skip to main content
article

Frugal path mechanisms

Published:02 February 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We consider the problem of selecting a low-cost s - t path in a graph where the edge costs are a secret, known only to the various economic agents who own them. To solve this problem, Nisan and Ronen applied the celebrated Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism, which pays a premium to induce the edges so as to reveal their costs truthfully. We observe that this premium can be unacceptably high. There are simple instances where the mechanism pays Θ(n) times the actual cost of the path, even if there is an alternate path available that costs only (1 + ϵ) times as much. This inspires the frugal path problem, which is to design a mechanism that selects a path and induces truthful cost revelation, without paying such a high premium.

This article contributes negative results on the frugal path problem. On two large classes of graphs, including those having three node-disjoint s - t paths, we prove that no reasonable mechanism can always avoid paying a high premium to induce truthtelling. In particular, we introduce a general class of min function mechanisms, and show that all min function mechanisms can be forced to overpay just as badly as VCG. Meanwhile, we prove that every truthful mechanism satisfying some reasonable properties is a min function mechanism.

Our results generalize to the problem of hiring a team to complete a task, where the analog of a path in the graph is a subset of the agents constituting a team capable of completing the task.

References

  1. Archer, A., Papadimitriou, C., Talwar, K., and Tardos, &Eactue;. 2004. An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents. Internet Math. 1, 129--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Archer, A., and Tardos, &Eactue;. 2001. Truthful mechanisms for one-parameter agents. In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 482--491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Archer, A., and Tardos, &Eactue;. 2002. Frugal path mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 991--999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Archer, A. F. 2004. Mechanisms for discrete optimization with rational agents. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bikhchandani, S., de Vries, S., Schummer, J., and Vohra, R. V. 2002. Linear programming and Vickrey auctions. In Mathematics of the Internet: E-Auction and Markets, B. Dietrich and R. V. Vohra, Eds. IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 127. Springer-Verlag, New York. 75--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, E. H. 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 8, 17--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Czumaj, A., and Ronen, A. 2004. On the expected payment of mechanisms for task allocation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 98--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. DeVries, S., and Vohra, R. 2003. Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS J. Comput. 15, 284--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Elkind, E., Goldberg, L. A., and Goldberg, P. W. 2006. Frugality ratios and improved truthful mechanisms for vertex cover. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.GT/0606044.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Elkind, E., Sahai, A., and Steiglitz, K. 2004. Frugality in path auctions. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 701--709. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Feigenbaum, J., Papadimitriou, C., Sami, R., and Shenker, S. 2005. A BGP-based mechanism for lowest-cost routing. Distrib. Comput. 18, 1, 61--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J. 1991. Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Garg, R., Kumar, V., Rudra, A., and Verma, A. 2003. Coalitional games on graphs: Core structure, substitutes and frugality. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 248--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Groves, T. 1973. Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 617--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Groves, T. 1982. On theories of incentive compatible choice with compensation. In Advance in Econonic Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York. 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hershberger, J., and Suri, S. 2001. Vickrey prices and shortest paths: What is an edge worth? In Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 252--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hildenbrand, W., Ed. 1982. Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Immorlica, N., Karger, D. R., Nikolova, E., and Sami, R. 2005. First-Price path auctions. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 203--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Karger, D. R., and Nikolova, E. 2005. Brief announcement: On the expected overpayment of VCG mechanisms in large networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Karlin, A. R., Kempe, D., and Tamir, T. 2005. Beyond VCG: Frugality of truthful mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 615--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Krishna, V. 2002. Auction Theory. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Laffont, J.-J., and Maskin, E. 1982. The theory of incentives: An overview. In Advance in Econonic Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York. 31--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavi, R., Mu'alem, A., and Nisan, N. 2003. Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 574--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M., and Green, J. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mihail, M., Papadimitriou, C. H., and Saberi, A. 2006. On certain connectivity properties of the internet topology. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 72, 2, 239--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nisan, N., and Ronen, A. 2000. Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. 242--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nisan, N., and Ronen, A. 2001. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior 35, 166--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Osborne, M. J., and Rubinstein, A. 1994. A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Papadimitriou, C. H. 2001. Algorithms, games, and the Internet. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. 749--753. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Roberts, K. 1979. The characterization of implementable choice rules. In Aggregation and Revelation of Preferences, J.-J. Laffont, Ed. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 321--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Talwar, K. 2003. The price of truth: Frugality in truthful mechanisms. In 20th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2607. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 608--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16, 8--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Frugal path mechanisms

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
              ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 3, Issue 1
              February 2007
              178 pages
              ISSN:1549-6325
              EISSN:1549-6333
              DOI:10.1145/1186810
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2007 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 2 February 2007
              Published in talg Volume 3, Issue 1

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader