Juhani Iivari
- 1 Aaen, I., Siltanen, A., S~rensen, C. and Tahvanainen V.-P. A tale of two countries: CASE experiences and expectations. In Kendall, K.E., Lyytinen, K. and DeGross, J., Eds. The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, 1FIP Transactions A-8, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992, 61-91. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2 Banker, R.D. and Kauffman, RJ. Reuse and productivity in integrated computeraided software engineering: An empirical study. MIS Q. 15, 3 (1991), 375-401. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3 Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W. Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. 36, 2 (1990), 23-139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35, 8 (1989), 982-1003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5 Fichman, R.G. Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. In DeGross, J.I., Becker, J.D. and Elam, JJ, Eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, (Dallas, TX, 1992), pp. 195-206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Finlay, P.N. and Mitchell, A.C. Perceptions of the benefits from introduction of CASE: An empirical study. MIS Q. 18, 4, (1994), 353-370. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Macmillan, New York, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8 Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Manage. Sci. 40, 4 (1994), 440-465. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Hertel, B.R. Minimizing error variance introduced by missing data routines in survey analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 4 (1976), 459-474.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10 Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations: Software for the Mind. McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.Google Scholar
- 11 Huff, C.C. Elements of a realistic CASE tool adoption budget. Commun. ACM 35, 4 (1992), 45-54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 Iivari, J. Factors affecting CASE usage. Working paper, Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, 1996 (available from the author).Google Scholar
- 13 Kemerer, C.F. How the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption. IEEE Software 9, 3 (1992), 23-28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14 Kusters, RJ. ja Wijers, G.M. On the practical use of CASE-tools: results of a survey, CASE'93. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on CASE (Singapore, 1993), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 2-10.Google Scholar
- 15 Lucas, H.C.,Jr. Implementation, the Key to Successful Information Systems. Columbia University Press, New York, 1981. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16 Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2, 3 (1991 ), 192-222.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17 Norman, RJ. and Nunamaker, J.F. Jr. CASE productivity perceptions of software engineering professionals. Commun. ACM 32, 9 (Sept. 1989), pp. 1102-1108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18 Nunally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
- 19 Orlikowski, W.J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MISQ. 17, 3 (1993), 309-340.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20 Prescott, M.B. and Conger, S.A. Information technology innovations: A classification by IT locus of impact and research approach. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 26, 2 & 3 (1995), 20-41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21 Rai, A. and Howard, G.S. Propagating CASE usage for software development: An empirical investigation of key organizaational correlates. Omega 22, 2 (1994), 133-147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22 Ramiller, N. Perceived compatibility of information technology innovations among secondary adopters: Towards reassessment. J. Engineering and Technology Management 11, 1 (1994), 1-23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23 Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition. The Free Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- 24 Straub, D., Limayem, M. and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. Measuring systems usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Manag. Sci. 41, 8 (1995), 1328-1342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Wynekoop, J.L., Senn, J.A. and Conger, S.A. The implementation of CASE tools: An innovation diffusion approach, Kendall, K.E., Lyytinen, K. and DeGross, J., Eds., The Impact of Computer Supported Technologies on Information Systems Development, IFIP Transactions A-8, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992, 25-41. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Why are CASE tools not used?
Recommendations
CASE tools: understanding the reasons for non-use
Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE) technologies are tools that provide automated assistance for software development [3]. The goal of introducing CASE tools is the reduction of the time and cost of software development and the enhancement of the ...
Making active CASE tools—toward the next generation CASE tools
In CASE field, there is a long-standing topic, i.e. the reason that CASE tools seem to be dearly bought but sparsely used. Based on our practical experience of making and using CASE tools, we point out the reason is that today's CASE tools are actually ...
Tools used in Global Software Engineering: A systematic mapping review
Context: This systematic mapping review is set in a Global Software Engineering (GSE) context, characterized by a highly distributed environment in which project team members work separately in different countries. This geographic separation creates ...
Comments