Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
In the past several years, the Chinese government has been pursuing “green” economic growth. This is an issue of policy making because undesirable outputs (e.g., pollution) are unavoidable during the production process. The existence of undesirable outputs complicates the analysis of firms’ behavior. This paper adopts Kuosmanen’s (2005) production frontier to study whether the government’s policy objective has been realized in the past decade. Incorporating both desirable and undesirable outputs in the study of 294 cities from 2003 to 2014 in China, the “true” picture of the productive performance of these cities is uncovered. First, the manufacturing sector was highly environmental inefficient in 2003. It became more environmentally friendly over time but was stagnant after 2010. In contrast, the sector was also very technically inefficient in the production of desirable goods but was improving over the whole studied period. Second, the gap between environmentally friendly and unfriendly cities, in desirable and undesirable goods, has been narrowing over time. Third, eastern provinces were more environmentally friendly and western provinces were lagging behind during 2003–2014. The western provinces were outperformed by other provinces over time. In conclusion, although the Chinese government has done much to improve environmental protection, our results show that more has to be done.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Ball, V.E., R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, and R. Nehring. 2001. Productivity of the U.S. Agricultural Sector: The Case of Undesirable Outputs. In Hulten, Charles; Dean, Edwin R.; Harper, Michael J. Eds., New Developments in Productivity Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago, 541–586.
Dyckhoff, H., and K. Allen, 2001. Measuring Environmental Efficiency with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research 132: 312–325.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, C.A.K. Lovell, and C. Pasurka. 1989. Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 71: 90–98.
Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and D. Tyteca. 1996. An Activity Analysis Model of the Environmental Performance of Firms - Application to Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utilities. Ecological Economics 18: 161–175.
Frantz, R.S. 1988. X-Efficiency: Theory, Evidence and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hailu, A., and T.S. Veeman. 2001. Non-Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 805–816.
Harbaugh, W.T., A. Levinson, and D.M. Wilson. 2002. Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kutznets Curve. Review of Economics and Statistics 84:541–551.
Hua, Z., Y. Bian, and L. Liang. 2007. Eco-efficiency Analysis of Paper Mills Along the HuaiRiver: an Extended DEA Approach. Omega 35: 578–587.
Jefferson, G.H., T.G. Rawski, and Y. Zheng. 1996. Chinese Industrial Productivity: Trends, Measurement Issues and Recent Developments. Journal of Comparative Economics, 23: 146–180.
Jefferson, G.H., A.G.Z. Hu, X. Guan, and X. Yu. 2003. Ownership, Performance, and Innovation in China’s Large- and Medium-size Industrial Enterprise Sector. China Economic Review 14: 89–113.
Kuosmanen, T. 2005. Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 1077–1082.
Lam, P., and A. Shiu. 2001. A Data Envelopment Analysis of the Efficiency of China’s Thermal Power Generation. Utilities Policy 10: 75–83.
Li, M., and L. Zhang. 2014. Haze in China: Current and future challenges. Environmental Pollution, 189: 85–86.
Liu, W., and J. Sharp. 1999. DEA Models via Goal Programming. In Westermann, G. (Ed.),Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Deutscher Universititätsverlag, Wiesbaden. 79–101.
Malikov, E., S.C. Kumbhakar, and E.G. Tsionas. 2015. “Bayesian Approach to Disentangling Technical and Environmental Productivity.” Econometrics 3: 443–465.
National Development and Reform Commission. 2016. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing, China: Central Compilation & Translation Press. (Translated by Compilation and Translation Bureau, Central Committee of the Communist Party of China).
Park, Y.S., S.H. Lim, G. Egilmez, and J. Szmerekovsky. 2016. Environmental Efficiency Assessment of US Transport Sector: A Slack-based Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.09.009.
Pittman, R.W. 1983. “Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs.” Economic Journal 93: 883–891.
Tyteca, D. 1997. Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environment Performance of Firms - Concepts and Empirical Results. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8: 183–197.
Wu, J., L. Lv, J. Sun, and X. Ji. 2015. A Comprehensive Analysis of China’s Regional Energy Saving and Emission Reduction Efficiency: From Production and Treatment Perspectives. Energy Policy 84: 66–176.
Wu, Y. 2000. Is China’s Economic Growth Sustanable? A Productivity Analysis. China Economic Review 11: 278–296.
Yaisawarng, S., and J.D. Klein. 1994. The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the US Electric Power Industry. Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 447–460.
Zheng, J., S. Liu, and A. Bigsten. 1998. Ownership Structure and Determinants of Technical Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Chinese Enterprises (1986–90). Journal of Comparative Economics 26: 465–484.
Zheng, J., X. Liu, and A. Bigsten. 2003. Efficiency, Technical Progress, and Best Practice in Chinese State Enterprises (1980–1994). Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 134–152.
Zhao, B., S. Wang, X. Dong, J. Wang, L. Duan, X. Fu, J. Hao, and J. Fu. 2013. Environmental Effects of the Recent Emission Changes in China: Implications for Particulate Matter Pollution and Soil Acidification. Environmental Research Letters 8: 024031.
- Was Economic Growth in China Environmentally Friendly? A Case Study of the Chinese Manufacturing Sector
Sung Ko Li
- Springer Singapore
- Chapter 9
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia