ABSTRACT
Computer-aided learning is fast gaining traction in developing regions as a means to augment classroom instruction. Reasons for using computer-aided learning range from supplementing teacher shortages to starting underprivileged children off in technology, and funding for such initiatives range from state education funds to international agencies and private groups interested in child development. The interaction of children with computers is seen at various levels, from unsupervised self-guided learning at public booths without specific curriculum to highly regulated in-class computer applications with modules designed to go with school curriculum. Such learning is used at various levels from children as young as 5 year-old to high-schoolers. This paper uses field observations of primary school children in India using computer-aided learning modules, and finds patterns by which children who perform better in classroom activities seat themselves in front of computer monitors, and control the mouse, in cases where children are required to share computer resources. We find that in such circumstances, there emerges a pattern of learning, unique to multi-user environments - wherein certain children tend to learn better because of their control of the mouse. This research also shows that while computer aided learning software for children is primarily designed for single-users, the implementation realities of resource-strapped learning environments in developing regions presents a strong case for multi-user design.
- Oppenheimer, T. (2003) "The Flickering Mind: Saving education from the false promise of technology", Random House Publishers.Google Scholar
- Mukherjee, A. (2002) "Build Robots Create Science - A Constructivist Education Initiative for Indian Schools", Proceedings of Development by Design (dyd 02), Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
- Wang, R, et al. (2004) "Distance Learning Technologies for Basic Education in Disadvantaged Areas" Proceedings of the 8th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (GCCCE 04).Google Scholar
- Pawar, U.S., and Toyama, K. (2005) "A Cross-Market Taxonomy for ICT-in-Education Projects", Proceedings of Digital Learning 2005, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M., Rusk, N., and Cooke, S. (1998). "The Computer Clubhouse: Technological Fluency in the Inner City". In Schon, D., Sanyal, B., and Mitchell, W. (eds.), High Technology and Low-Income Communities, MIT Press. pp. 266--286.Google Scholar
- Papert, S., and Harel, I. (1991) "Situating Constructionism", in Constructionism: Research reports and essays, Ablex Publishing, pp.1--11.Google Scholar
- Van Melle E., and Cimellaro L. (2003) "A Dynamic Framework to Guide the Implementation and Evaluation of Educational Technologies", Education and Information Technologies, 8 (3), pp. 267--285. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Watson, D. (2001). "Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching." Education and Information Technologies, 6 (4), pp. 251--266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pich, A., and Bokyeong, K. (2003) "Principles of ICT in education and implementation strategies in Singapore, the Province of Alberta in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Korea", Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 32 (4), pp. 315--335Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jedeskog, G. and Nissen, J. (2004) "ICT in the classroom: is doing more important than knowing?" Educational and Information Technologies. 9 (1), pp. 37--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003). "Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT." Education and Information Technologies, 8 (1), pp. 23--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inkpen, K., Booth, K.S., Gribble, S.D., and Klawe, M. (1995) Give and Take: Children Collaborating on One Computer", Short papers in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1995, ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stanton, D., and Neale, H.R. (2003) "The Effects of Multiple Mice on Children's Talk and Interaction", J. Computer Assisted Learning, 19, pp. 229-238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stewart J., Bederson B., and Druin A. (1999) "Single Display Groupware: A model for Co-present Collalboration", Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1999, ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pawar, U., Toyama, K., Pal, J. (2006) "Multiple Mice for Computers in Education in Developing Countries" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006Google Scholar
- Plauché, M., Wooters C, Ramachandran, D., Pal J, Udhaykumar, N. (2006) "Speech Recognition for Illiterate Access to Information and Technology" International Conference on Information Technologies and Development, May 2006Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions
Recommendations
Computer Science Education in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany—A Case Study
Special Issue II on Computer Science Education in K-12 SchoolsIn North-Rhine Westphalia, the most populated state in Germany, Computer Science (CS) has been taught in secondary schools since the early 1970s. This article provides an overview of the past and current situation of CS education in North-Rhine ...
Early olpc experiences in a rural uruguayan school
CHI EA '08: CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this paper, we discuss children's and teachers' experiences in a small rural town in Uruguay where every child in elementary school has received a laptop from the OLPC Foundation. In conducting activities in classrooms, observing children, and ...
Developing a Computer Science Concurrent Enrollment Program
SIGCSE '21: Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationHigher education institutions and their computer science departments have been strong supporters of K12 CS. One area that has not been explored in-depth is the use of concurrent enrollment (CE) programs to expand access to high school CS courses such as ...
Comments