skip to main content
10.1145/1148493.1148497acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessoftvisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Experimental evaluation of animated-verifying object viewers for Java

Published:04 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although many visualization techniques have been shown to be pedagogically effective, they are still not widely adopted. The reasons include: lack of suitable methods of automatic-generation of visualizations, lack of integration among visualizations, and lack of integration with basic integrated development environment (IDE) support. To effectively use visualizations when developing code, it is useful to automatically generate multiple synchronized views without leaving the IDE. The jGRASP IDE provides object viewers that automatically generate dynamic, state-based visualizations of objects and primitive variables in Java. Such seamless integration of a lightweight IDE with a set of pedagogically effective software visualizations is unique and is currently unavailable in any other environment. Multiple instructors have reported positive anecdotal evidence of their usefulness. We conducted formal, repeatable experiments to investigate the effect of these viewers for singly linked lists on student performance and we found a statistically significant improvement over traditional methods of visual debugging that use break-points.

References

  1. Eisenstadt, M. 1997. My hairiest bug war stories. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, issue 4, pp. 30--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Felder, R. M., and Silverman, L. K. 1988. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engr. Education, 1988, vol. 78, pp. 674--681.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hendrix, D. T., Cross, J. H., and Barowski, L. A. 2004. An extensible framework for providing dynamic data structure visualizations in a lightweight IDE. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, pp. 387--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hristova, M., Misra, A., Rutter, M., and Mercuri, R. 2003. Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Reno, Nevada, USA, pp. 153--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jain, J., Billor, N., Hendrix, D., and Cross, J. H. 2005. Survey to Investigate Data Structure Understanding. Submitted to the International Conference on Statistics, Combinatorics, Mathematics and Applications, Auburn, AL, December 2--4, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jain, J., Cross, J. H., and Hendrix, D. 2005. Qualitative Assessment of Systems Facilitating Visualization of Data Structures. In Proceedings of 2005 ACM Southeast Conference, Kennesaw, GA, March 18--20, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W. 1998. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 4th Edition, ISBN: 0130925535. Lewis, J. and Chase J. 2004. Java Software Structures: Designing and Using Data Structures, 2nd Edition, ISBN: 0321245849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lister, R., Adams, E. S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., McCartney, R., Moström, J. E., Sanders, K., Seppälä, O., Simon, B., and Thomas, L. 2004. A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers. In Working Group Reports From ITiCSE on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 119--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Metzger, R. C. 2003. Debugging by Thinking: A Multidisciplinary Approach (HP Technologies), ISBN: 1555583075.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rubey, R. J. 1975. Quantitative aspects of software validation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliable Software, Los Angeles, California, pp. 246--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shaffer, C., Heath, L. S., and Yang, J. 1996. Using the swan data structure visualization system for computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE, ACM Press, 1996, pp. 140--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shrout, Patrick E., and Fleiss, Joseph L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin. vol. 86, issue 2, Mar 1979, pp. 420--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Youngs, E. 1974. Human Errors in Programming. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 6, pp. 361--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Experimental evaluation of animated-verifying object viewers for Java

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SoftVis '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Software visualization
      September 2006
      199 pages
      ISBN:1595934642
      DOI:10.1145/1148493

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 September 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate20of65submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader