skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124774acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Scrolling is the standard way to navigate through many types of digital documents. However, moving more than a few pages can be slow because all scrolling techniques constrain visual search to only a small document region. To improve document navigation, we developed Space-Filling Thumbnails (SFT), an overview display that eliminates most scrolling. SFT provides two views: a standard page view for reading, and a thumbnail view that shows all pages. We tested SFT in three experiments that involved finding pages in documents. The first study (n=13) compared seven current scrolling techniques, and showed that SFT is significantly faster than the other methods. The second and third studies (n=32 and n=14) were detailed comparisons of SFT with thumbnail-enhanced scrollbars (TES), which performed well in the first experiment. SFT was faster than TES across all document types and lengths, particularly when tasks involved revisitation. In addition, SFT was strongly preferred by participants.

References

  1. Bederson, B. (2001). PhotoMesa: A Zoomable Image Browser Using Quantum Treemaps and Bubblemaps. Proc. UIST01, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bederson, B. and Hollan, J. (1994). Pad++: A Zooming Graphical Interface for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics. Proc. UIST'94, 17--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. de Bruijn, O. and Spence, R. (2000). Rapid Serial Visual Presentation: A Space-Time Trade-Off in Information Presentation. Proc. AVI2000, 189--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Byrd, D. (1999). A Scrollbar-based Visualization for Document Navigation. Proc. Digital Libr. '99, 122--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Byrne, M., John, B., Wehrle, N. and Crow, D. (1999). The Tangled Web We Wove: A Taskonomy of WWW Use. Proc. CHI'99, 544--551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Card, S. Mackinlay, JD and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Info. Visualization. Morgan-Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cockburn, A. and Greenberg, S. (2000). Issues of Page Representation and Organisation in Web Browser's Revisitation Tools. Aus. J. of Info. Sys, 7 (2), 120--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cockburn, A. and Savage, J. (2003). Comparing Speed- Dependent Automatic Zooming with Traditional Scroll, Pan and Zoom Methods. Proc. British HCI, 87--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cockburn, A., Savage, J. and Wallace, A. (2005). Tuning and Testing Scrolling Interfaces that Automatically Zoom. Proc. CHI'05, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Czerwinski, M., van Dantzich, M., Robertson, G. and Hoffman, H. (1999). The Contribution of Thumbnail Image, Mouse-Over Text and Spatial Location Memory to Web Page Retrieval in 3D. Proc.Interact'99, 163--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Egan, D. and Gomez, M. (1985). Assaying, Isolating, and Accommodating Individual Differences in Learning a Complex Skill. in Dillon, R. ed. Individual Differences in Cognition, 173--217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitts, P. (1954). The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement. J. Experimental Psychology, 47, 381--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gagnon, D. (1985). Videogames and Spatial Skills: An Exploratory Study. Educational Communication and Technology, 33 (4), 263--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hart, S. and Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. in Hancock, P.M., ed. Human Mental Workload, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hill, W. and Hollan, J. (1992). Edit Wear and Read Wear. Proc. CHI'92, 3--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hinckley, K., Cutrell, E., Bathiche, S. and Muss, T. (2002). Quantitative Analysis of Scrolling Techniques. Proc. CHI'2002, 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hornbaek, K. and Frokjaer, E. (2003). Reading Patterns and Usability in Visualizations of Electronic Documents. ACM Trans. CHI, 10 (2), 119--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Igarashi, T. and Hinckley, K. (2000). Speed-dependent Automatic Zooming for Browsing Large Documents. Proc. UIST'00, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jones, W. and Dumais, S. (1986). The Spatial Metaphor for User Interfaces: Experimental Tests of Reference by Location versus Name. ACM Trans. OIS, 4 (1), 42--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Klein, C. and Bederson, B. (2005). Benefits of Animated Scrolling. Ext. Abstracts CHI'05, 1965--1968. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lam, H. and Baudisch, P. (2005). Summary Thumbnails: Readable Overviews for Small Screen Web Browsers. Proc. CHI'05, 681--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mills, C. and Weldon, L. (1986). Reading text from computer screens. ACM Comp. Surveys, 19, 329--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Moyes, J. (1994). When Users Do and Don't Rely on Icon Shape. Ext. Abstrs. CHI'94, 283--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. O'Hara, K. and Sellen, A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. Proc. CHI'97, 335--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. O'Hara, K., Sellen, A. and Bentley, R. (1999). Supporting Memory for Spatial Location While Reading from Small Displays. Ext. Abs. CHI'99, 220--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Larson, K., Robbins, D., Thiel, D. and van Dantzich, M. (1998). Data Mountain: Using Spatial Memory for Document Management. Proc. UIST'98. 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. and Pastoor, S. (1983). A Comparison of Paging and Scrolling for Changing Screen Contents by Inexperienced Users. Human Factors, 25 (3), 279--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Spence, B., Witkowski, M., Fawcett, C., Craft, B. and de Bruijn, O. (2004). Image Presentation in Space and Time: Errors, Preferences and Eye-Gaze Activity. Proc. AVI'04, 141--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suh, B., Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R. and Glass, A. (2002). Popout Prism: Adding Perceptual Principles to Overview+Detail Document Interfaces. Proc. CHI'02, 251--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sun, L. and Guimbretiere, F. (2005). Flipper: a new method of digital document navigation. Ext. Abs CHI'05, 2001--2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sutherland, I. (1963). Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communication System. AFIPS Spring Joint Computer Conference, 329--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Teitelbaum, R. and Granda, R. (1983). The Effects of Positional Constancy on Searching Menus for Information. Proc. CHI'83, 150--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vicente, K., Hayes, B. and Williges, R. (1987). Assaying and Isolating Individual Differences in Searching a Hierarchical File System. Human Factors, 29 (3), 349--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Woodruff, A., Faulring, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J. and Pirolli, P. (2001). Using Thumbnails to Search the Web. Proc. CHI'01, 198--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zhai, S., Smith, B. and Selker, T. (1997). Improving Browsing Performance: A Study of Four Input Devices for Scrolling and Pointing Tasks. Proc. INTERACT'97, 286--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Faster document navigation with space-filling thumbnails

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader