Richard T. Watson
- 1 Arterton, F. C. Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy? Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1987.Google Scholar
- 2 Davidow, W.H., and Malone, M.S. The virtual corporation: structuring and revitalizing the corporation of the 21st century. Harper Bus., New York, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
- 3 Dourish, P., and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared work-spaces. In Proceedings of CSCW'92. (Toronto, 1992). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Elden, M. Three generations of worker democracy research in Norway. The Quality of Work Life in Europe. C.L. Cooper and E. Mumford, Eds. Associate Business Press, London, 1979.Google Scholar
- 5 Evjemo, B., and P. Ytterstad. Politikerkanal i telenettet (The mediation of political work through IT). Telenor Research and Development, Sci-entific Report R 15/96, Kjeller, Norway.Google Scholar
- 6 Fevolden, F., Hagen, T.P., and S~rensen R. Kommunal organisering (Municipal organization). Tano, Oslo, 1992.Google Scholar
- 7 Larsen, H. O. Ved roret? Folkevalgte i styringsrollen (At the steering wheel? Elected candidates as leaders). Kommuneforlaget, Oslo, 1992.Google Scholar
- 8 Mantovani, G. Is computer-mediated communication intrinsically apt to enhance democracy in organizations? Human Relations 47, 1 (1994), 45-62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 9 Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Manage. Sci. 32, 11 (1986), 1492-1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.K., Watson, R.T., Clapper, D.L., and McLean, E.R. Computer-mediated communication and majority influence: Assessing the impact in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. Manage. Sci. 44, 9 (1998), 1263-1278. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11 Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974), 1124-1131.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12 Walsh, J.P., and Ungson, G.R. Organizational memory. Acad. Manage. Rev. 16, 1 (1991), 57-91.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Reviews
Brad D. Reid
This paper briefly discusses the 1993–1995 field trial of a political telecommunications network called “POT” in Salangen, Norway, population 2,500. After discussing the preliminary research and needs that resulted in the selection of the location and the configuration of the system, the authors comment on the findings of the study. These include the leveling influence of email, changes in the balance of power, increased organizational memory, improved efficiency and attractiveness of political work, contextual awareness in decision making, and improved framing of problems. While the field trial was judged a success, the system was terminated in 1996 due to political changes, increased municipal administration workload, and technical problems experienced by users. The authors conclude that while “power trumps technology,” changes are inevitable. The paper contains references for additional study and should be read by people interested in the influence of technology on the political process.
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments