nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Wissen für den Wandel – Wissenstheoretische Grundlagen einer nachhaltigen Bioökonomiepolitik

verfasst von : Sophie Urmetzer, Michael P. Schlaile, Kristina Bogner, Matthias Mueller, Andreas Pyka

Erschienen in: Bioökonomie nachhaltig gestalten

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Eine Strategie zur Umsetzung einer nachhaltigen Bioökonomie muss neben disziplinären und technischen Zielvorstellungen auch den gesellschaftlichen Wandel einplanen und vorbereiten. Eine zukunftsfähige politische Strategie muss also neben dem techno-ökonomischen Wissen ebenso solches Wissen fördern, welches es Produzenten und Konsumenten ermöglicht, nicht-nachhaltige Verfahren und Verhaltensweisen nicht nur zu reduzieren, sondern radikal zu verändern. Dazu gehören neben den technologischen Fertigkeiten auch ein interdisziplinäres Verständnis systemischer Zusammenhänge, demokratisch legitimierte Zielvorstellungen sowie die notwendigen Fähigkeiten, um diese Ziele partizipativ umzusetzen. Nur durch die Anerkennung und gezielte Förderung dieses als dediziert bezeichneten Wissens können nachhaltige Veränderungen erwachsen. Der Beitrag ergänzt das evolutionsökonomische Konzept des wissensbasierten Wandels durch Ansätze aus den Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften. Konkret werden die besonderen Eigenschaften dieses dedizierten Wissens diskutiert, wodurch nicht zuletzt eine Grundlage für neue Ansätze in der Bioökonomiepolitik geschaffen wird.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Der Zukunftsdiskurs Bioökonomie im Spiegel der gegenwärtigen Themenlandschaft

Nächstes Kapitel Herausforderungen des systemischen Ansatzes in der Bioökonomie

Sämtliche wörtlichen Zitate aus englischsprachigen Publikationen wurden von den Autorinnen selbst übersetzt.

Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46 (1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.CrossRef

Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Baumgärtner, S., Fischer, J., Hanspach, J., Härdtle, W., Heinrichs, H., Klein, A. M., Lang, D. J., Martens, P., & Walmsley, D. (2014). Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics 103, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.CrossRef

Albrecht, S., Gottschick, M., Schorling, M., & Stirn, S. (2012a). Bio-Ökonomie – gesellschaftliche Transformation ohne Verständigung über Ziele und Wege? (BIOGUM-Forschungsbericht). Hamburg.

Albrecht, S., Gottschick, M., Schorling, M., & Stirn, S. (2012b). Bioökonomie am Scheideweg: Industrialisierung von Biomasse oder nachhaltige Produktion? GAIA 21 (1), 33–37.CrossRef

Almudi, I., & Fatas-Villafranca, F. (2018). Promotion and Coevolutionary Dynamics in Contemporary Capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues 52 (1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430943.CrossRef

Almudi, I., Fatas-Villafranca, F., & Potts, J. (2016). Utopia competition: a new approach to the micro-foundations of sustainability transitions. Journal of Bioeconomics 19 (1), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9239-2.CrossRef

Antonelli, C. (1999). The evolution of the industrial organisation of the production of knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.2.243.CrossRef

Arthur, W. B. (2007). The structure of invention. Research Policy 36 (2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.005.CrossRef

Asheim, B. T., Moodysson, J., & Tödtling, F. (2011). Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-Art Regional Innovation System Policies in Europe? European Planning Studies 19 (7), 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573127.CrossRef

Banks, J. A. (1993). The Canon Debate, Knowledge Construction, and Multicultural Education. Educational Researcher 22 (5), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x022005004.CrossRef

Beddoe, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Garza, E., Kent, J., Kubiszewski, I., Martinez, L., McCowen, T., Murphy, K., Myers, N., Ogden, Z., Stapleton, K., & Woodward, J. (2009). Overcoming systemic roadblocks to sustainability: the evolutionary redesign of worldviews, institutions, and technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (8), 2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812570106.CrossRef

Bennet, A., & Bennet, D. (2007). Knowledge mobilization in the social sciences and humanities. Moving from research to action. Virgina: MQI Press.

Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhüner, B., & Zondervan, R. (2010). Earth system governance: a research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 10 (4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3.CrossRef

Bioökonomierat (2016). Empfehlungen des Bioökonomierates: Weiterentwicklung der „Nationalen Forschungsstrategie Bioökonomie 2030“. http://biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/empfehlungen/181116_Ratsempfelungen_fu__r_die_Weiterentwicklung_der_Forschungsstrategie_final.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. April 2018.

Bioökonomierat (2019). Was ist der Bioökonomierat? https://biooekonomierat.de/biooekonomierat/. Zugegriffen: 11. September 2019.

Birch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2010). Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy”. Sustainability 2 (9), 2898–2918. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/9/2898/pdf.

Blok, V., Gremmen, B., & Wesselink, R. (2016). Dealing with the Wicked Problem of Sustainability in advance. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201621737.CrossRef

BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) (2014). Bioökonomie als gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Konzept zur Förderung sozial- und wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschung für die Bioökonomie. Berlin. https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Biooekonomie_als_gesellschaftlicher_Wandel.pdf. Zugegriffen: 29. Mai 2018.

BMBF (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research), & BMEL (German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture) (2015). Bioeconomy in Germany: Opportunities for a bio-based and sustainable future. Berlin, Bonn.

BMEL (Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft) (2016). Fortschrittsbericht zur Nationalen Politikstrategie Bioökonomie. Berlin.

Bogner, K. (2019). Knowledge Networks in the German Bioeconomy: Network Structure of Publicly Funded R&D Networks. Hohenheimer Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences (03-2019). https://wiso.uni-hohenheim.de/fileadmin/einrichtungen/wiso/Forschungsdekan/Papers_BESS/dp_03-2019_online.pdf.

Bogner, K., Mueller, M., & Schlaile, M. P. (2018). Knowledge diffusion in formal networks. The roles of degree distribution and cognitive distance. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics 8 (3/4), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEE.2018.096365.

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies 39 (1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887.CrossRef

Boulding, K. E. (1985). The world as a total system. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

Boyd, E., & Folke, C. (Hrsg.). (2012). Adapting institutions. Governance, complexity and social-ecological resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Breslin, D. (2014). Towards a generalized Darwinist view of sustainability. In: C. Scholz & J. Zentes (Hrsg.), Beyond sustainability (S. 13–35). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Brewer, J. (2015). Tools for culture design. Toward a science of social change? Spanda Journal 6 (1), 67–73.

Brewer, J., & Karafiath, L. (2013). Why Global Warming Won’t Go Viral. A research report prepared by DarwinSF. https://www.slideshare.net/joebrewer31/why-global-warming-wont-go-viral. Zugegriffen: 14. April 2018.

Bugge, M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 8 (7), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691.CrossRef

Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The Systems View of Life. A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Castells, M. (2010a). The rise of the network society (The information age, Vol. 1, 2^nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2010b). The power of identity (The information age, Vol. 2, 2^nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2010c). End of Millennium (The information age, Vol. 3, 2^nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: A systems of innovation approach. In: R. E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann & P. Shapira (Hrsg.), The theory and practice of innovation policy. An international research handbook (S. 95–114). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal 99 (397), 569–596.CrossRef

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.CrossRef

Copagnon, D., Chan, S., & Mert, A. (2012). The changing role of the state. In: F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Hrsg.), Global environmental governance reconsidered (S. 237–264). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Costanza, R. (2016). How do cultures evolve, and can we direct that change to create a better world? Wildlife Australia 53 (2), 46–47.

Cox, R. H., & Béland, D. (2013). Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability. Governance 26 (2), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12003.CrossRef

Daimer, S., Hufnagl, M., & Warnke, P. (2012). Challenge-oriented policy-making and innovation systems theory. Reconsidering systemic instruments. In: K. Koschatzky (Hrsg.), Innovation system revisited. Experiences from 40 years of Fraunhofer ISI research (S. 217–234). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer ISI.

Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. Journal of Lifelong Learning (7), 1–14.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy 11 (3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.CrossRef

Duden (2019). Wissen. Bedeutungen. https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Wissen. Zugegriffen: 10. Juli 2019.

Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001.CrossRef

European Commission (2012). Innovating for sustainable growth. A bioeconomy for Europe, Brussels. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2018.

European Commission (2017). Review of the 2012 European bioeconomy strategy, Brussels. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2018.

Fagerberg, J. (2017). Mission (im)possible? The role of innovation (and innovation policy) in supporting structural change & sustainability transitions (Working Papers on Innovation Studies Nr. 20180216). Oslo: Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.

Fatheuer, T., Fuhr, L., & Unmüßig, B. (2015). Kritik der Grünen Ökonomie. München: oekom Verlag.

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.CrossRef

Foray, D., & Mairesse, J. (2002). The knowledge dilemma in the geography of innovation. In: M. P. Feldman & N. Massard (Hrsg.), Institutions and Systems in the Geography of Innovation (S. 35–54). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Freeman, C. (2008). Systems of innovation. Selected essays in evolutionary economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon (2019). Wissen. Ausführliche Definition. https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/wissen-47196. Zugegriffen: 10. Juli 2019.

Galunic, C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1193::AID-SMJ5>3.0.CO;2-F.

Göpel, M. (2016). The Great Mindshift. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef

Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning Economies, Innovation Systems and European Integration. Regional Studies 31 (5), 479–490.CrossRef

Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1 (1/2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.2004.004619.CrossRef

Grunwald, A. (2007). Working Towards Sustainable Development in the Face of Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622774.CrossRef

Grunwald, A. (2016). Nachhaltigkeit verstehen. Arbeiten an der Bedeutung nachhaltiger Entwicklung. München: oekom Verlag.

Hausknost, D., Schriefl, E., Lauk, C., & Kalt, G. (2017). A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices. Sustainability 9 (4), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040669.CrossRef

Hempel, C., Will, S., & Zander, K. (2019). Societal Perspectives on a Bio-economy in Germany: An Explorative Study Using Q Methodology 10 (1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v10i1.02.CrossRef

Imbert, E., Ladu, L., Morone, P., & Quitzow, R. (2017). Comparing policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: The case of Italy and Germany. Energy Research & Social Science 33, 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.08.006.CrossRef

Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4.CrossRef

Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2003). Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8 (2), 94–99.CrossRef

Jahn, D., & Korolczuk, S. (2012). German exceptionalism: the end of nuclear energy in Germany! Environmental Politics 21 (1), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.643374.CrossRef

Lahsen, M. (2010). The social status of climate change knowledge: an editorial essay. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.27.CrossRef

Leach, M., Stirling, A., & Scoones, I. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities. Technology, environment, social justice. Abingdon Oxon: Earthscan.

Leemans, R., van Amstel, A., Battjes, C., Kreileman, E., & Toet, S. (1996). The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source. Global Environmental Change 6 (4), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-3780(96)00028-3.CrossRef

Lindner, R., Daimer, S., Beckert, B., Heyen, N., Koehler, J., Teufel, B., Warnke, P., & Wydra, S. (2016). Addressing directionality: Orientation failure and the systems of innovation heuristic. Towards reflexive governance. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers Innovation and Policy Analysis 52.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (2001). Innovation policy in the globalizing learning economy. In: D. Archibugi & B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.), The globalizing learning economy (S. 273–291). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.). (2010). National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning (Anthem other canon series). London: Anthem Press.

Lundvall, B.-Å., & Johnson, B. (1994). The Learning Economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1 (2), 23–42.CrossRef

Martin, B. R. (2016). Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy 43 (3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv077.CrossRef

McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability 5 (6), 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589.CrossRef

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems. A primer. London: Earthscan.

Mesoudi, A. (2016). Cultural Evolution: A Review of Theory, Findings and Controversies. Evolutionary Biology 43 (4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9320-0.CrossRef

Mesoudi, A. (2017). Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620741114.CrossRef

Meyer, M. (2010). The Rise of the Knowledge Broker. Science Communication 32 (1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009359797.CrossRef

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D., & Loorbach, D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science 9 (2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6.CrossRef

Mitton, C., Adair, C. E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S. B., & Waye Perry, B. (2007). Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. The Milbank quarterly 85 (4), 729–768. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x.CrossRef

Morone, P., Tartiu, V. E., & Falcone, P. (2015). Assessing the potential of biowaste for bioplastics production through social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 90, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.069.CrossRef

Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2010). Knowledge diffusion and innovation. Modelling complex entrepreneurial behaviours. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Mustalahti, I. (2018). The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3781–3790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R. (1989). What is private and what is public about technology? Science, Technology, & Human Values 14 (3), 229–241.CrossRef

Nelson, R. R. (Hrsg.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.CrossRef

Nooteboom, B., van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy 36 (7), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003.CrossRef

Nyholm, J., Normann, L., Frelle-Petersen, C., Riis, M., & Torstensen, P. (2001). Innovation policy in the knowledge-based economy. Can theory guide policy making? In: D. Archibugi & B.-Å. Lundvall (Hrsg.), The globalizing learning economy (S. 239–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., van der Hel, S., Widerberg, O., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., Anderton, K., Sethi, M., & Barau, A. (2017). Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001.CrossRef

Peterson, H. (2009). Transformational supply chains and the ‚wicked problem‘ of sustainability: aligning knowledge, innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership. Journal on Chain and Network Science 9 (2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.3920/jcns2009.x178.CrossRef

Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014). Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research. Sustainability 6 (3), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222.CrossRef

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

Potts, J. (2001). Knowledge and markets. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11 (4), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00003865.CrossRef

ProClim- (1997). Research on Sustainability and Global Change – Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers. Berne: Swiss Academy of Sciences (SAS).

Pyka, A. (2017). Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3 (1), 385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7.CrossRef

Pyka, A., Bogner, K., & Urmetzer, S. (2019). Productivity Slowdown, Exhausted Opportunities and the Power of Human Ingenuity – Schumpeter Meets Georgescu-Roegen. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 5 (3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030039.CrossRef

Pyka, A., & Prettner, K. (2018). Economic Growth, Development, and Innovation: The Transformation Towards a Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy. In: I. Lewandowski (Hrsg.), Bioeconomy (S. 331–342). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Raghu, S., Spencer, J. L., Davis, A. S., & Wiedenmann, R. N. (2011). Ecological considerations in the sustainable development of terrestrial biofuel crops. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3 (1–2), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.11.005.CrossRef

Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. (2018). Sustainable development – A ‚selling point‘ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4170–4180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157.CrossRef

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (2), 155–169.CrossRef

Rizzello, S. (2004). Knowledge as a Path-Dependence Process. Journal of Bioeconomics 6, 255–274.CrossRef

Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge within Planning Theory. Planning Theory 6 (1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161.CrossRef

Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2012). Bio-politische Ökonomie. Zur Zukunft des Regierens von Biotechnologien. In: S. Lettow (Hrsg.), Bioökonomie. Die Lebenswissenschaften und die Bewirtschaftung der Körper (S. 155–179). Bielefeld: transcript. Zugegriffen: 13. April 2018.

Scheiterle, L., Ulmer, A., Birner, R., & Pyka, A. (2018). From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: The case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 3851–3863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.150.CrossRef

Schlaile, M. P., Urmetzer, S., Blok, V., Andersen, A., Timmermans, J., Mueller, M., Fagerberg, J., & Pyka, A. (2017). Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously. Sustainability 9 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253.

Schlaile, M. P., Zeman, J., & Mueller, M. (2018). It’s a match! Simulating compatibility-based learning in a network of networks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 28, 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0579-z.

Schmid, O., Padel, S., & Levidov, L. (2012). The bio-economy concept and knowledge base in a public goods and farmer perspective. Bio-based and Applied Economics 1 (1), 47–63.

