nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Verifying Functionality: Maximizing Annual Operating Income (AOI)

verfasst von : Victor Tang, Kevin Otto, Warren Seering

Erschienen in: Executive Decision Synthesis

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This chapter is another verification simulation using the same ADI surrogate except for a different executive decision—to maximize annual operating income (AOI). This a decision to deal with internal operations. The goal is to demonstrate to the industry and its employees that the executive managers of the firm and competent and are able to run ADI. Best effort has been made to attach the data for the simulations as appendices and all the calculations are shown and illustrated.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Verifying Functionality: Maximizing Value of the Firm (MVF)

Nächstes Kapitel Verifying Efficacy: HiTEM Inc.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Simon (1997, 107).

AIAG. (2002). Measurement systems analysis (MSA). Reference Manual (3rd ed.). Troy: The Automotive Industries Action Group.

Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1999). Business market management: Teaching business market management. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems (Vol. 213). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bar-Yam, Y. (Ed.). (2000). Unifying themes in complex systems: Proceedings from the international conference on complex systems. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). Complexity of military conflict: Multiscale complex systems analysis of littoral warfare. Report for Contract F30602-02-C-0158 for the Chief of Naval Operations Strategic Studies Group, John Q. Dickmann and William G. Glenney.

Borsboom, D., & Markus, K. A. (2013). Truth and evidence in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 110–114.CrossRef

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061.CrossRef

Brealey, R. A., & Myers, S. C. (2006). Principles of corporate finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.CrossRef

Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.

Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations. Fort Worth, TX: Wadsworth.

Johnson, R. B. (1997). Examining the validity structure of qualitative research. Education, 118(2), 282.

Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.CrossRef

Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1970). Truth to power. New York: Praeger.

Otto, K. N., & Wood, C. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1999). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer.

Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality engineering using robust design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Simon, H. A. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N. P., & Kofman, F. (1997). Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Science, 13(4), 503–521.CrossRef

Thompson, J. D. (2004). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

van der Heijden, K. (2000). Scenarios and forecasting: Two perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(3), l–36.

Wu, C. F. J., & Hamada, M. (2000). Planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. New York: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

Wu, Y., & Wu, A. (2000). Robust design. New York: ASME Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Titel: Verifying Functionality: Maximizing Annual Operating Income (AOI)
verfasst von: Victor Tang
Kevin Otto
Warren Seering
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Executive Decision Synthesis
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63024-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-63026-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63026-7_6