skip to main content
10.1145/1159913.1159959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Quantifying Skype user satisfaction

Published:11 August 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

The success of Skype has inspired a generation of peer-to-peer-based solutions for satisfactory real-time multimedia services over the Internet. However, fundamental questions, such as whether VoIP services like Skype are good enough in terms of user satisfaction,have not been formally addressed. One of the major challenges lies in the lack of an easily accessible and objective index to quantify the degree of user satisfaction.In this work, we propose a model, geared to Skype, but generalizable to other VoIP services, to quantify VoIP user satisfaction based on a rigorous analysis of the call duration from actual Skype traces. The User Satisfaction Index (USI) derived from the model is unique in that 1) it is composed by objective source-and network-level metrics, such as the bit rate, bit rate jitter, and round-trip time, 2) unlike speech quality measures based on voice signals, such as the PESQ model standardized by ITU-T, the metrics are easily accessible and computable for real-time adaptation, and 3) the model development only requires network measurements, i.e., no user surveys or voice signals are necessary. Our model is validated by an independent set of metrics that quantifies the degree of user interaction from the actual traces.

References

  1. S. A. Baset and H. Schulzrinne. An analysis of the Skype peer-to-peer internet telephony protocol. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '06, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Berson. Skype security evaluation. ALR-2005-031, Anagram Laboratorie, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. R. Cox and D. Oakes. Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, June 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. R. Cox and E. J. Snell. A general definition of residuals (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 30:248--275, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. I. Daubechies. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 36(5):961--1005, Sept. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. L. Donoho. De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41(3):613--627, May 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. F. E. Harrell. Regression Modeling Strategies, with Applications to Linear Models, Survival Analysis and Logistic Regression. Springer, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. P. Harrington and T. R. Fleming. A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika, 69:553--566, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. ITU-T Recommendation P.862. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs, Feb 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Lam, O. Au, C. Chan, K. Hui, and S. Lau. Objective speech quality measure for cellular phone. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 487--490, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Rix, J. Beerends, M. Hollier, and A. Hekstra. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. In proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 2, pages 73--76, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Suh, D. R. Figueiredo, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Characterizing and detecting relayed traffic: A case study using Skype. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '06, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. M. Therneau and P. M. Grambsch. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Springer, 1st edition, August 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Quantifying Skype user satisfaction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCOMM '06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
          September 2006
          458 pages
          ISBN:1595933085
          DOI:10.1145/1159913
          • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
            ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 36, Issue 4
            Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
            October 2006
            445 pages
            ISSN:0146-4833
            DOI:10.1145/1151659
            Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 August 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader