Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

1. Why Consider Science in International Policy?

verfasst von : Jessica Espey

Erschienen in: Science in Negotiation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Das Kapitel befasst sich mit der Schaffung der Ziele Nachhaltiger Entwicklung (SDGs) im Rahmen der Agenda 2030 für nachhaltige Entwicklung und hebt die beispiellosen Konsultationsbemühungen hervor, an denen verschiedene Interessengruppen beteiligt waren. Sie untersucht, wie wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse die Formulierung dieser Ziele beeinflusst haben, insbesondere innerhalb der Generalversammlung der Vereinten Nationen (UNGA). Der Text diskutiert auch die einzigartigen institutionellen Arrangements und das Engagement nichtstaatlicher Akteure, die den Prozess zwischen den Beweisen und der Politik vermittelten. Durch die Konzentration auf drei Themenbereiche - öffentliche Gesundheit, städtische Nachhaltigkeit und Datensysteme - bietet das Kapitel eine sektorübergreifende Perspektive auf den Verhandlungsprozess für nachhaltige Entwicklungsziele. Die Analyse enthüllt die komplexe Dynamik der Verwendung von Beweisen in der globalen Politikentwicklung und betont die Bedeutung institutioneller Kultur und der Rolle epistemischer Gemeinschaften bei der Gestaltung internationaler Politik.

KI-Generiert

Diese Zusammenfassung des Fachinhalts wurde mit Hilfe von KI generiert.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nächstes Kapitel Scientific Evidence in Policy Processes: Concepts and Histories

See for example statements made by the UN Secretary General, the 2016 report of the UNESCO Scientific Advisory Board and guidance recently issued for countries on the importance of national science-policy interfaces (UNSG, 2021, UNESCO, 2016, UNDESA, 2021).

A UNGA-mandated coalition of self-organising children and youth representatives to the UN. Visit: https://www.unmgcy.org/

The IAEG was formed in 2004 to share data on child mortality, improve methods for child mortality estimation, report on progress towards child survival goals and enhance country capacity to produce timely and properly assessed estimates of child mortality. Visit: https://childmortality.org/about

The Friends of Governance group is an informal government group created in 2011. ‘The main objective of the Friends group is to create an informal space for governments to have discussions among themselves, backed up by expert papers when requested, on issues relating to good governance and the Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development (IFSD) in relation to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It builds on a rich tradition of ˜Friends of Groups” in New York which serves as a useful informal space for governments to discuss ideas and papers relating to a particular topic’ (Friend of Governance 2022; para 2). Visit: https://friendsofgovernance.org/

‘The Group of 77 (G-77) was established on 15 June 1964 by seventy-seven developing countries signatories of the “Joint Declaration of the Seventy-Seven Developing Countries” issued at the end of the first session of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in Geneva….Although the members of the G-77 have increased to 134 countries, the original name was retained due to its historic significance’. The G77 provides ‘the means for the countries of the South to articulate and promote their collective economic interests and enhance their joint negotiating capacity on all major international economic issues within the United Nations system, and promote South-South cooperation for development’ (G77 2022; paras 1-2).

See for example the EC’s Scientific Advice Mechanism established in 2015: https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/support-policymaking/scientific-support-eu-policies/group-chief-scientific-advisors_en [Last accessed 05/06/2020].

After the set of 17 goals had been decided upon by the Open Working Group (OWG) (in 2014), the deliberation process was informally redubbed the ‘SDG negotiations’. Both Post-2015 and SDG negotiations are used interchangeably throughout this report.

Once the OWG had concluded upon a set of SDGs (in 2014), the process was informally renamed the SDG negotiation process.

Allan, B. (2018). Scientific cosmology and international orders, Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

Anyebe, A. A. (2017). An overview of approaches to the study of public policy. International Journal of Political Science, 4(1), 208–217.

Australian Government. (2009). Strengthening evidence-based policy in the Australian federation, Canberra, 17–18 August 2009 Volume 1: Proceedings, Australian Government Productivity Commission. Proceedings available at: https://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/strengthening-evidence/roundtable-proceedings-volume1.pdf. Last accessed 05 May 2020.

Baum, R. (2017) American Chemical Society national historic chemical landmarks. Chlorofluorocarbons and Ozone Depletion. Available at: http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/cfcs-ozone.html. Last accessed 6 May 22.

Berridge, V., & Stanton, J. (1999). Science and policy: Historical insights. Social Science Medicine, 49(9), 1133–1138.

Bulmer, M. (1982). The use of social research. Allen and Unwin.

Caballero, P. (2016). A Short History of the SDGs. Impakter Blog. Available at: https://impakter.com/short-history-sdgs/. Last accessed 2 June 2022.

Commission on Evidence-Based Policy Making. (2016). Joint Statement from Chair Katharine G. Abraham and Co-Chair Ron Haskins on the Commencement of the Commission on Evidence-based Policymaking, July 22, 2016. Available at: https://www.cep.gov/about/abraham-haskins.pdf. Last accessed 15 May 2022.

Davies, P. (2004). Sociology and policy science: Just in time? The British Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 447–450.CrossRef

Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (Eds.). (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Policy Press.

Deacon, B. (2016). Assessing the SDGs from the point of view of global social governance. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 32(2), 116–130.CrossRef

Dodds, F., Donoghue, D., & Roesch, J. L. (2016). Negotiating the sustainable development goals. Routledge.CrossRef

Fukuda-Parr, S. (2019). Keeping out extreme inequality from the SDG agenda – The politics of indicators. Global Policy, 10(S1), 61–69.CrossRef

Gauch, H. G. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge University Press.

Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organisation, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRef

Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.CrossRef

IAEG. (2014). A world that counts: Mobilising the data revolution for sustainable development. A Report to the UN Secretary-General by the Independent Expert Advisory Group on the Data Revolution, Available online at: http://www.undatarevolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/A-World-That-Counts.pdf. Last accessed 17 May 2020.

Ichimura, H., & Kawaguchi, D. (2017). Evidence-based policymaking: Independence and human resource development are the key. Tokyo.

Kamau, M., Chasek, P., & O’Connor, D. (2018). Transforming multilateral diplomacy: The inside story of the sustainable development goals. Routledge.CrossRef

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (Eds.). (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable development goals as governance innovation. MIT Press.

Kingston, C., & Caballero, G. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), 151–180.CrossRef

Kraft, M., & Furlong, S. (2007). Public policy: Politics, analysis and alternatives (2nd ed.). CQ.

Lin, V., & Gibson, B. (Eds.). (2003). Evidence-based health policy: Problems and possibilities. Oxford University Press.

Marten, R. (2018). Global health disruptors: Millennium development goals, The BMJ Opinion, Available online: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/11/26/global-health-disruptors-millennium-development-goals/. Last accessed 17 May 2020.

Mawuko-Yevugah, L. (2010). Governing through developmentality: The politics of international aid reform and the (re)production of power, neoliberalism and neocolonial interventions in Ghana. University of Alberta.

McManus, J. (2013). Health in the Post-2015 agenda: Report of global thematic consultation on health in the post-2015 development agenda. The World We Want. Available at: https://www.post2020hlp.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/health-in-the-post-2015-agenda_LR.pdf. Last accessed 1 June 2022.

Mohammad, N. & Farjana, Y. (2018). Participation as a human right: A rights-based approach to development. In Awis, M.L. (ed) Stakeholders, governance and responsibility (Developments in corporate governance and responsibility, Vol. 14, pp. 33–45). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Molina, M. & Rowland, F. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature 249, 810–812.

Nevo, I., & Slonim-Nevo, V. (2011). The myth of evidence-based practice: Towards evidence-informed practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1176–1197.CrossRef

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

OECD. (2020). World Cities Tool, Available at: http://www.worldcitiestool.org/. Last accessed 3 Nov 2020.

Parkhurt, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge Studies in Governance and Public Policy.

Peters, G. (2005). Institutional theory in political science. Continuum.

Revi, A. (2016). Afterwards: Habitat III and the sustainable development goals. Urbanisation, 1(2), x–xiv.CrossRef

Revi, A. (2020) Harnessing urbanization to accelerate SDG implementation in a post-COVID-19 world, UN Chronicle, Available at: https://www.un.org/en/un-chronicle/harnessing-urbanization-accelerate-sdg-implementation-post-covid-19-world. Last accessed 2 Mar 2021.

