Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 3/2015

01.04.2015

Videocent: a quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery in opportunistic networks

verfasst von: Honghai Wu, Huadong Ma, Dong Zhao

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In recent years, more and more people begin to focus on data delivery through opportunistic contacts among mobile users. In most cases, the data that we expect to share with others are videos, such as popular music videos and funny films. Because the video delivery will consume numerous resources of devices, few people will provide such service for others without any benefit. Thus, this paper centers on the incentive mechanism design for video delivery in opportunistic networks. Although several incentive schemes for such kind of networks have been proposed, however, they all mainly focus on the encouragement of general data forwarding, and almost none of them aims to stimulate nodes to realize the performance objective of networks. In this paper, we propose Videocent, a novel quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery, which takes the characteristics of video data into account and formulates the video delivery among nodes as a game. This mechanism could not only encourage nodes to participate in the video delivery but also stimulate them to follow the defined rules to optimize the video delivery quality of whole networks. Its performance is validated through extensive simulations.
Vorheriger Artikel Upper bounds for the min–max and min–sum cost online problems in wireless ad hoc networks
Nächster Artikel An optimization algorithm for the minimum k-connected m-dominating set problem in wireless sensor networks

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Fußnoten
1
This set of data is selected from our simulation results based on synthetic mobility trace (TTL equals to 300s). DSVM and Drop head are two buffer management policies, and the difference between them is that the former can optimize the buffer management according to the characteristics of video data and the latter has no such function.
 
2
The meaning of “seen” is that a node received a replica of this packet at one time regardless of whether it still has this replica or has already removed it from its buffer.
 
