Abstract
Much of the Artificial Intelligence community is now aware of a computer simulation of paranoid processes developed by the Colby group at Stanford. The model (called PARRY) has been available for interviewing on the ARPA network and thousands of interviews have been conducted with several versions of the model. During the long period of development of the model, we have been aware of the limitations of various alternative programming approaches to designing an algorithm capable of conducting useful non-trivial dialogue in natural language. Colleagues, associates, and students have volunteered a number of criticisms of the model. Since criticisms can be endless, I shall restrict the discussion to only those which we consider serious, reasoned, and well-founded.
- Colby, K. M. (1974). ARTIFICIAL PARANOIA: a Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes. Pergamon, New York, (In Press). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby, K. M., Weber, S., and Hilf, F.D. (1971), "Artificial paranoia". Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1--25.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby, K. M., Parkison, R. C., and Faught, B. (1974). "Pattern-matching rules for the recognition of natural language dialogue expressions". American Journal of Computational Linguistics. Vol. 1, Microfiche 5. (Also appears as Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Memo AIM-234, Computer Science Department, Stanford University). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby, K. M., Hilf, F. D., Weber, S., and Kraemer, H. (1972). "Turing-like indistinguishability tests for the validation of a computer simulation of paranoid processes". Artificial Intelligence, 3, 199--221.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby, K. M. and Hilf, F. D. (1974). "Multidimensional evaluation of a computer simulation of paranoid thought". In Knowledge and Cognition, Gregg, L. (Ed.), Lawrence Ehrlbaum and Associates, Potomac, Maryland. (Also appears as Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Memo AIM-194, Computer Science Department, Stanford University). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Colby, K. M., Hilf, F. D., Wittner, W. K., Faught, B., and Parkison, R. C. (1974). "Measuring the improvement in linguistic comprehension in a model of paranoid processes." (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Appreciation to Referees
On behalf of the Editorial Board, I would like to thank the following people, who acted as Referees during the past year. Editor-in-Chief Adomavicius, Gediminas, New York University Fletcher, Roger, University of Dundee, Scotland Aggarwal, Charu C., ...
Comments