skip to main content
10.1145/1186822.1073243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A photon accurate model of the human eye

Published:01 July 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

A photon accurate model of individual cones in the human eye perceiving images on digital display devices is presented. Playback of streams of pixel video data is modeled as individual photon emission events from within the physical substructure of each display pixel. The thus generated electromagnetic wavefronts are refracted through a four surface model of the human cornea and lens, and diffracted at the pupil. The position, size, shape, and orientation of each of the five million photoreceptor cones in the retina are individually modeled by a new synthetic retina model. Photon absorption events map the collapsing wavefront to photon detection events in a particular cone, resulting in images of the photon counts in the retinal cone array. The custom rendering systems used to generate sequences of these images takes a number of optical and physical properties of the image formation into account, including wavelength dependent absorption in the tissues of the eye, and the motion blur caused by slight movement of the eye during a frame of viewing. The creation of this new model is part of a larger framework for understanding how changes to computer graphics rendering algorithms and changes in image display devices are related to artifacts visible to human viewers.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pps031.mp4

mp4

41.8 MB

References

  1. Ahumada, A, and Poirson, A. 1987. Cone Sampling Array Models. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 8, 1493-1502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Atchison, A., and Smith, G. 2000. Optics of the Human Eye. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsky, B. 2004. Vision-Realistic Rendering: Simulation of the Scanned Foveal Image from Wavefront Data of Human Subjects. First Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, 73--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barten, P. 1999. Contrast Sensitivity of the Human Eye and Its Effects on Image Quality. SPIE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Van Den Berg, T., and Tan, K. 1994. Light Transmittance of the Human Cornea from 320 to 700 nm for Different Ages. Vision Research, 34, 1453--1456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cook, R. 1986. Stochastic Sampling in Computer Graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5, 1, 51--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cook, R. Carpenter, L, and Catmull, E. 1987. The Reyes Image Rendering Architecture. In Computer Graphics (Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1987), 21, 4 ACM, 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Curcio, C., Sloan, K., Kalina, R., and Hendrickson, A. 1990. Human Photoreceptor Topography. J. Comparative Neurology 292, 497--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Deering, M. 1998. The Limits of Human Vision, in 2nd International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobkin, D., Eppstein, D., and Mitchell, D. 1996. Computing the Discrepancy with Applications to Supersampling Patterns. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 15, 4, 354--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Escudero-Sanz, I., and Navarro, R. 1999. Off-Axis Aberrations of a Wide-Angle Schematic Eye Model. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 16, 1881--1891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Geisler, W. 1989. Sequential Ideal-Observer Analysis of Visual Discriminations. Psychological Review, 96, 2, 267--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Glassner, A. 1995. Principles of Digital Image Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Haslwanter, T. 1995. Mathematics of Three-Dimensional Eye Rotations. Vision Research, 35, 1727--1739.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Halstead, A., Barsky, B., Klein, S., and Mandell, R. 1996. Reconstructing Curved Surfaces from Specular Reflection Patterns Using Spline Surface Fitting of Normals. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 1996 23, Annual Conference Series, 335--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hennig, M, Funke, K., and Wörögtter, F. 2002. The Influence of Different Retinal Subcircuits on the Non-linearity of Ganglion Cell Behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 19, 8726--8738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lakshminarayanan, Raghuram, A., and V, Enoch, J. 2003. The Stiles-Crawford Effects. Optical Society of America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahajan, V. 2001. Optical Imaging and Aberrations: Part II Wave Diffraction Optics. SPIE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinez-Conde, S, Macknik, S. and Hubel, D. 2004. The Role of Fixational Eye Movements in Visual Perception. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5. March.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Oyster, C. 1999. The Human Eye: Structure and Function. Sinauer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodieck, R. 1998. The First Steps in Seeing. Sinauer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Roorda, A., Metha, A., Lennie, P, and Williams, D. 2001. Packing Arrangements of the Three Cone Classes in Primate Retina. Vision Research, 41, 1291-1306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Roorda, A., and Williams, D. 1999. The Arrangement of the Three Cone Classes in the Living Human Eye. Nature, 397, 520--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Steinman, R. 1996. Moveo Ergo Video: Natural Retinal Image Motion and its Effect on Vision. In Exploratory Vision: The Active Eye. M. Landy et al., Ed., Springer Verlag, 3-49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Stockman, A., Sharpe, L., and Fach, C. 1999. The spectral sensitivity of the human short-wavelength cones. Vision Research, 40, 1711--1737.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Stockman, A., and Sharpe. 2000. Spectral sensitivities of the middle- and long-wavelength sensitive cones derived from measurements in observers of known genotype. Vision Research, 39, 2901--2927.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Stockman, A., and Sharpe, L. 2004. Colour & Vision Database. http:// cvrl.ucl.ac.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thibos, L. 2000. Formulation and Sampling of the Retinal Image. In Seeing, K. De Valois, Ed., Academic Press, 1--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tyler, C. 1997. Analysis of Human Receptor Density, in Basic and Clinical Applications of Vision Science, Ed. V. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 63--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wyatt, H. 1995. The Form of the Human Pupil. Vision Research, 35, 14, 2021--2036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A photon accurate model of the human eye

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGGRAPH '05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers
              July 2005
              826 pages
              ISBN:9781450378253
              DOI:10.1145/1186822
              • Editor:
              • Markus Gross

              Copyright © 2005 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 July 2005

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGGRAPH '05 Paper Acceptance Rate98of461submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

              Upcoming Conference

              SIGGRAPH '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader