røpke, I., Nyborg, S.: Energy impacts of the smart home – conflicting visions. In: ECEEE 2011 Summer Study, pp. 1849–1860 (2011)
40.
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4(1), 5–18 (2008)CrossRef
41.
42.
Simonsen, J., Robertson, T.: Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, London (2013)
43.
44.
Solaimani, S., et al.: What we do- and don’t- know about the smart home: an analysis of the smart home literature. Indoor Built Environ. 24(3), 370–383 (2015)CrossRef
45.
Technavio: Global Smart Appliances Market 2016-2020 (2016)
46.
47.
Vanhaelewyn, B., De Marez, L.: imec.Digimeter 2017: measuring digital media trends in flanders (2017)
48.
Victorino, L., et al.: Exploring the use of the abbreviated technology readiness index for hotel customer segmentation. Cornell Hosp. Q. 50, 342–359 (2009)CrossRef
49.
Visser, F.S., et al.: Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign 1(2), 119–149 (2005)CrossRef
50.
Wells, W.D., Gubar, G.: Life concept in marketing research. J. Mark. Res. 3(4), 355–363 (1966)CrossRef
51.
Wilkes, R.E.: Household life-cycle stages, transitions, and product expenditures. J. Consum. Res. 22(1), 27 (1995)CrossRef
52.
Wilson, C., et al.: Benefits and risks of smart home technologies. Energy Policy. 103, 72–83 (2017)CrossRef
53.
Wilson, C., et al.: Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 19(2), 463–476 (2015)CrossRef
54.
Woo, J., Lim, Y.: User experience in do-it-yourself-style smart homes. In: Proceedings of 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive Ubiquitous Computing – UbiComp 2015, pp. 779–790 (2015)
55.
Yang, R., Newman, M.W.: Learning from a learning thermostat: lessons for intelligent systems for the home, pp. 93–102 (2013)
56.
Zuehlke, D.: SmartFactory-towards a factory-of-things. Annu. Rev. Control 34(1), 129–138 (2010)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
User Needs in Smart Homes: Changing Needs According to Life Cycles and the Impact on Designing Smart Home Solutions
verfasst von
Olivia De Ruyck
Peter Conradie
Lieven De Marez
Jelle Saldien
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29383-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-29384-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29384-0_33

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise