nach oben

Journal of Business Economics

Erschienen in:

01.04.2015 | Original Paper

Effort provision in entrepreneurial teams: effects of team size, free-riding and peer pressure

verfasst von: Uschi Backes-Gellner, Arndt Werner, Alwine Mohnen

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper analyzes whether effort provision in entrepreneurial teams depends on the size of the team, assuming that size determines the strength of free-riding and peer pressure effects in entrepreneurial teams. We provide a theoretical model and empirical analyses to explain the joint effect of free-riding and peer pressure on effort in start-up teams. We begin with an economic model by Kandel and Lazear in J Polit Econ 100(4):801–817, (1992) and enrich it using insights from entrepreneurship research. Based on our model, we first hypothesize that with increasing team size in entrepreneurial teams, the efforts of the individual team founders should follow an inverted U-shaped pattern. Second, we argue that the peer pressure effect is stronger if team members have stronger social ties, and thus we expect the effort-maximizing team size to be larger in teams with stronger social ties. Using a data set from 214 German start-up teams, we find that our hypotheses are supported by the data.

Nächster Artikel Does professional tax preparation matter? Empirical evidence from Germany

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Thus, working in teams (of founders) creates particular problems and may result in a less-than-optimal use of additional resources if these problems cannot be resolved. Resources brought in by additional team members may not be fully or efficiently utilized and may therefore hinder the success of team startups.

In contrast, research also emphasizes that diverse teams are more effective because they better overcome cognitive conflicts (e.g., they allow team members to see multiple perspectives and avoid hazardous decisions).

In an established firm with already developed HR management, this monitoring technology would be a human resource tool, e.g., a feedback system including performance measures to control and incentivize employees’ effort level. In a start-up, such instruments are missing. However, we argue that founders monitor each other while working together, consciously or unconsciously.

The wording “internal and external peer pressure” (Kandel and Lazear 1992) means more or less the same as the terminus “team identification” in the sociological literature.

There are no complementarities assumed in our model. This approach is consistent with Adams (2002), who uses a similar production technology for medical and legal practices. In our case, this assumption appears to be reasonable because output for us is not sales or profits but rather effort (as measured by individual working time, which simply adds up to a total amount of working time).

Under our assumptions, these results have already been proven by Barua et al. (1995, p. 500), among others.

For the importance of close spatial proximity for the strength of peer pressure, see Zimmermann (2003).

Adams C (2002) Does size really matter? Empirical evidence on group incentives. FTC Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 252. Version also available as SSRN Discussion Paper Number 385862

Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777–795

Aldrich H (1990) Using an ecological approach to study organizational founding rates. Entrep Theory Pract 14(3):7–24

Almus M, Nerlinger EA (1999) Growth of new technology-based firms: which factors matter? Small Bus Econ 13:141–154CrossRef

Backes-Gellner U, Werner A (2007) Entrepreneurial signaling via education: a success factor in innovative start-ups. Small Bus Econ 29:173–190CrossRef

Bailey RM (1970) Economies of scale in medical practice. Empirical studies in health economics. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore

Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev Econ Stud 77(2):417–458CrossRef

Barua A, Lee SC-H, Whinston AB (1995) Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations. Organ Sci 6(4):487–504CrossRef

Bosma N, van Praag M, Thurik R, de Witt G (2004) The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Bus Econ 23(2):227–236CrossRef

Brinckmann J, Hoegl M (2011) Effects of initial teamwork capability and initial relational capability on the development of new technology-based firms. Strateg Entrep J 5(1):37–57CrossRef

Brüderl J, Preisendörfer P (1998) Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Bus Econ 10(3):213–225CrossRef

Brüderl J, Preisendörfer P, Ziegler R (1996) Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe: eine empirische Studie zu den Chancen und Risiken von Unternehmensgründungen. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin

Casson M, Della Giusta M (2007) Entrepreneurship and social capital: analysing the impact of social networks on entrepreneurial activity from a rational action perspective. Int Small Bus J 25(3):220–244CrossRef

Chandler G, Hanks SH (1998) An investigation of new venture teams in emerging business. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College

Chandler GN, Honig B, Wiklund J (2005) Antecedents, moderators, and performance of membership change in new venture teams. J Bus Ventur 20(5):705–725CrossRef

Che YK, Yoo SW (2001) Optimal incentives for teams. Am Econ Rev 91(3):525–541CrossRef

Chen C, Börner K (2005) From spatial promiximity to semantic coherence: a quantitative approach to the study of group dynamics in collaborative virtual environments. Vis Environ 14(1):81–103

Chowdhury S (2005) Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important? J Bus Ventur 20(6):727–746CrossRef

Clarysse B, Moray N (2004) A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. J Bus Ventur 19(1):55–79CrossRef

Coleman JS (1990) (1990) Social Capital. In: Coleman JS (ed) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, pp 300–321

Cooper AC, Gimeno-Gascon FJ, Woo CW (1994) Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. J Bus Ventur 9(5):371–395CrossRef

Cooper AC, Daily CM (1997) Entrepreneurial teams. In: Sexton DL, Smilor RW (eds) Entrepreneurship 2000. Upstart Publishing Company, Chicago, pp 127–150

Demski JS (1972) Information analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading

Dubini P, Aldrich H (1991) Personal and extended Networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 6(5):305–313CrossRef

Ensley M, Amason AC (1999) Entrepreneurial team heterogeneity and the moderating effects of environmental volatility and team tenure on new venture performance. In: Reynolds PD, WD et al (eds) Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Babson College, Massachusetts, pp 107–127

Ensley MD, Hmieleski KM (2005) A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between University-based and independent start-ups. Res Policy 34(7):1091–1105CrossRef

Ensley MD, Pearson AW (2005) An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):237–284CrossRef

Ensley MD, Pearson AW, Amason A (2002) Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. J Bus Ventur 17(4):365–386CrossRef

Fabel O, Hopp CH, Weber Th (2013) When teams of employees spin-off partnerships: matching-technology, information structure, and the “pure” incubator effect. J Bus Econ 83(4):383–407CrossRef

Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J Labor Econ 24(1):39–57CrossRef

Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868CrossRef

Forbes DP, Borchert PS, Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Sapienza HJ (2006) Entrepreneurial team formation: an exploration of new member addition. Entrep Theory Pract 30(2):225–248CrossRef

Francis D, Sandberg WR (2000) Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance. Entrep Theory Pract 25:5–25

Grosse S, Putterman L, Rockenbach B (2011) Monitoring in teams: using laboratory experiments to study a theory of the firm. J Eur Econ Assoc 9:785–816CrossRef

Hamilton B (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of returns to self-employement. J Polit Econ 108:605–631CrossRef

Holmström B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J Econ 13(2):324–340CrossRef

Horwitz SK (2005) The compositional impact of team diversity on performance: theoretical considerations. Hum Resour Dev Rev 4(2):219–245CrossRef

Huck S, Kübler DF, Weibull J (2010) Social norms and economic incentives in firms. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5264

Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Adm Sci Q 44(4):741–763CrossRef

Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRef

Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J Polit Econ 100(4):801–817CrossRef

Karau SJ, Williams KD (1997) The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dyn 1(2):156–168CrossRef

Knez M, Simester D (2001) Firm-wide incentives and mutual monitoring at continental airlines. J Labor Econ 19(4):743–772CrossRef

Kor YY, Mahoney JT (2000) Penrose’s resource-based approach: the process and product of research creativity. J Manag Stud 37(1):109–139

Lazear EP (2005) Entrepreneurship. J Labor Econ 23(4):649–680

Lechler T (2001) Social interaction: a determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Bus Econ 16(4):263–278CrossRef

Leung A, Foo MD, Chaturvedi S (2013) Imprinting effects of founding core teams on HR values in New Ventures. Entrep Theory Pract 37(1):87–106CrossRef

Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Jaworski RA, Bennett N (2004) Social loafing: a field investigation. J Manag 30(2):285–304

Littunen H (2000) Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Bus Econ 15(1):59–71CrossRef

Lockett A, Ucbasaran D, Butler J (2006) Opening up the investor-investee dyad: syndicates, teams, and networks. Entrep Theory Pract 30(2):117–130CrossRef

Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Am Econ Rev Am Econ Assoc 99(1):112–145CrossRef

Mellewigt T, Späth JF (2002) Entrepreneurial teams—a survey of german and US empirical Studies. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 5:107–125

Mohnen A, Pokorny K, Sliwka D (2008) Transparency, inequity aversion, and the dynamics of peer pressure in teams—theory and evidence. J Labor Econ 26(4):693–720CrossRef

Nederveen Pieterse A, van Knippenberg D, van Dierendonck D (2012) Cultural diversity and team performance: the role of team member goal orientation. Acad Manag J 56(3):782–804CrossRef

Newhouse JP (1973) The economics of group practice. J Hum Resour 8(1):37–56CrossRef

Nordqvist M (2005) Familiness in top management teams: commentary on Ensley and Pearson’s “an exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus”. Entrep Theory Pract 29(3):285–292CrossRef

Parker SC (2009) Can cognitive biases explain venture team homophily? Strateg Entrep J 3(1):67–83CrossRef

Patel PC, Terjesen S (2011) Complementary effects of network range and tie strength in enhancing transnational venture performance. Strateg Entrep J 5(1):58–80CrossRef

Radoslawa N (2009) Mutual monitoring versus incentive pay in teams, annals of economics and statistics/annales d’Économie et de Statistique, No. 93/94, pp 161–182

Reynolds PD, Curtin RT (2008) Business creation in the United States: panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics II initial assessment. Found Trends Entrepreneurship 4(3):155–307

Ruef M, Aldrich H, Carter N (2003) The structure of founding teams: homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Am Sociol Rev 68(2):195–222CrossRef

Sapienza HJ, Gupta AK (1994) Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Acad Manag J 37(6):1618–1632CrossRef

Talaulicar T, Grundei J, von Werder A (2005) Strategic decision making in start-ups: the effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. J Bus Ventur 20:519–541CrossRef

Thornton PH (1999) The sociology of entrepreneurship. Ann Rev Sociol 25:19–46CrossRef

Ucbasaran D, Lockett A, Wright M, Westhead P (2003) Entrepreneurial founder teams: factors associated with member entry and exit. Entrep Theory Pract 28(2):107–128CrossRef

Vanaelst I, Clarysse B, Wright M, Lockett A, Moray N, S’Jegers R (2006) Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: an examination of team heterogeneity. Entrep Theory Pract 30(2):249–271CrossRef

Verheul I, Carree M, Thurik R (2009) Allocation and productivity in new ventures of female and male entrepreneurs. Small Bus Econ 33(3):273–291CrossRef

Vyakarnam S, Handelberg J (2005) Four themes of the impact of management teams on organizational performance. Int Small Bus J 23(3):236–256CrossRef

Werner A, Moog P (2007) Working conditions in SME and their impact on nascent entrepreneurship. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 6:75–98

Witt P (2004) Entrepreneurs’ Networks and the Success of Start-ups. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev 16(5):391–412

Wooldridge JM (2003) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason

Zimmermann D (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Rev Econ Stat 85(1):9–23CrossRef

Titel: Effort provision in entrepreneurial teams: effects of team size, free-riding and peer pressure
verfasst von: Uschi Backes-Gellner
Arndt Werner
Alwine Mohnen
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0749-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Journal of Business Economics

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner