skip to main content
10.1145/1135777.1135896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer-aided learning is fast gaining traction in developing regions as a means to augment classroom instruction. Reasons for using computer-aided learning range from supplementing teacher shortages to starting underprivileged children off in technology, and funding for such initiatives range from state education funds to international agencies and private groups interested in child development. The interaction of children with computers is seen at various levels, from unsupervised self-guided learning at public booths without specific curriculum to highly regulated in-class computer applications with modules designed to go with school curriculum. Such learning is used at various levels from children as young as 5 year-old to high-schoolers. This paper uses field observations of primary school children in India using computer-aided learning modules, and finds patterns by which children who perform better in classroom activities seat themselves in front of computer monitors, and control the mouse, in cases where children are required to share computer resources. We find that in such circumstances, there emerges a pattern of learning, unique to multi-user environments - wherein certain children tend to learn better because of their control of the mouse. This research also shows that while computer aided learning software for children is primarily designed for single-users, the implementation realities of resource-strapped learning environments in developing regions presents a strong case for multi-user design.

References

  1. Oppenheimer, T. (2003) "The Flickering Mind: Saving education from the false promise of technology", Random House Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mukherjee, A. (2002) "Build Robots Create Science - A Constructivist Education Initiative for Indian Schools", Proceedings of Development by Design (dyd 02), Bangalore, India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang, R, et al. (2004) "Distance Learning Technologies for Basic Education in Disadvantaged Areas" Proceedings of the 8th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE 04).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pawar, U.S., and Toyama, K. (2005) "A Cross-Market Taxonomy for ICT-in-Education Projects", Proceedings of Digital Learning 2005, New Delhi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Resnick, M., Rusk, N., and Cooke, S. (1998). "The Computer Clubhouse: Technological Fluency in the Inner City". In Schon, D., Sanyal, B., and Mitchell, W. (eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities, MIT Press. pp. 266--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Papert, S., and Harel, I. (1991) "Situating Constructionism", in Constructionism: Research reports and essays, Ablex Publishing, pp.1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Van Melle E., and Cimellaro L. (2003) "A Dynamic Framework to Guide the Implementation and Evaluation of Educational Technologies", Education and Information Technologies, 8 (3), pp. 267--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Watson, D. (2001). "Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching." Education and Information Technologies, 6 (4), pp. 251--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pich, A., and Bokyeong, K. (2003) "Principles of ICT in education and implementation strategies in Singapore, the Province of Alberta in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Korea", Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 32 (4), pp. 315--335Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jedeskog, G. and Nissen, J. (2004) "ICT in the classroom: is doing more important than knowing?" Educational and Information Technologies. 9 (1), pp. 37--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003). "Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT." Education and Information Technologies, 8 (1), pp. 23--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Inkpen, K., Booth, K.S., Gribble, S.D., and Klawe, M. (1995) Give and Take: Children Collaborating on One Computer", Short papers in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1995, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Stanton, D., and Neale, H.R. (2003) "The Effects of Multiple Mice on Children's Talk and Interaction", J. Computer Assisted Learning, 19, pp. 229-238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Stewart J., Bederson B., and Druin A. (1999) "Single Display Groupware: A model for Co-present Collalboration", Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1999, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Pawar, U., Toyama, K., Pal, J. (2006) "Multiple Mice for Computers in Education in Developing Countries" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Plauché, M., Wooters C, Ramachandran, D., Pal J, Udhaykumar, N. (2006) "Speech Recognition for Illiterate Access to Information and Technology" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Stewart Mark Godwin

    The justification for using computers in education is well established with studies investigating and supporting single- and multiple-user environments. This study adds to this growing body of knowledge. Its focus is on the need for a multi-user design that will facilitate several students interacting with a single computer. The setting for this study was rural India, where 18 schools were visited over a four-month period. With limited resources, the schools in this study provided computer sessions for their students using multimedia CDs, with ratios of between three to five students per computer. Despite shortcomings in the data collection method and bias from respondents, the observations of computer sessions and interviews of teachers and administrators confirm the need for further study on multi-user design. The major finding from this study is that there is a lack of educational software that supports multiple input devices for multiple users. Furthermore, the outcome of this study suggests that future educational software should engage multiple users through multiple dialogs. This type of interaction would enable each student to participate and determine his or her own response; therefore, a single narrative would include multiple dialogs, one for each participating student. The conclusion of the paper indicates that further study is required to address the pedagogical and technical issues of multiple-user environments. Moreover, this paper highlights the progress and success of one educational system that is faced with using extremely antiquated computer equipment in a problematic environment. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Barrett Hazeltine

    Indian children were studied in a variety of schools as they used computer-based instructional material. The material, like most, was evidently intended to be used by a single student, but cost considerations resulted in three or more students working together. The student sitting in the center of the group, controlling the mouse, set the pace for the group, and appeared to learn more. Sadly, but not surprisingly, the student in the center generally had a better academic record, and came from a better-off family. According to the authors, "the main contribution of this paper is to underline the need for new thinking on design and deployment of computer-based learning techniques for primary schools in developing regions." The paper concludes with strategies for improving teaching effectiveness for all children, basically by designing hardware or software (or both) for multiple users. A strategy of having teachers insist that the students rotate positions is not mentioned. Another problem with computer-aided instruction is the unreliability of the electric supply; the relevant suggestion is to break the lessons into short bookmarked modules, which can be completed in a session or easily restarted. This clearly written paper is valuable because it describes the actual context and difficulties facing the implementation of educational technology in less industrialized places. The paper should be read by many advocates of computer-based learning in rural villages. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
      May 2006
      1102 pages
      ISBN:1595933239
      DOI:10.1145/1135777

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader