skip to main content
10.1145/778712.778756acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads

Published:25 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents design research conducted as part of a larger project on human-robot interaction. The primary goal of this study was to come to an initial understanding of what features and dimensions of a humanoid robot's face most dramatically contribute to people's perception of its humanness. To answer this question we analyzed 48 robots and conducted surveys to measure people's perception of each robot's humanness. Through our research we found that the presence of certain features, the dimensions of the head, and the total number of facial features heavily influence the perception of humanness in robot heads. This paper presents our findings and initial guidelines for the design of humanoid robot heads.

References

  1. Bates, J. The Role of Emotion in Believable Agents. Communications of the ACM, 37 (7). 122--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bates, B. The Human Face. BBC Worldwide Limited, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Breazeal, C. and Velasquez, J., Toward Teaching a Robot 'Infant' using Emotive Communication Acts. In Proceedings of Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, workshop on Socially Situated Intelligence '98, (Zurich, Switzerland, 1998), 25--40Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Breazeal, C. and Velasquez, J., Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance? In Proceedings of Agents 99 Workshop on emotion-based agent architectures, (Seattle, WA, 1999), 18--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B., How to Build Robots That Make Friends and Influence People. In Proceedings of IROS-99, (Kyonju, Korea, 1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bruce, A., Nourbakhsh, I. and Simmons, R. The Role of Expressiveness and Attention in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings, AAAI Fall Symposium. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassell, J. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Vilhjlmsson, H. and Yan, H., More Than Just a Pretty Face: Affordance in Embodiment. In Proceedings of 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, (New Orleans, LA, USA, 2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Don, A., Brennan, S., Laurel, B. and Schneiderman, B., Anthropomorphism: From Eliza to Terminator 2. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '92, (1992), 67--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ekman, P. (ed.), Emotion in the Human Face. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Humanoid Interaction Lab, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan. http://www.etl.go.jp/etl/robotics/Projects/Humanoid/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Humanoid Robotics Institute, Waseda University, Japan. http://www.humanoid.waseda.ac.jp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Humanoid Robotics Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/humanoid-robotics-group/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassin, R. and Trope, Y. Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78 (5). 837--852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. 'Social' Human Computer Interaction. In Friedman, B. ed. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1997, 191--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Klingspor, V., Demiris, J. and Kaiser, M. Human-Robot-Communication and Machine Learning. Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, 12 (7--8). 573--617.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Langlois Lab, University of Texas, Austin, USA. http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/HomePage/Group/LangloisLAB/composites.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Laurel, B. interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. in Friedman, B. ed. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1997, 207--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Moon, Y. When the Interface is the Face: Social Responses to Interactive Technologies. Report (113). 23--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nass, C. and Steuer, J. Anthropomorphism, Agency, and Ethopoeia: Computers as Social Actors. Human Communication Research, 19 (4). 504--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nass, C., Steuer, J. and Tauber, E., Computers are Social Actors. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '94, (1994), ACM Press: New York, 72--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Reichard, J. Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction. Penguin Books, 1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Reilly, W. S. N., A Methodology for Building Believable Social Agents. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents '97, (Marina Del Rey, California USA, 1997), 114--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Roy, N., Baltus, G., Fox, D., Gemperle, F., Goetz, J., Hirsch, T., Margaritis, D., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Schulte, J. and Thrun, S. Towards Personal Service Robots for The Elderly. http://www.cs.cmu.ed/~nursebot/web/papers.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Social Robots Project, Carnegie Mellon University, USA. http://www2/cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/robocomp/social/www/SRPmain.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J. H. and et al. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (2). 97--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Takeuchi, A. and Nagao, K., Communicative Facial Displays as A New Conversational Modality. In Proceedings of INTERCHI '93, (Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1993), ACM Press: New York, 187--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Takeuchi, A. and Naito, T., Situated Facial displays: Towards Social interaction. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems '95, (1995), ACM Press: New York, 450--455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zebrowitz, L. A. Reading faces: Window to the soul? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DIS '02: Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques
        June 2002
        413 pages
        ISBN:1581135157
        DOI:10.1145/778712

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 June 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        DIS '02 Paper Acceptance Rate44of139submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

        Upcoming Conference

        DIS '24
        Designing Interactive Systems Conference
        July 1 - 5, 2024
        IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader