skip to main content
10.1145/1180639.1180760acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Scalability of local image descriptors: a comparative study

Published:23 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer vision researchers have recently proposed several local descriptor schemes. Due to lack of database support, however, these descriptors have only been evaluated using small image collections. Recently, we have developed the PvS-framework, which allows efficient querying of large local descriptor collections. In this paper, we use the PvSframework to study the scalability of local image descriptors. We propose a new local descriptor scheme and compare it to three other well known schemes. Using a collection of almost thirty thousand images, we show that the new scheme gives the best results in almost all cases. We then give two stop rules to reduce query processing time and show that in many cases only a few query descriptors must be processed to find matching images. Finally, we test our descriptors on a collection of over three hundred thousand images, resulting in over 200 million local descriptors, and show that even at such a large scale the results are still of high quality, with no change in query processing time.

References

  1. L. Amsaleg and P. Gros. Content-based retrieval using local descriptors: Problems and issues from a database perspective. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 4(2/3), 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S.-A. Berrani, L. Amsaleg, and P. Gros. Approximate searches: k-neighbors + precision. In ACM CIKM, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S.-A. Berrani, L. Amsaleg, and P. Gros. Robust content-based image searches for copyright protection. In ACM MMDB, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Brown and D. G. Lowe. Invariant features from interest point groups. In British Machine Vision Conf., 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Y. Dufournaud, C. Schmid, and R. Horaud. Matching images with different resolutions. In CVPR, 2000.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Fagin, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Efficient similarity search and classification via rank aggregation. In ACM SIGMOD, 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. M. J. Florack, B. M. ter Haar Romeny, J. J. Koenderink, and M. A. Viergever. General intensity transformation and differential invariants. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 4(2), 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. M. Grabner, H. Grabner, and H. Bischof. Fast approximated SIFT. In ACCV, 2006.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Harris and M. Stephens. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey Vision Conf., 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. Joly, C. Fr'elicot, and O. Buisson. Robust content-based video copy identification in a large reference database. In CIVR, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Y. Ke and R. Sukthankar. PCA-SIFT: A more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In CVPR, 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Ke, R. Sukthankar, and L. Huston. Efficient near-duplicate detection and sub-image retrieval. In ACM Multimedia, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Lejsek, F. H. Asmundsson, B. Th. Jónsson, and L. Amsaleg. Efficient and effective image copyright enforcement. In BDA, 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. Lindeberg. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 30(2), 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. G. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2), 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. In CVPR, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. S. Pedersen and M. Nielsen. The Hausdorff dimension and scale-space normalisation. In Scale-Space, 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F. A. P. Petitcolas et al. A public automated web-based evaluation service for watermarking schemes: StirMark benchmark. In Electronic Imaging, Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents III, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. P. Witkin. Scale-space filtering. In IJCAI, 1983.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scalability of local image descriptors: a comparative study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '06: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia
          October 2006
          1072 pages
          ISBN:1595934472
          DOI:10.1145/1180639

          Copyright © 2006 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 October 2006

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader