Abstract
The introduction of competitive funding mechanisms in higher education is found to generally increase research productivity. However, the diversity within higher education systems may lead universities to behave in substantially different ways in response to the adoption of competitive funding criteria. In particular, we argue that the legitimacy of universities, defined as their level of recognition based on the adherence to socially accepted norms and expectations, is crucial in shaping their reaction. This paper investigates the change in research productivity experienced by Italian universities following the introduction of the first Performance-based Research Funding System (PRFS) in 2003, focusing on the moderating effect of university legitimacy. Using a sample of 75 universities observed during the period 1999–2011, we find that the introduction of PRFS leads to an increase in research productivity, and this increase is significantly more pronounced among more legitimate universities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a detailed review, see Djokovic and Souitaris (2008).
In order to guarantee homogeneity we exclude 6 doctoral universities, 11 long distance learning institutions, and 3 universities for foreigners from the population of 96 Italian universities.
For instance, the University of Milan is reported in three different ways: Università degli Studi di Milano, University of Milan, Università di Milano.
The correlation matrix of the variables employed in our analysis is reported in Table 7 in “Appendix”.
The test for autocorrelation fails to reject the null hypothesis that average auto-covariance in residuals of order 2 is zero (z = 1.48; p = 0.139 for the baseline specification), thus suggesting that it is safe to restrict the instrument set to up to 2 lags. The Sargan test for over identifying restrictions is valid all over our specifications.
References
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D’Angelo, C. (2012). Revisiting size effects in higher education research productivity. Higher Education, 63(6), 701–717.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. (2011a). Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 87(3), 499–514.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011b). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, 86(2), 347–364.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.
Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.
Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., & Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312.
Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance: An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.
Backes-Gellner, U., & Werner, A. (2007). Entrepreneurial signaling via education: A success factor in innovative start-ups. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 173–190.
Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367–403.
Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2013). University specialization and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 837–863.
Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). The M&A dynamics of European science-based entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 141–180.
Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2011). Valuing university-based firms: The effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 755–776.
Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications: The effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32(1), 143–155.
Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Meoli, M., & Minola, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship research centers around the world: Research orientation, knowledge transfer and performance. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2013, 1–17.
Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2014). Cross-border M&As of biotech firms affiliated with internationalized universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9349-8.
De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of Governance in Research Organizations (pp. 137–152). New York: Springer.
Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.
Desai, V. M. (2008). Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations. Organization Science, 19(4), 594–608.
Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 225–247.
Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2014). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy. doi:10.1057/hep.2014.6.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607–631.
Fritsch, M., & Aamoucke, R. (2013). Regional public research, higher education, and innovative start-ups: An empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 865–885.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11(1), 281–304.
Geuna, A., & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.
Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Fernández, M., & Morillo, F. (2009). Structure and research performance of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 79(1), 131–146.
Herbst, M. (2007). Financing public universities. Higher Education Dynamics (Vol. 18). New York: Springer.
Hicks, D. (2009). Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation. Higher Education, 57(4), 393–404.
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.
Horta, H., Dautel, V., & Veloso, F. M. (2012). An output perspective on the teaching-research nexus: An analysis focusing on the United States higher education system. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 171–187.
Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2014). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9333-3.
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and invention in universities. The Rand Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403–433.
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.
Leisyte, L., & Kizniene, D. (2006). New public management in Lithuania’s higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19(3), 377–396.
Lejpras, A. (2014). How innovative are spin-offs at later stages of development? Comparing innovativeness of established research spin-offs and otherwise created firms. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 327–351.
Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46(4), 469–489.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.
López, M. J. G. (2006). Towards decentralized and goal-oriented models of institutional resource allocation: The Spanish case. Higher Education, 51(4), 589–617.
Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.
Melkers, J., & Xiao, F. (2012). Boundary-spanning in emerging technology research: Determinants of funding success for academic scientists. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(3), 251–270.
Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2013). Completing the technology transfer process: M&As of science-based IPOs. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 227–248.
Minelli, E., Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2012). Waiting for the market: Where is the Italian university system heading? Higher Education Policy, 25(1), 131–145.
Moed, H. F. (2008). UK research assessment exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? Scientometrics, 74(1), 153–161.
Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2005). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Netherlands: Springer.
OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265.
Orr, D., Jaeger, M., & Schwarzenberger, A. (2007). Performance-based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 3–23.
Osuna, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2011). Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance. Scientometrics, 86(3), 575–592.
Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2013). The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face. Research Policy, 42(9), 1657–1666.
Reichert, S. (2009). Institutional diversity in European higher education. Brussels: EUA.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Strehl, F., Reisinger, S., & Kalatschan, M. (2007). Funding systems and their effects on higher education systems. OECD Education Working Papers. doi:10.1787/220244801417.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Fondazione Cariplo under Grant 2010-1106. We thank Davide Donina and Stefano Paleari for useful discussions and helpful comments as well as two referees for their stimulating suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M. & Signori, A. Performance-based funding and university research productivity: the moderating effect of university legitimacy. J Technol Transf 41, 85–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9379-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9379-2