Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Erschienen in: KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 3/2014

01.08.2014 | Technical Contribution

A Survey of Multi-Agent Decision Making

verfasst von: Nils Bulling

Erschienen in: KI - Künstliche Intelligenz | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this article we give a high-level overview of various aspects relevant to multi-agent decision making. Classical decision theory makes the start. Then, we introduce multi-agent decision making, focussing on game theory, complex decision making, and on intelligent agents. Afterwards, we discuss methods for reaching agreements interactively, e.g. by negotiation, bargaining, and argumentation, followed by approaches to coordinate and to control agents’ decision making.
Vorheriger Artikel Special Issue on Multi-Agent Decision Making
Nächster Artikel Strategic Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

The Scientific journal "KI – Künstliche Intelligenz" is the official journal of the division for artificial intelligence within the "Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V." (GI) – the German Informatics Society - with constributions from troughout the field of artificial intelligence.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Fußnoten
1
Acting strategically means, when acting an agent takes into consideration the behavior and motivations of other agents, specially how they will possibly react/respond to performed actions.
 
2
In this context, actions are also called strategies.
 
3
Goals can also be seen as abstractions of outcomes with their utility—those which are satisfactory for the agent [145].
 
4
Often, more general preference relations over outcomes are considered, cf. [99].
 
5
Social choice functions are also defined over preference relations [99] or agent types which characterize agents’ preferences  [141]; or they map to sets of outcomes [24, 99]. The latter type is sometimes called social choice rule, but the notation is not coherent in the literature.
 
6
In general, this can be defined for any other solution concept, e.g. a Nash equilibrium.
 
7
In the literature there are alternative definitions, e.g. when social choice rules are considered it is required that each possible outcome can be obtained by some equilibrium strategy; moreover, often the considered utility functions are taken from a restricted set rather than from the set of all possible functions, cf. [99, 141].
 
Literatur
1.
Ågotnes T, Harrenstein P, Van Der Hoek W, Wooldridge M (2013) Verifiable equilibria in boolean games. In: Proceedings of the twenty-third international joint conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, California, pp 689–695
2.
Ågotnes T, van der Hoek W, Tennenholtz M, Wooldridge M (2009) Power in normative systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS’09). IFAAMAS, Richland, pp 145–152
3.
Ågotnes T, van der Hoek W, Wooldridge M (2007) Normative system games. In: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS’07). ACM, New York, pp. 1–8. doi:10.​1145/​1329125.​1329284
4.
Ågotnes T, van der Hoek W, Wooldridge M (2009) Reasoning about coalitional games. Artif Intell 173(1):45–79MATHCrossRef
5.
6.
Amgoud L (2005) An argumentation-based model for reasoning about coalition structures. In: ArgMAS, pp 217–228
7.
Andrighetto G, Governatori G, Noriega P, van der Torre LWN (eds) (2013) Normative multi-agent systems, Dagstuhl follow-ups, vol 4. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik
8.
Azaria A, Rabinovich Z, Kraus S, Goldman CV (2011) Strategic information disclosure to people with multiple alternatives. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 594–600
9.
Belnap N, Perloff M (1988) Seeing to it that: a canonical form for agentives. Theoria 54(3):175–199CrossRef
10.
11.
Bernstein DS, Givan R, Immerman N, Zilberstein S (2002) The complexity of decentralized control of Markov decision processes. Math Oper Res 27(4):819–840MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
12.
Bernstein DS, Zilberstein S, Immerman N (2000) The complexity of decentralized control of markov decision processes. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp 32–37
13.
Blythe J (1999) Decision-theoretic planning. AI Mag 20(2):37
14.
Boella G, Van Der Torre L (2006) A game theoretic approach to contracts in multiagent systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 36(1):68–79CrossRef
15.
Boella G, Van Der Torre L, Verhagen H (2006) Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Comput Math Organ Theory 12(2–3):71–79CrossRef
16.
Bonzon E, Lagasquie-Schiex MC, Lang J (2009) Dependencies between players in Boolean games. Int J Approx Reason 50(6):899–914MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
17.
Bonzon E, Lagasquie-Schiex MC, Lang J, Zanuttini B (2006) Boolean games revisited. In: ECAI, pp 265–269
18.
Bordini R, Dix J (2013) Programming multi-agent systems. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn. vol 13. MIT Press, USA
19.
Bordini RH, Dastani M, Dix J, Seghrouchni AEF (2005) Multi-agent programming: languages, platforms and applications. Springer, New York
20.
Bordini RH, Dastani M, Dix J, Seghrouchni AEF (2009) Multi-agent programming: languages, tools and applications. Springer, New York
21.
Boutilier C (1994) Toward a logic for qualitative decision theory. KR 94:75–86
22.
Boutilier C (1999) Sequential optimality and coordination in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI’99), vol 1. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp 478–485
23.
24.
Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U (2013) Computational social choice. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems. MIT Press, USA, pp. 213–283
25.
Bratman M (1987) Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press, USA
26.
Broersen J, Herzig A (2014) Using STIT theory to talk about strategies. In: van Benthem J, Ghosh S, Verbrugge R (eds) Modeling strategic reasoning. LNCS-FoLLI series. Springer, New York
27.
Bulling N (2014) Interview With Professor Sarit Kraus. KI 28(3):1–7
28.
Bulling N, Dastani M (2011) Verification and implementation of normative behaviours in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), Barcelona, pp 103–108
29.
Bulling N, Dastani M (2013) Coalitional responsibility in strategic settings. In: Leite J, Son TC (eds) Proceedings of the 14th international workshop on computational logic in multi-agent systems (CLIMA XIV), LNCS. Springer, Corunna, pp 172–189
30.
Bulling N, Dastani M, Knobbout M (2013) Monitoring norm violations in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS’13). IFAAMAS, ACM Press, Saint Paul, pp 491–498
31.
Bulling N, Ghosh S, Verbrugge R (2013) Reaching your goals without spilling the beans: Boolean secrecy games. In: Proceedings if International conference on principles and practice of multi-agent systems (PRIMA’13). Dunedin, New Zealand, pp 37–53
32.
Bulling N, Goranko V (2013) How to be both rich and happy: combining quantitative and qualitative strategic reasoning about multi-player games (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on strategic reasoning. EPTCS, Rome, pp 33–41. doi:10.​4204/​EPTCS.​112.​8
33.
Bulling N, Goranko V, Jamroga W (2014) Logics for reasoning about strategic abilities in multi-player games. In: van Benthem J, Ghosh S, Verbrugge R (eds) Modeling strategic reasoning. LNCS-FoLLI series. Springer, New York
34.
Bulling N, Jamroga W, Dix J (2009) Reasoning about temporal properties of rational play. Ann Math Artif Intell 53(1–4):51–114MathSciNet
35.
Camerer C (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
36.
Chalkiadakis G, Elkind E, Wooldridge M (2011) Computational aspects of cooperative game theory. Synth Lect Artif Intell Mach Learn 5(6):1–168CrossRef
37.
Chopra AK, Singh MP (2009) Multiagent commitment alignment. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 2. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 937–944
38.
Chopra AK, Singh MP (2013) Agent communication. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 3. MIT Press, USA
39.
40.
Dastani M, Grossi D, Meyer JJC, Tinnemeier N (2009) Normative multi-agent programs and their logics. In: Proceedings of the knowledge representation for agents and multi-agent systems. Springer, New York, pp 16–31
41.
Dastani M, Hulstijn J, Van der Torre L (2005) How to decide what to do? Eur J Oper Res 160(3):762–784MATHCrossRef
42.
Dignum V, Padget J (2013) Multiagent organizations. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 2. MIT Press, USA
43.
Doyle J, Thomason RH (1999) Background to qualitative decision theory. AI Mag 20(2):55
44.
Dubois D, Fargier H, Perny P (2003) Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: an axiomatic approach. Artif Intell 148(1):219–260MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
45.
Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321–358MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Dunne PE, van der Hoek W, Kraus S, Wooldridge M (2008) Cooperative boolean games. In: Padgham L, Parkes DC, Müller JP, Parsons S (eds) AAMAS, vol 2. IFAAMAS, pp 1015–1022
47.
Durfee E, Zilberstein S (2013) Multiagent planning, control, and execution. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 11. MIT Press, USA
48.
Elkind E, Rahwan T, Jennings NR (2013) Computational coalition formation. In: Multiagent systems, p 329
49.
Endriss U, Kraus S, Lang J, Wooldridge M (2011) Designing incentives for boolean games. In: Sonenberg L, Stone P, Tumer K, Yolum P (eds) AAMAS, IFAAMAS, pp 79–86
50.
Fatima S, Rahwan I (2013) Negotiation and bargaining. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn. MIT Press, USA
51.
Fatima SS, Wooldridge M, Jennings NR (2006) Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. J Artif Intell Res (JAIR) 27:381–417MATHMathSciNet
52.
Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415(6868):137–140CrossRef
53.
Feldman JA, Sproull RF (1977) Decision theory and artificial intelligence ii: the hungry monkey*. Cogn Sci 1(2):158–192CrossRef
54.
Ferber J (1999) Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence, vol 1. Addison-Wesley Reading, USA
55.
Fox J, Glasspool D, Grecu D, Modgil S, South M, Patkar V (2007) Argumentation-based inference and decision making—a medical perspective. IEEE Intell Syst 22(6):34–41CrossRef
56.
Gal Y, Grosz B, Kraus S, Pfeffer A, Shieber S (2010) Agent decision-making in open mixed networks. Artif Intell 174(18):1460–1480MathSciNetCrossRef
57.
Gal Y, Kraus S, Gelfand M, Khashan H, Salmon E (2011) An adaptive agent for negotiating with people in different cultures. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 3(1):8
58.
Genesereth MR, Ginsberg ML, Rosenschein JS (1986) Cooperation without communication. In: Proceedings of the fifth national conference artificial intelligence (AAAI-86)
59.
Ghallab M, Nau D, Traverso P (2004) Automated planning: theory and practice. Elsevier, London
60.
Gigerenzer G, Selten R (2002) Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, USA
61.
Girle R, Hitchcock D, McBurney P, Verheij B (2004) Decision support for practical reasoning. In: Argumentation machines. Springer, New York, pp 55–83
62.
Gmytrasiewicz PJ, Doshi P (2005) A framework for sequential planning in multi-agent settings. J Artif Intell Res (JAIR) 24:49–79MATH
63.
Gmytrasiewicz PJ, Durfee EH (2000) Rational coordination in multi-agent environments. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 3(4):319–350CrossRef
64.
Grant J, Kraus S, Wooldridge M, Zuckerman I (2011) Manipulating boolean games through communication. In: Walsh T (ed) IJCAI. IJCAI/AAAI, pp 210–215
65.
Grossi D, Royakkers MML, Dignum F (2007) Organizational structure and responsibility. Artif Intell Law 15(3):223–249CrossRef
66.
Guttman RH, Maes P (1998) Cooperative vs. competitive multi-agent negotiations in retail electronic commerce. In: Cooperative information agents II learning, mobility and electronic commerce for information discovery on the internet. Springer, New York, pp 135–147
67.
Harrenstein P, van der Hoek W, Meyer JJ, Witteveen C (2001) Boolean games. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp 287–298
68.
Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1972) A generalized nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Manag Sci 18(5-part-2):80–106
69.
Hazon N, Lin R, Kraus S (2013) How to change a group’s collective decision? In: Proceedings of the twenty-third international joint conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press, California, pp 198–205
70.
van der Hoek W, Roberts M, Wooldridge M (2007) Social laws in alternating time: Effectiveness, feasibility and synthesis. Synthese Synthese 156(1):1–19
71.
Hübner JF, Boissier O, Bordini RH (2010) From organisation specification to normative programming in multi-agent organisations. In: Computational logic in multi-agent systems. Springer, New York, pp 117–134
72.
Jeffrey RC (1990) The logic of decision. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
73.
Jennings NR (1993) Commitments and conventions: the foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. knowl Eng Rev 8(03):223–250CrossRef
74.
Jennings NR (2000) On agent-based software engineering. Artif Intell 117(2):277–296MATHCrossRef
75.
Jennings NR, Faratin P, Lomuscio AR, Parsons S, Wooldridge MJ, Sierra C (2001) Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decis Negot 10(2):199–215CrossRef
76.
Jones AJI, Sergot M (1993) On the characterization of law and computer systems. In: Meyer JJC, Wieringa R (eds) Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification. Wiley, New York, pp 275–307
77.
Kakas A, Moraitis P (2003) Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, pp. 883–890
78.
Kant JD, Thiriot S (2006) Modeling one human decision maker with a multi-agent system: the codage approach. In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, pp 50–57
79.
Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system. Inf Syst 26(4):259–277MATHCrossRef
80.
Katz R, Kraus S (2006) Modeling human decision making in cliff-edge environments. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 21. AAAI Press: MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, Cambridge, MA, London p 169–174
81.
Katz R, Kraus S (2007) Gender-sensitive automated negotiators. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 22. AAAI Press; MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, Cambridge, MA, London, p 821–826
82.
Keen PG, Morton MSS (1978) Decision support systems: an organizational perspective. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
83.
Klein G (2008) Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 50(3):456–460CrossRef
84.
Kraus S (1997) Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artif Intell 94(1):79–97MATHCrossRef
85.
Kraus S, Lehmann D (1995) Designing and building a negotiating automated agent. Comput Intell 11(1):132–171CrossRef
86.
Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A (1998) Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artif Intell 104(1):1–69MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
87.
Kraus S, Wooldridge M (2012) Delegating decisions in strategic settings. In: Raedt LD, Bessière C, Dubois D, Doherty P, Frasconi P, Heintz F, Lucas PJF (eds) ECAI, frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, vol 242. IOS Press, pp. 468–473
88.
89.
Martinez MT, Fouletier P, Park KH, Favrel J (2001) Virtual enterprise-organisation, evolution and control. Int J Prod Econ 74(1):225–238CrossRef
90.
McCarthy J (1979) Ascribing mental qualities to machines. In: Philosophical perspectives in artificial intelligence. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands
91.
Modgil S, Caminada M (2009) Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, New York, pp 105–129
92.
Mogavero F, Murano A, Vardi MY (2010) Reasoning about strategies. In: Lodaya K, Mahajan M (eds) Proceedings of FSTTCS’2010, LIPIcs. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp 133–144
93.
Moses Y, Tennenholz M (1995) Artificial social systems. Comput AI 14(6):533–562
94.
Nash J (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:48–49
95.
Nash JF Jr (1950) The bargaining problem. Econ J Econ Soc 155–162
96.
97.
Neyman A, Sorin S (2003) Stochastic games and applications, vol 570. Springer, New York
98.
Norling E (2004) Folk psychology for human modelling: extending the BDI paradigm. In: Proceedings of the third international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 1. IEEE Computer Society, pp 202–209
99.
Osborne M, Rubinstein A (1994) A course in game theory. MIT Press, USA
100.
101.
Parsons S, Wooldridge M (2002) Game theory and decision theory in multi-agent systems. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 5(3):243–254MathSciNetCrossRef
102.
Pauly M (2001) Logic for social software. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam
103.
104.
Pearl J (1993) From conditional oughts to qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp. 12–20
105.
Peleg B, Sudhölter P (2007) Introduction to the theory of cooperative games, vol 34. Springer, New York
106.
Ponsati C, Watson J (1997) Multiple-issue bargaining and axiomatic solutions. Int J Game Theory 26(4):501–524MathSciNetCrossRef
107.
Prakken H (2009) Models of persuasion dialogue. In: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, New York, pp 281–300
108.
Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argum Comput 1(2):93–124CrossRef
109.
Puterman ML (2009) Markov decision processes: discrete stochastic dynamic programming, vol 414. Wiley, New York
110.
Pynadath DV, Tambe M (2002) The communicative multiagent team decision problem: analyzing teamwork theories and models. J Artif Intell Res 16:389–423MATHMathSciNet
111.
Rahwan I (2013) Argumentation among agents. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn. MIT Press, USA
112.
Rahwan I, Larson K (2009) Argumentation and game theory. In: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, New York, pp 321–339
113.
Rahwan I, Larson K (2011) Logical mechanism design. Knowl Eng Rev 26(01):61–69CrossRef
114.
Rahwan I, McBurney P (2007) Argumentation technology. IEEE Intell Syst 22(6):21–23CrossRef
115.
Rahwan I, Ramchurn SD, Jennings NR, Mcburney P, Parsons S, Sonenberg L (2003) Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowl Eng Rev 18(04):343–375CrossRef
116.
Rahwan I, Simari GR (2009) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, New York
117.
Rahwan T, Ramchurn SD, Dang VD, Jennings NR (2007) Near-optimal anytime coalition structure generation. IJCAI 7:2365–2371
118.
Rao A, Georgeff M (1991) Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, pp 473–484
119.
Rosenschein JS, Genesereth MR (1985) Deals among rational agents. In: Proceedings of ninth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-85). Department of Computer Science, Stanford University
120.
Rosenschein JS, Zlotkin G (1994) Rules of encounter: designing conventions for automated negotiation among computers. MIT press, USA
121.
122.
123.
Rubinstein A (1985) A bargaining model with incomplete information about time preferences. Econ J Econ Soc 1151–1172
124.
Rubinstein A (1998) Modeling bounded rationality, vol 1. MIT press, USA
125.
Rueda SV, García AJ, Simari GR (2002) Argument-based negotiation among bdi agents. J Comput Sci Technol 2
126.
Russel S, Norvig P (1995) Artificial Intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, USA
127.
Sabater-Mir J, Vercouter L (2013) Trust and reputation in multiagent systems. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent aystems, 2nd edn, vol 9. MIT Press, USA.
128.
Sandholm T, Larson K, Andersson M, Shehory O, Tohmé F (1999) Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees. Artif Intell 111(1):209–238MATHCrossRef
129.
Sandholm T, Vulkan N et al (1999) Bargaining with deadlines. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp 44–51
130.
Sandholm TW (1999) Distributed rational decision making. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 201–258
131.
Sarne D, Elmalech A, Grosz BJ, Geva M (2011) Less is more: restructuring decisions to improve agent search. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 1. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 431–438
132.
Savage LJ (1954) Foundations of statistics. Wiley, New YorkMATH
133.
Schelling TC (1960) The strategy of conflict. Oxford University Press, Oxford
134.
135.
Searle JR (1980) Minds, brains, and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3(03):417–424CrossRef
136.
Selten R (2001) What is bounded rationality. Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox 13–36
137.
Seuken S, Zilberstein S (2008) Formal models and algorithms for decentralized decision making under uncertainty. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 17(2):190–250CrossRef
138.
139.
Shehory O, Sturm A (eds) (2014) Agent-oriented software engineering: reflections on architectures, methodologies, languages, and frameworks. Springer, New York
140.
141.
Shoham Y, Leyton-Brown K (2009) Multiagent systems—algorithmic, game-theoretic, and logical foundations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
142.
Shoham Y, Tennenholtz M (1992) On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies. In: Proceedings of the tenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-92), San Diego
143.
144.
Sierra C, Faratin P, Jennings NR (1997) A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents. In: Multi-agent rationality. Springer, New York, pp 17–35
145.
Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118CrossRef
146.
Simon HA (1957) Models of man: social and rational. Wiley, New York
147.
Simon HA (1982) Models of bounded rationality: empirically grounded economic reason, vol 3. MIT press, USA
148.
Singh MP (2008) Semantical considerations on dialectical and practical commitments. AAAI 8:176–181
149.
150.
Ståhl I (1972) Bargaining theory. The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm
151.
Stirling WC (2003) Satisficing games and decision making: with applications to engineering and computer science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
152.
Stirling WC, Goodrich MA, Packard D (2002) Satisficing equilibria: a non-classical theory of games and decisions. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 5(3):305–328MathSciNetCrossRef
153.
Barber Suzanne K, Goel A, Martin CE (2000) Dynamic adaptive autonomy in multi-agent systems. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 12(2):129–147
154.
Sycara KP (1989) Multiagent compromise via negotiation. In: Distributed artificial intelligence, vol 2. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, pp 119–137
155.
Tan SW, Pearl J (1994) Qualitative decision theory. In: AAAI, pp 928–933
156.
Thimm M (2014) Strategic argumentation in multi-agent systems. In Künstliche Intelligenz, special issue on multi-agent decision making (to appear)
157.
Tuyls K, Tumer K (2013) Multiagent learning. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 10. MIT Press, USA
158.
Van Benthem J, Ghosh S, Verbrugge R (eds) (2014) Modeling strategic reasoning. LNCS-FoLLI series. Springer, New York (to appear)
159.
160.
Weiss G (ed) (1999) Multiagent systems. A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge
161.
Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn. MIT Press, New York
162.
Winikoff M, Padgham L (2013) Agent-oriented sofware engineering. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 15. MIT Press, USA
163.
Wooldridge M (2009) An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, New York
164.
Wooldridge M (2013) Intelligent agents. In: Weiss G (ed) Multiagent systems, 2nd edn, vol 1. MIT Press, USA
165.
Wooldridge M, van der Hoek W (2005) On obligations and normative ability: towards a logical analysis of the social contract. J Appl Logic 3(3–4):396–420MATHCrossRef
166.
Wooldridge M, Jennings NR (1995) Intelligent agents: theory and practice. knowl Eng Rev 10(02):115–152CrossRef
167.
Wright JR, Leyton-Brown K (2010) Beyond equilibrium: predicting human behavior in normal-form games. In: AAAI
Metadaten
Titel
A Survey of Multi-Agent Decision Making
verfasst von
Nils Bulling
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0933-1875
Elektronische ISSN: 1610-1987
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0314-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Technical Contribution

Strategic Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

Technical Contribution

Measuring Inconsistency in Multi-Agent Systems

Research Project

Responsible Intelligent Systems

Community

News

Editorial

Special Issue on Multi-Agent Decision Making

Research Project

Reconfigurable Autonomy

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise