Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
One of the questions posed at the National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored workshop on Creativity and Rationale in Software Design was on the role of rationale in supporting idea generation in the classroom. College students often struggle with problems where more than one possible solution exists. Part of the difficulty lies in the need for students to progress through different levels of development cognitively and intellectually before they can tackle creative problem solving. Argumentation-based rationale provides a natural mechanism for representing problems, candidate solutions, criteria, and arguments relating those criteria to the candidate solutions. Explicitly expressing rationale for their work encourages students to reflect on why they made their choices, and to actively consider multiple alternatives. We report on an experiment performed during a Data Structures course where students captured rationale.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377. CrossRef
Atman, C. J., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., & Adams, R. S. (2005). Comparing freshmen and senior engineering design processes: An in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies, 26, 325–357. CrossRef
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
Bruegge, B., & Dutoit, A. H. (2004). Object-oriented software engineering: Using UML, patterns, and Java (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Burge, J. E., & Brown, D. C. (2004). An integrated approach for software design checking using rationale. In J. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition ’04 (pp. 557–576). Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Carey, T., McKerlie, D., & Wilson, J. (1996). HCI design rationales as a learning resource. In T. Moran & J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 373–392). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carroll, J. M. (2009, June) The essential tension of creativity and rationale in software design. Manifesto from the workshop on Creativity and Rationale in Software Design, State College, PA, USA.
Casaday, G. (1996). Rationale in practice: Templates for capturing and applying design experience. In T. Moran & J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use (pp. 351–372). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daughtry, J., Burge, J., Carroll, J. M., & Potts, C. (2009). Creativity and rationale in software design. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 34(1), 27–29. CrossRef
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: D.C. Heath and Company.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Liefer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103–120.
Fischer, G., Lemke, A. C., McCall, R., & Morch, A. I. (1991). Making argumentation serve design. Human–Computer Interaction, 6, 393–419. CrossRef
Fox, C. (2006). Introduction to software engineering design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Glass, R. S. (1995). Software creativity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. MATH
Hamilton, H. R. (1974). Screening business development opportunities. Business Horizons, 7(4), 13–24. CrossRef
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting growth and critical thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. (2002). The reflective judgment model: Twenty years of research on epistemic cognition. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 37–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kloss, R. J. (1994). A nudge is best: Helping students through the Perry scheme of intellectual development. College Teaching, 42, 151–158. CrossRef
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V. M., & Moran, T. P. (1991). Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 201–250. CrossRef
Moran, T. P., & Carroll, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Pugh, S. (1991). Total design. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Rice, J. A. (1995). Mathematical statistics and data analysis (2nd ed.). Belmont: Duxbury Press. MATH
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24, 111–134. CrossRef
van Aalst, J. W., van der Mast, C. A. P. G., & Carey, T. T. (1995). An interactive multimedia tutorial for user interface design. Computers and Education, 25, 227–233. CrossRef
VanGundy, A. B. (1981). Techniques of structured problem solving. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Whiting, C. S. (1958). Creative thinking. New York: Reinhold.
- Using Rationale to Assist Student Cognitive and Intellectual Development
Janet E. Burge
- Springer London
- Chapter 9