nach oben

Cellulose

Erschienen in:

22.01.2022 | Original Research

Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste

verfasst von: Ekaterina A. Skiba, Evgenia K. Gladysheva, Vera V. Budaeva, Lyudmila A. Aleshina, Gennady V. Sakovich

Erschienen in: Cellulose | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The global abundance and availability of oat hulls make them a promising feedstock to produce a unique type of cellulose, the bacterial one. This is the first study examining how a chemical pretreatment method of oat hulls influences the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose (BC) in extended cultivation. Here we employed our own pretreatment methods that use dilute HNO₃ and NaOH solutions in one and two stages, a total of four pretreatment methods. Further technological stages were performed in the same manner: pulps were enzymatically hydrolyzed with commercial enzymes CelloLux-A and BrewZyme BGX, and biosynthesis of BC was run using the Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12 symbiotic culture. A two-stage (HNO₃ + NaOH) pretreatment of oat hulls was found to afford a biologically good medium and increase the BC yield 1.8−3.2-fold compared to the other pretreatments used. A pretreatment method of oat hulls determined the BC yield and degree of polymerization. However, a pretreatment method had no impact on the highest crystallinity index and allomorph Iα content of all the BC samples, which is explained by Medusomyces gisevii Sa-12 used. The crystallinity index and allomorph Iα content, as measured by X-ray diffractometry, are proposed for use as BC quality assessment criteria.

Graphical abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Preparation of porous regenerated cellulose microstructures via emulsion-coagulation technique

Nächster Artikel Bacterial nanocellulose containing diethylditiocarbamate bio-curatives: physicochemical characterization and drug delivery evaluation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bikales NM, Segal L (1971) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, vols Iv–V. Wiley Intersciense, New York, USA, p 510

Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, Bosnea L, Boura K, Tsafrakidou P, Castro GR (2016) Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresource Technol 213:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.071CrossRef

Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C (2016) Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review. Cellulose 23(1):57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0CrossRef

Chakravorty S, Bhattacharya S, Chatzinotas A, Chakraborty W, Bhattacharya D, Gachhui R (2016) Kombucha tea fermentation: microbial and biochemical dynamics. Int J Food Microbiol 220:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.12.015CrossRefPubMed

Cheng Z, Yang RD, Liu X (2016) Production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum through utilizing acetic acid hydrolysate of bagasse as low-carbon source. Bioresources 12(1):1190–1200. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.1190-1200

French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4CrossRef

French AD (2020) Increment in evolution of cellulose crystallinity analysis. Cellulose 27(10):5445–5448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03172-zCrossRef

Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose from biotechnology to bio-economy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, p 260CrossRef

Goelzer FDE, Faria-Tischer PCS, Vitorino JC, Sierakowski MR, Tischer CA (2009) Production and characterization of nanospheres of bacterial cellulose from Acetobacter xylinum from processed rice bark. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 29(2):546–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.10.013CrossRef

Goh WN, Rosma A, Kaur B, Fazilah A, Karim AA, Rajeev B (2012) Fermentation of black tea broth (Kombucha): I. Effects of sucrose concentration and fermentation time on the yield of microbial cellulose. Int Food Res J 19(1):109–117

Guo X, Cavka A, Jönsson L, Hong F (2013) Comparison of methods for detoxification of spruce hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production. Microb Cell Fact 12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-93CrossRef

Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum: II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352CrossRef

Hong F, Zhu XY, Yang G, Yang XX (2011) Wheat straw acid hydrolysate as a potential cost-effective feedstock for production of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86(5):675–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2567CrossRef

Hu F, Ragauskas A (2012) Pretreatmentand lignocellulosic chemistry. Bioenergy Res 5(4):1043–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9208-0CrossRef

Hussain Z, Sajjad W, Khan T, Wahid F (2019) Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: a revie. Cellulose 26(5):2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02307-1CrossRef

Kashcheyeva EI, Gismatulina YA, Budaeva VV (2019) Pretreatments of non-woody cellulosic feedstocks for bacterial cellulose synthesis. Polymers 11(10):1645. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101645CrossRefPubMedCentral

Kashcheyeva EI, Skiba EA, Zolotukhin VN, Budaeva VV (2020) Recycling of nitric acid solution in chemical pretreatment of oat hulls for biorefining, BioResources 15(1):1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1575-1586

Keshk SMAS (2014) Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 4:150–160. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000150CrossRef

Kim TH (2013) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Yang ST, El-Enshasy HA, Thongchul N, Martin Y (eds) Bioprocessing technologies in integrated biorefinery for production of biofuels, biochemicals, and biopolymers from biomass. Wiley, New York, pp 91–109

Kiziltas EE, Kiziltas A, Gardner DJ (2015) Synthesis of bacterial cellulose using hot water extracted wood sugars. Carbohydr Polym 124:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.036CrossRefPubMed

Klemm D, Cranston ED, Fischer D, Gama M, Kedzior SA, Kralisch D, Rauchfuss F (2018) Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: today’s state. Mater Today 21(7):720–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001CrossRef

Li W, Zhang S, Zhang T, Shen Y, Han L, Peng Z, Xie Z, Zhong C, Jia S (2021) Bacterial cellulose production from ethylenediamine pretreated Caragana korshinskii Kom. Ind Crop Prod 164:113340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113340CrossRef

Mankar AR, Pandey A, Modak A, Pant KK (2021) Pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review on recent advances. Bioresource Technol 334:125235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125235CrossRef

Marsh AJ, O’Sullivan O, Hill C, Ross RP, Cotter PD (2014) Sequence-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal Compositions of multiple kombucha (tea fungus) samples. Food Microbiol 38:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.09.003CrossRefPubMed

Orlovska I, Podolich O, Kukharenko O, Zaets I, Reva O, Khirunenko L, Zmejkoski D, Rogalsky S, Barh D, Tiwari S, Kumavath R, Góes-Neto A, Azevedo V, Brenig B, Ghosh P, Vera JP, Kozyrovska N (2021) Bacterial cellulose retains robustness but its synthesis declines after exposure to a Mars-like environment simulated outside the international space station. Astrobiology 21(6):706–717. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2020.2332CrossRefPubMed

Pacheco G, Nogueira CR, Meneguin AB, Trovatti E, Silva MCC, Machado RTA, Ribeiro SJL, Filho ECS, Baruda HS (2017) Development and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source. Ind Crop Prod 107:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.026CrossRef

Pillai MM, Tran HN, Sathishkumar G, Manimekalai K, Yoon JH, Lim DY, Noh I, Bhattacharyya A (2021) Symbiotic culture of nanocellulose pellicle: a potential matrix for 3D Bioprinting. Mat Sci Eng C-Bio S 119:111552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111552CrossRef

Provin AP, dos Reis VO, Hilesheim SE, Bianchet RT, de Aguiar Dutra AR, Cubas ALV (2021) Use of bacterial cellulose in the textile industry and the wettability challenge—a review. Cellulose 28:8255–8274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04059-3CrossRef

Shi QS, Feng J, Li WR, Zhou G, Chen AM, Ouyang YS, Chen YB (2013) Effect of different conditions on the average degree of polymerization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter Intermedius BC-41. Cell Chem Technol 47(7–8):503–508

Skiba EA, Budaeva VV, Baibakova OV, Zolotukhin VN, Sakovich GV (2017) Dilute nitric-acid pretreatment of oat hulls for ethanol production. Biochem Eng J 126:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.09.003CrossRef

Skiba EA, Budaeva VV, Ovchinnikova EV, Gladysheva EK, Kashcheyeva EI, Pavlov IN, Sakovich GV (2020) A technology for pilot production of bacterial cellulose from oat hulls. Chem Eng J 383:123128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123128CrossRef

Skiba EA, Gladysheva EK, Golubev DS, Budaeva VV, Aleshina LA, Sakovich GV (2021) Self-standardization of quality of bacterial cellulose produced by Medusomyces gisevii in nutrient media derived from Miscanthus biomass. Carbohydr Polym 252:117178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117178CrossRef

Thaveemas P, Chuenchom L, Kaowphong S, Techasakul S, Saparpakorn P, Dechtrirat D (2021) Magnetic carbon nanofiber composite adsorbent through green in-situ conversion of bacterial cellulose for highly efficient removal of bisphenol A. Bioresource Technol 333:125184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125184CrossRef

United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Office of Global Analysis. World Agricultural Production (Circular Series WAP 11–19). https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf. Accessed November 2019

Urbina L, Corcuera MÁ, Gabilondo N, Eceiza A, Retegi A (2021) A review of bacterial cellulose: sustainable production from agricultural waste and applications in various fields. Cellulose 28:8229–8253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04020-4CrossRef

Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, Galvagno M (2013) Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ 21:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0541-3CrossRef

Velásquez-Riaño M, Bojacá V (2017) Production of bacterial cellulose from alternative low-cost substrates. Cellulose 24(7):2677–2698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1309-7CrossRef

Villaverde JJ, Domingues RMA, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Pascoal Neto C, Ligero P, Vega A (2009) Miscanthus×giganteus extractives: a source of valuable phenolic compounds and sterols. J Agric Food Chem 57:3626–3631. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900071tCrossRefPubMed

Volova TG, Shumilova AA, Shidlovskiy IP, Nikolaeva ED, Sukovatiy AG, Vasiliev AD, Shishatskay EI (2018) Antibacterial properties of films of cellulose composites with silver nanoparticles and antibiotics. Polym Test 65:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.10.023CrossRef

Yang XY, Huang C, Guo HJ, Xiong L, Li YY, Zhang HR, Chen XD (2013) Bioconversion of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) acid hydrolysate to bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Appl Microbiol 115(4):995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12255CrossRefPubMed

Yurkevich DI, Kutyshenko VP (2002) Medusomyces (Tea Fungus): a scientific history, composition, features of physiology and metabolism. Biophysics 47:1116–1129

Titel: Yield and quality of bacterial cellulose from agricultural waste
verfasst von: Ekaterina A. Skiba
Evgenia K. Gladysheva
Vera V. Budaeva
Lyudmila A. Aleshina
Gennady V. Sakovich
Publikationsdatum: 22.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Cellulose / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04372-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Quantum-efficiency enhancement and mechanical responsiveness of solid-state photoluminescent flexible materials containing uniaxial cellulose nanocrystal arrays

Bacterial nanocellulose containing diethylditiocarbamate bio-curatives: physicochemical characterization and drug delivery evaluation

Cationic cellulose nanofibers with efficient anionic dye adsorption: adsorption mechanism and application in salt-free dyeing of paper

Controllable fabrication of ZnO nanorods@cellulose membrane with self-cleaning and passive radiative cooling properties for building energy-saving applications

Stretchable, sensitive, and environment-tolerant ionic conductive organohydrogel reinforced with cellulose nanofibers for human motion monitoring

High-flux, porous and homogeneous PVDF/cellulose microfiltration membranes