Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Challenges of Low-Code/No-Code Software Development: A Literature Review Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2022 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Will Mobile Payment Change Germans’ Love of Cash? A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Payment, Cash and Card Payment in Germany

verfasst von : Sören Aguirre Reid, Richard Lackes, Markus Siepermann, Valerie Wulfhorst

Erschienen in: Perspectives in Business Informatics Research

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Despite a global pandemic, it positively increases the intention to use contactless payments. MP usage still falls behind existing alternative payment methods like cash and card. Thus, this paper aims to explore the drivers and inhibitors of MP usage in relation to cash and card payment, which is still an underresearched area in MP. For this, we conducted an online survey (n = 227) in Germany and ran a partial least squares path modelling approach. The results reveal that relative advantage and compatibility drive the intention to use MP compared to cash and card payment. Especially, the result for relative advantage indicates that MP needs some “good” arguments to convince card-preferring users to switch to MP. Interestingly, users regard the disadvantages of MP differently. For instance, perceived switching costs are significantly stronger for MP compared to cash payment but data threat is significantly stronger for MP compared to card payment. The results of the disadvantages of MP confirm Germans’ strong “love” for cash payment and that German consumers regard MP as more similar to the card than to cash payment.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Are We Speaking the Same Language? An Analysis of German and Chinese Local Shopping Platforms
Nächstes Kapitel Drawing Attention on (Visually) Competitive Online Shopping Platforms – An Eye-Tracking Study Analysing the Effects of Visual Cues on the Amazon Marketplace
Literatur
1.
Dahlberg, T., Oorni, A.: Understanding changes in consumer payment habits - do mobile payments and electronic invoices attract consumers? In: 40th HICCS, Hawaii, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2007)
2.
Gerpott, T.J., Meinert, P.: Who signs up for NFC mobile payment services? Mobile network operator subscribers in Germany. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 23, 1–13 (2017)CrossRef
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Cabinakova, J., Knümann, F., Horst, F.: Kosten der Bargeldzahlung im Einzelhandel. Studie zur Ermittlung und Bewertung der Kosten, die durch die Bargeldzahlung im Einzelhandel verursacht werden, Deutsche Bundesbank (2019)
11.
Deutsche Bundesbank: Zwischenerhebung zum Zahlungsverhalten in Deutschland 2019, Deutsche Bundesbank (2019)
12.
Pietrowiak, A., Korella, L., Novotny, J.: Zahlungsverhalten in Deutschland 2020 – Bezahlen im Jahr der Corona-Pandemie. Erhebung über die Verwendung von Zahlungsmitteln, Deutsche Bundesbank (2021)
13.
14.
Dahlberg, T., Guo, J., Ondrus, J.: A critical review of mobile payment research. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 14, 265–284 (2015)CrossRef
15.
Bärsch, S., Siepermann, M., Lackes, R., Wulfhorst, V.: Nothing but cash? Mobile payment acceptance in Germany. In: 41th ICIS, pp. 1–17. AIS, India (2020)
16.
Boden, J., Maier, E., Wilken, R.: The effect of credit card versus mobile payment on convenience and consumers’ willingness to pay. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 52, 1–10 (2020)CrossRef
17.
Loh, X.-M., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G.W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Switching from cash to mobile payment: what’s the hold-up? INTR 31, 376–399 (2021)
18.
Mai, H.: Cash empowers the individual through data protection, DB Research (2019)
19.
Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P.Y., Cao, Y.: Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: a cross-environment perspective. Inf. Manag. 48, 393–403 (2011)CrossRef
20.
Hongxia, P., Xianhao, X., Weidan, L.: Drivers and barriers in the acceptance of mobile payment in China. In: ICEE, Shanghai, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2011)
21.
Pham, T.-T.T., Ho, J.C.: The effects of product-related, personal-related factors and attractiveness of alternatives on consumer adoption of NFC-based mobile payments. Technol. Soc. 43, 159–172 (2015)CrossRef
22.
Yang, S., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., Cao, Y., Zhang, R.: Mobile payment services adoption across time: an empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28, 129–142 (2012)CrossRef
23.
Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L., Beatty, S.E.: Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. J. Bus. Res. 55, 441–450 (2002)CrossRef
24.
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Ramos de Luna, I., Montoro-Ríos, F.: Intention to use new mobile payment systems: a comparative analysis of SMS and NFC payments. Econ. Res.h-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30, 892–910 (2017)
25.
Abrahão, R.D.S., Moriguchi, S.N., Andrade, D.F.: Intention of adoption of mobile payment: an analysis in the light of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação 13, 221–230 (2016)
26.
Kim, H.-W., Kankanhalli, A.: Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspective. MIS Q. 33, 567–582 (2009)CrossRef
27.
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRef
28.
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (2010)
29.
Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 192–222 (1991)CrossRef
30.
Schierz, P.G., Schilke, O., Wirtz, B.W.: Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: an empirical analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9, 209–216 (2010)CrossRef
31.
Bailey, A.A., Pentina, I., Mishra, A.S., Ben Mimoun, M.S.: Mobile payments adoption by US consumers: an extended TAM. IJRDM 45, 626–640 (2017)CrossRef
32.
Koenig-Lewis, N., Marquet, M., Palmer, A., Zhao, A.L.: Enjoyment and social influence: predicting mobile payment adoption. Serv. Ind. J. 35, 537–554 (2015)CrossRef
33.
Slade, E., Williams, M., Dwivedi, Y., Piercy, N.: Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. J. Strateg. Mark. 23, 209–223 (2015)CrossRef
34.
Ramos de Luna, I., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F.: Mobile payment is not all the same: the adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 146, 931–944 (2019)
35.
Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J.: Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 29, 28–45 (1982)CrossRef
36.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., Campos, F.: Mobile payment: understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 61, 404–414 (2016)CrossRef
37.
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Pearson, New Jersey (1980)
38.
Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., Warshaw, P.R.: The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consum. Res. 15, 325–343 (1988)CrossRef
39.
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991)CrossRef
40.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)CrossRef
41.
Lin, T.-C., Huang, S.-L., Hsu, C.-J.: A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product – the case of smartphones. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35, 215–228 (2015)CrossRef
42.
Polites, G.L., Karahanna, E.: Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Q. 36, 21 (2012)CrossRef
43.
Jenkins, P., Ophoff, J.: Factors influencing the intention to adopt NFC mobile payments – a South African perspective. In: CONF-IRM, pp. 1–12. AIS (2016)
44.
Featherman, M.S., Pavlou, P.A.: Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 451–474 (2003)CrossRef
45.
Peter, J.P., Ryan, M.J.: An investigation of perceived risk at the brand level. J. Mark. Res. 13, 184–188 (1976)CrossRef
46.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19, 139–152 (2011)CrossRef
47.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Richter, N.F., Hauff, S.: Partial Least Squares Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Verlag Franz Vahlen, München (2017)
48.
Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 295, 295–336 (1998)
49.
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F.: Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: the moderating effect of age. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35, 464–478 (2014)CrossRef
50.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)CrossRef
51.
Straub, D., Gefen, D., Boudreau, M.-C.: Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. CAIS 13, 380–427 (2004)CrossRef
52.
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L.G., Kuppelwieser, V.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) - an emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26, 106–121 (2014)
53.
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)
54.
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. JAMS 16, 74–94 (1988)CrossRef
55.
56.
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York (1988)MATH
57.
Conway, J.M., Lance, C.E.: What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. J. Bus. Psychol. 25, 325–334 (2010)CrossRef
58.
Kock, N.: Common method bias in PLS-SEM. Int. J. e-Collab. 11, 1–10 (2015)
59.
60.
Remus, W.: Graduate students as surrogates for managers in experiments on business decision making. J. Bus. Res. 14, 19–25 (1986)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Will Mobile Payment Change Germans’ Love of Cash? A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Payment, Cash and Card Payment in Germany
verfasst von
Sören Aguirre Reid
Richard Lackes
Markus Siepermann
Valerie Wulfhorst
Copyright-Jahr
2022
Buch
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16946-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-16947-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16947-2_10