nach oben

Erschienen in:

24.12.2019

What to expect after open heart valve surgery? Changes in health-related quality of life

verfasst von: Britt Borregaard, Susanne S. Pedersen, Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Jordi Dahl, Ola Ekholm, Kirstine Sibilitz, Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler, Sandra B. Lauck, Derek Kyte, Melanie Calvert, Lars Peter Schødt Riber, Jacob Eifer Møller

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

To (i) describe changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) pre-operatively, at discharge, and 4 weeks after discharge following open heart surgery, (ii) compare the performance of the EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D 5L) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) against an anchor-based approach, and to (iii) investigate the association between HRQoL and 180-day readmission.

Methods

A prospective, consecutive cohort (single-center study) of 291 patients completed the EQ-5D 5L and KCCQ pre-operatively, at discharge and 4 weeks post-discharge. Changes in HRQoL over time were evaluated, and the performance of the instruments was investigated. The association between HRQoL and readmission were investigated with Cox Proportional Hazard models.

Results

Scores of the EQ-5D Index and VAS decreased significantly from the pre-operative assessment to discharge and improved from discharge to 4 weeks after. The KCCQ scores significantly improved from baseline to 4 weeks after. Minimal clinically important improvements from before surgery to 4 weeks after were seen among 24% (EQ-5D Index), 45% (EQ-5D VAS), and 57% (KCCQ). More than one-third experienced worse HRQoL 1 month after discharge. Area under the curve (AUC) (performance of the instruments) demonstrated the following: EQ-5D Index AUC 0.622 (95% CI 0.540–0.704), VAS AUC 0.674 (95% CI 0.598–0.750), and KCCQ AUC 0.722 (95% CI 0.65–0.792). None of the HRQoL measurements were associated with 180-day readmission.

Conclusions

This study revealed that HRQoL measured with the EQ-5D is significantly worse at discharge compared to before surgery, but scores increases within the first month measured with the EQ-5D and the KCCQ. The EQ-5D and KCCQ have a moderate correlation with an anchor-based approach but were not associated with readmission.

Vorheriger Artikel Effects of an exercise program linked to primary care on depression in elderly: fitness as mediator of the improvement

Nächster Artikel An analysis of the relationship of character strengths and quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Baumgartner, H., Falk, V., Bax, J. J., De Bonis, M., Hamm, C., Holm, P. J., et al. (2017). 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Danielsen, S. O., Moons, P., Sandven, I., Leegaard, M., Solheim, S., Tonnessen, T., et al. (2018). Thirty-day readmissions in surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.026.CrossRefPubMed

Borregaard, B., Dahl, J. S., Riber, L. P. S., Ekholm, O., Sibilitz, K. L., Weiss, M., et al. (2019). Effect of early, individualised and intensified follow-up after open heart valve surgery on unplanned cardiac hospital readmissions and all-cause mortality. International Journal of Cardiology,289, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.056.CrossRefPubMed

Berg, S., Zwisler, A.-D., Pedersen, B., Haase, K., & Sibilitz, K. (2013). Patient experiences of recovery after heart valve replacement: suffering weakness, struggling to resume normality. BMC Nursing,12(1), 23.CrossRef

Borregaard, B., Sorensen, J., Ekholm, O., Moller, J. E., Riber, L. P., Thrysoee, L., et al. (2018). Sociodemographic, clinical and patient-reported outcomes and readmission after heart valve surgery. Journal of Heart Valve Disease,27(1), 78–86.PubMed

Sibilitz, K. L., Berg, S. K., Rasmussen, T. B., Risom, S. S., Thygesen, L. C., Tang, L., et al. (2016). Cardiac rehabilitation increases physical capacity but not mental health after heart valve surgery: A randomised clinical trial. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309414.CrossRefPubMed

Baron, S. J., Arnold, S. V., Wang, K., Magnuson, E. A., Chinnakondepali, K., Makkar, R., et al. (2017). Health status benefits of transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate surgical risk: results from the PARTNER 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol,2(8), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Oterhals, K., Hanssen, T. A., Haaverstad, R., Nordrehaug, J. E., Eide, G. E., & Norekval, T. M. (2015). Factors associated with poor self-reported health status after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant bypass surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery,48(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu425.CrossRefPubMed

Bayer-Topilsky, T., Suri, R. M., Topilsky, Y., Marmor, Y. N., Trenerry, M. R., Antiel, R. M., et al. (2015). Psychoemotional and quality of life response to mitral operations in patients with mitral regurgitation: A prospective study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery,99(3), 847–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.030.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Thomson Mangnall, L. J., Gallagher, R. D., Sibbritt, D. W., & Fry, M. M. (2015). Health-related quality of life of patients after mechanical valve replacement surgery: An integrative review. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs,14(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515114528126.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Holmes, C., & Briffa, N. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: why should we measure them and which instruments should we use? Open Heart,3(1), e000315. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Gronset, C. N., Thygesen, L. C., Berg, S. K., Zangger, G., Kristensen, M. S., Sibilitz, K. L., et al. (2019). Measuring HRQoL following heart valve surgery: The HeartQoL questionnaire is a valid and reliable core heart disease instrument. Quality of Life Research,28(5), 1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-02098-1.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Arnold, S. V., Spertus, J. A., Lei, Y., Allen, K. B., Chhatriwalla, A. K., Leon, M. B., et al. (2013). Use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for monitoring health status in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation: Heart Failure,6(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.112.970053.CrossRef

14.

