Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics 7/2014

01.10.2014 | Original Paper

Honesty in intra-organizational reporting

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Economics | Ausgabe 7/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this experimental study we analyze the trade-off between the subjects’ preference for wealth on the one hand and their preference for honesty on the other hand. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of communication medium on reporting behavior. We want to know whether situational cues, such as the communication method—digital (via computer) vs. hard-copy (via paper and pencil) matter, while considering deception. Furthermore, we are interested in the relationship between the social value orientation (SVO) and the reporting behavior. While the experimental evidence shows that participants in both treatments have a preference for truthful reporting and they avoid major lies, there are also remarkable differences between the treatments which we attribute to the reporting medium: computer treatment CT versus paper-and-pencil treatment PPT. Agents are willing to report more honestly via a hard-copy medium than via a digital medium. It seems like participants perceive the digital report more confidential and anonymous than the hard-copy report, and that is why they tend to misrepresent in the CT rather than in the PPT. Further, we found that the SVO influences reporting behavior.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Journal of Business Economics

From January 2013, the Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB) is published in English under the title Journal of Business Economics (JBE). The Journal of Business Economics (JBE) aims at encouraging theoretical and applied research in the field of business economics and business administration, promoting the exchange of ideas between science and practice.

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
The values of X used in these two treatments are different. However, there are no systematical differences between them, because the same programmed random algorithm was used to forecast these values. We tested the difference between values of X used in the CT and in the PPT also statistically and found no significant differences.
 
2
The regression of integrity (i) on SVO gives similar results, in the CT even the same (because h = i) and in the PPT we find slightly higher difference between the integrity of cooperative and individualistic types: β = 0.226 and p < 0.02 (R 2 =  0.076).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Antle R, Eppen GD (1985) Capital rationing and organizational slack in capital budgeting. Manage Sci 31(2):415–444CrossRef Antle R, Eppen GD (1985) Capital rationing and organizational slack in capital budgeting. Manage Sci 31(2):415–444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Arnold MC (2007) Experimentelle forschung in der budgetierung—luegen, nichts als luegen? J fuer Betriebswirtschaft 57(2):69–99CrossRef Arnold MC (2007) Experimentelle forschung in der budgetierung—luegen, nichts als luegen? J fuer Betriebswirtschaft 57(2):69–99CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baiman S, Lewis BL (1989) An experiment testing the behavioral equivalence of strategically equivalent employment contracts. J Account Res 27(1):1–20CrossRef Baiman S, Lewis BL (1989) An experiment testing the behavioral equivalence of strategically equivalent employment contracts. J Account Res 27(1):1–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: Kurtines WM, Gewirtz L (eds) Handbook of moral behavior and development, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 45–103 Bandura A (1991) Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: Kurtines WM, Gewirtz L (eds) Handbook of moral behavior and development, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 45–103
Zurück zum Zitat Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 3(3):193CrossRef Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 3(3):193CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bogaert S, Boone C, Declerck C (2008) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model. Br J Soc Psychol 47(3):453–480CrossRef Bogaert S, Boone C, Declerck C (2008) Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model. Br J Soc Psychol 47(3):453–480CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown JL, Evans JH III, Moser DV (2009) Agency theory and participative budgeting experiments. J Manag Account Res 21:317–345CrossRef Brown JL, Evans JH III, Moser DV (2009) Agency theory and participative budgeting experiments. J Manag Account Res 21:317–345CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Covaleski MA, Evans JH III, Luft JL, Shields MD (2007) Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Handb Manag Account Res 2:587–624CrossRef Covaleski MA, Evans JH III, Luft JL, Shields MD (2007) Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration. Handb Manag Account Res 2:587–624CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daft RL, Lengel RH (1984) Information richness: a new approach to managerial behaviour and organizational design. Res Organ Behav 6:191–233 Daft RL, Lengel RH (1984) Information richness: a new approach to managerial behaviour and organizational design. Res Organ Behav 6:191–233
Zurück zum Zitat Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage Sci 32(5):554–571CrossRef Daft RL, Lengel RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage Sci 32(5):554–571CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Q 11(3):354–366CrossRef Daft RL, Lengel RH, Trevino LK (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Q 11(3):354–366CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(5):979–995CrossRef DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(5):979–995CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Diekman A, Przepiorka W, Rauhut H (2011) Die Präventivwirkung des Nichtwissens im Experiment. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 40:74–84 Diekman A, Przepiorka W, Rauhut H (2011) Die Präventivwirkung des Nichtwissens im Experiment. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 40:74–84
Zurück zum Zitat Evans JH III, Hannan RL, Krishnan R, Moser DV (2001) Honesty in managerial reporting. Account Rev 76(4):537–559CrossRef Evans JH III, Hannan RL, Krishnan R, Moser DV (2001) Honesty in managerial reporting. Account Rev 76(4):537–559CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fandel G, Trockel J (2011a) A game theoretical analysis of an extended manager–auditor-conflict. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 4:33–53CrossRef Fandel G, Trockel J (2011a) A game theoretical analysis of an extended manager–auditor-conflict. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 4:33–53CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fandel G, Trockel J (2011b) Optimal lot sizing in a non-cooperative material manager–controller game. Int J Prod Econ 133:256–261CrossRef Fandel G, Trockel J (2011b) Optimal lot sizing in a non-cooperative material manager–controller game. Int J Prod Econ 133:256–261CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fandel G, Trockel J (2013) Avoiding non-optimal management decisions by applying a three-person inspection game. Eur J Oper Res 226:85–93CrossRef Fandel G, Trockel J (2013) Avoiding non-optimal management decisions by applying a three-person inspection game. Eur J Oper Res 226:85–93CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2):171–178CrossRef Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2):171–178CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fischbacher U, Heusi F (2008) Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. TWI Research Paper Series 40, Thurgau Institute of Economics Fischbacher U, Heusi F (2008) Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. TWI Research Paper Series 40, Thurgau Institute of Economics
Zurück zum Zitat Gneezy U (2005) Deception: the role of consequences. Am Econ Rev 95(1):384–394CrossRef Gneezy U (2005) Deception: the role of consequences. Am Econ Rev 95(1):384–394CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hannan RL, Rankin FW, Towry KL (2006) The effect of information systems on honesty in managerial reporting: a behavioral perspective. Contemp Account Res 23(4):885–918CrossRef Hannan RL, Rankin FW, Towry KL (2006) The effect of information systems on honesty in managerial reporting: a behavioral perspective. Contemp Account Res 23(4):885–918CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Koford K, Penno M (1992) Accounting, principal–agent theory, and self-interested behavior. In: Bowie NE, Freeman RE (eds) Ethics and agency theory, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 127–142 Koford K, Penno M (1992) Accounting, principal–agent theory, and self-interested behavior. In: Bowie NE, Freeman RE (eds) Ethics and agency theory, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 127–142
Zurück zum Zitat Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: the Principal–Agent Model, vol 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2002) The theory of incentives: the Principal–Agent Model, vol 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zurück zum Zitat Liebrand WBG (1984) The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an n-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. Eur J Soc Psychol 14(3):239–264CrossRef Liebrand WBG (1984) The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an n-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. Eur J Soc Psychol 14(3):239–264CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liebrand WBG, McClintock CG (1988) The ring measure of social values: a computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. Eur J Pers 2(3):217–230CrossRef Liebrand WBG, McClintock CG (1988) The ring measure of social values: a computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. Eur J Pers 2(3):217–230CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matuszewski LJ (2010) Honesty in managerial reporting: is it affected by perceptions of horizontal equity? J Manag Account Res 22:233–250CrossRef Matuszewski LJ (2010) Honesty in managerial reporting: is it affected by perceptions of horizontal equity? J Manag Account Res 22:233–250CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. JMR 45(6):633–644 Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. JMR 45(6):633–644
Zurück zum Zitat McClintock CG (1972) Social motivation—a set of propositions. Behav Sci 17(5):438–454CrossRef McClintock CG (1972) Social motivation—a set of propositions. Behav Sci 17(5):438–454CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Meinert D, Vitell SJ, Blankenship R (1998) Respondent “honesty”: a comparison of computer versus paper and pencil questionnaire administration. J Mark Manag (10711988) 8(1):34–43 Meinert D, Vitell SJ, Blankenship R (1998) Respondent “honesty”: a comparison of computer versus paper and pencil questionnaire administration. J Mark Manag (10711988) 8(1):34–43
Zurück zum Zitat Mietek A, Leopold-Wildburger U (2011) Honesty in budgetary reporting—an experimental study. In: Klatte et al (eds) Operations research proceedings 2011, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–210 Mietek A, Leopold-Wildburger U (2011) Honesty in budgetary reporting—an experimental study. In: Klatte et al (eds) Operations research proceedings 2011, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–210
Zurück zum Zitat Mittendorf B (2006) Capital budgeting when managers value both honesty and perquisites. J Manag Account Res 18:77–95CrossRef Mittendorf B (2006) Capital budgeting when managers value both honesty and perquisites. J Manag Account Res 18:77–95CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Naquin CE, Belkin LY, Kurtzberg TR (2010) The finer points of lying online: e-mail versus pen and paper. J Appl Psychol 95(2):387–394CrossRef Naquin CE, Belkin LY, Kurtzberg TR (2010) The finer points of lying online: e-mail versus pen and paper. J Appl Psychol 95(2):387–394CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rankin FW, Schwartz ST, Young RA (2008) The effect of honesty and superior authority on budget proposals. Account Rev 83(4):1083–1099CrossRef Rankin FW, Schwartz ST, Young RA (2008) The effect of honesty and superior authority on budget proposals. Account Rev 83(4):1083–1099CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shalvi S, Handgraaf MJJ, De Dreu CKW (2011) Ethical manoeuvring: why people avoid both major and minor lies. Br J Manag 22:16–27CrossRef Shalvi S, Handgraaf MJJ, De Dreu CKW (2011) Ethical manoeuvring: why people avoid both major and minor lies. Br J Manag 22:16–27CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sprinkle GB (2007) Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting. Handb Manag Account Res 1:415–444CrossRef Sprinkle GB (2007) Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting. Handb Manag Account Res 1:415–444CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tourangeau R, Yan T (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull 133(5):859–883CrossRef Tourangeau R, Yan T (2007) Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull 133(5):859–883CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Honesty in intra-organizational reporting
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Economics / Ausgabe 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0044-2372
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-8928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0740-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2014

Journal of Business Economics 7/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Editorial

Premium Partner