skip to main content
10.1145/1081870.1081961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Combining proactive and reactive predictions for data streams

Published:21 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mining data streams is important in both science and commerce. Two major challenges are (1) the data may grow without limit so that it is difficult to retain a long history; and (2) the underlying concept of the data may change over time. Different from common practice that keeps recent raw data, this paper uses a measure of conceptual equivalence to organize the data history into a history of concepts. Along the journey of concept change, it identifies new concepts as well as re-appearing ones, and learns transition patterns among concepts to help prediction. Different from conventional methodology that passively waits until the concept changes, this paper incorporates proactive and reactive predictions. In a proactive mode, it anticipates what the new concept will be if a future concept change takes place, and prepares prediction strategies in advance. If the anticipation turns out to be correct, a proper prediction model can be launched instantly upon the concept change. If not, it promptly resorts to a reactive mode: adapting a prediction model to the new data. A system RePro is proposed to implement these new ideas. Experiments compare the system with representative existing prediction methods on various benchmark data sets that represent diversified scenarios of concept change. Empirical evidence demonstrates that the proposed methodology is an effective and efficient solution to prediction for data streams.

References

  1. C. C. Aggarwal, J. Han, J. Wang, and P. S. Yu. A framework for clustering evolving data streams. In Proc. of 29th VLDB, pages 81--92, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. V. Ganti, J. Gehrke, and R. Ramakrishnan. Demon: Mining and monitoring evolving data. IEEE TKDE, 13(1):50--63, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Hulten, L. Spencer, and P. Domingos. Mining time-changing data streams. In Proc. of 7th SIGKDD, pages 97--106, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Keogh and S. Kasetty. On the need for time series data mining benchmarks: a survey and empirical demonstration. In Proc. of 8th SIGKDD, pages 102--111, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Z. Kolter and M. A. Maloof. Dynamic weighted majority: A new ensemble method for tracking concept drift. In Proc. of 3rd ICDM, pages 123--130, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Lanquillon and I. Renz. Adaptive information filtering: Detecting changes in text streams. In Proc. of 8th CIKM, pages 538--544, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Salganicoff. Tolerating concept and sampling shift in lazy learning using prediction error context switching. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11(1-5):133--155, February 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. K. O. Stanley. Learning concept drift with a committee of decision trees, 2003. Technical Report AI-03-302, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. W. N. Street and Y. Kim. A streaming ensemble algorithm (sea) for large-scale classification. In Proc. of 7th SIGKDD, pages 377--382, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Tsymbal. The problem of concept drift: definitions and related work, 2004. Technical Report TCD-CS-2004-15, Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Wang, W. Fan, P. S. Yu, and J. Han. Mining concept-drifting data streams using ensemble classifiers. In Proc. of 9th SIGKDD, pages 226--235, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Widmer and M. Kubat. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning, 23(1):69--101, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Yang, X. Wu, and X. Zhu. Dealing with predictive-but-unpredictable attributes in noisy data sources. In Proc. of 8th PKDD, pages 471--483, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Yang, X. Wu, and X. Zhu. Proactive-reactive prediction for data streams, 2005. Technical Report CS-05-03, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Vermont, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Combining proactive and reactive predictions for data streams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '05: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining
        August 2005
        844 pages
        ISBN:159593135X
        DOI:10.1145/1081870

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 August 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader