Sie können Operatoren mit Ihrer Suchanfrage kombinieren, um diese noch präziser einzugrenzen. Klicken Sie auf den Suchoperator, um eine Erklärung seiner Funktionsweise anzuzeigen.
Findet Dokumente, in denen beide Begriffe in beliebiger Reihenfolge innerhalb von maximal n Worten zueinander stehen. Empfehlung: Wählen Sie zwischen 15 und 30 als maximale Wortanzahl (z.B. NEAR(hybrid, antrieb, 20)).
Findet Dokumente, in denen der Begriff in Wortvarianten vorkommt, wobei diese VOR, HINTER oder VOR und HINTER dem Suchbegriff anschließen können (z.B., leichtbau*, *leichtbau, *leichtbau*).
Der Artikel vertieft die Komplexität der passiven Filmbildung an einer zweiphasigen Legierung Al0.3Cr0.5Fe2Mn0.25Mo0.15Ni1.5Ti0.3 und betont die unterschiedliche Chemie der passiven Filme über verschiedene Phasen. Er diskutiert die Rolle von Phasenstabilitätsindikatoren, mikrostrukturellen Merkmalen und elementarer Unterteilung bei der Beeinflussung der Zusammensetzung und Struktur des passiven Films. Die Studie untersucht auch die Auswirkungen dieser Variationen auf die Korrosionsbeständigkeit der Legierung, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf Lochfraß und galvanischer Kupplung liegt. Zu den wichtigsten Ergebnissen zählen die unabhängige Passivierung beider Phasen und die Identifizierung von Heterophase-Grenzflächen als potenzielle Schwachstellen im Korrosionsschutz. Der Artikel schließt mit Vorschlägen für Strategien zur Entwicklung mehrphasiger korrosionsbeständiger Legierungen auf der Grundlage dieser Erkenntnisse.
KI-Generiert
Diese Zusammenfassung des Fachinhalts wurde mit Hilfe von KI generiert.
Abstract
The passive film on a dual-phase Al0.3Cr0.5Fe2Mn0.25Mo0.15Ni1.5Ti0.3 FCC + Heusler (L21) compositionally concentrated alloy formed during extended exposure to an applied potential in the passive range in dilute chloride solution was characterized. Each phase, with its own distinct composition of passivating elements, formed unique passive films separated by a heterophase interface. High-resolution, surface sensitive characterization enabled chemical analysis of the passive film formed over individual phases. The film formed over the L21 phase had a higher concentration of Al, Ni, and Ti, while the film formed over FCC phase was of similar thickness but contained comparatively higher Cr, Fe, and Mo concentrations, consistent with the differences in bulk microstructure composition. The passive film was continuous across phase boundaries and the distribution of passivating elements (Al, Cr, and Ti) indicated both phases were independently passivated. Spatially resolved analysis of the surface chemistry of the dual-phase CCA revealed that the cation with the highest composition in passive film formed on the FCC phase was Cr (52.4 at. pct) and for the L21 phase was Ti (53.1 at. pct) despite the bulk concentration of each element being below 20 at. pct in their respective phases. Al, Cr, and Ti were enriched in both phases within the passive film relative to their respective bulk compositions. In parallel studies, single-phase alloys with compositions representative of the FCC and L21 phases were synthesized to evaluate the corrosion behavior of each phase in isolation. The corrosion behavior of the dual-phase alloy showed passivity evidenced by a pitting potential of 0.615 VSCE in 0.01 M NaCl. The pitting potential and other electrochemical parameters suggested a combination of behaviors of both single-phase samples, suggesting that the global corrosion behavior may be represented by a composite theory applied to phases, their area fractions, and interphase length. However, the interphase in the dual-phase CCA was a local corrosion initiation site and may limit localized corrosion protectiveness. The alloy design implications for optimization of second phase structure and morphology are discussed.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1 Introduction
Compositionally concentrated alloys (CCAs) are a broad alloy class generally defined as containing three or more constituent elements at concentrations above 5 at. pct.[1] The combinations of elements and resultant interactions may be unique and are not typical of those frequently seen in conventional alloys. CCAs often have beneficial properties such as mechanical strength,[2] high fracture toughness,[3] and paramagnetic or ferromagnetic behavior.[4] CCAs have additionally been developed for aqueous corrosion resistance with varying degrees of success.[5,6] Although CCAs were originally theorized to have a single-phase microstructure, with high configurational entropies contributing to the homogenous distribution of elements, the definition of the alloy class also includes alloys with dual-phase or multi-phase microstructures.[7]
Many thermodynamic indicators have been historically utilized to predict single-phase stability, such as configurational entropy, enthalpy of mixing, and complex thermodynamic indicators developed in part from such values.[7‐9] While such terms are useful in initial alloy design, Feng et al.[10] independently surveyed a range of single-phase and dual-phase CCAs and showed that single-phase CCAs generally satisfy criteria regarding the constituent elements’ atomic radii in addition to predictive metrics developed strictly from thermodynamic indicators. Namely, CCAs with net compositionally weighted deviations of constituent element atomic radii from the average atomic radii above 4.7 pct (originally defined as 6.6 pct by Yang et al.[9]) are predicted to form multi-phase microstructures regardless of other thermodynamic parameters. For example, the constituent elements of CoCrFeMnNi, the first CCA proposed by Cantor et al.,[11] have similar atomic radii and thus the equimolar mixture was found to be single-phase. However, significant additions of Al and Ti to such CCAs, two low density elements commonly utilized for lightweight alloy design, often lead to the formation of dual-phase CCAs when a significantly larger atomic radii mismatch is exceeded.[10] Although phase stability indicators are valuable in the initial design of CCAs to alert the designer to the likelihood of dual-phase microstructures, they provide little insight into the phase volume fractions and/or compositions. Thus, it is difficult to predict properties dependent on the morphology and composition of second phase.
Anzeige
CCA strategies to limit corrosion resistance often rely on multiple elements simultaneously present in protective passive films that can function in several ways, such as Al, Cr, and Ti.[12,13] Multiple elements may be present in a passive film through a range of mechanisms including layered oxides, soluble solid solution oxides,[14] complex oxides with long-range order, and solute trapping of oxidized or non-oxidized species within the passive film,[15] or a combination of the above mechanisms.[16] However, localized depletion of passivating elements limits passive film species. Notably, the formation of second phases in the CCA microstructure leads to compositional partitioning and possible concentration profiles across a multi-phase microstructure. High-temperature solutionizing treatments may be tailored for individual alloy compositions to alter microstructure or target a desired phase morphology.[7,17]
The increase in second phase area fraction in CCAs often improves mechanical strength;[18‐21] however, dual-phase microstructures pose significant concerns for corrosion resistance. Regions depleted in a passivating element are left susceptible to localized corrosion.[5,22‐24] For this reason, microstructural features formed due to the presence of a second phase often serve as preferential sites for localized corrosion of CCAs via mechanisms such as pit initiation at the phase interface as well as preferential dissolution of one or more phases.[23,25‐28] Such behavior is often enabled and/or enhanced by microgalvanic coupling.[22,29,30] Furthermore, the second phase area, structure, and/or composition can change the mechanism of localized corrosion, such as the transition from localized breakdown of the passive film at random locations by pitting to preferential dissolution of a Cr-depleted BCC second phase with increasing second phase area fraction as observed by Shi et al. in the AlxCoCrFeNi system.[23,31]
Wang et al. observed preferential dissolution of the FCC phase of the CoCrFeMoNi CCA, which was locally depleted in Cr and Mo due to the formation of mu and sigma phases.[32] Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was used to determine the composition of the passive film on both a local and global scale. Higher intensities of Cr and Mo were observed over regions suggested to be associated with the sigma phase. Additionally, depth profiling identified Cr–Mo layering phenomena specifically when evaluating the surface chemistry over the sigma phase. Such layering was not seen over the FCC matrix, further suggesting different passivation behavior. The findings provide strong evidence for lateral variation in the passive film but provide limited quantification or spatial resolution, limiting the development of relationships that can explain corrosion protectiveness.
Despite frequently observed localized corrosion in CCAs with regard to microstructural variation,[5,23,24,26,31,33‐42] there has been little further study of the lateral variation of passive film chemistry and/or structure. While many studies have characterized the passive film grown on dual-phase CCAs globally, evaluation with regard to microstructure length scale is often limited as the surface characterization methods (mainly x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) are surface sensitive but lack lateral resolution, characterizing an area larger the dimensions of individual phases. Thus, they lack the spatial resolution to identify the effect of, any microstructural features that may cause local chemical variation.[22,35,36,43,44] Although there is little study of dual-phase CCA passive films on CCAs, the governing phenomena have been evaluated from similar studies on duplex stainless steels, corrosion resistant alloys with a “balanced” dual-phase microstructure with both phases containing passivating elements as in the case of many Fe-containing dual-phase CCAs.
Anzeige
Långberg et al.[45‐47] evaluated the passive film of 25Cr–7Ni super duplex stainless steel with hard x-ray synchrotron techniques, enabling characterization of the passive film grown over individual constituent phases. A Cr- and Fe-containing passive film consisting of an outer hydroxide layer, inner oxide layer, and unoxidized Ni enrichment at the metal/oxide interface was present over both phases. The film formed over the ferrite phase generally had a higher Cr content, similar to the higher Cr content in the ferrite phase.[45] Cr enrichment was proposed to result from enhanced Fe dissolution occurring more prominently over the ferrite phase, leading to Cr enrichment that required higher applied potentials to dissolve.[47] No significant differences were observed in the passive film thickness between the ferrite and austenite phases; however, the film formed over (001) orientation ferrite grains was both thicker and had a higher Cr content than other ferrite phase orientations, a difference attributed to surface reactivity depending on the crystal structure of the dissolving plane.[46]
Vignal et al.[48] also evaluated the chemistry of the passive film for regions formed over both the austenite and ferrite phases of 2304 duplex stainless steel. Scanning Auger electron spectroscopy and microscale XPS were utilized to compare cation fraction depth profiles over both phases, finding higher Cr/Fe ratios in the film formed above the ferrite phase. The oxide to hydroxide ratio within the film formed over the austenite phase increased during extended aging in air; however, such changes were not observed in the regions formed over ferrite.
In addition to duplex steel passive film chemistry, local analysis of semiconductive properties has also become a topic of interest. Rahimi et al.[49] isolated the Volta potential distribution between austenite, ferrite, and intermetallic particle regions with scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy before local measurement of band gaps with scanning tunneling spectroscopy. The passive film grown over ferrite was found to be thicker than the film grown over austenitic regions. Guo et al.[50] showed increased conductivity and decreased thickness in passive film regions grown over austenite relative to those over ferrite via current sensing atomic force microscopy, but did not evaluate the corrosion behavior. The chemical composition of the passive film was also characterized, but not at a spatial resolution capable of isolating the film formed over individual phases. There was little evaluation comparing local semiconductive properties of inhomogeneous passive films to corrosion behavior.
The governing corrosion phenomena for duplex steels are dependent on the structure and area fractions of the phases present. For example, the ferrite phase dissolves at higher rates than martensite during immersion of duplex steel in 0.1 M H2SO4, with the polarization behavior affected by martensite area fraction.[51] Neetu et al.[52] further evaluated this effect by altering phase area fractions with differing cooling rates and quench temperatures applied to a high-C, high-Si steel. Heat treatments leading to higher area fractions of bainite (shorter continuous cooling times before isothermal holds) are often correlated with improved polarization resistance and decreased mass loss rates during immersion. Surface morphology indicated preferential dissolution of the ferrite phase during polarization. Similar preferential dissolution was observed by Ha et al.,[53] where increasing ferrite concentrations was introduced by heat treatment of S32101. This led to decreasing pitting potentials and increased pit depth in chloride solution. Preferential dissolution was utilized by Tsai and Chen[54] to evaluate galvanic coupling between austenite and ferrite in 2205 duplex stainless steel.
Gardin et al.[55] evaluated the air-formed passive film chemistry of 2304 duplex stainless steel with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Additionally, two single-phase alloys intended to represent the austenite and ferrite phases of the duplex stainless steel were synthesized with compositions identified from computational thermodynamic modeling and similarly characterized. Surface analysis of the single-phase alloys showed more Ni and N in the passive film formed on the austenite alloy, following trends in microstructural partitioning, whereas more Cr was present in the passive film of the single-phase ferrite alloy. The passive films of all three alloys had a higher Cr fraction in the passive film than in their respective bulk microstructure and had similar layering trends. The composition and thickness of the duplex stainless steel film more closely resembled that of the ferritic alloy than that of the austenitic alloy, despite the duplex stainless steel having roughly similar area fractions of each phase.
The existing literature body clearly shows that different phases in a multi-phase alloy may have passive films that vary in composition, structure, and electrochemical properties. As such, the morphology and volume fraction and chemistry of phases in the microstructure may have considerable effects on corrosion behavior. However, there is little work that evaluates such phenomena on CCAs. Many reported approaches for the design of corrosion resistant CCAs incorporate multiple passivating elements with the expectance that they can be found in the passive film.[5,12,14,16,56] Thus, there is a considerable need for a more thorough understanding of passivation including better assessment of the local compositions of the passive film formed over individual phases in CCAs and their effect on overall corrosion behavior. Ensuring a viable range of passivating elements which partition between phases such that a stable passive film can be formed over all phases, and that second phase regions do not become preferential corrosion sites, remains a critical challenge in the design of multi-phase corrosion resistant CCAs.
This work evaluates the corrosion resistance and passive film chemistry of a dual-phase CCA, isolating the behavior of individual phases with multiple methods. Synthesis of single-phase CCAs representative of constituent phases of the dual-phase CCA, a novel method for evaluation of CCA corrosion resistance, is utilized to enable electrochemical testing of constituent phases using global methods. A variety of studies are utilized designed to develop understanding of passivity both with the effects of localized corrosion (e.g., polarization in NaCl), and without (e.g., electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, polarization in H2SO4). The findings are compared to electrochemical and local passive film analysis of the dual-phase CCA.
2 Experimental Methods
2.1 Alloy Compositions, Synthesis, and Microstructural Characterization
The compositions of three synthesized alloys are listed in Table I, including the previously studied[12,26] Al0.3Cr0.5Fe2Mn0.25Mo0.15Ni1.5Ti0.3 dual-phase CCA, henceforth referred to as the parent alloy, and two single-phase CCAs selected to match the compositions of the FCC and L21 constituents of the parent alloy with methods further discussed below. The compositions are used to calculate the listed thermodynamic indicators used originally for identification of high-entropy alloys.[7,10] Equations for the thermodynamic indicators and ranges commonly used to predict the presence of disordered solid solution single-phase microstructures are shown in the electronic supplementary material.[8‐10] The decreasing atomic radius mismatch (δ), a less negative enthalpy of mixing (ΔHmix), and an increasing Ω parameter of the single-phase FCC matrix CCA all suggest an increased likelihood of a stable disordered single-phase microstructure, consistent with the matrix phase of the parent alloy. These parameters did not predict a disordered solid solution for the second phase L21 CCA, which meets expectation given the ordered nature of the alloy.
Table I
Nominal Compositions and Thermodynamic Phase Stability Indicators of Dual-Phase Parent Alloy and Single-Phase Alloys
Parent Alloy
Matrix (FCC)
Second Phase (L21)
Composition (At. Pct)
Al
6.0
3.7
19.7
Cr
10.0
11.1
1.5
Fe
40.0
42.5
10.4
Mn
5.0
5.2
4.0
Mo
3.0
3.1
0.3
Ni
30.0
28.8
44.8
Ti
6.0
5.6
19.4
Thermodynamic Indicators
ΔSmix
1.55R
1.51R
1.44R
ΔHmix (kJ mol−1)
− 10.74
− 9.20
− 29.32
δ (Pct)
8.42
7.53
12.5
Ω
2.16
2.49
0.67
Pure elements were massed within 1 pct error prior to arc melting. Bolded indicator terms suggest the presence of a high-entropy alloy with single-phase disordered solid solution on the basis of the suggested ranges mentioned above.
CCAs were synthesized via arc-melting from pure elements (Alfa Aesar, Cr > 99.2 pct purity, all other metals > 99.9 pct purity), flipped five times to ensure homogeneity, and suction cast into 1 cm diameter buttons in a water-cooled copper mold. Samples were annealed at 1070 °C, the temperature previously utilized to target the dual-phase microstructure, for five hours before quenching in water. Each sample was ground with SiC paper to a 1200 grit finish prior to electrochemical testing and polished with diamond paste to a 1 μm finish prior to microstructural and surface analysis.
The phases present in each alloy were identified via x-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Malvern PANalytical (Malvern, GBR) Empyrean DiffractometerTM with Cu Kα x-rays (1468.7 eV) and at a scan rate of 0.15 deg/s. Microstructures were imaged via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in backscattered electron (BSE) mode with an FEI (Hillsboro, OR, USA) Quanta 650TM. The chemical compositions of the parent alloy were first identified via energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) in point scan and mapping mode, and analyzed with Oxford Instruments (Abingdon, GBR) AztecTM software. The spot sizes for SEM and EDS were selected to ensure the probe diameter was below 10 nm, well below the size of microstructural features. EDS mapping of a representative two-phase region is shown in Figure 1. The compositions identified from point scans taken over each phase were used to isolate single-phase CCA compositions from the dual-phase CCA. The composition of the point scan of the FCC matrix of the parent alloy yielded a single-phase microstructure when synthesized. However, synthesis of the composition defined by the point scan obtained over the L21 phase led to the formation of a dual-phase microstructure with approximately equal area fractions of FCC and L21 phases suggested by micrograph threshold analysis. The presence of a multi-phase microstructure in spite of a predicted single-phase microstructure was attributed to EDS spill over from the L21 to the FCC phase due to the x-ray generation being possible at depths of up to 1 μm,[57] which can exceed the diameters of many of the second phase particles in the parent alloy. Thus, it is likely that some characteristic emission from the FCC matrix was detected in the L21 point scan, pushing the initial composition of this phase beyond regions of single-phase stability. Therefore, compositions obtained from point scans over the L21 phase of the equal area fraction alloy with larger regions of L21 was selected to represent the single-phase L21 CCA shown in Table I. Average compositions obtained from point scans of the single-phase alloys, parent alloy, and equal area fraction intermediate alloy along with a micrograph of the intermediate alloy are reported in Table S.1 and Figure S.1 of the electronic supplementary material, respectively.
