skip to main content
10.1145/1182807.1182831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks

Published:31 October 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

We undertake a systematic experimental study of the effects of concurrent packet transmissions in low-power wireless networks. Our measurements, conducted with Mica2 motes equipped with CC1000 radios, confirm that guaranteeing successful packet reception with high probability in the presence of concurrent transmissions requires that the signal-to-interference-plus-noise-ratio (SINR) exceed a critical threshold. However, we find a significant variation of about 6 dB in the threshold for groups of radios operating at different transmission powers. We find that it is harder to estimate the level of interference in the presence of multiple interferers. We also find that the measured SINR threshold generally increases with the number of interferers. Our study offers a better understanding of concurrent transmissions and suggests richer interference models and useful guidelines to improve the design and analysis of higher layer protocols.

References

  1. D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In ACM SIGCOMM, aug 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chipcon. CC1000 single chip very low power RF transceiver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chipcon. CC2420 2.4ghz ieee 802.15.4/ zigbee-ready RF transceiver.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, and R. Morris. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In IEEE Mobicom, sep 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crossbow. Mpr/mib user's manual 7430-0021-06, aug 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Dardari, V. Tralli, and R. Verdone. On the capacity of slotted aloha with rayleigh fading: The role played by the number of interferers. IEEE Communication letters, 4, 5:155--157, may 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Draves, J. Padhye, and B. Zill. Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks. In ACM Sigcomm, aug 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Elson, L. Girod, and D. Estrin. Fine-grained network time synchronization using reference broadcasts. In Fifth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), dec 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ISI Laboratory for Embedded Networked Sensor Experimentation (I-LENSE). PC104 based nodes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Ganesan, D. Estrin, A. Woo, D. Culler, B. Krishnamachari, and S. Wicker. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Technical Report CS TR 02-0013, UCLA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. Girod, J. Elson, A. Cerpa, T. Stathopoulos, N. Ramanathan, and D. Estrin. Emstar: a software environment for developing and deploying wireless sensor networks. Technical Report CENS TR34, UCLA, dec 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Goodman and A. Saleh. The near/far effect in local aloha radio communications. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 36, 1:19--27, feb 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Gupta and P. Kumar. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on information theory, 46, 2, mar 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. I. Habbab, M. Kavehrad, and C.-E.W. Sundberg. Aloha with capture over slow and fast fading radio channels with coding and diversity. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 40, 3:79--88, jan 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z. Hadzi-Velkov and B. Spasenovski. Capture effect with diversity in ieee 802.11b dcf. In IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC), jun 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Hull, K. Jamieson, and H. Balakrishnan. Mitigating congestion in wireless sensor networks. ACM Sensys, nov 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Jamieson, B. Hull, A. Miu, and H. Balakrishnan. Understanding the real-world performance of carrier sense. In SIGCOMM'05 Workshop, aug 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Kim and J. Lee. Capture effects of wireless csma/ca protocols in rayleigh and shadow fading channels. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 48, 4:1277--1286, jul 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Kochut, A. Vasan, A. Shankar, and A. Agrawala. Sniffing out the correct physical layer capture model in 802.11b. In IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), oct 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. D. Kotz, C. Newport, and C. Elliott. The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research. Technical Report TR2003-467, Dartmouth, jul 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Lal, A. Manjeshwar, F. Herrmann, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, and A. Keshavarzian. Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. In IEEE Globecom, dec 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. K. Leentvaar and J. Flint. The capture effect in fm receivers. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 24, 5:531--539, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. C. Namislo. Analysis of mobile radio slotted aloha networks. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 33, 3:199--204, aug 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. L. Roberts. Aloha packet system with and without slots and capture. Computer Communication Review, 24, 4:28--42, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Robertson and T. Ha. A model for local/mobile radio communications with correct packet capture. IEEE Transactions on communications, 40, 4:847--854, apr 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. Sheiki, Y. Yao, and X. Wu. The aloha systems in shadowed mobile radio channels with slow or fast fading. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 39, 4:289--298, nov 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. D. Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann. Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks. IEEE SECON, oct 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K. Whitehouse, A. Woo, F. Jiang, J. Polastre, and D. Culler. Exploiting the capture effect for collision detection and recovery. In IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNetS-II), may 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J.L. Wong, L. Kuang, M. Potkonjak, and D. Estrin. Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks. In IPSN, apr 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In ACM Sensys, nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Y. Yao and A. Sheikh. The cpature effect in frequency-hop spread-spectrum multiple-access communications over fading channels with near/far problem. In IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), jun 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. An energy-efficient mac protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, june 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. H. Zhang, A. Arora, and P. Sinha. Learn on the fly: Data-driven link estimation and routing in sensor network backbones. In IEEE Infocom, apr 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. K. Zhang and K. Pahlavan. Relation between transmission and throughput of slotted aloha local packet radio networks. IEEE Transactions on communications, 40, 3:577--583, mar 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In ACM Sensys, nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. H. Zhou and R. Deng. Capture model for mobile radio slotted aloha systems. IEEE Transactions on communications, 145, 2:91--97, apr 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. M. Zuniga and B. Krishnamachari. Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links. IEEE SECON, oct 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SenSys '06: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems
        October 2006
        444 pages
        ISBN:1595933433
        DOI:10.1145/1182807

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 October 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader