Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen
Are certain forms of government associated with superior economic outcomes? This paper attempts to answer that question by examining how government systems influence macroeconomic performance. We find that presidential regimes consistently are associated with less favorable outcomes than parliamentary regimes: slower output growth, higher and more volatile inflation and greater income inequality. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect is sizable. For example, annual output growth is between 0.6 and 1.2 percentage points lower and inflation is estimated to be at least four percentage points higher under presidential regimes relative to those under parliamentary ones. The difference in distributional outcomes is even starker; income inequality is 12 to 24% worse under presidential systems.
Acemoglu, D. (2005). Constitutions, politics, and economics: A review essay on Persson and Tabellini’s the economic effects of constitutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 1025–1048. CrossRef
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability, and investment. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203–1228. CrossRef
Barro, R. (2007). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Barro, R. J., & Gordon, D. B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 101–121. CrossRef
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198. CrossRef
Becker, S. O., & Woessmann, L. (2009). Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 531–596. CrossRef
Bell, D. & Machin, S. (2016). Brexit and wage inequality. Technical report, VOX EU.
Blume, L., Müller, J., Voigt, S., & Wolf, C. (2009). The economic effects of constitutions: replicating—and extending—Persson and Tabellini. Public Choice, 139(1–2), 197–225. CrossRef
Bormann, N.-C., & Golder, M. (2013). Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 360–369. CrossRef
Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent (Vol. 3). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. CrossRef
Campos, N. F., & Nugent, J. B. (2002). Who is afraid of political instability? Journal of Development Economics, 67(1), 157–172. CrossRef
Carey, J. M. (2008). Presidential versus parliamentary government. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 91–122). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. CrossRef
Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101. CrossRef
Crowe, C., & Meade, E. E. (2008). Central bank independence and transparency: Evolution and effectiveness. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(4), 763–777. CrossRef
Cukierman, A., Web, S., & Neyapti, B. (1992). Measuring the independence of central banks and its effect on policy outcomes. World Bank Economic Review, 6(3), 353–398. CrossRef
Elgie, R. (2005). From Linz to Tsebelis: Three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization, 12(1), 106–122. CrossRef
Frankel, J. A. & Romer, D. H. (1996). Trade and growth: An empirical investigation. NBER Working Paper (w5476).
Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., & Moreno, C. (2009). Are parliamentary systems better? Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 327–359. CrossRef
Gregorini, F. & Longoni, E. (2009). Inequality, political systems and public spending. Technical report.
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83–116. CrossRef
Hayo, B., & Voigt, S. (2010). Determinants of constitutional change: Why do countries change their form of government? Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(3), 283–305. CrossRef
Knutsen, C. H. (2009). The economic growth effect of constitutions revisited. Technical report, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
Linz, J. J. (1990). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51–69.
Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. S. (1997). Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy a critical appraisal. Comparative Politics, 29(4), 449–471. CrossRef
OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. E. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge: MIT press.
Polillo, S., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1764–1802. CrossRef
Reynal-Querol, M., & Montalvo, J. G. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict and civil war. American Economic Review, 95(3), 796–816. CrossRef
Rockey, J. (2012). Reconsidering the fiscal effects of constitutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(3), 313–323. CrossRef
Rogoff, M. A. (2011). French constitutional law: Cases and materials. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
Shugart, M. S. (1999). Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and the provision of collective goods in less-developed countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 10(1), 53–88. CrossRef
Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Who does better for the economy? Presidents versus parliamentary democracies
F. Gulcin Ozkan
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© BBL, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Neuer Inhalt/© hww, So bewältigen Sie Stress im Fernstudium/© granata68 | stock.adobe.com | AdobeStock