Schneider, F., Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A. B., Buser, T., Ingalls, M., & Messerli, P. (2019). How can science support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four tasks to tackle the normative dimension of sustainability. Sustainability Science 79 (4), 387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00675-y.CrossRef

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Schütte, G. (2018). What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? New Biotechnology 40 (Pt A), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003.CrossRef

Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008). Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319 (5867), 1238–1240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861.

Smith, K. (1994). Interactions in knowledge systems: Foundations, policy implications and empirical methods. STEP report R-10. Oslo: STEP group. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/226741/STEPrapport10-1994.pdf?sequence=1. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2018.

Smits, R., & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1 (1/2), 4–32.CrossRef

Soete, L. (2013). Is innovation always good? In: J. Fagerberg, B. R. Martin & E. S. Andersen (Hrsg.), Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges (S. 134–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., & McCormick, K. (2013). Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches. Sustainability 5 (6), 2751–2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751.CrossRef

Sterling, S. (2011). Transformative Learning and Sustainability: sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (5), 17–33.

Stern, T., Ploll, U., Spies, R., Schwarzbauer, P., Hesser, F., & Ranacher, L. (2018). Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria – An Explorative Case Study. Sustainability 10 (11), 4142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114142.CrossRef

Steward, F. (2008). Breaking the boundaries: Transformative innovation for the global good. NESTA Provocation 07. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/breaking-boundaries. Zugegriffen: 16. April 2018.

Steward, F. (2012). Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (4), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663959.CrossRef

Sustainable Influencers (2019). Sustainable Influencers. http://sustainableinfluencers.com/. Zugegriffen: 2. September 2019.

Szulanski, G. (2003). Sticky Knowledge. Barriers to Knowing in the Firm. London: SAGE.

The European Bioeconomy Stakeholders Panel (2017). European Bioeconomy Stakeholders Manifesto. Brussels.

UN (United Nations) (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Zugegriffen: 25. Juli 2019.

Urmetzer, S., & Pyka, A. (2019). Innovation Systems for Sustainability. In: W. Leal Filho, A. Azul, L. Brandli, P. Özuyar & T. Wall (Hrsg.), Decent Work and Economic Growth (Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_43-1.

Vermeulen, B., & Pyka, A. (2017). The Role of Network Topology and the Spatial Distribution and Structure of Knowledge in Regional Innovation Policy: A Calibrated Agent-Based Model Study. Computational Economics 11 (7), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9776-3.CrossRef

Virgin, I., Fielding, M., Fones Sundell, M., Hoff, H., & Granit, J. (2017). Benefits and challenges of a new knowledge-based bioeconomy. In: I. Virgin & E. J. Morris (Hrsg.), Creating Sustainable Bioeconomies. The bioscience revolution in Europe and Africa (S. 11–25). Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.

von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation. Management Science 40 (4), 429–439.CrossRef

von Wehrden, H., Luederitz, C., Leventon, J., & Russell, S. (2017). Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research. Challenges in Sustainability 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.12924/cis2017.05010035.

Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance. Introduction. In: J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht & R. Kemp (Hrsg.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (S. 3–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

WBGU (2011). Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen.

Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy 41 (6), 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015.CrossRef

Wiek, A., & Lang, D. J. (2016). Transformational Sustainability Research Methodology. In: H. Heinrichs, P. Martens, G. Michelsen & A. Wiek (Hrsg.), Sustainability Science (S. 31–41). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRef

Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014). Evolving the future: toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13001593.CrossRef

Wuketits, F. M. (1993). Moral systems as evolutionary systems: Taking evolutionary ethics seriously. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 16 (3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-7361(93)90035-p.CrossRef

Young, O. R. (2017). Governing Complex Systems. Social Capital for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef

Zagzebski, L. (1999). What is knowledge? In: J. Greco & E. Sosa (Hrsg.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (S. 92–116). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Titel: Wissen für den Wandel – Wissenstheoretische Grundlagen einer nachhaltigen Bioökonomiepolitik
verfasst von: Sophie Urmetzer
Michael P. Schlaile
Kristina Bogner
Matthias Mueller
Andreas Pyka
Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
Buch: Bioökonomie nachhaltig gestalten
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29432-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-29433-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29433-5_4