Literatur
1.
Liu, Y., Xiong, N., Zhao, Y., Vasilakos, A. V., Gao, J., & Jia, Y. (2010). Multi-layer clustering routing algorithm for wireless vehicular sensor networks. IET Communications, 4(7), 810–816.CrossRef
2.
Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Song, K., Jing, W., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Distributed media services in P2P-based vehicular networks. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, 60(2), 692–703.CrossRef
3.
Shen, Z., Luo, J., Zimmermann, R., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Peer-to-peer media streaming: Insights and new developments. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(12), 2089–2109.
4.
Spyropoulos, T., Rais, R. N. B., Turletti, T., Obraczka, K., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2010). Routing for disruption tolerant networks: Taxonomy and design. Wireless Networks, 16(8), 2349–2370.
5.
Zeng, Yuanyuan, Xiang, Kai, Li, Deshi, & Vasilakos, Athanasios V. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.
6.
Chaintreau, A., Hui, P., Crowcroft, J., Diot, C., Gass, R., & Scott, J. (2007). Impact of human mobility on opportunistic forwarding algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(6), 606–620.CrossRef
7.
Motani, M., Srinivasan, V., & Nuggehalli, P. S. (2005). Peoplenet: Engineering a wireless virtual social network. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2005.
8.
Balasubramanian, A., Levine, B., & Venkataramani, A. (2007). DTN routing as a resource allocation problem. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(4), 373–384.CrossRef
9.
Burgess, J., Gallagher, B., Jensen, D. & Levine, B. N. (2006). Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2006.
10.
Wang, Y., Nakao, A., Vasilakos, A. V., & Ma, J. (2011). P2P soft security: On evolutionary dynamics of P2P incentive mechanism. Computer Communications, 34(3), 241–249.CrossRef
11.
Jaramillo,J. J., & Srikant, R. (2007). DARWIN: Distributed and adaptive reputation mechanism for wireless ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2007.
12.
Marti, S., Giuli, T. J., Lai, K., Baker, M., et al. (2000). Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2000.
13.
Milan, F., Jaramillo, J. J., & Srikant, R. (2006). Achieving cooperation in multihop wireless networks of selfish nodes. In Proceedings of ACM workshop on GameNets 2006.
14.
Qiu, L., Yang, Y. R., Zhang, Y., & Shenker, S. (2003). On selfish routing in internet-like environments. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2003.
15.
Srinivasan, V., Nuggehalli, P., Chiasserini, C.-F., & Rao, R. R. (2003). Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2003.
16.
Chen, B. B., & Chan, M. C. (2010). Mobicent: A credit-based incentive system for disruption tolerant network. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010.
17.
Shevade, U.,Song, H. H., Qiu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Incentive-aware routing in DTNs. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP 2008.
18.
Rongxing, L., Lin, X., Zhu, H., Shen, X., & Preiss, B. (2010). Pi: A practical incentive protocol for delay tolerant networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(4), 1483–1493.CrossRef
19.
Zhu, H., Lin, X., Rongxing, L., Fan, Y., & Shen, X. (2009). Smart: A secure multilayer credit-based incentive scheme for delay-tolerant networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(8), 4628–4639.CrossRef
20.
Richardson, I. E. (2004). H. 264 and MPEG-4 video compression: Video coding for next-generation multimedia. Wiley.com.
21.
Buchegger, S., & Le Boudec, J.-Y. (2002). Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2002.
22.
Balakrishnan, K., Deng, J., & Varshney, V. K. (2005). TWOACK: Preventing selfishness in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 2005.
23.
Buttyán, L., & Hubaux, J.-P. (2000). Enforcing service availability in mobile ad-hoc WANs. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2000.
24.
Zhang, Y., Lou, W., Liu, W., & Fang, Y. (2007). A secure incentive protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 13(5), 569–582.CrossRef
25.
Chen, K., & Nahrstedt, K. (2004). iPass: An incentive compatible auction scheme to enable packet forwarding service in MANET. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDCS 2004.
26.
Mahmoud, M. E., & Shen, X. (2010). Stimulating cooperation in multi-hop wireless networks using cheating detection system. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010.
27.
Zhong, S., Li, L. E., Liu, Y. G., & Yang, Y. R. (2007). On designing incentive-compatible routing and forwarding protocols in wireless ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 13(6), 799–816.
28.
Xie, X., Chen, H., & Hongyi, W. (2009). Bargain-based stimulation mechanism for selfish mobile nodes in participatory sensing network. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2009.
29.
Mei, A., & Stefa, J. (2012). Give2get: Forwarding in social mobile wireless networks of selfish individuals. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(4), 569–582.CrossRef
30.
Ning, T., Yang, Z., Xie, X., & Hongyi, W. (2011). Incentive-aware data dissemination in delay-tolerant mobile networks. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2011.
31.
Chen, K., & Shen, H. (2013). Multicent: A multifunctional incentive scheme adaptive to diverse performance objectives for DTN routing. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2013.
32.
Wu, H., & Ma, H. (2013). DSVM: A buffer management strategy for video transmission in opportunistic networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2013.
33.
Gao, W., Li, Q., Zhao, B., & Cao, G. (2009). Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: A social network perspective. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2009.
34.
Conan, V., Leguay, J., & Friedman, T. (2007). Characterizing pairwise inter-contact patterns in delay tolerant networks. In Proceedings of ACM Autonomics 2007.
35.
Ziviani, A., Wolfinger, B. E., De Rezende, J. F., & Duarte, O. C. M., & Fdida, S. (2005). Joint adoption of QoS schemes for MPEG streams. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 26(1), 59–80.
36.
Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (2005). Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
37.
38.
Metadaten
Titel
Videocent: a quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery in opportunistic networks
verfasst von
Honghai Wu
Huadong Ma
Dong Zhao
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0813-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Wireless Networks 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Throughput-fairness optimization in energy-limited user-relay wireless networks

OriginalPaper

Sleeping mobile AP: a novel energy efficient Wifi tethering scheme

OriginalPaper

Performance analysis of V2V dynamic anchor position-based routing protocols

OriginalPaper

Network-layer abstraction and simulation of vehicle communication stack

OriginalPaper

Integrated mobility and resource management for cross-network resource sharing in heterogeneous wireless networks using traffic offload policies

OriginalPaper

Adaptive message forwarding for avoiding broadcast storm and guaranteeing delay in active safe driving VANET

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise