Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9460-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Recent work in the study of legislative politics has uncovered associations between the Big Five personality traits and myriad phenomena in the United States Congress. This literature raises new questions about political representation in terms of the Big Five, specifically, whether voters are more likely to support legislators with similar personality traits to their own, who would presumably have similar process preferences, or legislators with valence personality traits, regardless of congruence, which are associated with better leadership. We first revisit the measurement validity of voter assessments of legislator personality in the 2014 and 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Studies to demonstrate that such survey items are meaningful. Subsequently, we use these data to construct measures of personality congruence and valence and apply them to predict voters’ job approval of legislators. Our results support the claim that voters evaluate legislators’ job performance on the basis of perceived valence traits rather than legislators’ congruence to voters’ own personality dispositions.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 594 KB)11109_2018_9460_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2000). In the web of politics: Three decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Aldrich, J. H., & McKelvey, R. D. (1977). A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review, 71(1), 111–130. CrossRef
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M., Jr., & Stewart, C., III. (2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 136–159. CrossRef
Bafumi, J., & Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in congress. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 519–542. CrossRef
Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972–1059. CrossRef
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 546–553. CrossRef
Brady, D. W., Han, H., & Pope, J. C. (2007). Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(1), 79–105. CrossRef
Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D. W., & Cogan, J. F. (2002). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and house members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 127–140. CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20(1), 175–197. CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C., & Chris Fraley, R. (2007). When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference. Political Psychology, 28(5), 609–632. CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59(7), 581–594. CrossRef
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Clarke, K. A. (2001). Testing nonnested models of international relations: Reevaluating realism. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 724–744. CrossRef
Clarke, K. A. (2007). A simple distribution-free test for nonnested model selection. Political Analysis, 15(3), 347–363. CrossRef
Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. CrossRef
Dietrich, B. J., Lasley, S., Mondak, J. J., Remmel, M. L., & Turner, J. (2012). Personality and legislative politics: The Big Five trait dimensions among U.S. state legislators. Political Psychology, 33(2), 195–210. CrossRef
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. CrossRef
Egan, P. J. (2014). “Do something” politics and double-peaked policy preferences. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 333–349. CrossRef
Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., & Bradshaw, K. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 900–905. CrossRef
Enelow, J. M., & Hinich, M. J. (1982). Nonspatial candidate characteristics and electoral competition. Journal of Politics, 44(1), 115–130. CrossRef
Fenno, R. F., Jr. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little Brown.
Fraley, R. C., & Roberts, B. W. (2005). Patterns of continuity: A dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. Psychological Review, 112(1), 60–74. CrossRef
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 149–158. CrossRef
Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 656–672. CrossRef
Funk, C. L. (1996). The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits. Political Behavior, 18(1), 1–24. CrossRef
Funk, C. L. (1997). Implications of political expertise in candidate trait evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50(3), 675–697. CrossRef
Funk, C. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 61(3), 700–720. CrossRef
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2007). Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873–889. CrossRef
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B, Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. CrossRef
Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. CrossRef
Groseclose, T. (2001). A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 862–886. CrossRef
Hall, M. E. K. (2015). Judging with personality: The justices’ personality traits and decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court. Unpublished manuscript.
Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hetherington, M. J., & Husser, J. A. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325. CrossRef
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Holian, D. B., & Prysby, C. (2014). Candidate character traits in the 2012 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44(3), 484–505. CrossRef
Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr. (2015a). Naïve cronyism and neutral competence: Patronage, performance, and policy agreement in executive appointments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 341–372. CrossRef
Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr. (2015b). Vacancies, vetting, and votes: A unified dynamic model of the appointments process. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 27(2), 206–236. CrossRef
Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr., Horton, G., & Lewis, D. E. (2014). Presidents and patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1024–1042. CrossRef
Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr., Rothenberg, L. S., & Rulison, K. K. (2012). Does it really hurt to be out of step? Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 856–867. CrossRef
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57. CrossRef
Huber, J. D., & McCarty, N. (2004). Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 481–494. CrossRef
Jessee, S. A. (2012). Ideology and spatial voting in American elections. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In A. Lawrence, L. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford Press.
Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., & Fiske, S. T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior, 2(4), 315–337. CrossRef
Klingler, J. D., Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr., & Ramey, A. J. (2016). Don’t know what you got: A Bayesian hierarchical model of neuroticism and nonresponse. Political Science Research and Methods. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.50.
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1), 79–86. CrossRef
Lewis, D. E. (2008). The politics of presidential appointments: Political control and bureaucratic performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Lewis, D. E. (2009). Revisiting the administrative presidency: Policy, patronage, and agency competence. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(1), 60–73. CrossRef
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1994). The stability of personality: Observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(6), 173–175. CrossRef
McCurley, C., & Mondak, J. J. (1995). Inspected by #1184063113: The influence of incumbents’ competence and integrity in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 864–885. CrossRef
Moe, T. M. (1985). The politicized presidency. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The new direction in American politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Mondak, J. J. (1995). Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics, 57(4), 1043–1069. CrossRef
Nathan, R. P. (1983). The Administrative Presidency. New York: Wiley.
Oh, I.-S., Wang, G., & Mount, M. K. (2011). Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 762–773. CrossRef
Ottati, V. C. (1990). Determinants of political judgments: The joint influence of normative and heuristic rules of inference. Political Behavior, 12(2), 159–179. CrossRef
Page, B. I. (1994). Democratic responsiveness? Untangling the links between public opinion and policy. PS: Political Science & Politics, 27(1), 25–29.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190. CrossRef
Pateman, C. (1976). Participation and democratic theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ramey, A. (2016). Vox Populi, Vox Dei? Crowdsourced ideal point estimation. Journal of Politics, 78(1), 281–295. CrossRef
Ramey, A. J., Klingler, J. D., & Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr. (2016). Measuring elite personality using speech. Political Science Research and Methods. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.12.
Ramey, A. J., Klingler, J. D., & Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr. (2017). More than a feeling: Personality, polarization, and the transformation of the U.S. congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2006). I like him, but \(\ldots \): Vote choice when candidate likeability and closeness on issues clash. In D. P. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 187–208). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossRef
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. CrossRef
Rubenzer, S. J., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2004). Personality, character, and leadership in the White House: Psychologists assess the presidents. Sterling, VA: Potomac Books Inc.
Saward, M. (1998). The terms of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Shapiro, I. (2009). The state of democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Shor, B., Berry, C., & McCarty, N. (2010). A bridge to somewhere: Mapping state and congressional ideology on a cross-institutional common space. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 35(3), 417–448. CrossRef
Shor, B., & Rogowski, J. C. (2016). Ideology and the US congressional vote. Political Science Research and Methods. http://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.23.
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Using the California Psychological Inventory to assess the Big Five personality domains: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 25–38. CrossRef
Stimson, J. A., MacKuen, M. B., & Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565. CrossRef
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377. CrossRef
Tausanovitch, C., & Warshaw, C. (2013). Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. Journal of Politics, 75(2), 330–342. CrossRef
Vecchione, M., Castro, J. L. G., & Caprara, G. V. (2011). Voters and leaders in the mirror of politics: Similarity in personality and voting choice in Italy and Spain. International Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 259–270. CrossRef
Vuong, Q. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307–333. CrossRef
- What I Like About You: Legislator Personality and Legislator Approval
Jonathan D. Klingler
Gary E. Hollibaugh Jr.
Adam J. Ramey
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta