Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
This work empirically tests the concept of the ‘whistleblowing triangle,’ which is modeled on the three factors encapsulated by the fraud triangle (pressure or financial incentives, opportunity and rationalization), in the Indonesian context. Anchored in the proposition of an original research framework on the whistleblowing triangle and derived hypotheses, this work aims to expand the body of knowledge on this topic by providing empirical evidence. The sample used is taken from audit firms affiliated with both the big 4 and non-big 4 companies operating in Indonesia. The results of analysis using the PLS-PM method found a significant relationship between the components of the whistleblowing triangle and the intention of blowing the whistle. We found that financial incentives are the most significant predictor of auditors’ intention to blow the whistle in Indonesia. Other components, such as opportunity and rationalization, also play an important role in supporting auditors’ intention to blow the whistle. Our findings also suggest that related pressures are the top priority for audit firms in Indonesia to consider in increasing whistleblowing intention. We expand the previous literature on whistleblowing which has been derived from the components of the fraud triangle (Brown et al. in Account Public Interest 16(1):28–56, 2016; Smaili and Arroyo in J Bus Ethics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3663-7, 2017) by adding empirical evidence.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten
Sie möchten Zugang zu diesem Inhalt erhalten? Dann informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:
ACFE. (2016). Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: 2016 global fraud study. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduliader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 1–28. CrossRef
Anand, V., Dacin, M. T., & Murphy, P. R. (2015). The continued need for diversity in fraud research. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(4), 751–755. CrossRef
Andon, P., Free, C., Jidin, R., Monroe, G. S., & Turner, M. J. (2016). The impact of financial incentives and perceptions of seriousness on whistleblowing intention. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3215-6.
Andrade, J. A. (2015). Reconceptualising whistleblowing in a complex world. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 321–335. CrossRef
Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications for the social sciences. New York: Guilford Press.
Berger, L., Perreault, S., & Wainberg, J. (2017). Hijacking the moral imperative: How financial incentives can discourage whistleblower reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(3), 1–14. CrossRef
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personal Psychology, 69, 229–283. CrossRef
Boo, E., Ng, T. B.-P., & Shankar, P. G. (2016). Effects of incentive scheme and working relationship on whistle-blowing in an audit setting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(4), 23–38. CrossRef
Boyle, D. M., DeZoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2015). The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(6), 578–596. CrossRef
Brink, A. G., Lowe, D. J., & Victoravich, L. M. (2013). The effect of evidence strength and internal rewards on intentions to report fraud in the Dodd-Frank regulatory environment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(3), 87–104. CrossRef
Brink, A. G., Lowe, D. J., & Victoravich, L. M. (2017). The public company whistleblowing environment: Perceptions of a wrongful act and monetary attitude. Accounting and the Public Interest, 17(1), 1–30. CrossRef
Brown, J. O., Hays, J., & Stuebs, M. T. (2016). Modeling accountant whistleblowing intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior and the fraud triangle. Accounting and the Public Interest, 16(1), 28–56. CrossRef
Cheng, J., Bai, H., & Yang, X. (2017). Ethical leadership and internal whistleblowing: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3517-3.
Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74. CrossRef
Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2003). Exploring social desirability bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 291–302. CrossRef
Cooper, J. (2007). Cognitive dissonance fifty years of a classic theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cressey, D. R. (1973). Other peoples’ money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Patterson Smith.
Culiberg, B., & Mihelič, K. K. (2017). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 787–803. CrossRef
Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93. CrossRef
Dellaportas, S. (2013). Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37(1), 29–39. CrossRef
Dellaportas, S., Jackling, B., Leung, P., & Cooper, B. J. (2011). Developing an ethics education framework for accounting. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8(1), 63–82.
DeZoort, F. T., & Harrison, P. D. (2016). Understanding auditors’ sense of responsibility for detecting fraud within organizations. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3064-3.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The evolution of fraud theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. CrossRef
Dyck, A., Morse, A., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2213–2251. CrossRef
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Field, A. (2016). An adventure in statistics: The reality enigma. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Free, C. (2015). Looking through the fraud triangle: A review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2), 175–196. CrossRef
Gao, L., & Brink, A. G. (2017). Whistleblowing studies in accounting research: A review of experimental studies on the determinants of whistleblowing. Journal of Accounting Literature, 38, 1–13. CrossRef
Guthrie, C. P., & Taylor, E. Z. (2017). Whistleblowing on fraud for pay: Can I trust you? Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 2(1), A1–A19. CrossRef
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2017). Partial least squares path modeling: Updated guidelines. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 19–39). Cham: Springer International. CrossRef
Hoffman, W. M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2015). The morality of whistleblowing: A commentary on Richard T. De George. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 771–781. CrossRef
Jo, M.-S., Nelson, J. S., & Kiecker, P. (1997). A model for controlling social desirability bias by direct and indirect questioning. Marketing Letters, 8(4), 429–437. CrossRef
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 45–63. CrossRef
Kock, N. (2011). Using WarpPLS in e-collaboration studies: Mediating effects, control and second order variables, and algorithm choices. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 7(3), 1–13. CrossRef
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. CrossRef
Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2017). Ethical awareness, ethical judgment and whistleblowing: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2.
Latan, H., & Noonan, R. (Eds.). (2017). Partial least squares path modeling: basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Cham: Springer International.
Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2016). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3318-0.
Lee, G., & Xiao, X. (2018). Whistleblowing on accounting-related misconduct: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 22–46. CrossRef
Lokanan, M. E. (2015). Challenges to the fraud triangle: Questions on its usefulness. Accounting Forum, 39(3), 201–224. CrossRef
MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014a). The silent Samaritan syndrome: Why the whistle remains unblown. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 149–164. CrossRef
MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014b). Whistle while you work: Whistleblowing in the presence of competing incentives and pressures. Accounting Perspectives, 13(4), 309–324. CrossRef
MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. CrossRef
Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2014). Whistle-blowing by external auditors in South Africa: Enclosure, efficient bodies and disciplinary power. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 834–862. CrossRef
Maroun, W., & Solomon, J. (2014). Whistle-blowing by external auditors: Seeking legitimacy for the South African Audit Profession? Accounting Forum, 38(2), 109–121. CrossRef
McGrath, A. (2017). Dealing with dissonance: A review of cognitive dissonance reduction. Social and Personality Psychology Compas, 11(12), 1–17. CrossRef
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Dworkin, T. M. (2009). A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 379–396. CrossRef
Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., Rehg, M. T., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2012). Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing. Human Relations, 65(8), 923–954. CrossRef
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017). A theory of cognitive dissonance. London: Macat Library.
Murphy, P. R. (2012). Attitude, Machiavellianism and the rationalization of misreporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(4), 242–259. CrossRef
Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological pathways to fraud: Understanding and preventing fraud in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618. CrossRef
Murphy, P. R., & Free, C. (2016). Broadening the fraud triangle: Instrumental climate and fraud. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 41–56. CrossRef
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 679–708.
Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2009). Whistleblowing as planned behavior: A survey of South Korean police officers. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 545–556. CrossRef
Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Oktem, M. K., & Omurgonulsen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939. CrossRef
Price, L. R. (2017). Psychometric methods: Theory into practice. New York: Guilford Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (pp. 87–121). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. CrossRef
Ramli, N. A., Latan, H., & Nartea, G. V. (2018). Why should PLS-SEM be used rather than regression? Evidence from the capital structure perspective. In N. K. Avkiran & C. M. Ringle (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Recent advances in banking and finance (pp. 171–209). Cham: Springer International. CrossRef
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (2013). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the journal of business ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 173–190). New York: Springer. CrossRef
Reinstein, A., & Taylor, E. Z. (2017). Fences as controls to reduce accountants’ rationalization. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 477–488. CrossRef
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. In Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
Rose, J. M., Brink, A. G., & Norman, C. S. (2016). The effects of compensation structures and monetary rewards on managers’ decisions to blow the whistle. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3222-7.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1–40). Cham: Springer International.
Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2015). Beyond the fraud triangle: Swiss and Austrian elite fraudsters. Accounting Forum, 39(3), 176–187. CrossRef
Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8.
Seifert, D. L., Sweeney, J. T., Joireman, J., & Thornton, J. M. (2010). The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 707–717. CrossRef
Smaili, N., & Arroyo, P. (2017). Categorization of whistleblowers using the whistleblowing triangle. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3663-7.
Soni, F., Maroun, W., & Padia, N. (2015). Perceptions of justice as a catalyst for whistle-blowing by trainee auditors in South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(1), 118–140. CrossRef
Stikeleather, B. R. (2016). When do employers benefit from offering workers a financial reward for reporting internal misconduct? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 52, 1–14. CrossRef
Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S., & Willems, K. (2017). Dealing with nonlinearity in importance-performance map analysis (IPMA): An integrative framework in a PLS-SEM context. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues, and applications (pp. 367–403). Cham: Springer International. CrossRef
Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2013). A synthesis of fraud-related research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 287–321. CrossRef
Tsang, J.-A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50. CrossRef
Vandekerckhove, W. (2006). Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility: A global assessment. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Webber, S., & Archambeault, D. S. (2015). Whistleblowing: Not so simple for accountants. The CPA Journal, 85(8), 62–68.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Young, R. F. (2017). Blowing the whistle: Individual persuasion under perceived threat of retaliation. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 97–111. CrossRef
- ‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence
Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour
Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
- Springer Netherlands
Journal of Business Ethics
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock