skip to main content
article

Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions

Published:01 October 2001Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We propose a genre taxonomy as a knowledge repository of communicative structures or "typified actions" enacted by organizational members. The genre taxonomy is intended to help people make sense of diverse types of communicative actions and provide ideas for improving work processes that coordinate the communication of information. It engages several features to achieve this objective. First, the genre taxonomy represents the elements of both genres and genre systems as embedded in a social context reflecting the communicative questions why, what, who, when, where, and how (5W1H). In other words, the genre taxonomy represents the purpose, content, participants, timing, location, and form of communicative action. Second, the genre taxonomy distinguishes between widely recognized genres such as a report and specific genres such as a particular company's technical report, because the difference sheds light on the context of genre use. Third, the genre taxonomy represents use and evolution of a genre over time to help people understand how a genre is used and changed by a community over time. Fourth, the genre taxonomy represents aspects of information coordination via genres, thus providing ideas for improving work processes using genres. We have constructed a prototype of such a genre taxonomy using the Process Handbook, a process knowledge repository developed at MIT. We have included both widely recognized genres such as the memo and specific genres such as those used in the Process Handbook itself. We suggest that this genre taxonomy may be useful in the innovation of new document templates or methods for communication because it helps to clarify different possible uses of similar genres and explicates how genres play a coordination role among people and between people and their tasks.

References

  1. AUSTIN, J. L. 1975. How To Do Things with Things with Words. J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisa, Eds., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BAKHIN, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. V. W. McGee, Trans., C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Eds., University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BAZERMAN, C. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the New rhetoric, A. Freedman and P. Medway, Eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 79-101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BAZERMAN, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BERKENKOTTER,C.AND HUCKIN, T. N. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. BROWN, J. S. 1994. Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Hum. Comput. Interact. 9, 3-36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. BROWN, J. S., COLLINS, A., AND DUGUID, P. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. 18, 32-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. CHURCHILL,E.F.AND BLY, S. 1999. Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (San Francisco), 99-108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. FELLBAUM, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Available at http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cwn/w3wn.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. GIDDENS, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. HAGEL, G., III AND ARMSTRONG, A. G. 1997. Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. HASSARD, J. 1996. Images of Time in Work and Organization. In Handbook of Organization Studies, S. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W. Nord, Eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LEE,J.AND PENTLAND, B. 2001. Exploring the Process Space: A Grammatical Approach to Process Design/Redesign. Submitted to ISR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. LEHNERT, W. G. 1978. The Process of Question Answering. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MALONE,T.W.ET AL. 1999. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational process. Manage. Sci. 45, 425-443, Available at http://ccs.mit.edu/CCSWP198/index.htm. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. MALONE,T.W.AND CROWSTON, K. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACMComput. Surv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. MILLER, C. R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quart. J. Speech 70, 151-167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. MUNTER, M. 1997. Guide to Managerial Communication: Effective Business Writing and Speaking, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ORLIKOWSKI,W.J.AND YATES, J. 1998. Genre systems as communicative norms for structuring interaction in groupware. CCS WP205. Available at http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP205/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. ORLIKOWSKI,W.J.AND YATES, J. 1994. Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39, 541-574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. ORLIKOWSKI,W.J.,YATES,J.,AND FONSTAD, N. 2001. Sloan 2001: A virtual odyssey. In Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play, and Life Via Technology, I. Zigurs and L. Chidambaram, Eds., Idea Group, Harrisburg, Penn., 191-218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. OSBORN, C. S. 1996. Documents and dependencies: Enabling strategic improvement through coordination redesign. In Information and Process Integration in Enterprises: Rethinking Documents, T. Wakayama et al. Eds., Kluwer Academic, Hingham, Mass. 31-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ROGET,P.M.AND CHAPMAN, R. L. 1992. Roget's International Thesaurus. Harper Collins, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. SEARLE, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. SENGE, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. WEWGER,E.AND SNYDER, W. 2000. Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review 78,1, 2000, pp. 139-145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. YATES,J.AND ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 2001. Genre systems: Chronos and Kairos in communicative interaction. In The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre: Strategies for Stability and Change. R. Coe, L. Lingard, and T. Teslenko, Eds., Hampton, Cresskill, N.J.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. YATES,J.AND ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1998. Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Sloan WP #4030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. YATES,J.AND ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1997. Chronos and Kairos in communicative interaction. Second International Sumposium on Genre. ( Vancouver, Canada, December).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. YATES,J.AND ORLIKOWSKI, W. J. 1992. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Manage. Rev. 17, 299-326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. YATES, J., ORLIKOWSKI,W.J.,AND OKAMURA, K. 1999. Explicit and implicit structuring of genres: Electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Org. Sci. 10, 83-103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. YATES, J., ORLIKOWSKI, W.J.,AND RENNECKER, J. 1997. Collaborative genres for collaboration: Genre systems in digital media. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii, January). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
                ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 19, Issue 4
                October 2001
                120 pages
                ISSN:1046-8188
                EISSN:1558-2868
                DOI:10.1145/502795
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2001 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 October 2001
                Published in tois Volume 19, Issue 4

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • article

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader