skip to main content
10.1145/1132516.1132576acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Approximating the list-chromatic number and the chromatic number in minor-closed and odd-minor-closed classes of graphs

Published:21 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is well-known (Feige and Kilian [24], Håstad [39]) that approximating the chromatic number within a factor of n1-ε cannot be done in polynomial time for ε>0, unless coRP = NP. Computing the list-chromatic number is much harder than determining the chromatic number. It is known that the problem of deciding if the list-chromatic number is k, where k ≥ 3, is Π2p-complete [37].In this paper, we focus on minor-closed and odd-minor-closed families of graphs. In doing that, we may as well consider only graphs without Kk-minors and graphs without odd Kk-minors for a fixed value of k, respectively. Our main results are that there is a polynomial time approximation algorithm for the list-chromatic number of graphs without Kk-minors and there is a polynomial time approximation algorithm for the chromatic number of graphs without odd-Kk-minors. Their time complexity is O(n3) and O(n4), respectively. The algorithms have multiplicative error O(√log k) and additive error O(k), and the multiplicative error occurs only for graphs whose list-chromatic number and chromatic number are Θ(k), respectively.Let us recall that H has an odd complete minor of order l if there are l vertex disjoint trees in H such that every two of them are joined by an edge, and in addition, all the vertices of trees are two-colored in such a way that the edges within the trees are bichromatic, but the edges between trees are monochromatic. Let us observe that the complete bipartite graph Kn/2,n/2 contains a Kk-minor for k ≤ n/2, but on the other hand, it does not contain an odd Kk-minor for any k ≥ 3. Odd K5-minor-free graphs are closely related to one field of discrete optimization which is finding conditions under which a given polyhedron has integer vertices, so that integer optimization problems can be solved as linear programs. See [33, 34, 64]. Also, the odd version of the well-known Hadwiger's conjecture has been considered, see [28].Our main idea involves precoloring extension. This idea is used in many results; one example is Thomassen's proof on his celebrated theorem on planar graphs [69].The best previously known approximation for the first result is a simple O(k √log k)-approximation following algorithm that guarantees a list-coloring with O(k √log k) colors for Kk-minor-free graphs. This follows from results of Kostochka [54, 53] and Thomason [67, 68].The best previous approximation for the second result comes from the recent result of Geelen et al. [28] who gave an O(k √log k)-approximation algorithm.We also relate our algorithm to the well-known conjecture of Hadwiger [38] and its odd version. In fact, we give an O(n3) algorithm to decide whether or not a weaker version of Hadwiger's conjecture is true. Here, by a weaker version of Hadwiger's conjecture, we mean a conjecture which says that any 27k-chromatic graph contains a Kk-minor. Also, we shall give an O(n2500k) algorithm for deciding whether or not any 2500k-chromatic graph contains an odd-Kk-minor.Let us mention that this presentation consists of two papers which are merged into this one. The first one consists of results concerning minor-closed classes of graphs by two current authors, and the other consists of results concerning odd-minor-closed classes of graphs by the first author.