Fig. 1
EDS mapping of representative two-phase region of parent alloy reproduced from Ref. [26]
2.2 Electrochemical Characterization of Corrosion Behavior
A series of electrochemical methods were selected to indicate the characteristics of the passivity and identify the relative resistance to localized corrosion behavior. All measurement were global and lack spatial resolution to characterize individual phases within the parent alloy. Electrochemical characterization of the synthesized single-phase alloys was thus used to evaluate the performance of the individual phases. A Gamry Instruments (Warminster, PA, USA) Reference 600 + TM potentiostat connected to a conventional three-electrode cell with the CCA sample cold-mounted in epoxy as the working electrode, a platinum mesh counter electrode, a saturated calomel reference electrode (SCE, + 0.241 V vs standard hydrogen electrode), and 0.01 M NaCl1 (pH ~ 5.75) electrolyte solution was used for all electrochemical experimentation unless otherwise noted. All electrochemical experimentation was repeated threefold to ensure reproducibility. Samples were first potentiodynamically polarized using two procedures. In both cases, the scan rate was 0.5 mV/s. To evaluate the formation of the passive film, the air-formed oxide was first exposed to a − 1.3 VSCE treatment for 600 seconds before conducting cyclic polarization between − 1.3 and 0.8 VSCE. Additionally, to evaluate passivity and self-healing in the absence of Cl− ions capable of initiating localized corrosion, potentiodynamic polarization from a cathodically pre-treated surface was evaluated in 0.1 M H2SO4 with a procedure further detailed in the electronic supplementary material. Second, to characterize effects of the solution-exposed air-formed oxide, the sample was exposed at open circuit potential (OCP) for 1800 seconds before conducting electrochemical impedance spectroscopy over the frequency range of 100 kHz to 1 mHz measuring 5 points/decade with a 20 mVRMS AC voltage. All EIS spectra were fit to an equivalent circuit model discussed further below. Following EIS, the air-formed film was polarized from 0.1 V below the final OCP to 0.8 VSCE in the upward direction followed by downward polarization from 0.8 to − 1.3 VSCE.
To evaluate the formation and aging of a solution-formed passive film, a potentiostatic exposure procedure was used. A BioLogic SP-200TM potentiostat was instead utilized to decrease the timestep between current density and impedance measurements with the electrochemical setup otherwise identical to the description above. The samples were first exposed to − 1.3 VSCE for 600 seconds to reduce the effect of the air-formed passive film. A step increase in potential to − 0.25 VSCE, determined to be within the alloys’ passive ranges during potentiodynamic polarization, was then applied for 40 ks. The impedance was monitored in situ every 200 ms using a single frequency within the capacitive range of 5 Hz and a 20 mVRMS AC voltage. Following film growth, the film was characterized with full frequency range EIS at − 0.25 VSCE and all other parameters maintained from the air-formed oxide evaluation (100 kHz to 1 mHz, 5 points/decade, 20 mVRMS). The solution-formed film was subsequently characterized with x-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), scanning Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) as discussed further below.
The degree of microgalvanic coupling within the parent alloy was evaluated with a zero-resistance ammeter (ZRA). The FCC single-phase CCA was used as the working electrode with the L21 single-phase CCA of equal area as the counter electrode. Open circuit potential and current of the coupled system with air-formed oxides present were monitored for 40 ks directly after mechanical grinding of each sample at both equal area ratios (0.785 cm2) as well as a 10:1 FCC to L21 area ratio (0.785 to 0.0785 cm2) selected to more accurately represent the phase volume fractions. Current densities for both area ratios were normalized relative to the area of the FCC working electrode (0.785 cm2). The coupled potential was compared to the OCPs of the parent and single-phase alloys during a 40 ks exposure air-formed oxides to open circuit corrosion in the conventional three-electrode cell.
2.3 Characterization of Surface Chemistry and Homogeneity
The chemical compositions and molecular constituents of the solution-formed oxide films were characterized with XPS. Samples were transported under N2(g) directly after the 40 ks exposure at − 0.25 VSCE, subsequent EIS characterization, and OCP exposure described above to a PHI (Chanhassen, MN, USA) VersaProbe III XPS system. Samples were exposed to lab-air for a maximum of 20 minutes at room temperature. High-resolution spectra over the Al 2p, Cr 2p3/2, Fe 2p1/2, Mn 2p1/2,2 Mo 3d, Ni 2p3/2, and Ti 2p3/2 core series were obtained with Al Kα x-rays (1,468.7 eV) at a 26 eV pass energy, 100 μm spot size, and a 45 deg take off angle. The large spot size indicates the XPS lacks the lateral resolution to probe individual phases. Thus, the synthesized phases were treated as representative of individual phases on the local scale. Spectra were calibrated with C 1s set to 284.8 eV as a reference. Spectra were deconvoluted with KolXPDTM (Žďár nad Sázavou, CZE) software with a combination of Shirly background substitutions, Doniach–Sunjic peaks for metallic features, and Voigt functions for oxidized features with characteristic peak positions, intensities, widths, and multiplet splitting from reference spectra obtained elsewhere.[58‐60] The Cr 3s series, which overlaps the Al 2p series, was fit to a single Voigt peak with the intensity defined by the total Cr 2p3/2 signal adjusted with relative sensitivity factors. Surface cation fractions (X) were obtained via total intensity (I) of the peaks fit to oxidized species for each metal (M). The total intensity was normalized via relative sensitivity factors (R) as shown below in Eq. [1]. Elements for which surface cation fractions exceed the bulk microstructural composition for either a single-phase CCA or the parent alloy were considered enriched in the passive film.[61]
To evaluate the lateral variation of the passive film chemistry, the film growth procedure described above was repeated on a polished sample before transfer to a PHI (Chanhassen, MN, USA) 710TM Field Emission Scanning Auger Nanoprobe operating with a 10 keV, 1 nA electron beam, a beam diameter of approximately 3 to 5 nm, and a 0 deg take off angle.3 The instrument was equipped with an SEM which facilitated the location of phases for spot probe analysis. AES spectra were obtained for five point obtained over each phase and at least 1 μm from the interface and averaged to obtain representative surface cation fractions. Additionally, qualitative analysis of surface cation fractions was measured in mapping and line-scan modes to demonstrate the changes in passive film chemistry across the FCC-L21 interface with Eq. [1] modified to include system specific sensitivity factors.
Finally, a cross-section of the passive film was characterized via STEM-EDS. The film growth procedure was repeated on a polished sample before transfer under N2(g) to a ThermoFischer Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) Helios UC G4TM Dual Beam Focused Ion Beam (FIB) and SEM system for cross-sectioning. The surface was deposited with a 0.4 μm protective Pt layer with a 5 keV electron beam followed by a 1.5 μm layer with the ion beam. The film cross-section was then prepared via FIB lift-out technique with a Ga+ ion beam at an accelerating voltage of 30 keV followed by subsequent passes at 5 keV. The sample was transferred to a ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) ThemisTM 60-300 kV transmission electron microscopy system and imaged in dark-field mode operating at a 200 kV and a 350 pA beam current with probe correction, allowing for resolution as low as 0.1 nm. The bulk microstructure and passive film were mapped with STEM-EDS with a Super-X detection system over a representative area near the phase interface with three line integrals obtained to evaluate the passive film depth profile over each phase and lateral homogeneity of the passive film across the phase interface. Compositions were obtained from intensities normalized with Velox software.
3 Results
3.1 Alloy Microstructure
XRD patterns shown in Figure 2 index the matrix and second phase single-phase synthesized CCAs as FCC and Heusler (L21)[62] respectively, while peaks are present for both phases in the parent alloy XRD pattern. The presence of many peaks in the single-phase L21 CCA that were not observed in the parent alloy is attributed to the low volume fraction of the L21 phase. The microstructures are confirmed by BSE micrographs, as shown in Figure 3. EDS point scans listed in Table S.1 of the electronic supplementary material confirm similar compositions between the synthesized single-phase CCAs and constituent phases within the parent alloy. The FCC CCA is shown to be single-phase, while the L21 single-phase CCA has small (generally less than 1 μm) regions enriched in Fe and Cr,4 whose formation may be attributed to spill-over inaccuracy from EDS measurements of the L21 phase of previous alloys, which could have incorporated signal from the FCC phase. However, given that the L21 volume fraction is much greater than that of the previously established 4.33 pct L21 area fraction for the parent alloy,[26] the composition is assumed to be representative of the L21 behavior. The dual-phase microstructure consists of an FCC matrix with L21 features generally between 2 and 10 μm in size, well-distributed throughout the matrix. L21 regions generally have rounded interfaces with the matrix; however, some, such as the case of Figure 3(d), possess sharp corners and linear boundaries running in parallel with potential grain boundaries (GBs) indicated by contrast between FCC regions in the BSE micrograph.
Fig. 2
XRD patterns synthesized CCAs following homogenization at 1070 °C. Peak indexes are shown for FCC and L21 phases, with both features visible in the parent alloy
3.2 Corrosion Behavior of Alloys with Oxides Formed in Chloride Solutions
E–log(i) plots comparing the corrosion behavior of the parent alloy on a global scale in 0.01 M NaCl with the single-phase CCAs are shown in Figure 4. Key values are tabulated in Table II. The use of a dilute chloride solution leads to the formation of a broad passive range for all three alloys that may be characterized prior to breakdown, while the cathodic pre-treatment minimizes the effect of the air-formed oxide. Passivity of both phases is attributable to each phase having passivating elements enriched relative to the overall alloy composition (e.g., Cr in the FCC phase, Ti and Al in the L21). The zero-current potential (Ei=0), defined as the potential at which the current density switches from anodic to cathodic, of all three alloys is similar. Similar Tafel slopes in the anodic and cathodic regions of each CCA suggest Ei=0 may be used to assess trends in the CCA corrosion potentials. Likewise, there is little variation in the passive current density (ipass). For both parameters, the parent alloy resembles the values of its constituent phases. However, the lack of statistically significant variation between the alloys limits evaluation of Ei=0 and ipass as a function of phase volume fraction. Pitting was the dominant breakdown mechanism for all three alloys with limited crevice corrosion near the sample-epoxy interface also observed. Pits disproportionately occurred near the FCC-L21 interface, as in the case of the micrograph shown in Figure 5. The pitting potential (Epit) for the L21 phase was lower than that of the matrix phase, indicating a more modest breakdown potential in L21 relative to the FCC matrix. However, the interphase boundary is the weak site. Intermittent increases in current density prior to breakdown observed for all three scans suggest metastable pitting and repassivation, with the behavior most noticeable in the matrix single-phase CCA. Notably, Epit for both the parent and FCC alloys is above the range of stability for Cr2O3 formed on pure Cr. Enduring passivity at these potentials is attributable to stability due to the presence of Al and Ti passive species which retain a partially protective oxide.[12] Additionally, cyclic polarization scans shown in Figure S.2 of the electronic supplementary material also reveal a lower repassivation potential (Erep) for the L21 phase. The decrease in both Epit and Erep for the L21 phase may be attributable in part to significantly lower Mo concentrations in, which has been shown elsewhere to have strong effects both of these parameters in this alloy series.[33] Both Epit and Erep for the parent alloy were in between the respective values for the single-phases. The parent alloy values more closely resembled those of the matrix phase, likely resulting from its higher matrix volume fraction.
Fig. 4
Potentiodynamic polarization of CCAs in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75) following cathodic pre-treatment (600 s, − 1.3 VSCE). Dashed lines indicate stability ranges for the oxides of passive species formed on their pure constituent elements at a pH of 5.75 predicted by Hydra Medusa software
The corrosion behavior was also evaluated in 0.1 M H2SO4 to characterize passivity in the absence of localized corrosion-inducing Cl− ions (electronic supplementary material Figure S.2, Table S.2). ipass for the parent alloy is lower than both constituent phases; however, similar values for both ipass and the critical current density suggest similar rates of passive film formation and passive film strength between the three CCAs, as in the case of polarization in NaCl.
3.3 Corrosion Behavior of Alloys with Native Oxides
Experiments were also conducted on the alloys with the air-formed oxide without the reduction step. The air-formed solution-exposed passive film was first characterized with EIS after 1800 seconds exposure at the film OCP in 0.01 M NaCl solution. EIS spectra of selected representative runs for each alloy are shown in Figure 6. Table III shows parameters for the fit of each spectra with the equivalent circuit model shown in Figure 6(c). The equivalent circuit model includes resistances attributable to the solution (RS) and passive film charge transfer (RCT), a constant phase element (CPE) used to identify the non-ideal (i.e., frequency dependent) capacitive behavior of the film. The CPE consists of admittance (YCPE) and CPE coefficient terms (α). A physical basis for the CPE parameters, behavior, and applications is provided elsewhere.[63‐65] Additionally, a bounded Warburg impedance component (consisting of both an admittance term, Y, and a length-based bound, B) is used to represent finite mass-transport-limited processes, mainly diffusion and/or migration through the passive film. The goodness of fit values as well as discussion of the mathematical relationships between circuit parameters, impedance, and capacitance are provided in the electronic supplementary material. All fits suggest near-ideal capacitive behavior with the α values above 0.8 and have high RCT values, suggesting protectiveness of the passive films for both the single-phase and parent alloys in dilute chloride solutions. While the parent alloy RCT is slightly lower than both phase subcomponents, the low-frequency impedance modulus data shown in Table S.2 of the electronic supplementary material, a commonly used surrogate for the polarization resistance, shows that all phases possess good passivity and that differences between the CCAs are within the range of statistical scatter. Therefore, neither constituent phase is indicated to have an inferior passive film, nor can the parent alloy with interphase boundaries be shown to be superior to or inferior to either constituent phase.
Fig. 6
(a) Bode and (b) Nyquist plots of solution-exposed air-formed passive films of CCAs in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75) fit to equivalent circuit model shown in c). The OCP at which the test was conducted is indicated in the figure legend
EIS Fit Parameters for the Spectra Shown in Fig. 6
Alloy
RCT (kΩ cm2)
RS (Ω cm2)
αCPE
YCPE (μS sα cm−2)
YW (μS s0.5 cm-2)
BW (s0.5)
Parent Alloy
158
81.3
0.802
66.9
689.4
40.3
Matrix
313
371.2
0.807
47.7
86.3
38.1
Second Phase
253
208.5
0.885
33.6
233.9
46.0
Each term is defined by the Randles circuit shown in Fig. 6(c).
The CCAs with air-formed oxides were also characterized via polarization beginning slightly below the OCP of the films, bypassing any cathodic pre-treatment to avoid reducing the film. E–log(i) plots are shown in Figure 7 with key parameters identified in Table IV. The parent and matrix phase alloys had similar Ei=0 values, while Ei=0 for the L21 CCA was slightly more negative. Pitting was the dominant breakdown mechanism, with metastable pits that repassivate prior to Epit also indicated for the parent and FCC alloys. However, formation and repassivation of metastable pits were less prominent for L21 single-phase CCA. The L21 CCA also showed a less positive Epit, implying inferior resistance to film breakdown. Epit for the parent alloy was in between that of the two single-phase CCAs.
Fig. 7
Potentiodynamic polarization of CCAs with air-formed oxides in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75). Dashed lines indicate stability ranges for the oxides of passive species assumed to form on their pure constituent elements at a pH of 5.75 predicted by Hydra Medusa software
Selected Corrosion Parameters for Potentiodynamic Polarization in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75) Shown in Fig. 7
Alloy
Ei=0 (VSCE)
Epit (VSCE)
Parent Alloy
− 0.16 ± 0.084
0.466 ± 0.154
Matrix
− 0.203 ± 0.049
> 0.800
Second Phase
− 0.300 ± 0.098
0.303 ± 0.174
Each term includes the mean value bounded by a one standard deviation range. Consistent stable pitting was not observed in single-phase FCC CCA with breakdown potentials often exceeding the 0.8 VSCE maximum applied potential.
3.4 Potentiostatic Oxide Growth and Characterization
The passive film growth kinetics during exposure to a − 0.25 VSCE potential, within the passive range of all three evaluated alloys, on a cathodically pre-treated (600 seconds, − 1.3 VSCE) surface for each alloy are shown in Figure 8. Current density magnitudes for each alloy decrease with time after step potentiostatic hold at passive potentials, while the magnitude of the imaginary component of impedance (Z”) at an intermediate frequency, which has been previously shown to be directly proportional to film thickness,[65,66] increases with time. For all three alloys, the current density switches from positive to negative between ~ 2000 and ~ 10,000 seconds, indicating a change from anodic- to cathodic-dominated kinetics. Prior to the transition, all three alloys show similar film growth kinetics, consistent with similar current density measurements. The anodic current densities of the single-phase L21 CCA are the lowest, whereas they are the highest for the parent alloy. Sharp spikes the current density measurements for the single-phase L21 CCA may indicate metastable film breakdown and repassivation. Z” increases with time for all alloys, indicating steady film growth and increasing protectiveness. Changes in growth rate, such as those most visible in the step-like behavior of the single-phase L21 CCA, may indicate different metals’ passive species and/or passive film layers form at different times.
Fig. 8
(a) Current density and (b) in situ Imaginary component of impedance (5 Hz) of CCAs during potentiostatic passive film growth at − 0.25 VSCE in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75) following cathodic pre-treatment (600 s, − 1.3 VSCE). To minimize scatter in the data, a five point moving average is presented
The film grown within the passive range was also characterized via EIS as shown in Figure 9. Selected representative spectra were fit to the equivalent circuit model shown in Figure 6(c) with the parameters listed in Table V. Similar to the case of the air-formed oxides, high α values suggest nearly ideal capacitive behavior for all three alloys. The L21 CCA shows different time constant behavior, with the maximum phase angle magnitude obtained at a higher frequency than the other two CCAs. This may contribute to the higher Z” values during film growth and a higher impedance modulus at 5 Hz, which is shown by the phase angle plot to be firmly within the capacitive range, despite the comparatively lower RCT of the single-phase L21 CCA. Low-frequency impedance data tabulated in Table S.2 of the electronic supplementary material confirms passivity of all three alloys but suggest that deviations between the constituent phases may be considered statistically insignificant and that there is no strong evidence for the passivity of either phase being comparatively weaker.
Fig. 9
(a) Bode and (b) Nyquist plots of the passive films formed on the CCAs following 40 ks exposure to − 0.25 VSCE in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75) fit to equivalent circuit model shown in Fig. 6(c))
EIS Fit Parameters for the Spectra Shown in Fig. 9
Alloy
RCT (kΩ cm2)
RS (Ω cm2)
αCPE
YCPE (μS sα cm−2)
YW (μS s0.5 cm−2)
BW (s0.5)
Parent Alloy
270
277.3
0.861
117.4
43.1
37.9
Matrix
561
462.7
0.798
55.5
91.3
88.1
Second Phase
169
201.4
0.922
35.8
272.5
18.8
Each term is defined by the Randles circuit shown in Fig. 6(c).
3.5 Galvanic Interaction of Constituent Phases
Possible galvanic interaction was evaluated utilizing ZRA. The galvanic couple potentials and net current measurements at the conclusion of a 40 ks coupling of the constituent phase alloys with air-formed oxides are shown in Table VI. The current densities of the coupled system following 40 ks exposure reached average values below 50 nA cm−2 for both area ratios with maximum values generally below 750 nA cm−2 during the exposure. Such magnitudes are well below those of ipass for the parent alloy obtained during polarization (Table II). Following extended immersion, the current is generally negative for both area ratios, indicating the FCC matrix (working electrode) may be slightly cathodic or more passive than that of the L21 passive film (counter electrode). A cathodic FCC phase would suggest the galvanic couple potential following oxide exposure aging would be slightly below the OCP of the FCC phase. However, changes in the sign of the current were frequently observed, as in the case of Figure S.4 of the electronic supplementary material, indicating similarity between phases and the change in the polarizability of the passive film with exposure time. Significant variability was present with regard to the timescale and frequency of cathodic-anodic transitions. These results indicate negligible galvanic coupling of consequence. Furthermore, the galvanic couple potential is below Epit observed during potentiodynamic polarization of the air-formed oxides for both alloys, suggesting there is insufficient driving force for galvanic coupling-induced pitting for either phase. The coupled potential may also be compared to the OCP measurements following 40 ks solution exposure for the parent alloy shown in Table VII. Both area ratios displayed galvanic couple potentials within the statistical scatter of the final OCP measurement, possibly indicating the OCP of the parent alloy is representative of the coupling of its constituent phases.
Table VI
Coupled Potential and Current Measurements of Single-Phase FCC (Working Electrode) and L21 (Counter Electrode) CCAs with Air-Formed Oxides Following 40 ks Exposure in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75)
Area Ratio
Potential (VSCE)
Current (nA cm−2)
Equal Areas
− 0.217 ± 0.052
− 22.6 ± 77.4
Larger FCC Matrix (10:1)
− 0.187 ± 0.014
− 34.9 ± 10.8
Each term includes the mean value bounded by a one standard deviation range. Current densities are normalized to the working electrode area (0.784 cm2).
Table VII
Open Circuit Potentials of CCAs Following 40 ks Exposure of the Air-Formed Passive Film in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75)
Alloy
OCP (VSCE)
Parent Alloy
− 0.192 ± 0.085
Matrix
− 0.099 ± 0.003
Second Phase
− 0.131 ± 0.029
Each term includes the mean value bounded by a one standard deviation range.
3.6 Oxide Film Chemistry, Oxidation State, and Homogeneity
The passive film is suggested by XPS to contain passivated species for many constituent elements, consistent with the stability of multiple passive species including Al(III), Cr(III), and Ti(IV) oxides at the − 0.25 VSCE potential in the ~ 5.75 pH environment for which the passive film was grown.[67] Figure 10 shows the deconvolutions of high-resolution spectra collected over Al 2p, Cr 2p3/2, Fe 2p1/2, Ni 2p3/2, and Ti 2p3/2 core series for both single-phase CCAs compared to previously obtained[12] measurements of the parent alloy. Calculated surface cation fractions are reported in Table VIII. The XPS spot size (100 μm) was significantly larger than the L21 regions in the parent alloy (3 to 5 μm), ensure that XPS spectra spectra for the alloy cover a representative region of the microstructure and are not disproportionately characteristic of either phase. All films have high concentrations of Ti that were suggested to take the form of Ti(IV) oxide. The single-phase FCC passive film is dominated by Cr(III) signal attributable to oxide, hydroxide, and possible Fe–Cr spinel presence while also being enriched in Al(III) and Ti(IV) relative to bulk composition. The film formed over the L21 phase is dominated by Ti(IV) while also being enriched in Al(III), Cr(III), and Mo(VI) relative to the bulk composition. Al(III) and Ti(IV) surface cation fractions and surface cation fractions are higher than those of the film formed over the matrix phase, while Cr(III) surface cation fractions are lower. The decreased presence of Cr in the L21 film follows the decreased Cr composition in the bulk L21 phase. Contrastingly, the high Ti(IV), Al(III), and Ni(II) signal in the L21 film, attributable to Ti(IV) oxide, Al(III) oxide, and Ni(II) oxide, hydroxide, and possibly Ni–Cr spinel, respectively, is likely aided by the higher concentrations of Ti, Al, and Ni in the bulk L21 phase. Fe, Mn, and Mo are present at low concentrations over both phases at similar magnitudes, and cannot be established as more enriched over either phase. Although Cr was fit to show a intensity of spinel in both samples, the companion metal was suggested by the Cr 2p3/2 spectra to change from Fe in films of the parent and FCC alloys to Ni in the L21 film5. Notably, XPS deconvolution does not provide any structural information; thus, spinel deconvolutions may merely be indicative of disordered solid solution oxide nearest-neighbor interactions as opposed to long-range ordered complex oxides.[14] Further structural characterization that would be necessary to confirm long-range ordering would require further high intensity, hard x-ray techniques.[68‐70]
Fig. 10
Selected high-resolution XPS spectra following 40 ks potentiostatic passive film growth at − 0.25 VSCE in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75)
Surface Cation Fractions Obtained Following Potentiostatic Oxide Growth (− 0.25 VSCE, 40 ks, 0.01 M NaCl) Via XPS of the Dual-Phase and Single-Phase CCAs
Cation
Parent Alloy (Pct)
Matrix (Pct)
Second Phase (Pct)
Al(III)
16.5
5.9
24.1
Cr(III)
14.3
52.4
7.5
Fe(II/III)
9.1
9.8
5.3
Mn(II)
0.1
0.2
0.0
Mo(VI)
2.3
2.1
0.8
Ni(II)
2.4
3.6
9.2
Ti(IV)
55.4
26.1
53.1
Bolded terms are considered enriched relative to the bulk compositions of the respective CCA shown in Table I. Data for the parent alloy is reproduced from previous work.[26]
Figure 11(b) shows AES maps characterizing the local chemical composition of the passive film formed. Distinct regions of increased Al, Ti, and Ni signal are present over the L21 phase regions indicated by the secondary electron SEM micrograph. Fe and Cr are more prominent in the passive film formed over the matrix where higher bulk concentrations were present, while no conclusions were obtained regarding Mn and Mo, the two elements with the lowest compositions in the bulk alloy. Similar enrichment is present in the AES line scan (Figure 11(c)) with Al, Ti, and Ni enriched over the L21 phase, Fe, Cr, and Mn enriched over the FCC phase, and little Mo signal observed.
Fig. 11
Auger electron spectroscopy (a) schematic of spot size and penetration depth in comparison to XPS and microstructural morphology, (b) elemental mapping and (c) linescans of the dual-phase parent alloy following potentiostatic oxide grown (− 0.25 VSCE, 40 ks, 0.01 M NaCl)
Local passive film compositions evaluated over each phase are shown in Table IX. Although both the XPS and AES point scan data indicate the film formed over the L21 phase has more Al, Ni, and Ti than that which is formed over the FCC phase, quantitative cation fractions severely differ. This may be attributable to the XPS-obtained cation fractions only representing signals attributed to oxidized features (e.g., oxides, hydroxides, and spinels). AES point scans signal were obtained from within the photoelectron escape depth of approximately 10 nm. However, AES did not have the necessary resolution for deconvolution and thus surface cation fractions include both metallic and oxidized features. For example, the surface cation fraction for Ni is higher over both phases when measured by AES than by XPS, but this may be inflated by the high intensity of the Ni0 metal peak indicated by the XPS deconvolutions. Alternatively, for elements where the majority of escaped photoelectrons observed by XPS may be fit to oxidized features such as Cr and Ti, the majority of AES signal is also likely attributable to passivated features.
Table IX
Surface Cation Fractions Obtained Following Potentiostatic Oxide Growth (− 0.25 VSCE, 40 ks, 0.01 M NaCl) Via AES Point Scans Over Individual Phases Within the Dual-Phase CCA
Element
Matrix (Pct)
Second Phase (Pct)
Al
10.8 ± 1.5
26.1 ± 1.6
Cr
14.7 ± 1.1
3.1 ± 0.8
Fe
26.1 ± 0.7
6.1 ± 0.8
Mn
—
—
Mo
3.0 ± 0.8
2.0 ± 0.4
Ni
37.2 ± 1
46.8 ± 2.1
Ti
8.2 ± 0.7
15.9 ± 0.8
Each term includes the mean value bounded by a one standard deviation range. Bolded terms are considered enriched relative to the bulk compositions of the respective CCA shown in Table I. Ni cation fractions are suggested to be inflated by signal attributable to metallic species enrichment near the metal-oxide interface.
The passive film chemistry was also evaluated with the HAADF-STEM image and STEM-EDS mapping shown in Figure 12. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) imaging reveals an oxide layer with a thickness of 2 to 3 nm. Both the HAADF image and the O EDS map indicate the film thickness is fairly consistent across the FCC-L21 interface. EDS mapping shows the differing phase chemistries in both bulk microstructures and their oxides. Fe and Ni show high signals in the FCC and L21 phases, respectively, and in the passive films grown above each phase, where a Cr-dominated passive film over the FCC phase is suggested. This is in contrast with the Ti- and Al-dominated film formed over the L21 phase. Differences in compositional homogeneity of the passive film are confirmed by the line profile in the horizontal direction (i.e., in-plane with the oxide surface). The concentration of Al and Ti decreased when crossing the interface from the L21 to the FCC phase while the concentrations of Fe and Cr were higher in the film grown over the FCC phase. The changes in passive film composition occurred over a 5 to 10 nm lateral distance before leveling out. O concentrations were roughly similar across both phases.
Fig. 12
(a) Schematic of FIB lift-out, STEM micrograph, and STEM-EDS line integrations relative to passive film and microstructural morphology. (b) HAADF-STEM micrograph and STEM EDS mapping of phase interface of the dual-phase parent alloy following potentiostatic oxide grown (− 0.25 VSCE, 40 ks, 0.01 M NaCl). Quantitative line integrations are shown for the metal-oxide interfaces over the (c) L21 second phase, (d) FCC matrix phase, and (e) the in-plane line integration across the oxide phase interface within the passive film
Line profiles in the out-of-plane direction (i.e., perpendicular to the oxide surface), from each bulk microstructure phase though the oxide to the platinum deposition, illustrate the enriched elements in the passive film relative to the bulk microstructure. In the film grown over the L21 phase, Al and Ti concentrations were higher in the oxide region of the profile than in the metal region, signifying enrichment. Increasing Cr and Fe signal was also observed with the highest signal observed nearest the oxide/platinum interface, suggesting outer-layer enrichment, whereas inner-layer enrichment was suggested for Al and Ti. Ni was also shown to be present in the passive film, although at concentrations steadily decreasing with distance from the metal/oxide interface. The Ni concentration in the FCC region of the metal sharply increased near the interface but in the absence of strong O signal, demonstrating enrichment in the metal near the oxide interface. In both line profiles, limited Pt signal in the outer regions of the passive film was observed but is not expected to affect comparisons between constituent element cation fractions.
4 Discussion
4.1 Thermodynamics and Kinetics Governing Passive Film Composition
Independent passive films are formed over each phase. The composition of the passive film tracks with the bulk microstructure composition over which the film was grown, as summarized in Table X, which follows trends previously established models for passive film chemistry predicted based on bulk composition.[61] For example, the passive film formed over the FCC phase is suggested to have higher surface cation fractions of Cr, Fe, and Mo, while the film formed over the L21 phase has higher surface cation fractions of Ni, Al, and Ti (Figures 11(c), 12(e), Tables VIII, IX). Passive films form quickly in solution. Z”, and therefore film thickness, rises rapidly for the first 100 seconds before reaching near-steady state values after 10 ks (Figure 8(b)). The distinct phases within the passive film along with rapid film formation suggest surface diffusion is minor compared to cation flux perpendicular to the passive film by migration in the electric field perpendicular to the interface.
Table X
Summary of Highest Element in the Measured Composition for Each Single-Phase CCA Compared to Passive Film Cation Fractions Identified Via XPS Following Potentiostatic Oxide Growth (− 0.25 VSCE, 40 ks) in 0.01 M NaCl (pH ~ 5.75)
Phase composition may also be compared to traditionally established metrics for desirable passive film to limit aqueous corrosion in chloride containing environments. The matrix phase bulk Cr concentration of 10 pct is below the ~ 12 at. pct limit traditionally suggested to be a minimum required for the formation of a stable Cr-dominated passive film in Fe–Cr[71] and Ni–Cr[72] alloys. This is noteworthy particularly given reports suggesting possible stabilization of Cr passive species at subcritical bulk Cr concentrations in Al- and/or Ti-containing CCAs.[12,73] Alternatively, the bulk Cr concentration is much lower in the L21 phase (Table I). Thus, the matrix bulk composition contributes to significantly higher Cr surface cation fractions in the film formed over the matrix phase (Figures 11(c), 12(e), Tables VIII, IX), following previous reports. Likewise, the critical Al concentration thresholds must be obtained for the formation of a stable Al-dominated passive film[74,75] are exceeded for the L21 phase but not for the matrix. While high bulk Al concentrations promote increased Al surface cation fractions over the L21 phase, Al is still present over both phases, showing stable Al presence outside of such thresholds possible in CCAs.[12] The L21 phase has over three times the bulk Ti concentration as the FCC matrix, leading to higher Ti surface cation fractions, although the Ti concentrations remains below those of Fe–Ti alloys showing strong passivity).[76‐80]
Passive film chemistry may be influenced by the thermodynamic stability of oxides for each constituent species. Al, Cr, and Ti were present in the passive films of all three alloys at higher concentrations than those of each alloy’s respective bulk composition (Table VIII). The stability of the passivated species is likely aided by favorable formation energies of the Al, Cr, and Ti oxide species listed in Table XI relative to other stoichiometric oxides. Similar trends are observed in the surface cation fractions obtained via AES (Table IX), although such values may be influenced by signal coming from unoxidized species in the bulk microstructure. Extended exposure or aging during the 40 ks film growth procedure may further promote increasing surface cation fractions of more thermodynamically favorable passive species. Gradual enrichment of the prevalent oxides may occur through preferential chemical dissolution of less stable oxides to form metal chlorides.[81,82] Furthermore, favorable enthalpies of mixing or other beneficial interactions may contribute to Al, Cr, and Ti stability within the film.[12] Beneficial interactions with Cr and/or Al (akin to a third element effect) may influence the high surface cation fractions of Ti within the passive film of the matrix and parent alloy, despite comparatively lower bulk concentrations (Tables I, VIII, IX). Al, Cr, and Ti presence in the passive film is further supported by the predicted stability of their passive species from E-pH diagrams of their respective pure metals, while Fe, Mn, Mo, and Ni are predicted to exists in a dissolved state at − 0.25 VSCE in pH 5.75 conditions.[67] For all elements, the applied potential was well above the standard reduction potentials, indicating a sufficient driving force for passivation and/or dissolution was present. While E-pH diagrams of pure metals inform the effect of environment on passivity, stability may also be affected by interactions with other metals in the alloy, either through thermodynamic or kinetic considerations.[16] For example, despite pure Fe and Ni being suggested to dissolve, the stability of Fe and Ni in the passive film may be improved through the formation of spinel species. NiCr2O4 that is suggested to form over the L21 phase (Figure 10) has a comparable free energy of formation to pure Cr2O3 on both a per-atom and per-anion level (Table XI). FeCr2O4, which has a less negative free energy of formation than NiCr2O4 is instead suggested to form over the Fe-enriched FCC phase. Therefore, while free energy of formation may inform thermodynamically possible chemical species in the passive film, the local composition in bulk microstructure over which the film is formed also plays a prominent effect.
Table XI
Standard Free Energy of Formation of Proposed Oxide Species within CCA Passive Films
4.2 Interfacial Contributions to Nature of the Passive Film
The transition between chemically distinct compositions in the passive film scale provides evidence of a heterophase interface (HI) within a passive film formed over a CCA (Figures 11, 12). Compositions for each phase are suggested to be uniform over each phase beyond a transition region of less than 10 nm. This indicates little to no localized depletion of passivating elements near either the FCC-L21 interface of the bulk microstructure (Figure 1) or passive film phase interface (Figures 11(c), 12(e)), limiting the risk of localized corrosion at sites hypothetically depleted in passivating elements following solutionizing heat treatments. The film thickness and limited resolution in the HAADF-STEM image (Figure 12(b)) prohibit characterization of the orientation and nanostructure of the oxides and subsequently the structural aspects of the FCC-L21 interface. Structural considerations may be of note given the miscibility of Fe(III) and Al(III) in corundum-like structures that likely form over the Cr(III)-enriched FCC film,[14] whereas solubility, and therefore possible synergistic behavior, may be comparatively less likely in Ti(IV) oxides, which are generally suggested to be of rutile or amorphous structure.[83‐85] It is unclear to what degree the crystallinity of Ti(IV) oxides may affect compatibility with the corundum-like structures suggested to form over the FCC phases. Despite such limitations, the presence of a defined HI suggests the applicability of the comparatively well-established study of polycrystalline oxides[86] to explain electrochemical phenomena. For instance, oxygen vacancies, well established charge carriers under the point defect model,[87] have been shown to congregate near GBs in cerium oxides and affect local electrical resistivity[88] in addition to their well-established effect on global film-formation rates.[89] Local structural changes and increased oxygen vacancy concentration may further alter the local valence of passivating cations such as Ti,[90,91] despite valence changes not being observed in the global XPS measurements (Figure 10). Such effects may be enhanced by the multi-principal cation nature of films formed over CCAs. While the effects of HIs on localized corrosion, specifically pit initiation, are unclear, the nature of the interface must be considered.
4.3 Relationship between Passivity and Localized Corrosion
Pitting is considerably more likely at phase interfaces and appears to propagate equally in all directions (Figure 5). It is difficult to determine the connection between interfacial pitting and attributes of the passive film given no significant depletion of passivating elements was observed at the interfaces (Figures 11(c), 12(e)). Despite being slightly anodic to the FCC phase, low current density magnitudes observed during galvanic coupling (Table VI) and the equal growth of pits in each direction of the interface (Figure 5) suggest that the L21 phase is not subject to preferential dissolution from microgalvanic coupling. However, the consistently lower Epit and Erep values for the L21 CCA may imply inferior resistance to localized corrosion in the absence of galvanic coupling (Figures 4, 7, Tables II, IV). The lack of significant microgalvanic corrosion may have been aided by the similar open circuit potentials following both 1800 seconds (Figure 7, Table IV) and 40 ks solution exposure (Table VII). Similar values indicate a reduced driving force for microgalvanic corrosion. Additionally, passivation has been shown to decrease the current of a galvanic couple,[54] indicating the ability of both phases to independently passivate may contribute to decreased influence of microgalvanic effects.
Individual phases could be prone to preferential dissolution in dual-phase alloys if a phase is depleted in passivating elements, however, such behavior is not observed (Figure 5). Passivity of both phases is further justified by similar EIS results for both the air-formed and solution-formed passive films, with neither phase having a lower low-frequency impedance at a statistically significant level (Figures 6, 9, Tables III, V, electronic supplementary material Table S.2). In contrast, the Al-Ni rich BCC phase is strongly depleted in Cr relative to the AlxCoCrFeNi CCA, leading to pitting and eventual preferential dissolution in chloride environments.[23] The partitioning of Cr and Ti to different phases herein in the evaluated CCA ensures passivity over both phases, and limits preferential dissolution. Additionally, unlike previously reports for duplex stainless steel,[46,50] the film is suggested to be of similar thickness on both sides of the HI (Figure 12(b)), which could additionally contribute to similar levels of passivity obtained over both phases.
4.4 Implications for Alloy Design
Simultaneous passivation observed over both phases demonstrates that selecting combinations of multiple phases capable of independent passivation, such as the evaluated FCC-L21 microstructure, may be utilized as a strategy for the design of multi-phase, corrosion resistant CCAs. Therefore, high-throughput methods frequently utilized to narrow a broad CCA compositional space may filter compositions to target the preset phases with both desirable structures and compositions that possess the independent ability to passivate as a method to help promote corrosion resistance.[92] Phase volume fraction in a multi-phase CCAs can be used as a tunable feature within the design process. For example, predictive measurements of mechanical properties from changing area fractions of constituent phases have also become well established within the CCA field.[7,21,93] However, the effect of changing phase fraction on passive film chemistry and corrosion behavior must also be considered. The surface cation fractions (Figure 10, Table VIII), and by extension the corrosion behavior (Figures 4, 7), obtained for the parent alloy is generally contributed to by both constituent phases, but often not in a quantitative manner characteristic of the single-phase CCAs weighted by area fractions, as in the case of duplex stainless steel.[55] The findings indicate that second phase area fractions and composition may not be freely adjusted to tailor mechanical properties without regard to the effects on corrosion, even if the global composition does not change. Determination of the quantitative relationships between phase area fractions, compositions, and overall corrosion behavior provides opportunity for future study.
The morphology of HIs in the passive film is also likely to significantly alter corrosion behavior. Grain size, and thus the morphology of GBs in the microstructure, has been shown to strongly affect the corrosion behavior of CoCrFeMnNi,[94] potentially through localized thinning of the passive film.[95] HIs, with differing passive film chemistry on either side of the boundary, initiate more significant cation segregation than single-phase GBs; however, such partitioning may be limited by the high solubility of constituent elements aided by the high entropy nature of the passive film.[96] Ensuring the passive film possesses adequate concentrations of passivating elements in the film on both sides of the interface is demonstrated as a viable strategy for ensuring passivity in the design of corrosion resistant CCAs.[13] While local characterization of the passive film chemistry remains inefficient, the presence of HIs at similar locations to microstructural phase interfaces (Figures 11(b), 12(b)) ensures local passive film chemistry is governed by the local composition in the bulk microstructure. Thus, the local composition within the passive film, and therefore the passivity, is heavily influenced by each phase in the bulk microstructure having concentrations of passivating elements above critical threshold values, which may inform global alloy compositions and processing techniques. Additionally, microstructural analysis of and/or predictive tools for volume fraction, location, and second phase regions may be useful as an initial predictive metric for dual-phase CCA passivity over each phase, allowing for targeting of compositions with global corrosion resistance.
5 Conclusion
The passivity and corrosion behavior of a dual-phase Al0.3Cr0.5Fe2Mn0.25Mo0.15Ni1.5Ti0.3 CCA was characterized. Individual phases were isolated using both localized techniques on the dual-phase alloy and global techniques on single-phase CCAs of representative compositions. The following conclusions were drawn:
The passive film over a dual-phase alloy consisted of two distinct oxides with similar thicknesses. The primary passivators in the film formed over the FCC phase was Cr(III) while Ti(IV) and Al(III) were observed in the film formed over the L21 phase. Both phases exhibited independent abilities to passivate and form protective oxides in response to external potential in NaCl solution. Criteria for passivity were discussed in the context of alloy design.
The corrosion resistance of the dual-phase passive film was marked by corrosion attributes and properties weighted its two constituent phase passive films. Both phases are suggested to form stable and potentially metastable passive films in NaCl at a neutral pH, with each single-phase CCA exhibiting high impedance characteristics typical of passivated protective surfaces. Attributes of passivity low passive current density and critical current density were present for each single-phase and the dual-phase CCAs at similar magnitudes.
The dual-phase CCA breakdown potential was in between the breakdown potentials of the FCC and L21 single-phase CCAs for both the air-formed and cathodically pre-treated surfaces. The heterophase interface in the passive film of the dual-phase CCA was identified as a preferential pitting sites or weak link in corrosion protectiveness compared to the oxides formed over each phase.
Neither galvanic coupling nor dealloying corrosion was suggested to compromise the corrosion behavior of the alloy. Similar corrosion potentials may indicate a low driving force for microgalvanic coupling, potentially identifying a targetable attribute for corrosion resistance. However, the exact relationships between alloy composition, phase partitioning, and corrosion behavior require further evaluation.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the United States Office of Naval Research grants #N00014-23-1-2441 and #N00014-19-1-2420 under the directorship of David Shifler. Helga Heinrich operated the FIB and TEM. AES data was obtained from Surface Science Western (London, ON, Canada) by Jeffrey Henderson and Sridhar Ramamurthy. The University of Virginia Nanomaterials Characterization Facility provided FIB, SEM, TEM, XPS, and XRD facilities with additional technical assistance. The PHI VersaProbe III was procured under NSF award # 162601. Diego Ibarra Hoyos assisted with sample preparation. Alen Korjenic assisted with the ZRA setup and interpretation. Debashish Sur contributed to the electrochemical characterization. Author S.B. Inman is presently at Center for Intergrated Nanotechnologies, Sandia National Laboratories (Albuquerque, NM, USA). Author M.A. Wischhusen is presently at Y-12 National Security Complex (Oak Ridge, TN, USA).
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A dilute chloride electrolyte solution at a neutral pH was selected to ensure the stable formation of a passive film over large potential range that could be evaluated prior to breakdown. An overview of the corrosion behavior of the dual-phase alloy across a range of NaCl concentrations and pH may be found elsewhere.[12]
The Fe 2p1/2 and Mn 2p1/2 spectra were selected to avoid the overlap of Ni Auger peaks in the commonly used Fe 2p3/2 and Mn 2p3/2 region. A constant binding energy shift between the deconvoluted data in the 2p1/2 series and reference spectra in the 2p3/2 series was assumed.
Fe and Cr enrichment is determined by EDS mapping (not shown); however, the feature morphology is too small to obtain reliable quantitative compositions with point scans.
High levels of scatter within the Fe 2p1/2 spectra makes identification of spinel species difficult, particularly in the case of the film formed over the L21 phase. Thus, proposed species are mainly suggested on the basis of the Cr 2p3/2 series. Thus, despite uncertainty in fitting the Fe 2p1/2 spectra, the replacement of FeCr2O4 with NiCr2O4 is well supported by fitting of the Cr 2p3/2 and Ni 2p3/2 spectra.
1.
S. Gorsse, J.-P. Couzinié, and D.B. Miracle: C R Phys., 2018, vol. 19, pp. 721–36.CrossRef
2.
C. Varvenne, A. Luque, and W.A. Curtin: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 118, pp. 164–76.CrossRef
3.
B. Gludovatz, A. Hohenwarter, D. Catoor, E.H. Chang, E.P. George, and R.O. Ritchie: Science, 2014, vol. 345, pp. 1153–58.PubMedCrossRef
4.
M.-H. Tsai: Entropy, 2013, vol. 15, pp. 5338–45.CrossRef
5.
Y. Qiu, S. Thomas, M.A. Gibson, H.L. Fraser, and N. Birbilis: npj Mater. Degrad., 2017, vol. 1, p. 15.CrossRef
6.
Y. Shi, B. Yang, and P.K. Liaw: Metals, 2017, vol. 7, p. 43.CrossRef
7.
D.B. Miracle and O.N. Senkov: Acta Mater., 2017, vol. 122, pp. 448–511.CrossRef
8.
D.J.M. King, S.C. Middleburgh, A.G. McGregor, and M.B. Cortie: Acta Mater., 2016, vol. 104, pp. 172–79.CrossRef
9.
X. Yang and Y. Zhang: Mater. Chem. Phys., 2012, vol. 132, pp. 233–38.CrossRef
10.
R. Feng, C. Lee, M. Mathes, T.T. Zuo, S. Chen, J. Hawk, Y. Zhang, and P. Liaw: Entropy, 2016, vol. 18, p. 333.CrossRef
11.
B. Cantor, I.T.H. Chang, P. Knight, and A.J.B. Vincent: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, vol. 375–377, pp. 213–18.CrossRef
12.
S.B. Inman, D. Sur, J. Han, K. Ogle, and J.R. Scully: Corros. Sci., 2023, vol. 217, 111138.CrossRef
13.
S.B. Inman and J.R. Scully: Corrosion, 2024, vol. 80, p. 4451.CrossRef
14.
K. Wang, J. Han, A.Y. Gerard, J.R. Scully, and B.-C. Zhou: npj Mater. Degrad., 2020, vol. 4, p. 35.CrossRef
A.V. Ayyagari, B. Gwalani, S. Muskeri, S. Mukherjee, and R. Banerjee: npj Mater. Degrad., 2018, vol. 2, p. 33.CrossRef
42.
D.H. Xiao, P.F. Zhou, W.Q. Wu, H.Y. Diao, M.C. Gao, M. Song, and P.K. Liaw: Mater. Des., 2017, vol. 116, pp. 438–47.CrossRef
43.
K. Yamanaka, H. Shiratori, M. Mori, K. Omura, T. Fujieda, K. Kuwabara, and A. Chiba: npj Mater. Degrad., 2020, vol. 4, pp. 24–25.CrossRef
44.
Wu. Qi, W. Wang, X. Yang, G. Zhang, W. Ye, Su. Yitian, Y. Li, and S. Chen: J. Alloys Compd., 2022, vol. 925, 166751.CrossRef
45.
M. Långberg, C. Örnek, F. Zhang, J. Cheng, M. Liu, E. Grånäs, C. Wiemann, A. Gloskovskii, Y. Matveyev, S. Kulkarni, H. Noei, T.F. Keller, D. Lindell, U. Kivisäkk, E. Lundgren, A. Stierle, and J. Pan: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, vol. 166, p. C3336.CrossRef
46.
M. Långberg, F. Zhang, E. Grånäs, C. Örnek, J. Cheng, M. Liu, C. Wiemann, A. Gloskovskii, T.F. Keller, C. Schlueter, S. Kulkarni, H. Noei, D. Lindell, U. Kivisäkk, E. Lundgren, A. Stierle, and J. Pan: Corros. Sci., 2020, vol. 174, 108841.CrossRef
47.
M. Långberg, C. Örnek, J. Evertsson, G.S. Harlow, W. Linpé, L. Rullik, F. Carlà, R. Felici, E. Bettini, U. Kivisäkk, E. Lundgren, and J. Pan: npj Mater. Degrad., 2019, vol. 3, p. 22.CrossRef
48.
V. Vignal, H. Krawiec, O. Heintz, and D. Mainy: Corros. Sci., 2013, vol. 67, pp. 109–117.CrossRef
49.
E. Rahimi, A. Rafsanjani-Abbasi, A. Davoodi, and S. Hosseinpour: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2019, vol. 166, p. C609.CrossRef
50.
L.Q. Guo, M.C. Lin, L.J. Qiao, and A.A. Volinsky: Corros. Sci., 2014, vol. 78, p. 55.CrossRef
51.
K. Fushimi, K. Yanagisawa, T. Nakanishi, Y. Hasegawa, T. Kawano, and M. Kimura: Electrochim. Acta, 2013, vol. 114, pp. 83–87.CrossRef
52.
Neetu, P.K. Katiyar, S. Sangal, and K. Mondal: Corros. Sci., 2021, vol. 178, p. 109043.
53.
H.-Y. Ha, T.-H. Lee, C.-G. Lee, and H. Yoon: Corros. Sci., 2019, vol. 149, pp. 226–35.CrossRef
54.
W.-T. Tsai and J.-R. Chen: Corros. Sci., 2007, vol. 49, pp. 3659–68.CrossRef
55.
E. Gardin, S. Zanna, A. Seyeux, A. Allion-Maurer, and P. Marcus: Corros. Sci., 2018, vol. 143, pp. 403–413.CrossRef
56.
S. Choudhary, Y. Qiu, S. Thomas, and N. Birbilis: Electrochim. Acta, 2020, vol. 362, 137104.CrossRef
57.
D.C. Joy: Monte Carlo Modeling for Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis, Oxford University Press, Incorporated, New York, 1995.
58.
J. Baltrusaitis, B. Mendoza-Sanchez, V. Fernandez, R. Veenstra, N. Dukstiene, A. Roberts, and N. Fairley: Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, vol. 326, pp. 151–61.CrossRef
59.
M.C. Biesinger, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson, and R.C. Smart: Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, vol. 257, pp. 887–98.CrossRef
J.E. Castle and K. Asami: Surf. Interface Anal., 2004, vol. 36, pp. 220–24.CrossRef
62.
R. Feng, C. Zhang, M.C. Gao, Z. Pei, F. Zhang, Y. Chen, D. Ma, Ke. An, J.D. Poplawsky, L. Ouyang, Y. Ren, J.A. Hawk, M. Widom, and P.K. Liaw: Nat. Commun., 2021, vol. 12, p. 4329.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, I. Frateur, and M. Musiani: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, vol. 157, p. C452.CrossRef
64.
B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, I. Frateur, and M. Musiani: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, vol. 157, p. C458.CrossRef
65.
B. Hirschorn, M.E. Orazem, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, I. Frateur, and M. Musiani: Electrochim. Acta, 2010, vol. 55, pp. 6218–27.CrossRef
66.
K. Lutton, K. Gusieva, N. Ott, N. Birbilis, and J.R. Scully: Electrochem. Commun., 2017, vol. 80, pp. 44–47.CrossRef
67.
M. Pourbaix: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, 1974.
68.
F. Carrette, M.C. Lafont, L. Legras, L. Guinard, and B. Pieraggi: Mater. High Temp., 2003, vol. 20, pp. 581–91.CrossRef
69.
A.J. Davenport, L.J. Oblonsky, M.P. Ryan, and M.F. Toney: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, vol. 147, p. 2162.CrossRef
70.
O.M. Magnussen, J. Scherer, B.M. Ocko, and R.J. Behm: J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, vol. 104, pp. 1222–26.CrossRef
71.
P.F. King and H.H. Uhlig: J. Phys. Chem., 1959, vol. 63, pp. 2026–32.CrossRef
72.
H.H. Uhlig: Z. Elektrochem. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 1958, vol. 62, pp. 700–07.
73.
W.H. Blades, B.W.Y. Redemann, N. Smith, D. Sur, M.S. Barbieri, Y. Xie, S. Lech, E. Anber, M.L. Taheri, C. Wolverton, T.M. McQueen, J.R. Scully, and K. Sieradzki: Unpublished Research, 2024.
74.
J. Peng, F. Moszner, J. Rechmann, D. Vogel, M. Palm, and M. Rohwerder: Corros. Sci., 2019, vol. 149, pp. 123–32.CrossRef
75.
Q. Bai and K. Sieradzki: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2023, vol. 170, 021510.CrossRef
76.
H. Kim, N. Akao, N. Hara, and K. Sugimoto: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, vol. 145, p. 2818.CrossRef
77.
J.D. Cox, D.D. Wagman, and V.A. Medvedev: CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984.
78.
S.E. Ziemniak, L.M. Anovitz, R.A. Castelli, and W.D. Porter: J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2007, vol. 39, pp. 1474–92.CrossRef
79.
B.S. Hemingway: Am. Miner., 1990, vol. 75, pp. 781–90.
80.
E.B. Rudnyi, E.A. Kaibicheva, L.N. Sidorov, M.T. Varshavskii, and A.N. Men: J. Chem. Thermodyn., 1990, vol. 22, pp. 623–32.CrossRef
81.
K. Orson, E. Romanovskaia, A. Costine, J. Han, K. Ogle, J.R. Scully, and P. Reinke: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2024, vol. 171, 011505.CrossRef
82.
K. Lutton, J. Han, H.M. Ha, D. Sur, E. Romanovskaia, and J.R. Scully: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2023, vol. 170, 021507.CrossRef
83.
O. Durante, C. Di Giorgio, V. Granata, J. Neilson, R. Fittipaldi, A. Vecchione, G. Carapella, F. Chiadini, R. DeSalvo, F. Dinelli, V. Fiumara, V. Pierro, I.M. Pinto, M. Principe, and F. Bobba: Nanomaterials, 2021, vol. 11, p. 1409.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
84.
C.K. Dyer and J.S.L. Leach: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1978, vol. 125, p. 1032.CrossRef
85.
M.R. Kozlowski, P.S. Tyler, W.H. Smyrl, and R.T. Atanasoski: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1989, vol. 136, p. 442.CrossRef
86.
H. Vahidi, K. Syed, H. Guo, X. Wang, J.L. Wardini, J. Martinez, and W.J. Bowman: Crystals, 2021, vol. 11, p. 878.CrossRef
87.
D.D. Macdonald: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1992, vol. 139, p. 3434.CrossRef
88.
P. Gao, Z. Wang, Fu. Wangyang, Z. Liao, K. Liu, W. Wang, X. Bai, and E. Wang: Micron, 2010, vol. 41, pp. 301–05.PubMedCrossRef
89.
B. Roh and D.D. Macdonald: Russ. J. Electrochem., 2007, vol. 43, pp. 125–35.CrossRef
90.
S. Ishihara, E. Tochigi, R. Ishikawa, N. Shibata, and Y. Ikuhara: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2020, vol. 103, pp. 6659–65.CrossRef
91.
C. Ma, K. Chen, C. Liang, C.W. Nan, R. Ishikawa, K. More, and M. Chi: Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, vol. 7, p. 1638.CrossRef
92.
D. Sur, E.F. Holcombe, W.H. Blades, E.A. Anber, D.L. Foley, B.L. DeCost, J. Liu, J. Hattrick-Simpers, K. Sieradzki, H. Joress, J.R. Scully, and M.L. Taheri: High Entropy Alloys Mater., 2023, vol. 1, pp. 336–53.CrossRef
93.
R. Mueller, A. Rossoll, L. Weber, M.A.M. Bourke, D.C. Dunand, and A. Mortensen: Acta Mater., 2008, vol. 56, pp. 4402–416.CrossRef
94.
Y. Wang, J. Jin, M. Zhang, X. Wang, P. Gong, J. Zhang, and J. Liu: J. Alloys Compd., 2021, vol. 858, 157712.CrossRef
95.
P. Marcus, V. Maurice, and H.H. Strehblow: Corros. Sci., 2008, vol. 50, pp. 2698–2704.CrossRef
96.
K. Syed, Xu. Mingjie, K.K. Ohtaki, D. Kok, K.K. Karandikar, O.A. Graeve, W.J. Bowman, and M.L. Mecartney: Materialia, 2020, vol. 14, 100890.CrossRef
97.
G.J. Brug, A.L.G. van den Eeden, M. Sluyters-Rehbach, and J.H. Sluyters: J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 1984, vol. 176, pp. 275–95.CrossRef