nach oben

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

27.03.2024 | Original Paper

Performance of a novel hybrid membrane bioreactor (HMBR) treating synthetic dairy wastewater: assessment of coupled mechanical removal sections and MBR

verfasst von: Milad Vaezi, Salar Helchi, Farshid Pajoum Shariati, Mir Mehrshad Emamshoushtari, Mahsa Keyvan Hosseini, Parisa Keyvan Hosseini, Delara Daliri

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this study, a novel mechanical hybrid membrane bioreactor (HMBR) was designed and constructed to treat synthetic dairy wastewater. The system integrated mechanical oil separators, including API (published by the American Petroleum Institute), corrugated plate interceptor (CPI), and membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology, to investigate the oil removal efficiency during the separation processes. The optimal diagonal plate angle in the CPI section was determined to be 30°, achieving an oil removal efficiency exceeding 30% for the initial oil concentrations of 200, 400, and 800 mg L⁻¹. Subsequently, trials were conducted in HMBR, utilizing an initial oil concentration, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and plate angle of 800, 4000 mg L⁻¹, and 30°, respectively. After the mechanical pre-treatment section, the initial oil content was 501 mg L⁻¹ and decreased to 9 mg L⁻¹ in the membrane permeate. Additionally, the COD in the effluent of the mechanical pre-treatment section ranged from 2639 to 2849 mg L⁻¹, which decreased to 169–387 mg L⁻¹ in the membrane permeate. Finally, the HMBR system demonstrated removal efficiencies of 98.8% for oil and 90–95.7% for COD. The HMBR showed efficient removal of oil and COD despite the challenging characteristics of dairy wastewater, including its high oil and organic content. Integrating mechanical separation, biodegradation, and membrane filtration highlights the potential of this system for cost-effective and eco-friendly dairy wastewater treatment. This integration addresses the need for comprehensive studies examining mechanical pre-treatment methods integrated with MBR technology for dairy wastewater treatment in a compact system.

Graphical abstract

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdollahzadeh Sharghi E, Bonakdarpour B (2013) The study of organic removal efficiency and halophilic bacterial mixed liquor characteristics in a membrane bioreactor treating hypersaline produced water at varying organic loading rates. Bioresour Technol 149:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.110CrossRef

Ahmad AL, Chong MF, Bhatia S, Ismail S (2006) Drinking water reclamation from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination 191:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.033CrossRef

Akansha J, Nidheesh PV, Gopinath A et al (2020) Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by combined aerated electrocoagulation and phytoremediation process. Chemosphere 253:126652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126652CrossRef

Alighardashi A, Pakan M, Jamshidi S, Pajoum Shariati F (2017) Performance evaluation of membrane bioreactor (MBR) coupled with activated carbon on tannery wastewater treatment. Membr Water Treat 8:517. https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2017.8.6.517

Amaral MCS, Lange LC, Borges CP (2014) Evaluation of the use of powdered activated carbon in membrane bioreactor for the treatment of bleach pulp mill effluent. Water Environ Res 86:788–799. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143014X13975035526383CrossRef

Andrade LH, Motta GE, Amaral MCS (2013) Treatment of dairy wastewater with a membrane bioreactor. Brazilian J Chem Eng 30:759–770. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322013000400008CrossRef

Baeta BEL, Luna HJ, Sanson AL et al (2013) Degradation of a model azo dye in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) operated with powdered activated carbon (PAC). J Environ Manage 128:462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.038CrossRef

Bazinet L (2015) Electrodialysis applications on dairy ingredients separation. Hu K , Dickson JM, (eds), Membr Process Dairy Ingred Sep Oxford, UK John Wiley Sons, Ltd., pp 241–266

Bazrafshan E, Moein H, Kord Mostafapour F, Nakhaie S (2013) Application of electrocoagulation process for dairy wastewater treatment. J Chem 2013:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/640139CrossRef

Beychok MR (1967) Aqueous wastes from petroleum and petrochemical plants. Wileym, New York

Bhuvaneshwari S, Majeed F, Jose E, Mohan A (2022) Different treatment methodologies and reactors employed for dairy effluent treatment—a review. J Water Process Eng 46:102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102622CrossRef

Boguniewicz-Zablocka J, Klosok-Bazan I, Naddeo V (2019) Water quality and resource management in the dairy industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0608-8CrossRef

Chen F, Bi X, Ng HY (2016) Effects of bio-carriers on membrane fouling mitigation in moving bed membrane bioreactor. J Memb Sci 499:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2015.10.052CrossRef

Daneshvar E, Zarrinmehr MJ, Hashtjin AM et al (2018) Versatile applications of freshwater and marine water microalgae in dairy wastewater treatment, lipid extraction and tetracycline biosorption. Bioresour Technol 268:523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.032CrossRef

Dereli RK, Ersahin ME, Ozgun H et al (2012) Potentials of anaerobic membrane bioreactors to overcome treatment limitations induced by industrial wastewaters. Bioresour Technol 122:160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.139CrossRef

Dionysiou DD, Balasubramanian G, Suidan MT et al (2000) Rotating disk photocatalytic reactor: development, characterization, and evaluation for the destruction of organic pollutants in water. Water Res 34:2927–2940. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00022-1CrossRef

Dizayee KKH, Raheem AM, Judd SJ (2023) The cost benefit of refinery effluent pretreatment upstream of membrane bioreactors. Membranes (basel) 13:715. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13080715CrossRef

Duran A, Monteagudo JM, Sanmartin I, Gomez P (2013) Homogeneous sonophotolysis of food processing industry wastewater: study of synergistic effects, mineralization and toxicity removal. Ultrason Sonochem 20:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.09.011CrossRef

Eaton AD, Franson MAH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater. American Public Health Association. APHA

Emamshoushtari MM, Helchi S, Pajoum Shariati F et al (2022) An investigation into the efficiency of microalgal dynamic membrane photobioreactor in nickel removal from synthesized vegetable oil industry wastewater: a water energy nexus case study. Energy Nexus 7:100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100116CrossRef

Ertugay N, Acar FN (2014) The degradation of direct blue 71 by sono, photo and sonophotocatalytic oxidation in the presence of ZnO nanocatalyst. Appl Surf Sci 318:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.178CrossRef

Faisal M, Machdar I, Gani A, Daimon H (2016) The combination of air flotation and a membrane bioreactor for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Int J Technol 7:767–777. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v7i5.3163

FAO (2021) Dairy market review, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. Food Agric Organ United Nations, pp 1–13

Farizoglu B, Uzuner S (2011) The investigation of dairy industry wastewater treatment in a biological high performance membrane system. Biochem Eng J 57:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2011.08.007CrossRef

Fraga FA, García HA, Hooijmans CM et al (2017) Evaluation of a membrane bioreactor on dairy wastewater treatment and reuse in Uruguay. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 119:552–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IBIOD.2016.11.025CrossRef

Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd S (2000) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00056-8CrossRef

Ganta A, Bashir Y, Das S (2022) Dairy wastewater as a potential feedstock for valuable production with concurrent wastewater treatment through microbial electrochemical technologies. Energies 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239084

Goei R, Lim T-T (2014) Ag-decorated TiO2 photocatalytic membrane with hierarchical architecture: Photocatalytic and anti-bacterial activities. Water Res 59:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.025CrossRef

Han Y, He L, Luo X et al (2017) A review of the recent advances in design of corrugated plate packs applied for oil–water separation. J Ind Eng Chem 53:7–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.04.029CrossRef

Keyvan Hosseini P, Liu L, Keyvan Hosseini M et al (2023) Treatment of a synthetic decanted oily seawater in a pilot-scale hollow fiber membrane filtration process: Experimental investigation. J Hazard Mater 441:129928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129928CrossRef

Izadi A, Hosseini M, Najafpour G et al (2019) Performance of an integrated fi xed bed membrane bioreactor ( FBMBR ) applied to pollutant removal from paper-recycling wastewater. Water Resour Ind 21:100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2019.100111CrossRef

Karadag D, Koroglu OE, Ozkaya B et al (2015) Anaerobic granular reactors for the treatment of dairy wastewater: a review. Int J Dairy Technol 68:459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12252CrossRef

Karadag D, Köroğlu OE, Ozkaya B et al (2014) A review on fermentative hydrogen production from dairy industry wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:1627–1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4490CrossRef

Keyvan Hosseini M, Keyvan Hosseini P, Helchi S, Pajoum Shariati F (2022) The comparison between two methods of membrane cleaning to control membrane fouling in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR). Prep Biochem Biotechnol, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2022.2095574

Kumari R, Ankit H, Basu S (2021) Reclamation of water from dairy wastewater using membrane bioreactor (MBR)–Membrane filtration processes. Mater Today Proc 47:1452–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.452CrossRef

Kushwaha JP, Srivastava VC, Mall ID (2010) Organics removal from dairy wastewater by electrochemical treatment and residue disposal. Sep Purif Technol 76:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2010.10.008CrossRef

Kusmayadi A, Lu P-H, Huang C-Y et al (2022) Integrating anaerobic digestion and microalgae cultivation for dairy wastewater treatment and potential biochemicals production from the harvested microalgal biomass. Chemosphere 291:133057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133057CrossRef

Leal MCMR, Freire DMG, Cammarota MC, Sant’Anna GL, (2006) Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater. Process Biochem 41:1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.014CrossRef

Li B, Irvin S (2007) The comparison of alkalinity and ORP as indicators for nitrification and denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). Biochem Eng J 34:248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2006.12.020CrossRef

Licata M, Ruggeri R, Iacuzzi N, et al (2021) Treatment of combined dairy and domestic wastewater with constructed wetland system in Sicily (Italy). Pollutant Removal Efficiency and Effect of Vegetation. Water 13:1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081086

Liu Y, Zhang Y, Quan X et al (2011) Effects of an electric field and zero valent iron on anaerobic treatment of azo dye wastewater and microbial community structures. Bioresour Technol 102:2578–2584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.109CrossRef

Mahat SB, Omar R, Che Man H et al (2021) Performance of dynamic anaerobic membrane bioreactor (DAnMBR) with phase separation in treating high strength food processing wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 9:105245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105245CrossRef

Maiti S, Mishra IM, Bhattacharya SD, Joshi JK (2011) Removal of oil from oil-in-water emulsion using a packed bed of commercial resin. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 389:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.041CrossRef

Martin I, Pidou M, Soares A et al (2011) Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 32:921–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2011.565806CrossRef

Muniz GL, Borges AC, da Silva TCF (2020) Performance of natural coagulants obtained from agro-industrial wastes in dairy wastewater treatment using dissolved air flotation. J Water Process Eng 37:101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWPE.2020.101453CrossRef

Ozturk A, Aygun A, Nas B (2019) Application of sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) in dairy wastewater treatment. Korean J Chem Eng 36:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-018-0198-2CrossRef

Praneeth K, Moulik S, Vadthya P et al (2014) Performance assessment and hydrodynamic analysis of a submerged membrane bioreactor for treating dairy industrial effluent. J Hazard Mater 274:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.030CrossRef

Qin JJ, Oo MH, Tao G, Kekre KA (2007) Feasibility study on petrochemical wastewater treatment and reuse using submerged MBR. J Memb Sci 293:161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2007.02.012CrossRef

Salama E-S, Saha S, Kurade MB et al (2019) Recent trends in anaerobic co-digestion: Fat, oil, and grease (FOG) for enhanced biomethanation. Prog Energy Combust Sci 70:22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.08.002CrossRef

Santos AD, Martins RC, Quinta-Ferreira RM, Castro LM (2020) Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) for dairy wastewater treatment. Energy Rep 6:340–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.158CrossRef

Sarkar B, Chakrabarti PP, Vijaykumar A, Kale V (2006) Wastewater treatment in dairy industries—possibility of reuse. Desalination 195:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.11.015CrossRef

Saththasivam J, Loganathan K, Sarp S (2016) An overview of oil–water separation using gas flotation systems. Chemosphere 144:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.087CrossRef

Shariati FP, Mehrnia MR, Salmasi BM et al (2010) Membrane bioreactor for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing acetaminophen. Desalination 250:798–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.11.044CrossRef

Sibag M, Kim H-S (2012) Nitrification denitrification enhanced biological phosphorous removal (NDEBPR) occurs in a lab-scale alternating hypoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 104:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.001CrossRef

Singh V, Das D (2019) Potential of hydrogen production from biomass. Sci Eng Hydrog Energy Technol Hydrog Prod Pract Appl Energy Gener, pp 123–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814251-6.00003-4

Smithers GW (2008) Whey and whey proteins—From ‘gutter-to-gold.’ Int Dairy J 18:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IDAIRYJ.2008.03.008CrossRef

Soltani S, Mowla D, Vossoughi M, Hesampour M (2010) Experimental investigation of oily water treatment by membrane bioreactor. Desalination 250:598–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2009.09.031CrossRef

Song W, Xie B, Huang S, et al (2020) Aerobic membrane bioreactors for industrial wastewater treatment. Curr Dev Biotechnol Bioeng, pp 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819809-4.00006-1

Stasinakis AS, Charalambous P, Vyrides I (2022) Dairy wastewater management in EU: Produced amounts, existing legislation, applied treatment processes and future challenges. J Environ Manage 303:114152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114152CrossRef

Stewart M, Arnold K (2008) Emulsions and oil treating equipment: selection, sizing and troubleshooting. Elsevier

Su CX-H, Low LW, Teng TT, Wong YS (2016) Combination and hybridisation of treatments in dye wastewater treatment: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3618–3631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.07.026

Sun Y, Liu Y, Chen J et al (2021) Physical pretreatment of petroleum refinery wastewater instead of chemicals addition for collaborative removal of oil and suspended solids. J Clean Prod 278:123821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123821CrossRef

Teymouri SA, Habibi A, Pajoum Shariati F et al (2019) Nitrate and phosphate removal from treated dairy wastewater using microalgae chlorella salina. Modares J Biotechnol 10:183–186

Tiwari S, Behera CR, Srinivasan B (2016) Simulation and experimental studies to enhance water reuse and reclamation in India’s largest dairy industry. J Environ Chem Eng 4:605–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2015.12.001CrossRef

Tummons E, Han Q, Tanudjaja HJ et al (2020) Membrane fouling by emulsified oil: a review. Sep Purif Technol 248:116919. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2020.116919CrossRef

Wang X, Yan Y, Xu Z (2017) Application experiment and numerical simulation analysis of oil–water separator with two-oriented corrugated coalescence plate. J Dispers Sci Technol 38:1509–1515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2016.1259072CrossRef

Woskowicz E, Łożyńska M, Życki M, Kowalik-Klimczak A (2019) Hybrid processes combining microfiltration and adsorption/ion exchange for dairy wastewater treatment. J Mach Constr Maintenance-Problemy Eksploat 4:75–82

Yu R-F, Lin C-H, Chen H-W et al (2013) Possible control approaches of the Electro-Fenton process for textile wastewater treatment using on-line monitoring of DO and ORP. Chem Eng J 218:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.061CrossRef

Yuan Z, Pratt S, Batstone DJ (2012) Phosphorus recovery from wastewater through microbial processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:878–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPBIO.2012.08.001CrossRef

Zhou YB, Chen L, Hu XM, Lu J (2009) Modified resin coalescer for oil-in-water emulsion treatment: effect of operating conditions on oil removal performance. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:1660–1664. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie8012242CrossRef

Titel: Performance of a novel hybrid membrane bioreactor (HMBR) treating synthetic dairy wastewater: assessment of coupled mechanical removal sections and MBR
verfasst von: Milad Vaezi
Salar Helchi
Farshid Pajoum Shariati
Mir Mehrshad Emamshoushtari
Mahsa Keyvan Hosseini
Parisa Keyvan Hosseini
Delara Daliri
Publikationsdatum: 27.03.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02801-6