References

  1. K. Appel and W. Haken. Every planar map is four colorable, part I. Discharging. Illinois J. Math., 21:429--490, 1977.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K. Appel, W. Haken, and J. Koch. Every planar map is four colorable, part II. Reducibility. Illinois J. Math., 21:491--567, 1977.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Arnborg and S. Proskurowski. Linear time algorithms for NP-hard problems restricted to partial k-trees. Discrete Appl. Math., 23:11--24, 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Biro, M. Hujter, and Z. Tuza. Precoloring extension I, interval graphs. Discrete Math., 100:267--279, 1990.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Biro, M. Hujter, and Z. Tuza. Cross fertilisation of graph theory and aircraft maintenace scheduling. In Thirty-Second Annual Symposium (G. Davison, ed.), AGIFORS (Airline Group of the international Federation of Operational Research), pages 307--317, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Blum and D. Karger. An Õ(n3/14)-coloring algorithm for 3-colorable graphs. Information Processing Letters, 61(1):49--53, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. L. Bodlaender. A linear-time algorithm for finding tree-decompositions of small treewidth. SIAM Journal on Computing, 25(6):1305--1317, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. L. Bodlaender, K. Jansen, and G. J. Woeginger. Scheduling with incompatible jobs. Discrete Applied Math., 55:219--232, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Bohme, K. Kawarabayashi, J. Maharry, and B. Mohar. Linear connectivity forces large complete bipartite minors. To appear in J. Combin. Theory Ser B.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. Bollobas and A. Thomason. Highly linked graphs. Combinatorica, 16:313--320, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. A. Catlin. A bound on the chromatic number of a graph. Discrete Math., 22:81--83, 1978.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Charikar and A. Sahai. Dimension reduction in the l1 norm. In Proceedings of the 43th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'02), pages 551--560, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Chartrand, D. Geller, and T. Hedetniemi. Graphs with forbidden subgraphs. J. Combin. Theory, 10:12--41, 1971.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. Chartrand and H. V. Kronk. The point-arboricity of planar graphs. J. London Math. Soc., 44:612--616, 1969.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C. Chekuri, A. Gupta, I. Newman, Y. Rabinovich, and S. Alistair. Embedding k-outerplanar graphs into '1. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'03), pages 527--536, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Z.-Z. Chen. NC algorithms for partitioning sparse graphs into induced forests with an application. In Proc. 6th Internat. Symp. on Algorithms and Computation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1004, Springer, Berlin, pages 428--437, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z.-Z. Chen. Efficeint algorithms for acyclic coloring graphs. Theoretical Computer Scienece, 230:79--95, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Z.-Z. Chen and X. He. Parallen complexity of partitioning a planar graph into vertex-induced forests. Discrete Applied Math., 69:183--198, 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. W. Cunningham and A. Marsh. A primal algorithm for optimum matching. In Polyhedral Combinatorics, (dedicated to the memory of D. R. Fulkerson), Eds: M. L. Balinski and A. J. Hoffman, Math. Programming Sud. No. 8, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pages 60--72, 1978.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. D. Demaine, M. Hajiaghayi, and K. Kawarabayashi. Algorithmic graph minor theory: Decomposition, approximation, and coloring. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 637--646, Pittsburgh, PA, October 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. G. Ding, B. Oporowski, D. Sander, and D. Vertigan. Surface, tree-width, clique-minors, and partitions. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 79:221--246, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Dirac. A property of 4-chromatic graphs and some remarks on critical graphs. J. London Math. Soc., 27:85--92, 1952.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. P. Erdos, Rubin, and Taylor. Choosability in graphs. In Proc. West-Coast conference on Combinatorics Graph Theory and Computing, Arcata Califonia, Congressus Numerantium, volume XXVI, pages 125--157, 1979.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. U. Feige and J. Kilian. Zero-knowledge and the chromatic number. J. Comput. System Sci., 57:187--199, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. R. Fellows and M. A. Langston. Nonconstructive tools for proving polynomial-time decidability. Journal of the ACM, 35:727--739, 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Gabow. Implementation of algorithms for maximum matching on non-bipartite graphs. Ph . D. Stanford University, Dep. Comput., 1973.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Z. Galil, S. Micali, and H. Gabow. Priority queues with variable priority and an o(ev log v) algorithm for finding a maximal weighted matching in general graohs. In 23rd Annual Sumposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Chicago), pages 255--261, 1982.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. Geelen, B. Gerards, L. Goddyn, B. Reed, P. Seymour, and A. Vetta. The odd case of Hadwiger's conjecture. Submitted.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Geelen and B. Guenin. Packing odd circuits in eulerian graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 86:280--295, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. W. Goddard. Acyclic coloring of planar graphs. Discrete Math, 91:91--94, 1991.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Grotschel, L. Lovasz, and A. Schrijver. The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization. Combinatorica, 1:169--197, 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. M. Grotschel and W. Pullyblank. Weakly bipartite graphs and the max-cut problem. Oper. Res. Lett., 1:23--27, 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. B. Guenin. A characterization of weakly bipartite graphs. In Integer Programming and Combinatorial optimizaition, Proceedings, 6th IPCO conference, Houston, Texas, 1998, (R.E. Bixby et al., Eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, volume 1412, pages 9--22.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. B. Guenin. A characterization of weakly bipartite graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 83:112--168, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. B. Guenin. Talk at Oberwolfach on graph theory. Jan. 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. A. Gupta, I. Newman, Y. Rabinovich, and S. Alistair. Cuts, trees and '1-embeddings of graphs. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'99), pages 399--409, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. Gutner. The complexity of planar graph choosability. Discrete Math., 159:119--130, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. H. Hadwiger. Über eine Klassifikation der Streckenkomplexe. In Vierteljahrsschr. naturforsch. Ges. Zurich, volume 88, pages 133--142, 1943.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. J. Hastad. Clique is hard to approximate within n1??". Acta Math., 182:105--142, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Henzinger, S. Rao, and H. Gabow. Computing vertex connectivity: New bounds from old techniques. J. Algorithms, 34:222--250, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. T. R. Jensen and B. Toft. Graph Coloring Problems. Wiley-Interscience, 1995.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. K. Kawarabayashi. Linkage problem and its application to hadwiger's conjecture. preprint.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. K. Kawarabayashi. Minors in 7-chromatic graphs. Preprint.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. K. Kawarabayashi. On the connectivity of minimal counterexamples to Hadwiger's conjecture. To appear in J. Combin. Theory Ser. B.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. K. Kawarabayashi, A. Kostochka, and G. Yu. On sufficient degree conditions for a graph to be k-linked. To appear in Combin. Probab. Comput.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. K. Kawarabayashi and B. Mohar. Algorithmic aspects of Hadwiger's conjecture. Submitted.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. K. Kawarabayashi and B. Mohar. A relaxed Hadwiger's conjecture for list colorings. To appear in J. Combin. Theory Ser. B.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. K. Kawarabayashi and B. Reed. Highly parity linked graphs. To appear in Combinatorica.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. K. Kawarabayashi and Z. Song. Some remarks on the odd hadwiger's conjecture. To appear in Combinatorica.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. K. Kawarabayashi and B. Toft. Any 7-chromatic graph has K7 or K4;4 as a minor. Combinatorica, 25:327--353, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. K. Kawarabayashi and P. Wollan. Non-zero disjoint cycles in highly connected group-labelled graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 96:296--301, 2006.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. P. N. Klein, S. A. Plotkin, and S. Rao. Excluded minors, network decomposition, and multicommodity flow. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'93), pages 682--690, 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. A. Kostochka. The minimum Hadwiger number for graphs with a given mean degree of vertices (in Russian). Metody Diskret. Analiz., 38:37--58, 1982.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. A. Kostochka. Lower bound of the Hadwiger number of graphs by their average degree. Combinatorica, 4:307--316, 1984.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. E. Lawler. Combinatorial optimization; Networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, New York, 1976.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. W. Mader. Existenz n-fach zusammenhangender Teilgraphen in Graphen genugend grosser Kantendichte. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 37:86--97, 1972.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. S. A. Plotkin, S. Rao, and W. D. Smith. Shallow excluded minors and improved graph decompositions. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'94), pages 462--470, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. N. Robertson, D. P. Sanders, P. D. Seymour, and R. Thomas. The four-color theorem. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 70:2--44, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. N. Robertson and P. D. Seymour. Graph minors XIII. The disjoint paths problems. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 63:65--110, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. N. Robertson and P. D. Seymour. Graph minors. XVII. Taming a vortex. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 77:162--210, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. N. Robertson and P. D. Seymour. Graph minors. XVI. Excluding a non-planar graph. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 89:43--76, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. N. Robertson, P. D. Seymour, and R. Thomas. Hadwiger's conjecture for K6-free graphs. Combinatorica, 13:279--361, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. A. Roychoudhury and S. Sur-Kolay. Efficient algorithm for vertex arboricity of planar graphs. In Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, volume 1026, pages 37--51, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. A. Schrijver. A short proof of Guenin's characterization of weakly bipartite graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 85:255--260, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. P. D. Seymour. The matroids with the max-ow min-cut property. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 23:189--222, 1977.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. R. Thomas and P. Wollan. An improved linear edge bound for graph linkages. Europ. J. Combin., 26:309--324, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. A. Thomason. An extremal function for contractions of graphs. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 95:261--265, 1984.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. A. Thomason. The extremal function for complete minors. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 81:318--338, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. C. Thomassen. Every planar graph is 5-choosable. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 62:180--181, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. B. Toft. A survey of Hadwiger's conjecture. Congr. Numer., 115:249--283, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Z. Tuza. Graph colorings with local constraints | a survey. Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, 17:161--228, 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. V. G. Vizing. Coloring the vertices of a graph in prescribed colors. Metody Diskret. Anal. v Teorii Kodov i Schem (In Russian), 29:3--10, 1976.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. M. Voigt. List colourings of planar graphs. Discrete Math., 120:215--219, 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. K. Wagner. Uber eine Eigenschaft der ebenen Komplexe. Math. Ann., 114:570--590, 1937.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. D. R. Woodall. Improper colourings of graphs. In Graph Colourings (ed. R. Nelson and R. J. Wilson), Pitman Research Notes, Longman, volume 218, pages 45--63, 1990.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Approximating the list-chromatic number and the chromatic number in minor-closed and odd-minor-closed classes of graphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '06: Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
        May 2006
        786 pages
        ISBN:1595931341
        DOI:10.1145/1132516

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        STOC '24
        56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
        June 24 - 28, 2024
        Vancouver , BC , Canada

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader