Abstract
We study a dynamic pricing problem of a firm facing stochastic reference price effect. Randomness is incorporated in the formation of reference prices to capture either consumers’ heterogeneity or exogenous factors that affect consumers’ memory processes. We apply the stochastic optimal control theory to the problem and derive an explicit expression for the optimal pricing strategy. The explicit expression allows us to obtain the distribution of the steady-state reference price. We compare the expected steady-state reference price to the steady-state reference price in a model with deterministic reference price effect, and we find that the former one is always higher. Our numerical study shows that the two steady-state reference prices can have opposite sensitivity to the problem parameters and the relative difference between the two can be very significant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.P., Sinha, I.: Reference price research: review and propositions. J. Mark. 69, 84–102 (2005)
Briesch, R., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.: A comparative analysis of reference price models. J. Consum. Res. 24(2), 202–214 (1997)
Greenleaf, E.A.: The impact of reference price effects on the profitability of price promotions. Mark. Sci. 14, 82–104 (1995)
Kopalle, P.K., Rao, A.G., Assunção, J.L.: Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Mark. Sci. 15(1), 60–85 (1996)
Popescu, I., Wu, Y.: Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3), 834–848 (2007)
Hu, Z., Chen, X., Hu, P.: Dynamic pricing with gain-seeking reference price effects. Oper. Res. 64(1), 150–157 (2016)
Nasiry, J., Popescu, I.: Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6), 1361–1368 (2011)
Chen, X., Hu, P., Hu, Z.: Efficient algorithms for dynamic pricing problem with reference price effect. Manag. Sci. 63(12), 4389–4408 (2017)
Fibich, G., Gavious, A., Lowengart, O.: Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effects. Oper. Res. 51(5), 721–734 (2003)
Wang, Z.: Intertemporal price discrimination via reference price effects. Oper. Res. 64(2), 290–296 (2016)
Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., Raj, S.P.: Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consum. Res. 19(3), 387–400 (1992)
Rajendran, K.N., Tellis, G.J.: Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J. Mark. 58, 22–34 (1994)
Øksendal, B.: Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications. Springer, New York (2002)
Allenby, G.M., Rossi, P.E.: Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econom. 89(1), 57–78 (1998)
Cox, J.C., Ingersoll Jr., J.E., Ross, S.A.: A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53, 385–407 (1985)
Heston, S.L.: A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev. Financ. Stud. 6(2), 327–343 (1993)
Bell, D.R., Lattin, J.M.: Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: the confounding effect of price-response heterogeneity. Mark. Sci. 19, 185–200 (2000)
Miranda, M.J., Fackler, P.L.: Applied Computational Economics and Finance. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Petruzzi, N., Dada, M.: Pricing and the newsvendor problem: a review with extensions. Oper. Res. 47, 183–194 (1999)
Hu, Z., Nasiry, J.: Are markets with loss-averse consumers more sensitive to losses? Manag. Sci. 64(3), 1384–1395 (2018)
Kloeden, P.E., Platen, E.: Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Alfonsi, A.: On the discretization schemes for the cir (and bessel squared) processes. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 11(4), 355–384 (2005)
Kounta, M., Lefebvre, M.: On a discrete version of the cir process. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 19(8), 1276–1291 (2013)
Federgruen, A., Heching, A.: Combined pricing and inventory control under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 47(3), 454–475 (1999)
Chen, X., Simchi-Levi, D.: Coordinating inventory control and pricing strategies with random demand and fixed ordering cost: The finite horizon case. Oper. Res. 52, 887–896 (2004a)
Chen, X., Simchi-Levi, D.: Coordinating inventory control and pricing strategies with random demand and fixed ordering cost: the infinite horizon case. Math. Oper. Res. 29, 698–723 (2004b)
Chen, X., Simchi-Levi, D.: Coordinating inventory control and pricing strategies: the continuous review model. Oper. Res. Lett. 34(3), 323–332 (2006)
Chen, X., Simchi-Levi, D.: Pricing and inventory management. The Oxford handbook of pricing management, pp. 784–824 (2012)
Chen, X., Hu, P., Shum, S., Zhang, Y.: Dynamic stochastic inventory management with reference price effects. Oper. Res. 64(6), 1529–1536 (2016)
Fleming, W.H., Rishel, R.W.: Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control. Springer, Berlin (1982)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to Professor Yin-Yu Ye in celebration of his 70th birthday.
This research is partly supported by the National Science Foundation (Nos. CMMI-1030923, CMMI-1363261, CMMI-1538451 and CMMI-1635160), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71228203, 71201066 and 71520107001), and research Grant of National University of Singapore (Project R-314-000-105-133)
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Proof of Proposition 3.1
To solve the HJB equation (3.1), we start from solving a more general finite horizon problem. That is, let
be the value of optimal accumulated profit (profit-to-go function) from time t to the end of horizon T when the initial reference price is r. Notice that the value function in our problem (2.6) \(V(r_0) = \lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }V(r_0,0)\).
From standard theory in stochastic optimal control, V(r, t) then satisfies the HJB equation
Using first-order condition in (6.1) and with a slight abuse of notation, we can solve p as
Substitute the above equation into (6.1), it follows
Introducing a few new notations, this can be written concisely as:
where
If we assume function V(r, t) has the following form:
then we get the following ordinary differential equations (ODEs):
with terminal condition \(Q(T) = R(T) = M(T) = 0\).
We first explicitly solve ODE (6.4) by rewriting it as:
where \(Q_1<Q_2\) are the two distinct roots of the equation:
Namely:
Therefore,
where C and \(D = e^C\) are constants to be determined. By \(Q(T)=0\), we can solve
Substitute D back into (6.7), it follows
With the expressions for Q(t), expressions for R(t) and M(t) can then be obtained by solving () and (6.6). Consequently, \(p^*(r)\) can be determined as well. One can easily verify using Theorem 4.1 in chapter VI of [30] that \(p^*(r)\) solved in this way is indeed optimal and V(r, t) is given by (6.3).
The solution to (3.1) is then obtained by letting \(T\rightarrow \infty \). Since \(Q_1<Q_2\), we have \(Q:= Q_1 = \lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }Q(t)\), where by substituting the expressions for \(B, p_{11}\) and \(p_{22}\)
and \(\Delta \) is given by:
Correspondingly, one can also obtain \(R:=\lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }R(t)\) as
Similarly, \(M:=\lim _{T\rightarrow \infty }M(t)\) can be computed.
Now, we have explicitly solved (3.1), where \(V(r) = Qr^2 + Rr + M\) and the optimal pricing strategy can then be obtained as (3.2).
Finally, we remark that both \(Q_1\) and \(Q_2\) are positive solutions to the Algebraic Riccati Equation (ARE): \(4BQ^2-(\Gamma -2p_{11})Q+p_{22}=0\), which has no negative solution. This deviates significantly from standard linear quadratic control theory and is the primal reason we need to solve from the finite horizon problem instead of solving ARE directly.
1.2 Proof of Proposition 3.2
Note that \(r^*(t)\) follows (3.3), which is a square-root diffusion process. It is not difficult to show that \(\lambda , \mu >0\). For such square-root diffusion process, it is known that \(r^*(t)\) converges in distribution to a steady state which follows a Gamma distribution with shape parameter \(\frac{2\lambda \mu }{\sigma ^2}\) and rate parameter \(\frac{2\lambda }{\sigma ^2}\) (see, for instance, [15]).
1.3 Proof of Corollary 3.3
By Proposition 3.2, \(R_s^*\) follows a Gamma distribution and its mean and variance can then be computed as
Substituting the expressions for Q, R and \(\lambda \) into \(\mu \), with cumbersome algebraic manipulations, one can further obtain
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Hu, ZY. & Zhang, YH. Dynamic Pricing with Stochastic Reference Price Effect. J. Oper. Res. Soc. China 7, 107–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-018-0227-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-018-0227-1