skip to main content
10.1145/1080192.1080203acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Avoiding ballot stuffing in eBay-like reputation systems

Published:22 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a preliminary study on the robustness of binary feedback reputation systems (e.g. eBay) to ballot stuffing and bad mouthing. In a feedback based reputation system, a seller can collude with other buyers to undertake fake transactions in order to enhance her reputation. This problem is referred to as ballot stuffing. A seller can also be targeted by a group of buyers to deliberately lower her reputation. This problem is referred to as bad mouthing. For the reputations to be meaningful, any practical reputation system needs to be resistant to these problems. We use a simplified model to give an explicit relation between the reputation premium and the transaction cost that needs to hold in order to avoid ballot stuffing. Thus we draw attention to the necessity of transaction costs for a well functioning reputation system. Our conclusions are confirmed by empirical experiments on eBay.

References

  1. S. Ba and P.A. Pavlou. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart., 26:243--268, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G.E. Bolton, E. Katok, and A. Ockenfels. How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? an experimental investigation. Managament Science, 50(11):1587--1602, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. C. Dellarocas. Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discrimatory behavior. Proceedings of the second ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, October 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Dellarocas. Mechanisms for coping with unfair ratings and discriminatory behaviour in online reputation reporting systems. International conference on Information Systems, December 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Dellarocas. Analysing the economic efficiency of ebay-like online reputation reporting mechanisms. Proceedings of the third ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, October 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Dellarocas. The digitization of word-of-mouth: promise and challenges of online reputation systems. Management Science, October 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Friedman and P. Resnick. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10(1):173--199, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. GartnerG2. Online transaction fraud and prevention get more sophisticated. http://www.gartnerg2.com/rpt/rpt-0102-0013.asp. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Lucking-Reiley, D. Bryan, N. Prasad, and D. Reeves. Pennies from ebay: The determinants of price in online auctions. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M.I. Melnik and J. Alm. Does a seller's e-commerce reputation matter? J. Indust. Econom., 50(3):337--349, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. U.S. Department of Justice. Internet fraud. http://www.internetfraud.usdoj.gov. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Resnick and R. Zeckhauser. Trust among strangers in internet transactions: empirical analysis of ebay's reputation system. The economics of the Internet and e-commerce, 11:127--157, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, E. Friedman, and K. Kuwabara. Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12):45--48, December 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Resnick, R. Zeckhauser, J. Swanson, and K. Lockwood. The value of reputation on ebay: A controlled experiment. Working paper originally presented at the ESA conference, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Avoiding ballot stuffing in eBay-like reputation systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      P2PECON '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Economics of peer-to-peer systems
      August 2005
      296 pages
      ISBN:1595930264
      DOI:10.1145/1080192

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 August 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader