skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124779acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Minimap: a web page visualization method for mobile phones

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Web has become available even on mobile phones, but the current methods to view large pages on small screens have not been highly usable. Current mobile phone browsers reformat Web pages to a single column that fits the screen width. Because not all content is comprehensible in this format, browsers provide a second mode for viewing pages in the same layout as on a PC. We have developed a modeless Web page visualization method called Minimap that shows pages in a modified Original layout. We conducted a long-term usability study with 20 participants to compare the state-of-the-art mobile phone browser with this new method. 18 participants preferred the new method, and it also scored better in more detailed usability ratings.

References

  1. Baudisch P., Xie X., Wang C., Ma W.: Collapse-to-Zoom: Viewing Web Pages on Small Screen Devices by Interactively Removing Irrelevant Content. Proc. ACM UIST 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Björk, S., Holmquist, L.E., Redström, J., Bretan, I., Danielsson, R., Karlgren, J., Franzén, K. WEST: a Web Browser for Small Terminals. Proc. ACM UIST 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buyukkokten O., Garcia-Molina H., Paepcke A., Winograd T.: Power Browser: Efficient Web Browsing for PDAs. Proc. ACM CHI 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Buyukkokten, O., Kaljuvee, O., Garcia-Molina, H., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T.: Efficient Web Browsing on Handheld Devices Using Page and Form Summarization. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, January 2002, p. 82--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen Y., Ma W., Zhang H.: Detecting Web Page Structure for Adaptive Viewing on Small Form Factor Devices. Proc. WWW 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. de Bruijn O., Spence R., Chong M. Y.: RSVP Browser: Web Browsing on Small Screen Devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2002) 6:245--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fulk, M.: Improving Web Browsing on Handheld Devices. Proc. ACM CHI 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Furnas, G. Generalized Fisheye Views. Proc. ACM CHI 1986, p. 16--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Igarashi, T., Hinckley, K. Speed-dependent Automatic Zooming for Browsing Large Documents. Proc. ACM UIST 2000, p. 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lam H., Baudisch P.: Summary Thumbnails: Readable Overviews for Small Screen Web Browsers. Proc. ACM CHI 2005, p. 681--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Lieberman, H.: A Multiscale, Multilayer Translucent Virtual space. Proc. IEEE Information Visualization 1997, p. 124--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. MacKay B.: The Gateway: A Navigation Technique for Migrating to Small Screens. Proc. ACM CHI 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Milic-Frayling, N., Sommerer, R.: SmartView: Flexible Viewing of Web Page Contents. Poster paper at WWW 2002 (http://www2002.org/CDROM/poster/172/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Roto, V., Kaikkonen, A.: Perception of Narrow Web Pages on a Mobile Phone. Proc. Human Factors in Telecommunications 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Spence, R.: Information Visualization. ACM Press (2001), p. 111--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thunderhawk. http://www.bitstream.com/wireless.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Trevor J., Hilbert D., Schilit B., Koh T.: From Desktop to Phonetop: A UI For Web Interaction On Very Small Devices. Proc. ACM symposium on User interface software and technology table of contents, 2001. p. 121--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W3C: Cascading Style Sheets, level 2 Specification, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Watters, C., Zhang, R., Duffy, J.: Comparing Table Views for Small Devices. Proc. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC) 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Wobbrock J., Forlizzi J., Hudson S., Myers B.: WebThumb: Interaction Techniques for Small-Screen Browsers. Proc. ACM UIST 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yin X., Lee W.: Using Link Analysis to Improve Layout on Mobile Devices. Proc. WWW 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Minimap: a web page visualization method for mobile phones

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader