skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055082acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a new interaction technique, called a spotlight, for directing the visual attention of an audience when viewing data or presentations on large wall-sized displays. A spotlight is simply a region of the display where the contents are displayed normally while the remainder of the display is somewhat darkened. In this paper we define the behavior of spotlights, show unique affordances of the technique, and discuss design characteristics. We also report on experiments that show the benefit of using the spotlight a large display and standard desktop configuration. Our results suggest that the spotlight is preferred over the standard cursor and outperforms it by a factor of 3.4 on a wall-sized display.

References

  1. Baecker, R., Small, I. and Mander, R. (1991) Bringing icons to life, In Proceedings of ACM CHI'91, pp. 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bartram, L. (1997) Perceptual and interpretative properties of motion for information visualization, In Proceedings 1997 workshop on New paradigms in information visualization and manipulation, pp.3--7, November 10--14, 1997, Las Vegas, Nevada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barzel R. (1997) Lighting Controls for Computer Cinematography, Journal of Graphics Tools, 2(1), pp. 1--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P. Bederson, B., and Zierlinger, A. (2003) Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for Accessing Remote Screen Content on Touch- and Pen-operated Systems. Proceedings of Interact 2003, pp. 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baudisch, P. and Rosenholtz, R. (2003) Halo: a Technique for Visualizing Off-Screen Locations, In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2003, pp. 481--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Baudisch, P., Good, N., and Stewart, P. (2001) Focus Plus Context Screens: Combining Display Technology with Visualization Techniques, In Proceedings of ACM UIST '01, pp.31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E. and Robertson, G. (2003) High-density cursor: a visualization technique that helps users keep track of fast-moving mouse cursor, Proceedings of Interact 2003, pp. 236--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Baudisch, P. Cutrell, E., Hinckley, K. and Gruen, R. (2004) Mouse Ether: Accelerating the Acquisition of Targets Across Multi-Monitor Displays, In Proceedings of CHI 2004, pp. 1379--1382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Box, H.C. (1997) Set Lighting Technician's Handbook, Film Lighting Equipment, Practice, and Electrical Distribution, Second Ed., Focal Press, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxton, W., Fitzmaurice, G.W., Balakrishnan, R. and Kurtenbach, G. (2000) Large displays in automotive design, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, July/August 2000, pp. 68--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cadiz, J.J., Venolia, G., Jancke, G. and Gupta, A. (2002) Designing and Deploying an Information Awareness Interface, In Proceedings of CSCW 2002, pp. 314--323. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chang, B-W and Ungar, D. (1993) Animation: from cartoons to the user interface, In Proceedings of ACM UIST 1993, pp 45--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Chapman, D. and Ware, C. (1992) Manipulating the Future: Predictor Based Feedback for Velocity Control in Virtual Environment Navigation. Special Issue of Computer Graphics. Proceedings of ACM 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Cambridge Mass, 63--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Czerwinski, M., Tan, D.S. and Robertson, G.G. (2002) Women Take a Wider View, Proceedings of CHI 2002, pp. 195--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Elrod, S., Bruce, R., Gold, R., Goldberg, D., Halasz, F., Janssen, W., Lee, D., McCall, K., Pedersen, E., Pier, K., Tang, J., and Welch, B. (1992) Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration, Proceedings of CHI 1992, pp. 599--607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fass, A., Forlizzi, J. and Pausch, R. (2002). MesyDesk and MessyBoard: two designs inspired by the goal of improving human memory. In Proceedings of ACM DIS 2002, pp. 303--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fitzmaurice, G., Khan, A., Pieke, R., Buxton, B. and Kurtenbach, G. (2003) Tracking Menus, In Proceedings of ACM UIST 2003, pp. 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Geiβler, J. (1998) Shuffle, Throw or Take It! Working Efficiently with an Interactive Wall. In ACM Conference Companion to CHI 1998, pp. 265--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grudin, J. (2001) Partitioning Digital Worlds: Focal and Peripheral Awareness in Multiple Monitor Use, Proc. CHI 2001, pp. 458--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Guimbretière, F., Stone, M. & Winograd, T. (2001) Fluid Interaction with High-resolution Wall-size Displays, Proceedings of ACM UIST 2001, pp. 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hascoët, M. (2003) Throwing models for large displays, Proceedings of HCI'2003, Designing for Society, Volume 2, pp. 73--77, British HCI Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hinckley, K., Ramos, G., Guimbretiere, F., Baudisch, P. and Smith, M. (2004) Stitching: Pen Gestures that Span Multiple Displays, In Proceedings of AVI'04, pp. 23--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C., Paek, T. and Hovel, D. (2003) Model of Attention in Computing and Communication: From principles to applications, Communications of the ACM, 46 (3), pp. 52--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Humphreys, G., Eldridge, M., Buck, I., Stoll, G., Everett, M. and Hanrahan, P. (2001) WireGL: a scalable graphics system for clusters, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, pp. 129--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hutchings, D.R., Smith, G. and Meyers, B. (2004) Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proceedings of AVI 2004, pp. 32--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Johanson, B., Hutchins, G., Winograd, T., and Stone, M. (2002) PointRight: Experience with Flexible Input Redirection in Interactive Workspaces. Proceedings of UIST 2002, pp. 227--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jung, T., Gross, M.D. and Do, E.Y.-L. (2003) Light Pen - Sketching light in 3D, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures, Tainan, Taiwan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E.D., Voida, S., Hansen, K.M., Tullio, J., Corso and G.M. (2001) Support for Multitasking and Background Awareness Using Interactive Peripheral Displays, UIST'01, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mackinlay, J.D. and Heer, J. (2004) Wideband Displays: Mitigating Multiple Monitor Seams, In Proceedings of CHI 2004, pp. 1521--1524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Maglio, P.P., Campbell, C. (2000) Tradeoffs in Displaying Peripheral Information, Proceedings of CHI 2000, pp. 241--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pashler, H.E. (1998) The Psychology of Attention, "A Bradford book" Publisher.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pellacini, F., Tole, P. and Greenberg, D.P. (2002) A User Interface for Interactive Cinematic Shadow Design, In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 21 (3), July 2002 pp. 563--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rekimoto, J. and Saitoh, M. (1999) Augmented Surfaces: A Spatially Continuous Work Space for Hybrid Computing Environments, In Proceedings of CHI 1999, pp. 378--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Shell, J.S., Vertegaal, R. and Skaburskis, A.W. (2003) EyePliances: Attention-Seeking Devices that Respond to Visual Attention, In Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 770--771. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Streitz, N.A., Geiβler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., Steinmetz, R. (1999) i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation, Proceedings of ACM CHI 1999, pp.120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Swaminathan, K., and Sato, S. (1997) Interaction Design for Large Displays. Interactions 4(1). pp. 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tan, D.S. and Czerwinski, M. (2003) Effects of Visual Separation and Physical Discontinuities when Distributing Information across Multiple Displays. In Proceedings of Interact 2003, pp. 252--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan, D.S., Czerwinski, M. and Robertson, G. (2003) Women Go With the (Optical) Flow, Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 209--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tan, D.S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P.G., and Pausch, R. (2003) With Similar Visual Angles, Larger Displays Improve Spatial Performance, Proceedings of CHI 2003, 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Tani, M., Horita, M., Yamaashi, K., and Tanikoshi, K. (1994) Courtyard: Integrating Shared Overview on a Large Screen and Per-user Detail on Individual Screens, Proceedings of CHI'94, pp. 44--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Tsang, M., Fitzmaurice, G., Kurtenbach, G., Khan, A., Buxton, B. (2002). Boom Chameleon: Simultaneous capture of 3D viewpoint, voice and gesture annotations on a spatially-aware display. ACM CHI Letters, 4(2). p. 111--120. ACM UIST 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Vogel, D. Balakrishnan, R. (in press, 2004). Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users. To appear in UIST 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zellweger, P.T., Mackinlay, J.D., Good, L., Stefik, M., Baudisch, P. (2003) City Lights: Contextual views in minimal space, In Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 838--839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Spotlight: directing users' attention on large displays

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2005
        928 pages
        ISBN:1581139985
        DOI:10.1145/1054972

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 April 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader