Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Water Resources Management 8/2019

27.05.2019

Water Resources Allocation in Transboundary River Basins Based on a Game Model Considering Inflow Forecasting Errors

verfasst von: Jisi Fu, Ping-an Zhong, Juan Chen, Bin Xu, Feilin Zhu, Yu Zhang

Erschienen in: Water Resources Management | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Dynamic transboundary water resources allocation based on inflow prediction results is an important task for water resources management in river basins. This paper takes the watershed management agency as the leader and the associated area as the follower, and proposes a two-level asymmetric Nash-Harsanyi Leader-Follower game model considering inflow forecasting errors. In the proposed model, the Monte Carlo method is used to analyze the uncertainty of various stakeholder allocation results and the response regularity to the total water resource uncertainty. The quantitative relationship between the allocation results of stakeholders and the mean and standard deviation of total water resource uncertainty is subsequently established. The Huaihe River basin in China is selected as a case study. The results show the following: (1) the water allocated to the watershed management agency and three provinces has a normal distribution when the inflow forecasting error obeys the normal distribution; (2) the sum of the mean of the water allocated to stakeholders equals the mean of the forecast water resource and the sum of the standard deviations of the water allocated to stakeholders equals the standard deviation of the forecast water resource; (3) the mean and standard deviation of the allocation results have a good linear relationship with the mean and standard deviation of forecast water resource; (4) the distribution parameters of the stakeholder allocation results can be directly derived from the distribution parameters of the forecast information, thus aiding the stakeholders in making decisions and improving the practical value of the method.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bogardi I, Szidarovsky F (1976) Application of game theory in water management. Appl Math Model 1(1):16–20CrossRef Bogardi I, Szidarovsky F (1976) Application of game theory in water management. Appl Math Model 1(1):16–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Casella G, Robert CP, Wells MT (2004) Generalized accept-reject sampling schemes. In: DasGupta A (ed) A Festschrift for Herman Rubin, vol Volume 45. Lecture Notes--Monograph Series. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, Ohio, USA, p 342–347. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/lnms/1196285403 Casella G, Robert CP, Wells MT (2004) Generalized accept-reject sampling schemes. In: DasGupta A (ed) A Festschrift for Herman Rubin, vol Volume 45. Lecture Notes--Monograph Series. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, Ohio, USA, p 342–347. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1214/​lnms/​1196285403
Zurück zum Zitat Curiel IJ, Maschler M, Tijs SH (1987) Bankruptcy games. Z Oper Res 31:A 143–A 159 Curiel IJ, Maschler M, Tijs SH (1987) Bankruptcy games. Z Oper Res 31:A 143–A 159
Zurück zum Zitat Dai T, Labadie JW (2001) River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(5):295–305CrossRef Dai T, Labadie JW (2001) River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(5):295–305CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Degefu DM, He W, Yuan L, Zhao JH (2016) Water allocation in transboundary river basins under water scarcity: a cooperative bargaining approach. Water Resour Manag 30(12):4451–4466CrossRef Degefu DM, He W, Yuan L, Zhao JH (2016) Water allocation in transboundary river basins under water scarcity: a cooperative bargaining approach. Water Resour Manag 30(12):4451–4466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diao YF, Wang BD, Ji L (2007) Study on distribution of flood forecasting errors by the method based on maximum entropy. J Hydraul Eng 38:591–595 (in Chinese) Diao YF, Wang BD, Ji L (2007) Study on distribution of flood forecasting errors by the method based on maximum entropy. J Hydraul Eng 38:591–595 (in Chinese)
Zurück zum Zitat Fu J, Zhong PA, Zhu F, Chen J, Wu YN, Xu B (2018) Water resources allocation in transboundary river based on asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model. Water 10(3):270CrossRef Fu J, Zhong PA, Zhu F, Chen J, Wu YN, Xu B (2018) Water resources allocation in transboundary river based on asymmetric Nash–Harsanyi Leader–Follower game model. Water 10(3):270CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson JL, Lord WB (1995) A gaming evaluation of Colorado river drought management institutional options. J Am Water Resour Assoc 31(5):907–924CrossRef Henderson JL, Lord WB (1995) A gaming evaluation of Colorado river drought management institutional options. J Am Water Resour Assoc 31(5):907–924CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kucukmehmetoglu M (2012) An integrative case study approach between game theory and Pareto frontier concepts for the transboundary water resources allocations. J Hydrol 450-451:308–319CrossRef Kucukmehmetoglu M (2012) An integrative case study approach between game theory and Pareto frontier concepts for the transboundary water resources allocations. J Hydrol 450-451:308–319CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann JM (2004) International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the Euphrates and the Tigris. Environ Plan A 36(5):783–801CrossRef Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann JM (2004) International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the Euphrates and the Tigris. Environ Plan A 36(5):783–801CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu XM, Huang GH, Wang S, Fan YR (2016) Water resources management under uncertainty: factorial multi-stage stochastic program with chance constraints. Stoch Env Res Risk A 30(3):945–957CrossRef Liu XM, Huang GH, Wang S, Fan YR (2016) Water resources management under uncertainty: factorial multi-stage stochastic program with chance constraints. Stoch Env Res Risk A 30(3):945–957CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Loáiciga HA (2004) Analytic game—theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. J Hydrol 297:22–33CrossRef Loáiciga HA (2004) Analytic game—theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. J Hydrol 297:22–33CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238CrossRef Madani K (2010) Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol 381:225–238CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ren CF, Li RH, Zhang LD, Guo P (2016) Multiobjective stochastic fractional goal programming model for water resources optimal allocation among industries. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(10):04016036CrossRef Ren CF, Li RH, Zhang LD, Guo P (2016) Multiobjective stochastic fractional goal programming model for water resources optimal allocation among industries. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(10):04016036CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers P (1969) A game theory approach to the problems of International River basins. Water Resour Res 5(4):749–760CrossRef Rogers P (1969) A game theory approach to the problems of International River basins. Water Resour Res 5(4):749–760CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Safari N, Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2014) Nash bargaining and leader–follower models in water allocation: application to the Zarrinehrud River basin, Iran. Appl Math Model 38:1959–1968CrossRef Safari N, Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2014) Nash bargaining and leader–follower models in water allocation: application to the Zarrinehrud River basin, Iran. Appl Math Model 38:1959–1968CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stefano LD, Wolf AT (2012) Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. J Peace Res 49(1):193–209CrossRef Stefano LD, Wolf AT (2012) Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. J Peace Res 49(1):193–209CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Res Forum 23(1):3–30CrossRef Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Res Forum 23(1):3–30CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu B, Zhong PA, Huang Q, Wang J, Yu Z, Zhang J (2017) Optimal hedging rules for water supply reservoir operations under forecast uncertainty and conditional value-at-risk criterion. Water 9(8):568CrossRef Xu B, Zhong PA, Huang Q, Wang J, Yu Z, Zhang J (2017) Optimal hedging rules for water supply reservoir operations under forecast uncertainty and conditional value-at-risk criterion. Water 9(8):568CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operations models: a state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818CrossRef Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operations models: a state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yu Z, Barron EJ, Yarnal B, Lakhtakia MN, White RA, Pollard D, Miller DA (2002) Evaluation of basin-scale hydrologic response to a multi-storm simulation. J Hydrol 257:212–225CrossRef Yu Z, Barron EJ, Yarnal B, Lakhtakia MN, White RA, Pollard D, Miller DA (2002) Evaluation of basin-scale hydrologic response to a multi-storm simulation. J Hydrol 257:212–225CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Water Resources Allocation in Transboundary River Basins Based on a Game Model Considering Inflow Forecasting Errors
verfasst von
Jisi Fu
Ping-an Zhong
Juan Chen
Bin Xu
Feilin Zhu
Yu Zhang
Publikationsdatum
27.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Water Resources Management / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02259-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Water Resources Management 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe