Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Multistakeholderism and Contestation in the Global Governance of the Information Society Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. World Summit on the Information Society: Catalyst for Transnational Advocacy and a Milestone for Multistakeholder Global Governance

verfasst von : Derrick L. Cogburn

Erschienen in: Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society

Verlag: Palgrave Macmillan US

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter presents a detailed case study of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) and highlights the historic steps it took to include civil society and non-state actors. For many analysts, WSIS signaled a shift in the power relations between state and non-state actors. In practice, however, the effective participation of civil society lagged substantially behind this lofty rhetoric. Nonetheless, the chapter highlights the catalytic role played by WSIS in stimulating the creation of numerous Transnational Advocacy Networks (TANs), and explores the contestation between the top-down Civil Society Bureau (CSB) and the bottom-up Civil Society Plenary (CSP). This chapter sets the stage for subsequent chapters by highlighting the key policy issues left unresolved by WSIS—Internet governance and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and development—which presaged the two institutions created by the UN to address them.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel ISOC, ICANN, and Experiments in Multistakeholder Global Internet Governance
Nächstes Kapitel Global Alliance for ICT and Development: What Went Right, and Wrong?
Literatur
Association for Progressive Communications/Campaign for Communication Rights in the Information Society. (2003). Involving civil society in ICT policy: The world summit on the information society. Johannesburg: STE Publishers.
Betsill, M., & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance, the cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 471–493.CrossRef
Bockman, J., & Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: The transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 310–352.CrossRef
Cogburn, D. L. (1996). Bold Proposals Endorsed by Information Society Conference. I-Ways.
Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage.
Gersick, C. J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management journal, 31(1), 9-41.
Global Contract Foundation. (2003, September 14–26). Does input lead to impact?: How governments treated civil society proposals in drafting the 21 September 2003 Draft Declaration. Distributed at the Third WSIS Preparatory Committee Meeting, Geneva.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32, 367–368.CrossRef
Haas, E. B. (1990). When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRef
Haas, E. B., Williams, M. P. T., & Babai, D. (1977). Scientists and world order: The uses of technical knowledge in international organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRef
Hudson, A. (2001). NGOs’ transnational advocacy networks: From ‘legitimacy’ to ‘political responsibility’? Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1(4), 331.CrossRef
ITU. (1998). World telecommunications development report. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders Advocacy Networks in International Politics: Cornell University Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies: Longman Pub Group.
Kraut, R. E., Lewis, S. H., & Swezey, L. W. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 43(4), 718.
MacLean, D. (2003). The quest for inclusive governance of global ICTs: Lessons from the ITU in the limits of national sovereignty. Information Technology and International Development, 1(1), 1–18.CrossRef
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication, 56(1), 72-77.
Nations, U. (2003). World Summit on the Information Society. New York. A/RES/57/238
O’Brien, R., Goetz, A. M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams, M. (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ó Siochrú, S. (2004, June–July). Will the real WSIS please stand-up? The historic encounter of the ‘Information Society’ and the ‘Communication Society’ Paper for: ‘Gazette—The International Journal for Communication Studies’ 66(3/4).
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–179.CrossRef
Olson, G. M., Finholt, T. A., & Teasley, S. D. (2000). Behavioral aspects of collaboratories. In S. H. Koslow & M. F. Huerta (Eds.), Electronic collaboration in science (pp. 1–14). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Olson, G. M., Teasley, S., Bietz, M. J., & Cogburn, D. L. (2002). Collaboratories to Support Distributed Science: The Example of International HIV/AIDS Research. Paper presented at the ACM International Conference Proceedings Series.
Schattschneider, E. (1964). The Semisovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960). SchattschneiderThe Semi-Sovereign People1960.
Schechter, M. G. (2001). United nations-sponsored world summits: Focus on impact and follow-up. New York: United Nations University Press.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2001). The accountability of government networks. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8(2), 347–367.
Sproull, L. S., Kiesler, S., & Zubrow, D. (1984). Encountering an alien culture. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 31-48.
Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
Wulf, W. A. (1989, March 17–18). The national collaboratory—A white paper. Appendix A in Towards a National Collaboratory. The unpublished report of an invitational workshop held at the Rockefeller University.
Metadaten
Titel
World Summit on the Information Society: Catalyst for Transnational Advocacy and a Milestone for Multistakeholder Global Governance
verfasst von
Derrick L. Cogburn
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Buch
Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society

Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49263-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-137-48361-4

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48361-4_5