Skip to main content

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

8. What Is Value? Marx’s Use of Analogy

verfasst von : Desmond McNeill

Erschienen in: Fetishism and the Theory of Value

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, I analyse the challenge that Marx faced—most notably in Chapter 1 of Capital Volume I—in seeking an appropriate way to explain the mysterious phenomenon of exchange-value: what does it mean that 1 quarter of corn = x cwt. iron? He considers analogies with geometry, and with chemistry, and suggests that value is like weight. None of these entirely satisfies him, but he does not consider analogy with language, which I suggest would be more apt, in view of the fact that value is a social rather than a natural or material phenomenon. Indeed, Marx referred more than once to language as the epitome of the social. For example: “For to stamp an object of utility as a value is much as much as social product as language”. One passage in the Grundrisse indicates that he considered, but rejected, adopting this analogy, but I suggest that he would have strengthened his argument if he had chosen otherwise.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Marx’s observations here, and in some of the quotations that follow, relate closely to Cohen’s remarks about relational properties referred to in Chap. 4.
 
2
These alternative types of “common unity” are less applicable, if at all, to the other analogies already discussed. Different substances contain oxygen, but are not also part of a greater whole. Different things have weight; they are not thereby parts of a “whole”—but they are members of a system of mutually attracting things, somewhat akin to having “a common unity”.
 
3
This passage could be interpreted as consistent with the view that labour is not a substance. The more common reading would be that labour is indeed a substance and that Aristotle’s error lay not in looking for such a substance but in failing to find it.
 
4
Here Rubin’s discussion of the “Content and Form of Value” is of interest. He asks “what is that ‘form of value’ which as opposed to exchange value is included in the concept of value?” His answer is as follows:
I will mention only one of the clearest definitions of the form of value in the first edition of Capital: ‘The social form of commodities and the form of value, or form of exchangeability are, thus, one and the same’. As we can see, the form of value is called a form of exchangeability, or a social form of the product of labour which resides in the fact that it can be exchanged for any other commodity, if this exchangeability is determined by the quantity of labour necessary for theproductionof the given commodity (my stress). (Rubin 1982: 115)
This last sentence of Rubin’s unfortunately fails to clarify—indeed even evades—the issue of the (quantitative and qualitative) relation between labour and value.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Korsch, K. (1938). Introduction to Das Kapital. Berlin. Korsch, K. (1938). Introduction to Das Kapital. Berlin.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, K. (1954). Capital (Vol. I). Moscow: Progress. Marx, K. (1954). Capital (Vol. I). Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, K. (1956). Capital (Vol. II). Moscow: Progress. Marx, K. (1956). Capital (Vol. II). Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, K. (1970). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress. Marx, K. (1970). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value, Part III. Moscow: Progress. Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value, Part III. Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Moscow: Progress. Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Moscow: Progress.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin, I. I. (1982). Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value. Montreal: Black Rose Books. Rubin, I. I. (1982). Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Metadaten
Titel
What Is Value? Marx’s Use of Analogy
verfasst von
Desmond McNeill
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56123-9_8