Richardson, E. T. (2020). Pandemicity, COVID-19 and the limits of public health science. BMJ Global Health, 5, e002571.CrossRef

Russell, B. (1926a). Theory of knowledge, Encyclopaedia Britannica (Vol. 2, 13th ed., pp. 642–645). The Encyclopaedia Britannica Company Ltd.

Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. W.W. Norton and Co.

Stone, D. (2019). Making global policy (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Strydom, W. F., Funke, N., Nienaber, S., Nortje, K., & Steyn, M. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: A review. South African Journal of Science, 106(5/6), 249.CrossRef

Sutcliffe, S., & Court, J. (2005). Evidence-based policymaking: What is it? How does it work? What relevance for developing countries? ODI Working Paper.

Valencia, S. C., Simon, D., Croese, S., Nordqvist, J., Oloko, M., Sharma, T., Taylor Buck, N., & Versace, I. (2019). Adapting the sustainable development goals and the new urban agenda to the city level: Initial reflections from a comparative research project. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(1), 4–23.CrossRef

Vandemoortele, J. (2018). From simple-minded MDGs to muddle-headed SDGs. Development Studies Research, 5(1), 8389.CrossRef

Waqa, G., Mavoa, H., Snowdon, W., Moodie, M., Nadakuitavuki, R., McCabe, M., & Swinburn, B. (2013). Participants’ perceptions of a knowledge-brokering strategy to facilitate evidence-informed policymaking in Fiji. BMC Public Health, 13(1).

Ward, M., & Mowat, D. (2012). Creating an Organisational culture for evidence-informed decision making. Healthcare Management Forum, 25(3), 146–150.CrossRef

Wesselink, A., Colebatch, H., & Pearce, W. (2014). Evidence and policy: Discourses, meanings and practices. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 339–344.CrossRef

Woods, N. (2007). Multilateralism and building stronger international institutions. In A. Ebrahim & E. Weisband (Eds.), Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics (pp. 27–44). Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

UNDESA (2021). CEPA strategy guidance note on the science-policy interface, UNDESA: New York. Available at: https://unpan.un.org/sites/unpan.un.org/files/Strategy%20note%20science%20policy%20interface%20March%202021.pdf

UN News. (2015). Accurate and timely data vital to post-2015 agenda, says UN Assembly President, 17 April 2015. UN News Online. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2015/04/496322. Last accessed 10 June 2022.

UN Secretary General. (2021). United in Science - Video Message from the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eli0crdZUxg. Last accessed 4 June 2022.

UNDG. (2013). The Global Conversation Begins, UN Development Group: New York. Available at: https://unsdg.un.org/resources/global-conversation-begins

UNDP. (2012a). Millennium development goals report. United Nations.

UNESCO. (2016). The future of scientific advice to the United Nations, a summary report to the secretary-general of the United Nations from the scientific advisory board to the UN. UNESCO.

UNGA. (2013). Draft decision submitted by the president of the general assembly, open working Group of the General Assembly on sustainable development goals, sixty-seventh session agenda item 20, a/67/L.48/rev.1. Available at: https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/67/L.48/Rev.1andLang=E. Last accessed 17 May 2020.

United Nations. (2012a). The Future We Want, Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development, A/RES/66/288, New York: United Nations. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf. Last accessed 30 Jan 2020.

United Nations. (2012b). Terms of reference for the high-level panel of eminent persons on the Post-2015 development agenda. United Nations. https://www.un.org/sg/sites/www.un.org.sg/files/documents/management/ToRpost2015.pdf. Last accessed 6 June 2022

United Nations. (2013a). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. The report of the high-level panel of eminent persons on the Post-2015 development agenda. United Nations.

United Nations. (2015a). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1. United Nations.

United Nations. (2015b). Secretary General’s remarks to press conference on the outcome document of the post-2015 development agenda. New York, 3 August. Available at: http://www.un.org/press/en/2015/sgsm16987.doc.htm. Last accessed 12 Apr 2017.

Titel: Why Consider Science in International Policy?
verfasst von: Jessica Espey
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Science in Negotiation
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18125-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-18126-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18126-9_1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"