2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel
Tipp
Weitere Kapitel dieses Buchs durch Wischen aufrufen
Erschienen in:
How Political Actors Use the Media
This chapter explores the informational function of the mass media in politicians’ work. More precisely, it focuses on instances where political elites actively use media coverage in their political work—called “political agenda-setting processes”. It tries to understand what role the media precisely play in these instances. The central claim is that the interpretation of media effects on political agendas is dependent on two factors: (1) what politicians learn from the media when they react to it and (2) which motivations underlie politicians’ reactions to media information. The author develops a theoretical model that integrates the various possible learning and motivational mechanisms. By means of in-depth interviews, she tests whether political elites themselves confirm the existence of these mechanisms.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Anzeige
Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Leech, B. L. (1997). Media attention and congressional agendas. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.),
Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 349–363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication.
Journal of Communication,
58(4), 707–731.
CrossRef
Boydstun, A. E. (2013).
Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CrossRef
Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Sheafer, T. (2008). The influence of presumed media influence in politics: Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter?
Public Opinion Quarterly,
72(2), 331–344. doi:
10.1093/poq/nfn014.
CrossRef
Cook, F. L., Tyler, T. R., Goetz, E. G., Gordon, M. T., Protess, D., Leff, D. R., Molotch, H.L., et al. (1983). Media and agenda setting: Effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy.
Public Opinion Quarterly,
47(1), 16–35. doi:
10.1086/268764.
CrossRef
Davis, A. (2009). Journalist–source relations, mediated reflexivity and the politics of politics.
Journalism Studies,
10(2), 204–219. doi:
10.1080/14616700802580540.
CrossRef
Delshad, A. B. (2012). Revisiting “Who influences whom?” Agenda setting on biofuels.
Congress & the Presidency,
39(2), 177–198. doi:
10.1080/07343469.2012.674082.
CrossRef
Eissler, R., Russell, A., & Jones, B. D. (2014). New avenues for the study of agenda setting.
Policy Studies Journal,
42, S71–S86. doi:
10.1111/psj.12048.
CrossRef
Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Wien, C. (2008). What’s the fuss about? The interplay of media hypes and politics.
The International Journal of Press/Politics,
13(3), 247–266. doi:
10.1177/1940161208319292.
CrossRef
Green-Pedersen, C. (2010). Bringing parties into parliament: The development of parliamentary activities in Western Europe.
Party Politics,
16(3), 347–369. doi:
10.1177/1354068809341057.
CrossRef
Herbst, S. (1998).
Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Studies in communication, media, and public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005).
The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Melenhorst, L. (2015). The media’s role in lawmaking: A case study analysis.
The International Journal of Press/Politics,
20(3), 297–316.
CrossRef
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy.
The American Political Science Review,
77(1), 175–190.
CrossRef
Sevenans, J. (2017). One concept, many interpretations: The media’s causal roles in political agenda-setting processes.
European Political Science Review, published online 18 April 2017. doi:
10.1017/S1755773917000078.
Strøm, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties.
American Journal of Political Science,
34(2), 565–598. doi:
10.2307/2111461.
CrossRef
Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization.
International Communication Gazette,
75(4), 341–358. doi:
10.1177/1748048513482266.
CrossRef
Tan, Y., & Weaver, D. H. (2007). Agenda-setting effects among the media, the public, and congress, 1946–2004.
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,
84(4), 729–744.
CrossRef
van der Pas, D. (2014). Making hay while the sun shines: Do parties only respond to media attention when the framing is right?
The International Journal of Press/Politics,
19(1), 42–65. doi:
10.1177/1940161213508207.
CrossRef
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites.
Journal of Communication. doi:
10.1111/jcom.12229.
Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., Bonafont, L.C., et al. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries.
European Journal of Political Research,
55(2), 283–301. doi:
10.1111/1475-6765.12134.
CrossRef
Vos, D. (2014). Which politicians pass the news gates and why? Explaining inconsistencies in research on news coverage of individual politicians.
International Journal of Communication,
8, 24.
de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology.
Information Design Journal & Document Design,
13(1), 51–62.
CrossRef
Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing actors and the construction of political news: The contest over waves in Israel.
Political Communication,
23(3), 333–354. doi:
10.1080/10584600600808927.
CrossRef
- Titel
- What Politicians Learn from the Mass Media and Why They React to It: Evidence from Elite Interviews
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_6
- Autor:
-
Julie Sevenans
- Sequenznummer
- 6
- Kapitelnummer
- Chapter 6