Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11558-017-9276-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Given that their main function is to forge durable commitments, it is notable that many international treaties change over time through the practice of renegotiation. While some agreements have remained intact after their initial conclusion, others are amended, updated, or replaced. Why are some international agreements renegotiated while others remain stable? This paper offers a systematic analysis of treaty renegotiation by presenting theoretical propositions and testing them in the context of bilateral investment treaties (BITs). We argue that states renegotiate when they learn new information about the legal and political consequences of their treaty commitments, and that such learning is most likely to take place when states are involved in investor-state dispute settlement cases. Employing an original data set on renegotiated BITs, we find robust empirical support for the learning argument. We conclude by discussing implications for the study of institutional change and the evolving investment regime.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. CrossRef
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2010). Delegating differences: Bilateral investment treaties and bargaining over dispute resolution provisions. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 1–26. CrossRef
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2011). Contingent credibility: The impact of investment treaty violations on foreign direct investment. International Organization, 65(3), 401–432. CrossRef
Allee, T., & Peinhardt, C. (2014). Evaluating three explanations for the design of bilateral investment treaties. World Politics, 66(1), 47–87.
Alschner, W. (2014). Regionalism and overlap in investment treaty law: Toward consolidation or contradiction? Journal of International Economic Law, 17(2), 271–290. CrossRef
Alschner, W., & Skougarevskiy, D. (2016). Mapping the universe of international investment agreements. Journal of International Economic Law, 19(3), 561–588. CrossRef
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24. CrossRef
Alvarez, J. E. (2002). The new treaty makers. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 25, 213–234.
Australian Government. (2011). Bilateral and regional trade agreements, Research Report. Productivity Commission. http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/trade-agreements/report.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165–176.
Blake, D. J. (2013). Thinking ahead: Time horizons and the legalization of international investment agreements. International Organization, 67(4), 797–827. CrossRef
Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L.N.S., & Waibel, M. (Forthcoming). The political economy of the international investment treaty regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brooks, S. M., & Kurtz, M. J. (2007). Capital, trade, and the political economies of reform. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 703–720. CrossRef
Broude, T., Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (Forthcoming). Who cares about regulatory space in BITs? A comparative international approach. In A Roberts, P-H Verdier, M Versteeg, P. B. Stephan (Eds.), Comparative International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, C., & Miles, K. (Eds.). (2012). Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Büthe, T., & Milner, H. V. (2008). The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: Increasing FDI through international trade agreements? American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 741–762. CrossRef
Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis, 18(3), 271–292. CrossRef
Cooney, R., & Lang, A. T. F. (2007). Taking uncertainty seriously: Adaptive governance and international trade. European Journal of International Law, 18(3), 523–551. CrossRef
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912. CrossRef
DTI. (2009). Bilateral investment treaty policy framework review: A government position paper. Pretoria: Department of Trade and Industry, Republic of South Africa.
Dupont, C., & Schultz, T. (2013). Do hard economic times lead to international legal disputes? The case of investment arbitration. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(4), 564–569. CrossRef
Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., & Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811–846. CrossRef
European Union. (2015). Inside TTIP: An overview and chapter-by-chapter guide in plain English. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.
Fecák, T. (2011). Czech experience with bilateral investment treaties: Somewhat bitter taste of investment protection. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2, 233–267.
Fioretos, O. (2011). Historical institutionalism in international relations. International Organization, 65, 367–399. CrossRef
Gallagher, N., & Shan, W. (2009). Chinese investment treaties: Policies and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666. CrossRef
Goldstein, J., & Steinberg, R. H. (2008). Negotiate or litigate? Effects of WTO judicial delegation on U.S. trade politics. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71, 257–282.
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O., & Slaughter, A.-M. (Eds.). (2001). Legalization and world politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Goldstein, J. L., Rivers, D., & Tomz, M. (2007). Institutions in international relations: Understanding the effects of the GATT and the WTO on world trade. International Organization, 61(1), 37–67. CrossRef
Grieco, J. M., Gelpi, C. F., & Camber Warren, T. (2009). When preferences and commitments collide: The effect of relative partisan shifts on international treaty compliance. International Organization, 63(2), 341–355. CrossRef
Guzman, A. T. (1998). Why LDCs sign treaties that hurt them: Explaining the popularity of bilateral investment treaties. Virginia Journal of International law, 38, 640–688.
Haftel, Y. Z. (2010). Ratification counts: U.S. investment treaties and FDI flows into developing countries. Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 348–377. CrossRef
Haftel, Y. Z., & Hofmann S. C. (2017). Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research. doi: 10.1177/0022343316675908.
Haftel, Y. Z., & Thompson, A. (2013). Delayed ratification: The domestic fate of bilateral investment treaties. International Organization, 67(2), 355–387. CrossRef
Helfer, L. R. (2012). Flexibility mechanisms in international agreements. In J. Dunoff & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), International law and international relations: Taking stock. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Henckels, C. (2016). Protecting regulatory autonomy through greater precision in investment treaties: The TPP, CETA, and TPP. Journal of International Economic Law, 19, 27–50. CrossRef
Jandhyala, S., Henisz, W. J., & Mansfield, E. W. (2011). Three waves of BITs: The global diffusion of foreign investment policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(6), 1047–1073. CrossRef
Jensen, N. M. (2006). Nation-states and the multinational corporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jupille, J., Mattli, W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163. CrossRef
Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55(2), 289–325.
Koremenos, B. (2005). Contracting around international uncertainty. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 549–565. CrossRef
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–800.
Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336–366.
Lavopa, F. M., Barreiros, L. E., & Bruno, V. (2013). How to kill a BIT and not die trying: Legal and political challenges of denouncing or renegotiating bilateral investment treaties. Journal of International Economic Law, 16(4), 869–891. CrossRef
Levy, J. S. (1994). Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization, 48(2), 279–312. CrossRef
Manger, M. S., & Peinhardt, C. (2017). Learning and the precision of international investment agreements. International Interactions (in press).
March, J. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. CrossRef
Marshall, Monty G., Keith Jaggers and Ted Robert Gurr. (2010). Polity IV project: Characteristics and transitions, 1800–2009. Dataset Users’ Manual. Center for Systemic Peace.
Milner, H. V., & Judkins, B. (2004). Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: Is there a left–right divide on trade policy? International Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 95–120. CrossRef
Mitchell, S. M. L., & Hensel, P. R. (2007). International institutions and compliance with international agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 721–737. CrossRef
Moser, C., & Rose, A. K. (2012). Why do trade negotiations take so long? Journal of Economic Integration, 27(2), 280–290. CrossRef
Nottage, L. R. (2016). The TPP investment chapter and investor-state arbitration in asia and oceania: Assessing prospects for ratification. Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 16/128.
OECD. (2011). Roundtable on freedom of investment 15. Paris: OECD Secretariat.
OECD. (2014). Roundtable on freedom of investment 21. Paris: OECD Secretariat.
Olivet, C. (2013). A test for European solidarity: The case of intra-EU bilateral investment treaties. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.
Pauwelyn, J. (2014). At the edge of chaos? Foreign investment law as a complex adaptive system: How it emerged and how it can Be reformed. ICSID Review, 29(2), 372–418. CrossRef
Peterson, L. (2012). Canada announces conclusion of investment treaty with China, but There’s an asterisk. Investment Arbitration Reporter, February, 16, 2012.
Pinto, P. M. (2013). Partisan investment in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Porta, L., Rafael, F. L.-d.-S., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. CrossRef
Poulsen, L. S. (2010). The importance of BITs for foreign direct investment and political risk insurance: Revisiting the evidence. In Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2009/2010, edited by Karl Sauvant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poulsen, L. S. (2014). Bounded rationality and the diffusion of modern investment treaties. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 1–14. CrossRef
Poulsen, L. S. (2015). Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: The politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poulsen, L. S., & Aisbett, E. (2013). When the claim hits: Bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning. World Politics, 65(2), 273–313. CrossRef
Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. American Journal of International Law, 99, 581–614. CrossRef
Rixen, T., Viola, L. A., & Zürn, M. (Eds.). (2016). Historical institutionalism and international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, A. (2010). Power and persuasion in investment treaty interpretation: The dual role of states. American Journal of International Law, 104, 179–225.
Rosendorff, P., & Milner, H. (2001). The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857.
Sauvant, K.P., & Sachs, L. (2009). The effect of treaties on foreign direct investment: Bilateral investment treaties, double taxation treaties, and investment flows. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schill, S. W. (2009). The multilateralization of international investment law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schlemmer, E. C. (2016). An overview of South Africa’s bilateral investment treaties and investment policy. ICSID Review, 3(1), 167–193. CrossRef
Simmons, B. (2000). International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 819–835. CrossRef
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Singh, K. & Ilge, B. (2016). India overhauls its investment treaty regime, July 15. http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2016/07/15/india-overhauls-its-investment-treaty-regime/. Accessed 26 December 2016.
Solingen, E. (2012). Of dominoes and firewalls: The domestic, regional, and global politics of international diffusion. International Studies Quarterly, 56, 631–644. CrossRef
Stasavage, D. (2002). Private investment and political institutions. Economics and Politics, 14(1), 41–63. CrossRef
Suchman, M. C., & Edelman, L. B. (1996). Legal rational myths: The new institutionalism and the law and society tradition. Law and Social Inquiry, 21, 903–941. CrossRef
Thompson, A. (2010). Rational Design in Motion: Uncertainty and flexibility in the global climate regime. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 269–296. CrossRef
Thompson, A., & Verdier, D. (2014). Multilateralism, bilateralism and regime design. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 15–28. CrossRef
Tobin, J. L., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2011). When BITs have some bite: The political-economic environment for bilateral investment treaties. Review of International Organizations, 6, 1–32. CrossRef
UNCTAD (2010). Denunciation of the ICSID convention and BITS: Impact on investor-state claims. IIA Issues Note, No. 2 (December).
UNCTAD (2011). Latest developments in investor-state dispute settlement. IIA Issues Note, No. 1 (March).
UNCTAD (2014). Reform of the IIA regime: Four paths of action and a way forward. IIA Issues Note No. 3 (June).
Urpelainen, J. (2011). The enforcement–exploitation trade-off in international cooperation between weak and powerful states. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 631–653. CrossRef
van Aaken, A. (2009). International investment law between commitment and flexibility: A contract theory analysis. Journal of International Economic Law, 12(2), 507–538. CrossRef
Vandevelde, K. J. (2009). A brief history of international investment agreements. In K. P. Sauvant & L. Sachs (Eds.), The effect of bilateral investment treaties and double taxation treaties on foreign direct investment flows. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weyland, K. (2008). Toward a new theory of institutional change. World Politics, 60(2), 281–314. CrossRef
Yackee, J. W. (2008). Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment, and the rule of (international) law: Do BITs promote foreign direct investment? Law and Society Review, 42(4), 805–832.
- When do states renegotiate investment agreements? The impact of arbitration
Yoram Z. Haftel
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta