nach oben

Erschienen in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Work Autonomy and Adaptive Digital Assistance in Flexible Working Environments

verfasst von : Elisa Gensler, Hendrik Oestreich, Anja-Kristin Abendroth, Sebastian Wrede, Britta Wrede

Erschienen in: The Digital Twin of Humans

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Digital assistance has increasingly been implemented to cognitively support employees and enhance efficiency in different working environments. However, implementations of current assistance systems are often too rigid to provide personalised support, which can restrict employees’work autonomy. Therefore, in this chapter we discuss opportunities to enhance human work autonomy in collaboration with digital assistance systems by facilitating adaptivity within these systems. First, we discuss the concept of autonomy from both a sociological and a technical perspective. Second, we develop a theoretical conception of the interaction between human and system autonomy. We identify three theoretical scenarios and provide examples of autonomy distributions in which increasing technical autonomy (a) restricts human autonomy, (b) does not affect human autonomy, or (c) enhances human autonomy. Based on this conceptualisation, we suggest that adaptive digital assistance promotes flexible distributions of autonomy levels between human beings and systems, which better addresses and enhances human work autonomy. Proceeding from research findings, our previous work, and theoretical assumptions, we present a guideline with concrete design recommendations for adaptive digital assistance systems that focus on increasing human work autonomy. In this context, we also discuss under what conditions the digital twin of a human can contribute to adaptivity to provide specific support for employees and better interaction opportunities with digital assistance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Adaptive Assistance Systems: Approaches, Benefits, and Risks

Nächstes Kapitel Individual Assembly Guidance

Some scholars also refer to criteria autonomy using the term ‘decision-making autonomy’ (Morgeson & Humphrey, 2006; Muecke & Iseke, 2019). We stick to the term ‘criteria autonomy’ for a clear distinction, as all the described autonomy dimensions involve making decisions about various facets of work.

Ahlborn, K., Bachmann, G., Biegel, F., Bienert, J., Falk, S., Dr-Ing Fay, A., et al. (2019). Technologieszenario Künstliche Intelligenz in der Industrie 4.0.

Alaieri, F., & Vellino, A. (2016). Ethical decision making in robots: Autonomy, trust and responsibility. Lecture notes in computer science. In A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, & H. He (Eds.), Social robotics (Vol. 9979, pp. 159–168). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-316

Alpaydin, E. (2016). Machine learning: The new AI. MIT Press essential knowledge seriesCambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.

Ansari, F., Hold, P., & Sihn, W. (2018). Human-centered cyber physical production system: How does Industry 4.0 impact on decision-making tasks? In 2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488409

Apt, W., Bovenschulte, M., Priesack, K., Weiß, C., & Hartmann, E. A. (2018). Einsatz von digitalen Assistenzsystemen im Betrieb No. 502 in Forschungsbericht. Berlin: Institut für Innovation und Technik.

Backhaus, N. (2019). Kontextsensitive Assistenzsysteme und Überwachung am Arbeitsplatz: Ein meta-analytisches Review zur Auswirkung elektronischer Überwachung auf Beschäftigte. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 73(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-018-00140-zMathSciNetCrossRef

Baethge-Kinsky, V., Marquardsen, K., & Tullius, K. (2018). Perspektiven industrieller Instandhaltungsarbeit. WSI-Mitteilungen, 71(3), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2018-3-174CrossRef

Baumann, H., & Maschke, M. (2016). Betriebsvereinbarungen 2015 - Verbreitung und Themen. WSI-Mitteilungen, 69(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2016-3-223CrossRef

Beer, J. M., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(2), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.2.BeerCrossRef

Beernaert, T. F., Bayrak, A. E., Etman, L., Papalambros, P. Y., et al. (2018) Framing the concept of autonomy in system design. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 2821–2832).

Berisha-Gawlowski, A., Caruso, C., & Harteis, C. (2020). The concept of a digital twin and its potential for learning organizations. In D. Ifenthaler, S. Hofhues, M. Egloffstein, & C. Helbig (Eds.), Digital transformation of learning organizations (pp. 95–114). Berlin: Springer Nature [S.l.]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_6

Bertschinger, N., Olbrich, E., Ay, N., & Jost, J. (2008). Autonomy: An information theoretic perspective. Biosystems, 91(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.05.018CrossRef

Bibel, W. (2010). General aspects of intelligent autonomous systems. In Intelligent autonomous systems (pp. 5–27). Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11676-6_2

Bläsing, D., & Bornewasser, M. (2021). Influence of increasing task complexity and use of informational assistance systems on mental workload. Brain Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010102

Böhle, F. (2018). Arbeit als handeln. In F. Böhle, G. G. Voß, & G. Wachtler (Eds.), Handbuch Arbeitssoziologie (pp. 171–200). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRef

Bradtke, E., Melzer, M., Röllmann, L., & Rösler, U. (2016). Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt - Tätigkeitsspielraum in der Arbeit. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:bericht20160713/1a

Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604CrossRef

Breaugh, J. A. (1999). Further investigation of the work autonomy scales: Two studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022926416628CrossRef

Buchholz, V., & Kopp, S. (2021). Towards adaptive worker assistance in monitoring tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS), IEEE.

Bunt, A., Conati, C., & McGrenere, J. (2004). What role can adaptive support play in an adaptable system? In N. Jardim Nunes & C. Rich (Eds.), IUI 04 (p. 117). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964465

Burggräf, P., Dannapfel, M., Adlon, T., & Kasalo, M. (2021). Adaptivity and adaptability as design parameters of cognitive worker assistance for enabling agile assembly systems. Procedia CIRP, 97, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.229CrossRef

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171562251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512CrossRef

Butollo, F., Jürgens, U., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2018). Von Lean Production zur Industrie 4.0. Mehr Autonomie für die Beschäftigten? Arbeits-und Industriesoziologische Studien, 11(2), 75–90.

Choi, S., Leiter, J., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2008). Contingent autonomy: Technology, bureaucracy, and relative power in the labor process. Work and Occupations, 35(4), 422–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888408326766CrossRef

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., & Shore, L. M. (2007). The employee-organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008CrossRef

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602CrossRef

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108CrossRef

Delfanti, A. (2021). Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: Digital work in an Amazon warehouse. New Media & Society, 23(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819891613CrossRef

Demerouti, E., & Nachreiner, F. (2019). Zum Arbeitsanforderungen-Arbeitsressourcen-Modell von Burnout und Arbeitsengagement - Stand der Forschung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 73(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-018-0100-4CrossRef

Demerouti, E., Bakker, Arnold, & B, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli, Wilmar, B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Dourish, P. (2016). Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 205395171666512. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128CrossRef

Durkheim, É. (1984). Erziehung, Moral und Gesellschaft: Vorlesung an der Sorbonne 1902/1903, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, (7th ed., Vol. 487). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Elliott, C. S., & Long, G. (2016). Manufacturing rate busters: Computer control and social relations in the labour process. Work, Employment & Society: A Journal of the British Sociological Association, 30(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014564601CrossRef

Endsley, M. R. (2017). From here to autonomy. Human Factors, 59(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350CrossRef

Engels, G. (2020). Der digitale Fußabdruck, Schatten oder Zwilling von Maschinen und Menschen. Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 51(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-020-00527-9CrossRef

Eramo, R., Bordeleau, F., Combemale, B., van Den Brand, M., Wimmer, M., & Wortmann, A. (2021). Conceptualizing digital twins. IEEE Software.

Evers, M., Krzywdzinski, M., & Pfeiffer, S. (2018). Designing wearables for use in the workplace: The role of solution developers.

Fischer, H., Engler, M., & Sauer, S. (2018). A human-centered perspective on software quality: Acceptance criteria for work 4.0. In A. Marcus & W. Wang (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability: Theory and practice. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 570–583). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Fletcher, S. R., Johnson, T., Adlon, T., Larreina, J., Casla, P., Parigot, L., Alfaro, P. J., & Del Otero, M. M. (2020). Adaptive automation assembly: Identifying system requirements for technical efficiency and worker satisfaction. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.036CrossRef

Friedman, A. (1977). Responsible autonomy versus direct control over the labour process. Capital & Class, 1(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981687700100104CrossRef

Gensler, E., & Abendroth, A. K. (2021). Verstärkt algorithmische Arbeitssteuerung Ungleichheiten in Arbeitsautonomie? Eine empirische Untersuchung von Beschäftigten in großen deutschen Arbeitsorganisationen. Soziale Welt Sonderband, 72(4), 514–550. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2021-4-514CrossRef

Gil, M., Albert, M., Fons, J., & Pelechano, V. (2019). Designing human-in-the-loop autonomous cyber-physical systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.04.006CrossRef

Gottschalk-Mazouz, N. (2008). Autonomie und die Autonomie autonomer technischer Systeme. In XXI. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie (Vol. 30). Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft.

Graessler, I., & Poehler, A. (2017). Integration of a digital twin as human representation in a scheduling procedure of a cyber-physical production system. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE IEEM, IEEE.

Graessler, I., & Poehler, A. (2018). Intelligent control of an assembly station by integration of a digital twin for employees into the decentralized control system. Procedia Manufacturing, 24, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.041CrossRef

Gransche, B., Shala, E., Hubig, C., Alpsancar, S., & Harrach, S. (2014). Wandel von Autonomie und Kontrolle durch neue Mensch-Technik-Interaktionen. Grundsatzfragen autonomieorientierter Mensch-Technik-Verhältnisse Stuttgart.

Gräßler, I., Roesmann, D., & Pottebaum, J. (2020). Traceable learning effects by use of digital adaptive assistance in production. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 479–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.058CrossRef

Green, F. (2008). Leeway for the loyal: A model of employee discretion. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00666.xCrossRef

Haase, T., Termath, W., Berndt, D., & Dick, M. (2020). Assistive technologies - companion or controller - appropriation instead of instruction. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 18(7), 13–18.

Hacker, W., & Sachse, P. (2014). Allgemeine Arbeitspsychologie: Psychische Regulation von Tätigkeiten (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Heinz, M., & Röcker, C. (2018). Feedback presentation for workers in industrial environments - Challenges and opportunities. In A. Holzinger, P. Kieseberg, A. M. Tjoa, & E. Weippl (Eds.), Machine learning and knowledge extraction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 11015, pp. 248–261). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_17

Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332CrossRef

Ittermann, P., & Niehaus, J. (2018). Industrie 4.0 und Wandel von Industriearbeit - revisited. Forschungsstand und Trendbestimmungen. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, P. Ittermann, & J. Niehaus (Eds.), Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit (pp. 33–60). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845283340-32

Josifovska, K., Yigitbas, E., & Engels, G. (2019). A digital twin-based multi-modal UI adaptation framework for assistance systems in Industry 4.0. In Human-computer interaction. Design practice in contemporary societies (HCII 2019). Lecture notes in computer science. Cham: Springer.

Kalleberg, A. L., & Vaisey, S. (2005). Pathways to a good job: Perceived work quality among the machinists in North America. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2005.00363.xCrossRef

Kalleberg, A. L., Nesheim, T., & Olsen, K. M. (2009). Is participation good or bad for workers? Effects of autonomy, consultation and teamwork on stress among workers in Norway. Acta Sociologica, 52(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309103999CrossRef

Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498CrossRef

Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174CrossRef

Kubicek, B., Korunka, C., & Tement, S. (2014). Too much job control? Two studies on curvilinear relations between job control and eldercare workers’ well-being. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(12), 1644–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.005CrossRef

Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. In Korunka, C., & Kubicek, B. (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work (pp. 45–63). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4

Kuhlmann, M., Splett, B., & Wiegrefe, S. (2018) Montagearbeit 4.0? Eine Fallstudie zu Arbeitswirkungen und Gestaltungsperspektiven digitaler Werkerführung. WSI-Mitteilungen, 71(3), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2018-3-182

Lammi, I. J. (2021). Automating to control: The unexpected consequences of modern automated work delivery in practice. Organization, 28(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420968179CrossRef

Langfred, C. W. (2005). Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management, 31(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272190CrossRef

Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.934CrossRef

Loch, F., Czerniak, J., Villani, V., Sabattini, L., Fantuzzi, C., Mertens, A., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (2018). An adaptive speech interface for assistance in maintenance and changeover procedures. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. Interaction technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10903, pp. 152–163). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91250-9_12

Lyons, J. B., Sycara, K., Lewis, M., & Capiola, A. (2021). Human-autonomy teaming: Definitions, debates, and directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 589585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589585CrossRef

Mark, B. G., Rauch, E., & Matt, D. T. (2021). Worker assistance systems in manufacturing: A review of the state of the art and future directions. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 59, 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.017CrossRef

Meijerink, J., & Bondarouk, T. (2021). The duality of algorithmic management: Toward a research agenda on HRM algorithms, autonomy and value creation. Human Resource Management Review, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100876

Morana, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Adam, M. T. P. (2020). User assistance for intelligent systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 62(3), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00640-5CrossRef

Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321CrossRef

Muecke, S., & Iseke, A. (2019). How does job autonomy influence job performance? A meta-analytic test of theoretical mechanisms. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14632. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.145

Mühge, G. (2018). Einzug der Rationalität in die Organisation? Digitale Systeme der Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Produktion. WSI-Mitteilungen, 71(3), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2018-3-189CrossRef

Murphy, R. R. (2000). Introduction to AI robotics. MIT Press.

Oestreich, H., Töniges, T., Wojtynek, M., & Wrede, S. (2019). Interactive learning of assembly processes using digital assistance. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.003CrossRef

Oestreich, H., Wrede, S., & Wrede, B. (2020). Learning and performing assembly processes. In: Makedon, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (pp. 1–8). Association for Computing Machinery, [S.l.]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3389189.3397977

Oestreich, H., Da Silva Bröker, Y., & Wrede, S. (2021). An adaptive workflow architecturefor digital assistance systems. In The 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference (pp. 177–184). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453892.3458046

Oestreich, H., Heinz, M., Sehr, P., & Wrede, S. (2022). Human-centered adaptive assistance systems for the shop floor. In S. Büttner, C. Röcker (Ed.), Human technology interaction - Shaping the future of industrial user interfaces. Berlin: Springer International Publishing (in press).

O’Neill, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2020) Human-autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors, 18720820960865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600CrossRef

Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology: An International Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241

Peterson, H. (2019). How Amazon tracks and scores delivery drivers on the road. Business Insider.

Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’. Concepts and Transformation, 8(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04ponCrossRef

Rohlfing, K. J., Cimiano, P., Scharlau, I., Matzner, T., Buhl, H. M., Buschmeier, H., Esposito, E., Grimminger, A., Hammer, B., Häb-Umbach, R., Horwath, I., Hüllermeier, E., Kern, F., Kopp, S., Thommes, K., Ngomo, A. C. N., Schulte, C., Wachsmuth, H., Wagner, P., & Wrede, B. (2020). Explanation as a social practice: Toward a conceptual framework for the social design of AI systems. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2020.3044366

Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015). About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141CrossRef

Sankaran, S., Zhang, C., Aarts, H., & Markopoulos, P. (2021). Exploring peoples’ perception of autonomy and reactance in everyday AI interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713074

Schildt, H. (2017). Big data and organizational design - The brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency. Innovation, 19(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1252043

Schilling, M., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, S., Wrede, B., Ritter, H., Brox, T., Nebel, B., & Burgard, W. (2016). Towards a multidimensional perspective on shared autonomy.

Schwarz, J., Fuchs, S., & Flemisch, F. (2014). Towards a more holistic view on user state assessment in adaptive human-computer interaction. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 1228–1234). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2014.6974082

Schweden, F., Kästner, T., & Rau, R. (2019). Erleben von Tätigkeitsspielraum. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 63(2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000280CrossRef

Selke, S., & Biniok, P. (2015). Assistenzensembles in der Gesellschaft von morgen. In AAL-Kongress 2015. Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland: VDE Verlag.

Simmler, M., & Frischknecht, R. (2021). A taxonomy of human-machine collaboration: Capturing automation and technical autonomy. AI & Society, 36(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01004-zCrossRef

de Spiegelaere, S., van Gyes, G., de Witte, H., Niesen, W., & van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12079CrossRef

de Spiegelaere, S., van Gyes, G., & van Hootegem, G. (2016). Not all autonomy is the same. Different dimensions of job autonomy and their relation to work engagement & innovative work behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20666

Stanton, J. M., & Barnes Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 738–745.CrossRef

Strauch, B. (2018). Ironies of automation: Still unresolved after all these years. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(5), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2732506CrossRef

Tomczak, D. L., Lanzo, L. A., & Aguinis, H. (2018). Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring. Business Horizons, 61(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.11.006CrossRef

Töniges T., Ötting, S. K., Wrede, B., Maier, G. W., & Sagerer, G. (2017). An emerging decision authority. In Cyber-physical systems (pp. 419–430). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803801-7.00026-2

Ullrich, C. (2016). Rules for adaptive learning and assistance on the shop floor. In 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (pp. 261–268). IADIS Press.

Varadinek, B., Indenhuck, M., & Surowiecki, E. (2018) Rechtliche Anforderungen an den Datenschutz bei adaptiven Arbeitsassistenzsystemen. https://doi.org/10.21934/baua:bericht20180820

Weitz, K., Schiller, D., Schlagowski, R., Huber, T., & André, E. (2021). Let me explain!: Exploring the potential of virtual agents in explainable AI interaction design. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 15(2), 87–98.CrossRef

Wendemuth, A., Böck, R., Nürnberger, A., Al-Hamadi, A., Brechmann, A., & Ohl, F. W. (2018). Intention-based anticipatory interactive systems. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 2583–2588). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2018.00442

Wheatley, D. (2017). Autonomy in paid work and employee subjective well-being. Work and Occupations, 44(3), 296–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888417697232CrossRef

Wood, A. J. (2021). Algorithmic management: Consequences for work organisation and working conditions.

Woolf, B. P. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Amsterdam and Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers / Elsevier.

Yigitbas, E., Jovanovikj, I., Biermeier, K., Sauer, S., & Engels, G. (2020). Integrated model-driven development of self-adaptive user interfaces. Software and Systems Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00777-7CrossRef

Zibuschka, J., Ruff, C., Horch, A., & Roßnagel, H. (2020). A human digital twin as building block of open identity management for the Internet of Things, 1617–5468. https://doi.org/10.18420/ois2020_11

Titel: Work Autonomy and Adaptive Digital Assistance in Flexible Working Environments
verfasst von: Elisa Gensler
Hendrik Oestreich
Anja-Kristin Abendroth
Sebastian Wrede
Britta Wrede
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: The Digital Twin of Humans
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26103-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-26104-6

Copyright-Jahr: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26104-6_7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"