Skip to main content

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. What Should Economists Do Now?

verfasst von : Robert Sugden

Erschienen in: James M. Buchanan

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This essay discusses the arguments in Buchanan’s 1964 paper, ‘What should economists do?’, in the light of recent developments in behavioural economics. Criticizing the preference-satisfaction criterion of neoclassical economics, Buchanan argues that the central concern of economics should be to design and maintain institutions that allow individuals as much opportunity as possible to make their own choices and to engage in voluntary cooperation. He worries that using preference rather than choice as the fundamental normative concept might license social planners (and economists who see themselves as their advisers) to set themselves up as the judges of what individuals ‘truly’ prefer. This is exactly what behavioural welfare economics is now doing by using the satisfaction of (supposed) latent preferences as its criterion. Following Buchanan, I propose an opportunity-based criterion and argue that the contractarian justification for this criterion is unaffected by behavioural findings.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
The ideas in that paper appear in a more fully worked-out form in Sugden (1985).
 
2
I defend this view of Hume’s Treatise in Sugden (2006).
 
3
This work is brought together in Sugden (2018).
 
4
A similar thought is implicit in David Gauthier’s (1986, pp. 83–112) account of the market as a ‘morally free zone’. Gauthier’s contractarian theory treats a competitive market as morally equivalent to an archipelago of mutually isolated one-person island economies: ‘Each person is thus a Robinson Crusoe, even in the market’ (p. 91).
 
5
This is a conception of individual agency as a continuing locus of responsibility. I say more about this in Sugden (2004).
 
6
Approval of unilaterally self-imposed constraints is a recurring theme in Buchanan’s work, aligned with his advocacy of constitutional rules to restrict day-to-day political decision-making. His analysis of the ‘Samaritan’s dilemma’, for which the solution is a self-imposed rule against generosity to would-be ‘parasites’, is an example (Buchanan 1975a).
 
7
In fairness to Buchanan’s adversary, I should add that I was fortunate in being able to go one of the ‘new universities’ established in Britain in the 1960s on the recommendation of a committee chaired by the then Lord Robbins. My education there had all the properties that tend to foster self-creation.
 
8
Many of these effects were known, to psychologists and to some economists, long before the explosion of interest in behavioural economics. (For example, Wicksteed’s [1910] exposition of neoclassical economics includes psychologically acute discussions of many now-familiar ‘anomalies’.) What is new is the widespread recognition of the economic significance of these effects.
 
9
There is far too much evidence about these and other ‘anomalies’ for specific citations to be useful. A representative sample of this evidence is collected in Kahneman and Tversky (2000).
 
10
As far as I can recall, issues arising from behavioural economics did not feature in any of the many conferences at which Buchanan and I were co-participants. In his later years, I would have been reluctant to initiate discussion of topics on which I expected the two of us to have fundamental disagreements.
 
11
This paragraph contains sweeping claims that some behavioural economists might dispute. The evidence on which they are based is presented in Infante et al. (2016) and Sugden (2018).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1954). Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 114–123. Reprinted in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1954). Social Choice, Democracy, and Free Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 114–123. Reprinted in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1964). What Should Economists Do? Southern Economic Journal, 30, 213–222. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1964). What Should Economists Do? Southern Economic Journal, 30, 213–222. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1975a). The Samaritan’s Dilemma. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory (pp. 71–85). New York: Russell Sage. Reprinted in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1975a). The Samaritan’s Dilemma. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory (pp. 71–85). New York: Russell Sage. Reprinted in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1975b). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Buchanan, J. (1975b). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1979). Natural and Artifactual Man. In J. Buchanan (Ed.), What Should Economists Do? (pp. 93–112). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1979). Natural and Artifactual Man. In J. Buchanan (Ed.), What Should Economists Do? (pp. 93–112). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1986a). Liberty, Market, and State. Brighton: Wheatsheaf. Buchanan, J. (1986a). Liberty, Market, and State. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1986b). Better Than Plowing. Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 159, 359–375. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1986b). Better Than Plowing. Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 159, 359–375. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1991). The Foundations for Normative Individualism. In J. Buchanan (Ed.), The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999). Buchanan, J. (1991). The Foundations for Normative Individualism. In J. Buchanan (Ed.), The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Page References to Reprint in Buchanan (1999).
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, J. (1999). The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan (Vol. 1). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. Buchanan, J. (1999). The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan (Vol. 1). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Zurück zum Zitat Dold, M. (2018). Back to Buchanan? Explorations of Welfare and Subjectivism in Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25, 160–178.CrossRef Dold, M. (2018). Back to Buchanan? Explorations of Welfare and Subjectivism in Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25, 160–178.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hargreaves Heap, S. (2013). What Is the Meaning of Behavioural Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 985–1000. Hargreaves Heap, S. (2013). What Is the Meaning of Behavioural Economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 985–1000.
Zurück zum Zitat Hume, D. (1739–1740/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hume, D. (1739–1740/1978). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016). Preference Purification and the Inner Rational Agent: A Critique of the Conventional Wisdom of Behavioural Welfare Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23, 1–25.CrossRef Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016). Preference Purification and the Inner Rational Agent: A Critique of the Conventional Wisdom of Behavioural Welfare Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23, 1–25.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Russell Sage. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Russell Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Schubert, C. (2015). Opportunity and Preference Learning. Economics and Philosophy, 31, 275–295.CrossRef Schubert, C. (2015). Opportunity and Preference Learning. Economics and Philosophy, 31, 275–295.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sugden, R. (1985). Liberty, Preference and Choice. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 213–229.CrossRef Sugden, R. (1985). Liberty, Preference and Choice. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 213–229.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sugden, R. (2004). The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences. American Economic Review, 94, 1014–1033.CrossRef Sugden, R. (2004). The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences. American Economic Review, 94, 1014–1033.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sugden, R. (2006). Hume’s Non-instrumental and Non-propositional Decision Theory. Economics and Philosophy, 22, 365–391.CrossRef Sugden, R. (2006). Hume’s Non-instrumental and Non-propositional Decision Theory. Economics and Philosophy, 22, 365–391.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sugden, R. (2018). The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Sugden, R. (2018). The Community of Advantage: A Behavioural Economist’s Defence of the Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.CrossRef Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism Is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review, 70, 1159–1202.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat von Hayek, F. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. von Hayek, F. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wicksteed, P. (1910). The Common Sense of Political Economy. London: Macmillan. Wicksteed, P. (1910). The Common Sense of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.
Metadaten
Titel
What Should Economists Do Now?
verfasst von
Robert Sugden
Copyright-Jahr
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03080-3_2