Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Our paper aims at evaluating the role that the local administrations play on Italian regional innovation performance, by using a revised version of Regional Innovation Scoreboard. Carrying out a panel data analysis and a logistic regression, the analysis is based on a combined approach towards institutions, involving socio-political aspects, considered by the institutional quality index, and the capability of regional administrators of expending Structural and Cohesion Funds, by a quantitative index. Firstly, a panel data analysis helped us to highlight the role of institutions and which sectoral themes of EU investments affected the most regional innovative performances in the time span 2007-2015. Secondly, the logistic regression captures which investment is more likely to affect innovation performances within Italian Regions. The results underline that major effect on innovation performance derive from the combined effect of high quality institutions and efficient public expenditure.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
Agovino, M., Casaccia, M., & Crociata, A. (2016). Effectiveness and efficiency of European Regional Development Fund on separate waste collection: Evidence from Italian regions by a stochastic frontier approach. Econ: Polit. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-016-0050-2.
Andrew, J. P., De Rocco, E. S., & Taylor, A. (2009). The innovation imperative in manufacturing. Boston Consulting Group. https://doi.org/10.1049/me:20040510.
Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 465–476. CrossRef
Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2011). Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe? Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(6), 1153–1182. CrossRef
Asatryan, Z., Heinemann, F., & Pitlik, H. (2016). Reforming the public administration: The role of crisis and the power of bureaucracy. European Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.08.004.
Banca D’Italia. (2015). Economie regionali. L’economia delle regioni italiane. Dinamiche recenti e aspetti strutturali, Numero 43-Dicembre 2015.Banca d’Italia (2016), Economie Regionali. L’economia delle regioni italiane. Dinamiche recenti e aspetti strutturali, Numero 43-Dicembre 2016.
Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report Prepared at the Request of DanutaHübner. Bruxelles: Commissioner for Regional Policy.
Billon, M., Marco, R., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2016). Innovation and ICT use in the EU: An analysis of regional drivers. Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1153-x.
Brasoveanu, I. V., Silvestru, I. C., Pavel, A., & Onica, D. (2011). Structural and cohesion funds: Theoretical and statistical aspects in Romania and Eu. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 33(E/2011), 30–48.
Capello, R. (2014). Smart specialisation strategy and the new EU cohesion policy reform: Introductory remarks. ScienzeRegionali, 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3280/SCRE2014-001001.
Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The quadruple/quintuple innovation helixes and smart specialisation strategies for sustainable and inclusive growth in europe and beyond. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5, 212–239. CrossRef
Castaldo, A., Fiorini, A., & Maggi, B. (2017). Measuring (in a time of crisis) the impact of broadband connections on economic growth: an OECD panel analysis. Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1343448.
Chakravorti, B., & Chaturvedi, R. S. (2017). Digital planet 2017. How competitiveness and trust in digital economies vary across the world. Medford: The Fletcher School, Tufts University.
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2010). Mapping quality of government in the European Union: A study of national and sub-national variation. QoG Working Paper Series 2010 (pp. 22).
Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Dijkstra, L. (2012). Regional governance matters: A study on regional variation in quality of government within the European Union Member States. Regional Studies, 48, 68–90. CrossRef
Cleantech Group, & WWF. (2017). The Global Cleantech Innovation Index 2017. Which countries look set to produce the next generation of start- ups?.
Commission, E. (2014). Programming period 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation of european cohesion policy European Social Fund Guidance document on indicators of public administration capacity building—Final—June 2014 indicators of public administration capacity. Building, 1, 1–16.
Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (2003/361/EC).
Commonwealth of Australia. (2016). Australian innovation system report 2016. Office of the Chief Economist.
Cooke, P., & De Propris, L. (2011). A policy agenda for EU smart growth: the role of creative and cultural industries. Policy Studies, 32(4), 365–375. CrossRef
Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. Ithaca.
Coy, P., & Lu, W. (2015). The Bloomberg Innovation Index. Bloomberg. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-innovative-countries/.
Dellmuth, L. M., Schraff, D., & Stoffel, M. F. (2017). Distributive politics, electoral institutions and European structural and investment funding: Evidence from Italy and France. JCMS, 55(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12433.
Dotti, N. F. (2016). Unwritten factors affecting structural funds: The Influence of Regional political behaviours on the implementation of EU cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 24(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1047328. CrossRef
Dumitru, N. (2017). The role of financial instruments and their impact on the SME sector. Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series, XVII, 556–561.
Dutrénit Bielous, G., Zaragoza López, M. L., Saldívar Chávez, M. A., Solano Flroes, E., & Zúñiga-Bello, P. (2014). Ranking Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.
Dutta, S., Bruno, L., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015. Stronger Innovation Linkages. ( ISBN 978-2-9522210-8-5).
European Commission. (2016a). European Innovation Scoreboard 2016, Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Ref. Ares(2016):3366176, July 13, 2016.
European Commission. (2016b). Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2016, Directorate-General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Ref. Ares(2016)3366176, July 13, 2016.
Farole, T., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2011). Cohesion policy in the European Union: Growth, geography, institutions. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1089–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x. (ISSN0021-9886).
Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and the civil society. IMF working paper number 74. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Getler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequence of modernity. Oxford: Polity.
Global Entrepreneurship Research Association. (2017). The global report 2016/2017 global entrepreneurship monitor.
Global Intellectual Propriety Centre. (2017). The roots of innovation . U.S. Chamber International IP Index (5th ed.), February 2017.
Gupta, V., Agarkhedkar, S., & Sahney, S. (2015). The role of social networks in diffusing innovation within organisations. International Journal Innovation and Learning, 18(2), 185–197. CrossRef
Hlaváček, P., & Siviček, T. (2017). Spatial differences in innovation potential of central European regions during post-transformation period. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-2/4. CrossRef
Hudson, J., & Minea, A. (2013). Innovation. Intellectual property rights, and economic development: A unified empirical investigation, world development, 46, 66–78.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. CrossRef
Kyriacou, A. P., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2012). The impact of EU structural funds on regional disparities within member states. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(2), 267–281. CrossRef
Lee, S., Nam, Y., Lee, S., & Son, H. (2016). Determinants of ICT innovations: A cross-country empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110(2016), 71–77. CrossRef
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42. CrossRef
Malagueño, R., Lopez-Valeiras, E., & Gomez-Conde, J. (2017). Balanced scorecard in SMEs: Effects on innovation and financial performance. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9921-3.
Massachusetts Technology Innovation Institute. (2016). The Massachusetts innovation economy annual index. Westborough: Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economics and Society, 6, 187–216. CrossRef
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2015). Smart Specialization, regional growth and applications to European union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769. CrossRef
Mets, T., Kelli, A., Mets, A., & Tiimann, T. (2016). From patent counting towards the system of IP strategic indicators. InzinerineEkonomika-Engineering Economics, 27(3), 316–324.
Mihailescu, G. (2012). Two eastern European countries with different paths: Why polish manage to efficiently absorb the European money while Romania remains with its funds blocked, published within the project “Poor governance in public spending in Romania between 2004 and 2012”, conducted by SAR (Romanian Academic Society) with the support of Open Society Foundations.
Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4), 429–442. CrossRef
Mohl, P., & Hagen, T. (2010). Do EU structural funds promote regional growth? New evidence from various panel data approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(2010), 353–365. CrossRef
Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional conditions and innovation systems: On the impact of regional policy on firms in different sectors. Regional Studies, 48, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.649004. CrossRef
Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2014). Do institutions play a role in skilled Migration? The Case of Italy, Regional Studies, 48(10), 1628–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.835799. CrossRef
Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2015a). Measuring institutional quality in Italy. Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, 29(1–2), 157–182.
Nifo, A., & Vecchione, G. (2015b). Measuring institutional quality in Italy. Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, 29(1–2), 157–182.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
North, D. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Pater, R., & Lewandowska, A. (2015). Human capital and innovativeness of the European Union regions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 28(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.962487.
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. (2008). Il sistema di classificazione dei progetti nel CUP. Dipartimento per la Programmazione e il Coordinamento della Politica Economica: Classificazione CPV a parte.
Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2017). Different approaches to managing innovation activities: An analysis of strong, moderate, and modest innovators. InzinerineEkonomika-Engineering Economics, 28(1), 47–55.
Pupo, V., & Aiello, F. (2012). Structural funds and the economic divide in Italy. Journal of Policy Model., 34, 403–418. CrossRef
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978. CrossRef
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Di-Cataldo, A. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. CrossRef
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, F., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165. CrossRef
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037. CrossRef
Romero, I., & Fernández-Serrano, J. (2014). The European cohesion policy and the promotion of entrepreneurship. The case of Andalusia, Investigaciones Regionales, 29(2014), 215–236.
Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2016–2017. Cologny: World Economic Forum.
Sivak, R., Caplanova, A., & Hudson, J. (2011). The impact of governance and infrastructure on innovation. Post-Communist Economies, 23, 203–217. CrossRef
Smeriglio, A., Bachtler, J., De Francesco, F., Olejniczak, K., & Thomson, R. (2015). Administrative capacity-building and EU Cohesion Policy. EPRC, Sch. Gov. Public Policy.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94. CrossRef
Streeck, W. (1991). On the institutional conditions of diversified quality production. In E. Metzner & W. Streeck (Eds.), Beyond Keynesianism: Socio-economics of production and full employment (pp. 21–61). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Surubaru, N. (2017). Administrative capacity or quality of political governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13. Regional Studies, 51(6), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798. CrossRef
Tebaldi, E., & Elmslie, B. (2013). Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from cross-country patent grant data. Applied Economics, 45(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613777. CrossRef
Terracciano, B., & Graziano, P. R. (2016a). EU cohesion policy implementation and administrative capacities: Insights from Italian regions. Regional & Federal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1200033.
Terracciano, B., & Graziano, P. R. (2016b). EU cohesion policy implementation and administrative capacities: Insights from Italian regions. Regional & Federal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1200033.
The World Bank. (2017). World development indicators 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Tiits, M., Kalvet, T., & Murk, I. (2015). Smart specialisation in cohesion economics. Journal of the Knowledge Economics, 6, 296–319. CrossRef
Truong, Q., & Rowley, C. (2016). The network-based economy in Vietnam: Business network in context and over time. In Business networks in East Asian capitalisms: Enduring trends, emerging patterns (pp. 307–329) September 20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100639-9.00014-1.
UNESCO. (2017). Summary report of the 2015 UIS innovation data collection. https://doi.org/10.15220/978-92-9189-211-2-en.
Vasilescu, L. (2014). Accessing finance for innovative eu smes-key drivers and challenges. Economic Review: Journal of Economics & Business/Ekonomska Revija: Casopis za Ekonomiju i Biznis, 12, 35–47.
Wamser, G., Woon Nam, C., & Schoenberg, A. (2013). The Lisbon agenda and innovation-oriented cohesion policy: A new challenge for economic integration among the EU Regions. Journal of Economic Integration, 28(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2013.28.1.37. CrossRef
Wojnicka-Sycz, E., & Sycz, P. (2013). Public innovation policy and other determinants of innovativeness in poland. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(3), 1.
World Economic Forum. (2016). Global agenda council on the economics of innovation . Evaluation of Leading Indicators of Innovation. http://www.weforum.org/.
- Which are the Factors Influencing Innovation Performances? Evidence from Italian Cohesion Policy
Luisa De Simone
- Springer Netherlands
Social Indicators Research
An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, digitale Transformation/© Maksym Yemelyanov | Fotolia