Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Are Instant Messages Speech? Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2010 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Web Search Studies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Web Search Engines

verfasst von : Michael Zimmer

Erschienen in: International Handbook of Internet Research

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Perhaps the most significant tool of our internet age is the web search engine, providing a powerful interface for accessing the vast amount of information available on the world wide web and beyond. While still in its infancy compared to the knowledge tools that precede it – such as the dictionary or encyclopedia – the impact of web search engines on society and culture has already received considerable attention from a variety of academic disciplines and perspectives. This article aims to organize a meta-discipline of “web search studies,” centered around a nucleus of major research on web search engines from five key perspectives: technical foundations and evaluations; transaction log analyses; user studies; political, ethical, and cultural critiques; and legal and policy analyses.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel The Possibilities of Network Sociality
Fußnoten
1
According to the Pew internet & American Life Project, 84% of American adult internet users have used a search engine to seek information online (Fallows, 2005: 1), making searching the web the second most popular online activity (behind using e-mail) (Rainie, 2005). In August 2007, over 750 million people worldwide over the age of 15 conducted a search, totaling more than 61 billion searches (Burns, 2007).
 
2
The first full-text web search engine was WebCrawler, launched in 1994 (InfoSpace, 2007), making search engines relative “teenagers” compared to other tools and technologies for organizing and retrieving information. Encyclopedias, for example, date back to the first century AD.
 
3
These categories are not necessarily mutually exclusive and are not put forth as airtight ontological divisions. They are meant simply to help organize this interdisciplinary collection of studies to aid discussion.
 
4
Critical responses to PageRank, and Google overall, will be discussed below.
 
5
For a comparison of web search engine ranking algorithms, see Borodin, Roberts, Rosenthal, and Tsaparas (2001).
 
6
For a summary of literature on search engine design, see Arasu, Cho, Garcia-Molina, Paepcke, and Raghavan (2001).
 
7
A library of research on information retrieval systems can be found at the website for the ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval: http://​www.​sigir.​org/​proceedings/​Proc-Browse.​html.
 
8
These concerns relate to some of the cultural and social issues that will be discussed in more detail below.
 
9
See “Regulating Search?: A Symposium on Search Engines, Law, and Public Policy” (http://​isp.​law.​yale.​edu/​regulatingsearch​/​overview/​).
 
Literatur
Albrechtslund, A. (2006). Surveillance in searching. Paper presented at the EASST 2006, Lausanne.
Arasu, A., Cho, J., Garcia-Molina, H., Paepcke, A., & Raghavan, S. (2001). Searching the Web. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 1(1), 2–43.CrossRef
Bar-Ilan, J., Mat-Hassan, M., & Levene, M. (2006). Methods for comparing rankings of search engine results. Computer Networks, 50(10), 1448–1463.MATHCrossRef
Borodin, A., Roberts, G. O., Rosenthal, J. S., & Tsaparas, P. (2001). Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the world wide Web. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on world wide web. Hong Kong (pp. 415–429).
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. WWW7/Computer Networks, 30(1–7), 107–117.
Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., et al. (2000). Graph structure in the Web. Computer Networks, 33(1–6), 309–320.CrossRef
Chandler, J. (2008). A right to reach an audience: An approach to intermediary bias on the internet. Hofstra Law Review, 35(3), 1095–1138.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (1998). A behavioral model of information seeking on the Web: Preliminary results of a study of how managers and IT specialists use the Web. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 290–302.
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2), 2000.
Chopra, S., & White, L. (2007). Privacy and artificial agents, or, is google reading my email? Paper presented at the IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dennis, S., Bruza, P., & McArthur, R. (2002). Web searching: A process-oriented experimental study of three interactive search paradigms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 120–133.CrossRef
Diaz, A. (2008). Through the Google goggles: Sociopolitical bias in search engine design. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 11–34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Eichmann, D. (1994). The rbse spider – balancing effective search against Web load. Proceedings of the 1st international world wide web conference. Geneva (pp. 113–120).
Elkin-Koren, N. (2001). Let the crawlers crawl: On virtual gatekeepers and the right to exclude indexing. University of Dayton Law Review, 26, 180–209.
Fitzgerald, B., O’Brien, D., & Fitzgerald, A. (2008). Search engine liability for copyright infringement. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 103–120). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Gasser, U. (2006). Regulating search engines: Taking stock and looking ahead. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 9, 124–157.
Goldman, E. (2006).Search engine bias and the demise of search engine utopianism. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 8, 188–200.
Grimmelmann, J. (2007). The structure of search engine law. Iowa Law Review, 93(1), 1–63.
Gulli, A., & Signorini, A. (2005). The indexableWeb is more than 11.5 billion pages. International World Wide Web Conference. Chiba: ACM Press (pp. 902–903).CrossRef
Hansell, S. (2006). AOL removes search data on vast group of Web users. The New York Times, C4.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s Web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1239–1244.CrossRef
Hargittai, E. (2004a). Informed Web surfing: The social context of user sophistication. In Society Online: the Internet in Context (pp. 257–274). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Heintz, C. (2006). Web search engines and distributed assessment systems. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 387–409.CrossRefMathSciNet
Hellsten, I., Leydesdorff, L., &Wouters, P. (2006). Multiple presents: How search engines re-write the past. New Media & Society, 8(6), 901–924.CrossRef
Hendry, D., & Efthimiadis, E. (2008). Conceptual models for search engines. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 277–307). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004). Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22(1), 5–53.CrossRef
Heydon, A., & Najork, M. (1999). Mercator: A scalable, extensible Web crawler. world wide web, 2(4), 219–229.CrossRef
Hindman, M., Tsioutsiouliklis, K., & Johnson, J. A. (2003). Googlearchy: How a few heavilylinked sites dominate politics on the Web. Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
Hinman, L. (2005). Esse est indicato in Google: Ethical and political issues in search engines. International Review of Information Ethics, 3, 19–25.
Höelscher, C. (1998). How internet experts search for information on the Web. World conference of the world wide web, Internet, and Intranet. Orlando, FL.
Höelscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000).Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 33(1–6), 337–346.CrossRef
Introna, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping theWeb:Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169–185.CrossRef
Jansen, B. J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 235–246.CrossRef
Jansen, B. J., & Spink, A. (2005). How are we searching the world wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248–263.CrossRef
Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on theWeb. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207–227.CrossRef
Keenoy, K., & Levene, M. (2005). Personalisation of Web search. In Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization (pp. 201–228). Berlin: Springer.
Kleinberg, J., & Lawrence, S. (2001). The structure of the Web. Science, 294, 1849–1850.CrossRef
Kleinberg, J. M., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., & Tomkins, A. (1999). The Web as a graph: Measurements, models and methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Combinatorics and Computing, 6(1), 1–18.MathSciNet
Kopytoff, V. (2006). Google says no to data demand. San Francisco Chronicle, A1.
Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (1998). Searching the world wide Web. Science, 280(5360), 98–100.CrossRef
Lawrence, S., & Giles, L. (2000). Accessibility of information on the Web. Intelligence, 11(1), 32–39.CrossRef
Lempel, R., & Moran, S. (2000). The stochastic approach for link-structure analysis (salsa) and the tkc effect. Computer Networks, 33(1–6), 387–401.CrossRef
Lev-On, A. (2008). The democratizing effects of search engine use: On chance exposures and organizational hubs. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 135–149). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Lewandowski, D., Wahlig, H., & Meyer-Bautor, G. (2006). The freshness of Web search engine databases. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 131.CrossRef
Machill, M., Neuberger, C., Schweiger,W., &Wirth,W. (2004). Navigating the internet. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 321–347.CrossRef
Martey, R. M. (2008). Exploring gendered notions: Gender, job hunting and Web search engines. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 51–65). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
McBryan, O. A. (1994). Genvl and wwww: Tools for taming the Web. Proceedings of the 1st International world wide web conference. Geneva pp. 79–90).
Menczer, F., Fortunato, S., Flammini, A., & Vespignani, A. (2006). Googlearchy or googlocracy? IEEE Spectrum, 43(2). http://​www. spectrum.ieee.org/feb06/2787.
Nagenborg, M. (2005). The ethics of search engines (special issue). International Review of Information Ethics, 3.
O’Brien, D., & Fitzgerald, B. (2006). Digital copyright law in a YouTube world. Internet Law Bulletin, 9(6/7), 71, 73–74.
Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Joachims, T., Lorigo, L., Gay, G., & Granka, L. (2004). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823.CrossRef
Pinkerton, B. (1994). Finding what people want: Experiences with the webcrawler. Proceedings of the 2nd International world wide web conference. Elsevier Science
Raghavan, S., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2001). Crawling the hidden Web. Proceedings of the 27th International conference on very large data bases. Rome (pp. 129–138).
Rieder, B. (2005). Networked control: Search engines and the symmetry of confidence. International Review of Information Ethics, 3, 26–32.
Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. C. (2003). Gender differences in patterns of searching the Web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 335–348.CrossRef
Sanderson, M. (2005). Information retrieval system evaluation: Effort, sensitivity, and reliability. Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. Salvador (pp. 162–169).
Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M. R., Marais, H., & Moricz, M. (1999). Analysis of a very large Web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum, 33(1), 6–12.CrossRef
Spink, A., & Jansen, B. J. (2004). Web search: Public searching of the web. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Spink, A., Jansen, B. J., Blakely, C., & Koshman, S. (2006). A study of results overlap and uniqueness among major Web search engines. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 1379–1391.CrossRef
Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (2000). A comparison of document clustering techniques. KDD Workshop on Text Mining, 34, 35.
Tavani, H. T. (2005). Search engines, personal information and the problem of privacy in public. International Review of Information Ethics, 3, 39–45.
Teevan, J., Dumais, S. T., & Horvitz, E. (2005). Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities. Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM Press (pp. 449–456).
Travis, H. (2006). Google Book search and fair use. University of Miami Law Review, 61, 601–681.
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2007). The googlization of everything and the future of copyright. University of California Davis Law Review, 40(3), 1207–1231.
Van Couvering, E. (2004). New media? The political economy of internet search engines. Annual conference of the International Association of Media & Communications Researchers. Porto Alegre, Brazil (pp. 7–14).
Van Couvering, E. (2008). The history of the internet search engine: Navigational media and the traffic commodity. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 77–206). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Vaughan, L. (2004). New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal, 40(4), 677–691.MATHCrossRef
Welp, C., & Machill, M. (2005). Code of conduct: Transparency in the net: Search engines. International Review of Information Ethics, 3, 18.
Wirth, W., Böcking, T., Karnowski, V., & von Pape, T. (2007). Heuristic and systematic use of search engines. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 778–800.CrossRef
Zimmer, M. (2008a). Privacy on planet Google: Using the theory of “contextual integrity” to clarify the privacy threats of Google’s quest for the perfect search engine. Journal of Business & Technology Law, 3(1), 109–126.
Zimmer, M. (2008b). The gaze of the perfect search engine: Google as an infrastructure of dataveillance. In A. Spink & M. Zimmer (Eds.), Web searching: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 77–99). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Metadaten
Titel
Web Search Studies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Web Search Engines
verfasst von
Michael Zimmer
Copyright-Jahr
2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
International Handbook of Internet Research

Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9788-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4020-9789-8

Copyright-Jahr: 2010

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_31