Berg, S. K., Thorup, C. B., Borregaard, B., Christensen, A. V., Thrysoee, L., Rasmussen, T. B., et al. (2019). Patient-reported outcomes are independent predictors of one-year mortality and cardiac events across cardiac diagnoses: Findings from the national DenHeart survey. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology,26(6), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318769766.CrossRefPubMed

15.

van Veen, B., Andersen, C. M., Johansen, J. B., Theuns, D. A., & Pedersen, S. S. (2019). Patient-reported quality of life as a predictor of mortality and ventricular Tachyarrhythmia’s during 7 years’ follow-up in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (from the MIDAS Study). American Journal of Cardiology,123(4), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.11.021.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Arnold, S. V., Spertus, J. A., Vemulapalli, S., Dai, D., O’Brien, S. M., Baron, S. J., et al. (2015). Association of patient-reported health status with long-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Report from the STS/ACC TVT registry. Circ Cardiovascular Interventions,8(12), e002875. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.115.002875.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sibilitz, K. L., Berg, S. K., Thygesen, L. C., Hansen, T. B., Kober, L., Hassager, C., et al. (2015). High readmission rate after heart valve surgery: A nationwide cohort study. International Journal of Cardiology,189, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.078.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Benstoem, C., Moza, A., Autschbach, R., Stoppe, C., & Goetzenich, A. (2015). Evaluating outcomes used in cardiothoracic surgery interventional research: A systematic review of reviews to develop a core outcome set. PLoS ONE,10(4), e0122204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Schmidt, M., Maeng, M., Jakobsen, C. J., Madsen, M., Thuesen, L., Nielsen, P. H., et al. (2010). Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The Western Denmark Heart Registry. Clinical Epidemiology,2, 137–144.CrossRef

20.

Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Reenen, M. V., & Janssen, B. (2015). EQ-5D-5L User Guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Version 2.1. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation.

22.

Rabin, R., & de Charro, F. (2001). EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine,33(5), 337–343.CrossRef

23.

Chen, P., Lin, K. C., Liing, R. J., Wu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., & Chang, K. C. (2016). Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Quality of Life Research,25(6), 1585–1596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Spertus, J. A., & Jones, P. G. (2015). Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes,8(5), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.115.001958.CrossRef

25.

Spertus, J., Peterson, E., Conard, M. W., Heidenreich, P. A., Krumholz, H. M., Jones, P., et al. (2005). Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: A comparison of methods. American Heart Journal,150(4), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Arnold, S. V., Spertus, J. A., Vemulapalli, S., Li, Z., Matsouaka, R. A., Baron, S. J., et al. (2017). Quality-of-life outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in an unselected population: A report From the STS/ACC transcatheter valve therapy registry. JAMA Cardiology,2(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

WMA (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. In H. 18th WMA General Assembly, Finland (Ed.), (Vol. 18th).

28.

Borregaard, B., Ekholm, O., Riber, L., Sorensen, J., Moller, J. E., Thrysoe, L., et al. (2018). Patient-reported outcomes after aortic and mitral valve surgery—Results from the DenHeart Study. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing,17(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515117731391.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Petersen, J., Vettorazzi, E., Winter, L., Schmied, W., Kindermann, I., & Schafers, H. J. (2016). Physical and mental recovery after conventional aortic valve surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,152(6), 1549–1556.e1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.072.CrossRefPubMed

30.

King, M. T., Dueck, A. C., & Revicki, D. A. (2019). Can methods developed for interpreting group-level patient-reported outcome data be applied to individual patient management? Medical Care,57, S38–s45. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001111.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ando, T., Takagi, H., Briasoulis, A., Grines, C. L., & Afonso, L. (2018). Comparison of health related quality of life in transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis. Heart Lung Circ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.07.013.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hansen, T. B., Thygesen, L. C., Zwisler, A. D., Helmark, L., Hoogwegt, M., Versteeg, H., et al. (2015). Self-reported health-related quality of life predicts 5-year mortality and hospital readmissions in patients with ischaemic heart disease. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology,22(7), 882–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487314535682.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Oterhals, K., Fridlund, B., Nordrehaug, J. E., Haaverstad, R., & Norekval, T. M. (2013). Adapting to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Advanced Nursing,69(9), 2088–2098. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12076.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Pettersen, T. R., Fridlund, B., Bendz, B., Nordrehaug, J. E., Rotevatn, S., Schjott, J., et al. (2018). Challenges adhering to a medication regimen following first-time percutaneous coronary intervention: A patient perspective. International Journal of Nursing Studies,88, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.013.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Simkovic, M., & Trauble, B. (2019). Robustness of statistical methods when measure is affected by ceiling and/or floor effect. PLoS ONE,14(8), e0220889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220889.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: What to expect after open heart valve surgery? Changes in health-related quality of life
verfasst von: Britt Borregaard
Susanne S. Pedersen
Selina Kikkenborg Berg
Jordi Dahl
Ola Ekholm
Kirstine Sibilitz
Ann Dorthe Olsen Zwisler
Sandra B. Lauck
Derek Kyte
Melanie Calvert
Lars Peter Schødt Riber
Jacob Eifer Møller
Publikationsdatum: 24.12.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02400-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Influence of executive functions on the self-reported health-related quality of life of children with ADHD

Health-related quality of life in neonates and infants: a conceptual framework

Investigating child self-report capacity: a systematic review and utility analysis

Back pain occurrence and treatment-seeking behavior among nurses: the role of work-related emotional burden

Measurement of health-related quality of life in pediatric organ transplantation recipients: a systematic review of the PedsQL transplant module

How peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?